I want to pin a chart to the Azure DevOps Services dashboard that shows how many bugs in the current sprint have a linked test case or not.
I have been able to put up a query for the same but it appears that such queries can't be charted out. Is there an alternate way?
Here's the error that I get while creating a chart out of my query
Additionally, I would also like to know if there is a way to ensure that when I Resolve/Close a bug workitem in AzDo services, I can check if there is at least one associated test case work item with the bug. I have explored Bug rules but can't find out a clean way to get the link types associated with the work item. How can I achieve this?
Thanks
I have been able to put up a query for the same but it appears that
such queries can't be charted out. Is there an alternate way?
As for the error you got, it's one open issue here in our feedback forum, the product team is considering about it. But there might be some time before the feature comes true. You can track the issue to get notifications if there's any update. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Is there an alternate way?
If you just need a widget to display the results of the query, you can consider using Query Results widget, if supports tree or direct links. But if you do want the pie chart for WITs, I afraid it's not supported for now when using tree or direct links. You can check the related extensions here.
I have explored Bug rules but can't find out a clean way to get the
link types associated with the work item. How can I achieve this?
As I know we don't have such option in Azure Devops Boards.
If we close/delete one workItem, it won't display a prompt or what that tells us the related workItems are still active.
But I think that would be a great idea, so I suggest you can post one feature request here to share your idea to product team. Then we can share the feature request link here and people who interested in that would vote for you! Hope all above make some help :)
Related
I have a User Story against which there is an impediment faced in current sprint. Due to this impediment, we are not able to complete the US in this sprint. However we cannot also close it or mark it resolved. Since its open without any action, its also interfering with the burndown charts.
Can I get an advice on how we can handle impediments in Azure DevOps and thereby set that work has been halted/suspended on a particular user story? I was reading the related article here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/boards/backlogs/manage-issues-impediments?view=azure-devops.
Thanks and Regards,
Satheesh Vijayan
As stated in the documentation:
You use issues or impediments to track items that may block work from
getting done. In general, you link these items to user stories or
other work items using a Related link type.
So as a workaround ,you can try customizing impediments tracking ,through this you can customize the item state,add a special state to impediment item . For details, see Customize an inheritance process.
Organization Settings -> Process -> Inheritance process -> Impediment ->State -> New state
Note: only inheritance process can be customized.
I'd like to add a new column in a Github issues report with the date when a specific label was added for the first time. Checking at the Issue Labels API on Github, I see no way of achieving this, as Label entities don't contain dates.
Is there another way to find out when a label was set to an issue?
No, there isn't currently a way to do this. The nearest thing would be the updated_at entry on an issue, but there's no way to guarantee that that update was the result of a label being set on the issue.
GitHub clearly has this information, as the timestamp from a label being applied is available in the web UI—I wonder if you might be better off scraping the page (and asking GitHub to provide this information via the API)?
I want to find all the GitHub issues that I commented on. I tried searching for commenter:mbigras type:issue like the Searching issues and pull requests GitHub article suggests. But that method returns fewer results than the public activity section of my profile.
See both attached images:
Search method
Doesn't display current results:
Profile method
Gets mixed up with other public activity:
Is there a way to get the full history of my comments on GitHub?
EDIT
author:mbigras type:issue gives wider results but still not the full history:
What I'm looking for is a way to quickly view all my comment/issue history in all issues.
EDIT
I emailed GitHub about this. Search doesn't match the public activity section because search indexes issues by creation date and not last active date.
How do you keep organized about which issues you've commented on?
Search for commenter:username in the main Github search box.
For example commenter:gavinandresen
To see recent activity, select Recently updated from Sort dropdown
You can also narrow the search: is:issue commenter:gavinandresen
I have also been very frustrated when I could not find an issue that I have commented on a while ago. I even did not remember the project it was in. I knew only the problem I was referring to.
Then, I went to the Notification settings on Github and saw there is an Include your own updates option that is unchecked by default.
Once you check it, Github will send you an e-mail notification about every comment or PR you make. They you probably want to add an appropriate label and filter for emails so Github messages do not clutter an inbox.
My life has changed since then. Now, every time I want to find something I have written on Github, I just search for it in the e-mail notifications.
You can view all the issues on Github you have commented on by going to https://github.com/notifications/subscriptions and selecting Reason as Comment.
This will show all the issues that you've commented on.
You can also filter the issues by selecting other reason such as Assign, Author, Manual, Mention, etc. but you can select only one reason at a time. Also, you can filter the issues by repository by selecting the concerned repository from dropdown after clicking Repository
Search All GitHub using the search term is:issue author:#me
You can also check the following links.
For all your subscriptions
https://github.com/notifications/subscriptions
For all your issues
https://github.com/issues
For all your pull requests
https://github.com/pulls
In case someone is interested to know how to find these links, go to github's resi api documentation. The URL's are not explicitly described there. However, look for the page names bellow REFERENCE.
If you lowercase the relevant word (for example Issues become issues, Pulls become pulls) and put that after https://github.com/, you most probably will find what you are looking for.
This might be a little late, but there's also another way to find what issues/PRs you have participated in. This method also brings in a lot more things you might be interested in too!
When you are on the website main page, on github.com, use the keyboard shortcuts as described here to open your pull requests or issues. The shortcut for these is in particular [g, i] for issues and [g, p] for pull requests (I remember g by go, but whatever works for you.)
After you go to the page directed by these shortcuts you are greeted by an entire screen of goodies you can use! The search bar can be edited and the buttons can be used to make your experience fast!
Type involves:<your username> in the search box on the GitHub's main page. This will find all the issues that you commented on, was assigned to or mentioned in.
For example, if your username on GitHub is unclebob, the search query should look like:
involves:unclebob
Or if you're logged in to GitHub, then simply:
involves:#me
Note the difference between involves and similar search qualifiers - author and commenter:
author will find only the issues that were started by you; if you comment on the issue that was started by someone else, author query won't return it in the search results.
E.g., compare involves:unclebob and author:unclebob type:issue.
commenter will find only those issues where you commented second or later (creator of the first comment in an issue is considered its author and not a commenter); if you start an issue and then never comment on it, the commenter query won't return it in the search results.
E.g., compare involves:unclebob and commenter:unclebob.
In other words, when it comes to searching comments, author and commenter return only a subset of involves' results. So I recommend using involves not to miss anything.
Also, since Github is on the web, any HTTP search engine works, eg Google, Bing, etc. This works to the extent of your search engine's quality and the uniqueness of the writer name.
(Indeed, I actually do this all the time when I need to find any previously written web (engine)-accessible publication, including those on StackExchange. Names I use are 1 in probably an infinity, so Google often works better than forum search options.)
(Sample Google link.)
If you want to search for multiple users in a single search, use it like in the global search bar without the OR logical conjugation:
commenter:FantomX1 commenter:FantomX1-github
since the similar google way approach with 'OR' would not work
commenter:FantomX1 OR commenter:FantomX1-github
We are trying to use GitHub for issue tracking in one of our projects and while its very simply to use, we aren't sure its powerful enough at the same time to fulfil our needs to organize our issue management since we can't find a way to customize it.
Question: Is it possible to add custom attributes in GitHub for issue tracking, search/sort and export the list of issues with those attributes? For example, we'd like to add and use following attributes:
External Issue ID: There is an external list of issues/change requests maintained by a separate group that we need to associate
our issues with and need a field to specify the external issue ID.
Priority: so that we can easily discuss and prioritize what we want to tackle first
Severity: to identify impact on the system
Type of Issue: Bug, Change Request, New Requirement
Class: Performance, Security, Function, Compliance etc.
Source: to track whether issue was reported by a specific customer (which could be in hundreds), end user, internal team,
partner etc.
Date Opened: I think this is maintained internally by GitHub but not exposed anywhere in the UI
Date Closed
etc.
We understand some of these can be implemented with labels but there would be too many of them to assign and they do not allow exclusivity (for example you can only specify one priority - high, medium, or low assigning - to an issue)
Any ideas if and how this can be implemented in GitHub?
If not, any recommendations?
Thanks!
As you mentioned already, this so far is only done by using labels, for example the way i do priority is having multiple labels:
Priority: Blocker
Priority: High
....
Yes, unfortunately this feature is not intended to exclusively select one value per category as these are labels.
There is a github issue that proposes a new feature to GitHub so that we can have a Priority attribute in every GitHub issue right here
https://github.com/isaacs/github/issues/472
Not sure about all the other custom attributes, but maybe this would be a good start for your idea.
There does not seem to be a way to create custom parameters. You may be able to do this by storing the data inline in the text of the issue and then parsing that issue text programatically, but that's kind of a hack.
For instance, if you wanted to link a GitHub issue to an internal bug tracker like JIRA, just use the JIRA issue name in the text of the GitHub issue and then write a regular expression to parse it back out. This requires a little bit of extra plumbing on top of GitHub.
Date opened and closed are available in the API. See documentation.
(Incidentally, I'd note that the lack of customisation and complexity is a key feature of GitHub's issue tracking system: it is designed for developers, not project managers who want to tweak it into a confusing JIRA-like hellscape of misery.)
Update June 2021: you could use custom fields for those attributes!
New beta features within GitHub Issues, with better ways to plan, track, and manage projects.
Read more on the GitHub Issues page or in the FAQ.
✨ NEW – Project planning for developers
Available in limited public beta
Built like a spreadsheet, project tables give you a live canvas to filter, sort, and group issues and pull requests.
Tailor them to your needs with custom fields and saved views.
Sign up for the beta now.
That includes:
Extend issues with custom fields with support for text, number, date and single-select types
Change custom field values right from the issues sidebar
Filter, sort, and group by any field
Use tags
Most of the time you can put the kinds of things you want in the body of the issue as text or use a tag for things like priority. You only need to set priority if it's not the default one.
I'm using the github issue tracker for the first time, and I'm trying to manage a set of about 50 open issues. I would like to filter the set using standard Boolean queries over labels. But all I can figure out how to do is AND queries.
For example, I can show all issues that are labelled both view/controller and easy meat. But I do not know how to do any of the following queries:
Show me all open issues that are labeled view/controller but are not labeled easy meat.
Show me all open issues that are labeled either major refactoring or needs thought.
Show me every open issue that does not have any label.
I've searched and I've RTFM, and I can't find a way to ask these kinds of queries. Are such queries even possible? If so, how does one ask them?
This is possible since GitHub introduced the advanced filters.
Show me all open issues that are labeled view/controller but are not labeled easy meat.
is:open is:issue label:"view/controller" -label:"easy meat"
Notice the - before label: which says do not give me the issues containing this label.
Show me all open issues that are labeled either major refactoring or needs thought.
This is not supported (using label:A label:B means A and B instead of A or B) but you can do two different queries:
is:open is:issue label:"major refactoring"
is:open is:issue label:"needs thought"
Show me every open issue that does not have any label.
Use the no:label query:
is:open is:issue no:label
As additional info, you can refer to the GitHub documentation. And, https://github.com/issues can be your playgroud–being authenticated, you can search all the issues from repositories you have read access!
Not possible, at least using the GitHub Web app only. There may be 3rd party issue-management Web apps that do this (via GitHub API), but I'm not aware of any that do exactly and only what you want. Check out:
http://gissues.com/
http://huboard.com/
http://githubissues.herokuapp.com/
https://zapier.com/zapbook/github/trello/ (trello integration)
There are ways to achieve nearly what you want using formatted issue naming + searching, as described here:
https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/129714/how-to-manage-github-issues-for-priority-etc