Restore postgres data on GCloud VM instance restart - postgresql

We use Postgres as a docker container, and each time we restart the machine, the data and tables are lost.
Even data files under the base and global folders.
Even more, now we've faced some RAM problems, so I'm not able to connect to Postgres and VM instance itself in now way -- neither by ssh, psql client nor redash. The last one says the following:
Error running query: could not send SSL negotiation packet: Resource temporarily unavailable.
Is there any way to somehow solve the problem?
UPD. I've tried to create a disk snapshot, but it doesn't help.
UPD2. BTW, the pgdata folder is set to be a container volume and could be used outside of it.

Related

"error: too many connections for database 'postgres'" when trying to connect to any Postgres 13 instance

My team and I are currently experiencing an issue where we can't connect to Cloud SQL's Postgres instance(s) from anything other than the psql cli tool. We get a too many connections for database "postgres" error (in PGAdmin, DBeaver, and our node typeorm/pg backend). It initially happened on our (only) Postgres database instance. After restarting, stopping and starting again, increasing machine CPU/memory proved to do nothing, I deleted the database instance entirely and created a new one from scratch.
However, after a few hours the problem came back. I know that we're not actually having too many connections as I am able to query pg_stat_activity from psql command line and see the following:
Only one of those (postgres username) connections is ours.
My coworker also can't connect at all - not even from psql cli.
If it matters, we are using PostgreSQL 13, europe-west2 (London), single zone availability, db-g1-small instance with 1.7GB memory, 10GB HDD, and we have public IP enabled and the correct IP addresses whitelisted.
I'd really appreciate if anyone has any insights into what's causing this.
EDIT: I further increased the instance size (to no longer be a shared core), and I managed to successfully connect my backend to it. However my psql cli no longer works - it appears that only the first client to connect is allowed to connect after a restart (even if it disconnects, other clients can't connect...).
From the error message, it is clear that the database "postgres" has a custom connection limit (set, for example, by ALTER DATABASE postgres CONNECTION LIMIT 1). And apparently, it is quite small. Why is everyone try to connect to that database anyway? Usually 'postgres' database is reserved for maintenance operations, and you should create other databases for daily use.
You can see the setting with:
select datconnlimit from pg_database where datname='postgres';
I don't know if the low setting is something you did, or maybe Google does it on its own for their cloud offering.
#jjanes had the right idea/mention.
I created another database within the Cloud SQL instance that wasn't named postgres and then it was fine.
It wasn't anything to do with maximum connection settings (as this was within Google Cloud SQL) or not closing connections (as TypeORM/pg does this already).

Database transfer from Heroku to Digital Ocean

I'm currently in the process of switching my cloud server from Heroku to Digital Ocean. However is there a way to migrate the database from the heroku server to the digital ocean one? I use postgresql for my database
I hope you already got a solution, but in case you didn’t, I’ll provide a simple guide on how I did it. I am going to assume that you have already created a postgres database on digitalocean. Also you need navigate to your project directory and log in to heroku using the heroku cli. And, you need to have postgresql installed or a psql client. Installing postgresql would do it as it comes with psql.
Step 1: Create a backup and download the backup from heroku postgres
heroku pg:backups:capture --app <app_name>
heroku pg:backups:download --app <app_name>
The first command will create a backup of your database and the second command will download it to your current directory, its a .dump file. If you would like to read more, here is an article.
Step 2: Connect to your remote (digital ocean’s) database using psql
Before you can do this, you need to go and add your machine you are connecting from to the list of database’s list of trusted sources, If you don’t, you’ll get a Connection Timed Out error. That’s because the database’s firewall doesn’t allow you to connect to the database from your local machine or resource (for security reasons).
Step 3: Import the Database
pg_restore -d "postgresql://<database_username>:<database_password>#<host>:<port>/<database>?sslmode=require" --jobs 4 -c "/path/to/dump_file.dump"
This will import your database from your dump file. Just substitute the variables will your connection parameters that you get from your dashboard. If you would like to read more, here is another article for this step.
Another thing to make clear is, sometimes, you will see some harmless error messages when running this command, but it will push through anyway. To learn more about pg_restore read this article.
And that’s it, your database has been migrated. Now, can you confirm it worked?, well, as for me, I used pgAdmin to connect to the remote database and I saw the tables and data as expected.
Hope this helps anyone with the same problem :)

ERROR: cannot execute CREATE TABLE in a read-only transaction

I'm trying to setup the pgexercises data in my local machine. When I run: psql -U <username> -f clubdata.sql -d postgres -x I get the error: psql:clubdata.sql:6: ERROR: cannot execute CREATE SCHEMA in a read-only transaction.
Why did it create a read-only database on my local machine? Can I change this?
Normally the most plausible reasons for this kind of error are :
trying create statements on a read-only replica (the entire instance is read-only).
<username> has default_transaction_read_only set to ON
the database has default_transaction_read_only set to ON
The script mentioned has in its first lines:
CREATE DATABASE exercises;
\c exercises
CREATE SCHEMA cd;
and you report that the error happens with CREATE SCHEMA at line 6, not before.
That means that the CREATE DATABASE does work, when run by <username>.
And it wouldn't work if any of the reasons above was directly applicable.
One possibility that would technically explain this would be that default_transaction_read_only would be ON in the postgresql.conf file, and set to OFF for the database postgres, the one that the invocation of psql connects to, through an ALTER DATABASE statement that supersedes the configuration file.
That would be why CREATE DATABASE works, but then as soon as it connects to a different database with \c, the default_transaction_read_only setting of the session would flip to ON.
But of course that would be a pretty weird and unusual configuration.
Reached out to pgexercises.com and they were able to help me.
I ran these commands(separately):
psql -U <username> -d postgres
begin;
set transaction read write;
alter database exercises set default_transaction_read_only = off;
commit;
\q
Then I dropped the database from the terminal dropdb exercises and ran script again psql -U <username> -f clubdata.sql -d postgres -x -q
I was having getting cannot execute CREATE TABLE in a read-only transaction, cannot execute DELETE TABLE in a read-only transaction and others.
They all followed a cannot execute INSERT in a read-only transaction. It was like the connection had switched itself over to read-only in the middle of my batch processing.
Turns out, I was running out of storage!
Write access was disabled when the database could no longer write anything. I am using Postgres on Azure. I don't know if the same effect would happen if I was on a dedicated server.
I had same issue for Postgre Update statement
SQL Error: 0, SQLState: 25006 ERROR: cannot execute UPDATE in a read-only transaction
Verified Database access by running below query and it will return either true or false
SELECT pg_is_in_recovery()
true -> Database has only Read Access
false -> Database has full Access
if returns true then check with DBA team for the full access and also try for ping in command prompt and ensure the connectivity.
ping <database hostname or dns>
Also verify if you have primary and standby node for the database
In my case I had a master and replication nodes, and the master node became replication node, which I believe switched it into hot_standby mode. So I was trying to write data into a node that was meant only for reading, therefore the "read-only" problem.
You can query the node in question with SELECT pg_is_in_recovery(), and if it returns True then it is "read-only", and I suppose you should switch to using whatever master node you have now.
I got this information from: https://serverfault.com/questions/630753/how-to-change-postgresql-database-from-read-only-to-writable.
So full credit and my thanks goes to Craig Ringer!
Dbeaver: In my case
This was on.
This doesn't quite answer the original question, but I received the same error and found this page, which ultimately led to a fix.
My issue was trying to run a function with temp tables being created and dropped. The function was created with SECURITY DEFINER privileges, and the user had access locally.
In a different environment, I received the cannot execute DROP TABLE in a read-only transaction error message. This environment was AWS Aurora, and by default, non-admin developers were given read-only privileges. Their server connections were thus set up to use the read-only node of Aurora (-ro- is in the connection url), which must put the connection in the read-only state. Running the same function with the same user against the write node worked.
Seems like a good use case for table variables like SQL Server has! Or, at least, AWS should modify their flow to allow temp tables to be created and dropped on read nodes.
This occurred when I was restoring a production database locally, the database is still doing online recovery from the WAL records.
A little bit unexpected as I assumed pgbackgrest was creating instantly recoverable restores, perhaps not.
91902 postgres 20 0 1445256 14804 13180 D 4.3 0.3 0:28.06 postgres: startup recovering 000000010000001E000000A5
If like me you are trying to create DB on heroku and are stuck as this message shows up on the dataclip tab
I did this,
Choose Resources from(Overview Resources Deploy Metrics Activity Access Settings)
Choose Settings out of (Overview, Durability, Settings, Dataclip)
Then in Administration->Database Credentials choose View Credentials...
then open terminal and fill that info here and enter
psql --host=***************.amazonaws.com --port=5432 --username=*********pubxl --password --dbname=*******lol
then it'll ask for password, copy-paste from there and you can run Postgres cmds.
I suddenly started facing this error on postgres installed on my windows machine, when I was running alter query from dbeaver, all I did was deleted the connection of postgres from dbeaver and created a new connection
If you are using Azure Database for PostgreSQL your server gets into read-only mode when the storage used is near total capacity.
The error you get is exactly:
ERROR: cannot execute XXXXXXXXX in a read-only transaction
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/postgresql/flexible-server/concepts-compute-storage
I just had this error. My cause was not granting permission to the SEQUENCE
GRANT ALL ON SEQUENCE word_mash_word_cube_template_description_reference_seq TO ronshome_user;
If you are facing this issue with an RDS instance cluster, please check your endpoint and use the Writer instance endpoint. Then it should work now.
Issue can be dur to Intellij config:
Go to Database view> click on Data Source Properties (Shift + enter)> (Select your data source)>
Options tab> Under Connection : uncheck Read-only
For me it was Azure PostgreSQL failing over to standby during maintaince in Azure and never failing back to master when PostgreSQL was in HA mode. You can check this event in Service Health and also check which zone you current VM is running from. If it's 2 and not 1 them most likely that's the result of events described above.

Migrate mongodb to Google Cloud Compute Cluster

I have a mongodb in a replica set running with a cloud provider called compose.io.
I just created a new Google cloud compute mongodb cluster using these instructions
I want to copy all the data in my compose database to the compute instance.
One path I have been following has led me to get a file system backup of the running database and store it locally. I have opened that database locally and executed mongodump (I didn't seem to have permission to do that against the remote database) so I have the output of mongodump and a file system copy of the database stored on my machine.
I have no idea how to get any of this in to the compute cluster I created. I don't seem to be able to run mongorestore although figuring that out is still my main path at the moment. I am getting authentication errors which may be my not getting the command right or a database configuration issue. I am not sure yet.
I tried mongorestore from my local machine to the machine holding the primary database in the replica set.
Edit:
The last thing I tried was copy scp the mongodump output on to that machine and run mongorestore there.
I got this error:
2015-01-28T23:35:40.303+0000 Creating index: { key: { _id: 1 }, ns: "admin.system.users", name: "_id_" }
Error creating index admin.system.users: 13 err: "not authorized to create index on admin.system.users"
Aborted
Now I don't seem to be able to run any commands in mongo that require any kind of privileges, such as list database. Tried passing credentials for users that existed in the original database but that is not working so far.
Here is one possible fix.
Turn off auth in mongod.conf:
# mongod.conf
#auth=false
noauth=true
Run the mongorestore, then restart mongod with auth enabled.

MongoDB does not see database or collections after migrating from localhost to EBS volume

full disclosure: I am a complete n00b to mongodb and am just getting my feet wet with using mongo on AWS (but have 2 decades working in IT so not a total n00b :P)
I setup an EBS volume and installed mongo on a EC2 instance.
My problem is that I provisioned too small an EBS volume initially.
When I realized this I:
created a new larger EBS volume
mounted it on the server
stopped mongo ( $ sudo service mongod stop)
copied all my /data/db files into the new volume
updated conf files and fstab (dbpath, logpath, pidfilepath and mount point for new volume respectively)
restarted mongod
When I execute: $ sudo service mongod start
- everything runs fine.
- I can futz about in the admin and local databases.
However, when I run the mongos command: > show databases
- I only see the admin and local.
- the database I copied into the new volume (named encompass) is not listed.
I still have a working local copy of the database so my data is not lost, just not sure how best to move mongo data around other than:
A) start all over importing the data to the db on the AWS server (not what I would like since it is already loaded in my local db)
B) copy the local db to the new EBS volume again (also not preferred but better that importing all the data from scratch again!).
NOTE: originally I secure copied the data into the EBS volume with this command:
$ scp -r -i / / ec2-user#:/
then when I copied between volumes I used a vanilla cp command.
Did I miss something here?
The best I could find on SO and the web was this process (How to scale MongoDB?), but perhaps I missed a switch in a command or a nuance to the process that rendered my database files inert/useless?
Any idea how I can get mongo to see my other database files and collections?
Or did I make a irreversible error somewhere along the way?
Thanks for any help!!
Are you sure you conf file is being loaded? You can, for a test, load mongod.exe and specify the path directly to your db for a test, i.e.:
mongod --dbpath c:\mongo\data\db (unix syntax may vary a bit, this is windows)
run this from the command line and see what, if anything, mongo complains about.
A database has a very finicky algorithm that is easy to damage. Before copying from one database to another you should probably seed the database, a few dummy entries will tell you the database is working.