Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I'm given these warnings on GitHub and I am wondering how to fix them. It is not overwhelmingly clear!
Thanks
One way is below.
Remove all the lock files and node modules
Then do a npm i which will generate lock files with updated packages.
This should fix at least some of your warnings. Sometimes, it might fix all.
Related
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 5 days ago.
Improve this question
I am trying to run the checkpatch.pl on a c file and the script is not checking the indentations, if conditions or functions.For every line I am getting the error: please, no space at the start of the line where I have only used tab. Can someone tell me whats the issue?
It is showing me false positive errors and not throwing errors when required. What am I missing from the checkpatch.pl file to show all the standard coding errors?
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 9 months ago.
Improve this question
Please advise me if you had the same issue.
There is an error when I use "New-SPOSite" of Powershell command for managing SPO on AzureAutomation.
I searched a lot but there was no solution for that. Does someone have a solution or an advice?
Here is the error result I faced.
It needed to set the -Template option for New-SPOSite. According to the official site, even though this parameter is not mandatory, it is required in this situation.
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Can someone help me figure out why is throwing me that error when I try to run the program?
It seems that the module name is lab06.erl, so the function should be lab06:hello_world().
I don't know if the IDE does it automatically, but most likely you'll need to compile and load the code into the VM. You can do that with c(lab06). (the file should be reachable from the code path, though).
Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm having the same issue as described here: Can't enable Parse Local Datastore
However, I do not understand what he is talking about when he talks about Cache Policy.
Can someone please help me fix this error?
Thanks!
do you have the line that goes somewhat
query.cachepolicy = something something
if you do delete it
also in app delegate put the "enable localstore" AFTER Parse.clientkey....
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I was studying SCM/Bug tracker integration when I found that it is not only possible to close and modify issues from the commit log, but it is also possible to create them.
But since the commit log is for code changes, I don't see why anyone would modify the code to create an issue. Please cite one scenario where this is justifiable.
One scenario might be where you're committing the fix for a particular issue, but you know the issue you've resolved is a short term fix for the problem.
In this case it might be necessary to open another issue in light of the short term fix so that you know you need to provide a long term fix somewhere down the road.
Maybe in a situation where a bug-report includes several "sub-bugs" : the commit can solve one of those "sub-bugs", and create another report for the remaining "sub-bugs" ?
Or sometimes, if you commit some hacky patch to quickly solve an urgent bug, you might want to create another report to "correct the hacky patch", to create a long-term solution ?