I have 2 Views. One has an event, that passes two variables to the second page and loads the page up:
private void CollectionView_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
var item = (GalleryListEntry)e.CurrentSelection.FirstOrDefault();
Navigation.PushModalAsync(new Gallery(item.PhotographerCode, item.GalleryCode));
}
in the second page I have this:
public Gallery(string photographerCode, string galleryCode)
{
InitializeComponent();
}
The second page, has a Collection view that has its own Bindingsource.
For this bindingsource i have a Model, a Service, and a ViewModel. The service is called by the Viewmodel, and returns a List of images to be shown in the second page's collection view.
Inside this service class, I would need to access to the two variables passed above (photograperCodeand galleryCode) but I cannot figure out how to pass the variables to the ViewModel so i can then forward it to the class.
ViewModel:
using GalShare.Model;
using GalShare.Service;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Collections.ObjectModel;
using System.Text;
namespace GalShare.ViewModel
{
class GalleryViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<Gallery> Galleries { get; set; }
public GalleryViewModel()
{
Galleries = new GalleryService().GetImageList();
}
}
}
I tried like this
((GalleryViewModel)this.BindingContext).pCode = photographerCode;
((GalleryViewModel)this.BindingContext).gCode = galleryCode;
but I get this error: System.NullReferenceException: 'Object reference not set to an instance of an object.'
BindingContext is Null, but in the Xaml file i have this:
<ContentPage.BindingContext>
<vm:GalleryViewModel/>
</ContentPage.BindingContext>
This should work fine. First in your Gallery
public Gallery(string photographerCode, string galleryCode)
{
InitializeComponent();
BindingContext = new GalleryViewModel(photographerCode, galleryCode);
}
And now in the ViewModel
class GalleryViewModel
{
public ObservableCollection<Gallery> Galleries { get; set; }
public GalleryViewModel(string pCode, string gCode)
{
this.pCode = pCode;
this.gCode = gCode;
Galleries = new GalleryService().GetImageList();
}
}
Related
I have an MVC application that uses Entity Framework 5. In few places I have a code that creates or updates the entities and then have to perform some kind of operations on the updated data. Some of those operations require accessing navigation properties and I can't get them to refresh.
Here's the example (simplified code that I have)
Models
class User : Model
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
class Car : Model
{
public Guid Id { get; set; }
public Guid DriverId { get; set; }
public virtual User Driver { get; set; }
[NotMapped]
public string DriverName
{
get { return this.Driver.Name; }
}
}
Controller
public CarController
{
public Create()
{
return this.View();
}
[HttpPost]
public Create(Car car)
{
if (this.ModelState.IsValid)
{
this.Context.Cars.Create(booking);
this.Context.SaveChanges();
// here I need to access some of the resolved nav properties
var test = booking.DriverName;
}
// error handling (I'm removing it in the example as it's not important)
}
}
The example above is for the Create method but I also have the same problem with Update method which is very similar it just takes the object from the context in GET action and stores it using Update method in POST action.
public virtual void Create(TObject obj)
{
return this.DbSet.Add(obj);
}
public virtual void Update(TObject obj)
{
var currentEntry = this.DbSet.Find(obj.Id);
this.Context.Entry(currentEntry).CurrentValues.SetValues(obj);
currentEntry.LastModifiedDate = DateTime.Now;
}
Now I've tried several different approaches that I googled or found on stack but nothing seems to be working for me.
In my latest attempt I've tried forcing a reload after calling SaveChanges method and requerying the data from the database. Here's what I've done.
I've ovewrite the SaveChanges method to refresh object context immediately after save
public int SaveChanges()
{
var rowsNumber = this.Context.SaveChanges();
var objectContext = ((IObjectContextAdapter)this.Context).ObjectContext;
objectContext.Refresh(RefreshMode.StoreWins, this.Context.Bookings);
return rowsNumber;
}
I've tried getting the updated object data by adding this line of code immediately after SaveChanges call in my HTTP Create and Update actions:
car = this.Context.Cars.Find(car.Id);
Unfortunately the navigation property is still null. How can I properly refresh the DbContext immediately after modifying the data?
EDIT
I forgot to originally mention that I know a workaround but it's ugly and I don't like it. Whenever I use navigation property I can check if it's null and if it is I can manually create new DbContext and update the data. But I'd really like to avoid hacks like this.
class Car : Model
{
[NotMapped]
public string DriverName
{
get
{
if (this.Driver == null)
{
using (var context = new DbContext())
{
this.Driver = this.context.Users.Find(this.DriverId);
}
}
return this.Driver.Name;
}
}
}
The problem is probably due to the fact that the item you are adding to the context is not a proxy with all of the necessary components for lazy loading. Even after calling SaveChanges() the item will not be converted into a proxied instance.
I suggest you try using the DbSet.Create() method and copy across all the values from the entity that you receive over the wire:
public virtual TObject Create(TObject obj)
{
var newEntry = this.DbSet.Create();
this.Context.Entry(newEntry).CurrentValues.SetValues(obj);
return newEntry;
}
UPDATE
If SetValues() is giving an issue then I suggest you try automapper to transfer the data from the passed in entity to the created proxy before Adding the new proxy instance to the DbSet. Something like this:
private bool mapCreated = false;
public virtual TObject Create(TObject obj)
{
var newEntry = this.DbSet.Create();
if (!mapCreated)
{
Mapper.CreateMap(obj.GetType(), newEntry.GetType());
mapCreated = true;
}
newEntry = Mapper.Map(obj, newEntry);
this.DbSet.Add(newEntry;
return newEntry;
}
I use next workaround: detach entity and load again
public T Reload<T>(T entity) where T : class, IEntityId
{
((IObjectContextAdapter)_dbContext).ObjectContext.Detach(entity);
return _dbContext.Set<T>().FirstOrDefault(x => x.Id == entity.Id);
}
I have Konu and Etiketler tables in database.
public class HomeController : Controller
{
//
// GET: /Home/
public ActionResult Index()
{
SonerSevincComEntities context = new SonerSevincComEntities();
var Konular = context.Konu.ToList();
return View(Konular);
}
}
In Konu Controller's View ,
I want to call Etiketler table and its Id.
I already use Konu Model But i want to use Etiketler Model in 1 View.
How can i call 2 tables(models)in 1 view page ?
You will need to create a ViewModel:
public class KonuEtiketlerViewModel
{
public virtual List<Konu> Konus {get; set;}
public virtual List<Etiketler> Etiketlers {get; set;}
}
and in your controller:
public ActionResult Index()
{
SonerSevincComEntities context = new SonerSevincComEntities();
var viewModel = new KonuEtiketlerViewModel
{
Konus = context.Konu.ToList(),
Etiketlers = context.Etiketler.ToList()
}
return View(viewModel);
}
View:
#model projectname.ViewModels.KonuEtiketlerViewModel // you must create a new class, preferably inside a ViewModels folder, called KonuEtiketlerViewModel
//you can access all your properties here....
Here is the setup:
I have an autocompletebox that is being populated by the viewmodel which gets data from a WCF service. So it's quite straightforward and simple so far.
Now, I am trying to follow the principles of MVVM by which the viewmodel doesn't know anything about the view itself. Which is good, because I bound the Populating event of the autocomplete box to a method of my viewmodel via triggers and commands.
So the view model is working on fetching the data, while the view is waiting. No problems yet.
Now, the view model got the data, and I passed the collection of results to a property bound to the ItemSource property of the control. Nothing happens on the screen.
I go to MSDN and to find the officially approved way on how this situation is supposed to be handled (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.windows.controls.autocompletebox.populating(v=vs.95).aspx):
Set the MinimumPrefixLength and MinimumPopulateDelay properties to
values larger than the default to minimize calls to the Web service.
Handle the Populating event and set the PopulatingEventArgs.Cancel
property to true.
Do the necessary processing and set the ItemsSource property to the
desired item collection.
Call the PopulateComplete method to signal the AutoCompleteBox to show
the drop-down.
Now I see a big problem with the last step because I don't know how I can call a method on a view from the view model, provided they don't know (and are not supposed to know!) anything about each other.
So how on earth am I supposed to get that PopulateComplete method of view called from the view model without breaking MVVM principles?
If you use Blend's Interactivity library, one option is an attached Behavior<T> for the AutoCompleteBox:
public class AsyncAutoCompleteBehavior : Behavior<AutoCompleteBox>
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty SearchCommandProperty
= DependencyProperty.Register("SearchCommand", typeof(ICommand),
typeof(AsyncAutoCompleteBehavior), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public ICommand SearchCommand
{
get { return (ICommand)this.GetValue(SearchCommandProperty); }
set { this.SetValue(SearchCommandProperty, value); }
}
protected override void OnAttached()
{
this.AssociatedObject.Populating += this.PopulatingHook;
}
protected override void OnDetaching()
{
this.AssociatedObject.Populating -= this.PopulatingHook;
}
private void PopulatingHook(object sender, PopulatingEventArgs e)
{
var command = this.SearchCommand;
var parameter = new SearchCommandParameter(
() => this.AssociatedObject
.Dispatcher
.BeginInvoke(this.AssociatedObject.PopulateComplete),
e.Parameter);
if (command != null && command.CanExecute(parameter))
{
// Cancel the pop-up, execute our command which calls
// parameter.Complete when it finishes
e.Cancel = true;
this.SearchCommand.Execute(parameter);
}
}
}
Using the following parameter class:
public class SearchCommandParameter
{
public Action Complete
{
get;
private set;
}
public string SearchText
{
get;
private set;
}
public SearchCommandParameter(Action complete, string text)
{
this.Complete = complete;
this.SearchText = text;
}
}
At this point you need to do 2 things:
Wire up the Behavior
<sdk:AutoCompleteBox MinimumPopulateDelay="250" MinimumPrefixLength="2" FilterMode="None">
<i:Interaction.Behaviors>
<b:AsyncAutoCompleteBehavior SearchCommand="{Binding Search}" />
</i:Interaction.Behaviors>
</sdk:AutoCompleteBox>
Create a DelegateCommand which handles your aysnc searching.
public class MyViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
public ICommand Search
{
get;
private set;
}
private void InitializeCommands()
{
this.Search = new DelegateCommand<SearchCommandParamater>(DoSearch);
}
private void DoSearch(SearchCommandParameter parameter)
{
var client = new WebClient();
var uri = new Uri(
#"http://www.example.com/?q="
+ HttpUtility.UrlEncode(parameter.SearchText));
client.DownloadStringCompleted += Downloaded;
client.DownloadStringAsync(uri, parameter);
}
private void Downloaded(object sender, DownloadStringCompletedEventArgs e)
{
// Do Something with 'e.Result'
((SearchCommandParameter)e.UserState).Complete();
}
}
First of all, I have read this post and did not find the answer for my problem.
I am not sure if this is an aggregated Model class or an aggregated ViewModel class, but this is what I have:
In my WPF (with Prism) application, I have a view 'Filter Customers View' that connects to a service and requests a list of 'Customer' objects, based on a filter.
The list that is returned from the service is this :
List<CustomerDTO> FilteredCustomers;
And the CustomerDTO looks like this:
public class CustomerDTO
{
public Guid CustomerId;
public String Name;
public String Address;
public String PhoneNumber;
public OrderInfoDTO LastOrderInformation;
public List<OtherClass> ListOfSomething;
}
And the OrderInfoDTO looks like this:
public class OrderInfoDTO
{
public Guid OrderId;
public DateTime OrderDate;
public int NumberOfProducts;
public double TotalAmountSpent;
}
And the OtherClass looks like this:
public class OtherClass
{
public Guid Id;
public String SomeText;
}
As you can see - the customer might or might not have a 'Last Order',
I would like to wrap the 'CustomerDTO' object in a ViewModel,
so that I can bind it to the view.
This is what I thought of doing :
public class CustomerViewModel : NotificationObject
{
private CustomerDTO _customerDTO;
public CustomerViewModel(CustomerDTO customerDTO)
{
_customerDTO = customerDTO;
}
public Guid CustomerId
{
get { return _customerDTO.CustomerId; }
set { _customerDTO.CustomerId = value; RaisePropertyChanged("CustomerId "); }
}
public String Name
{
get { return _customerDTO.Name; }
set { _customerDTO.Name = value; RaisePropertyChanged("Name"); }
}
public String Address
{
get { return _customerDTO.Address; }
set { _customerDTO.Address = value; RaisePropertyChanged("Address"); }
}
public String PhoneNumber
{
get { return _customerDTO.PhoneNumber; }
set { _customerDTO.PhoneNumber= value; RaisePropertyChanged("PhoneNumber"); }
}
}
.
Questions:
First of all - is 'CustomerDTO' what is known as a Model ? And is 'OrderInfoDTO' also a Model ? and what about 'OtherClass' ?
How do I treat the 'OrderInfoDTO' in my CustomerViewModel class ? Do I create a 'ViewModel' for it also ? where do I create the 'OrderInfoDTO' view-model ??? What happens if now someone updates the customer and sets the 'OrderInfoDTO' value ?
How do I treat the list of 'OtherClass' in my CustomerViewModel class ? Do I create an ObservableCollection for it ? What happens if someone will want to delete an item in it or update an item in it or add an item to it ?
Think about it this way:
The View is your UI that you would bind elements from the View Model to using the {Binding Path=, Mode=TwoWay -- If you want to update based upon the user input
The Model is only the data, this could a record set, file, database records etc. So CustomerDTO and OrderInfoDTO are models.
The View Model is your link between the data (Model) and the UI (View). It will allow to you change the data so it's easier to present on the UI
You would need to use ObservableCollection in all instances where there's a list that could change in the background.
You don't need a view model for OrderInfoDTO unless you need a view to update that data. If you are presenting a CustomerDTO info with OrderInfoDTO in it, then making it a property of the CustomerDTO view model would be fine.
I have two questions regarding communication between ViewModels.
I am developing a customer management program. I'm using Laurent Bugnion's MVVM Light framework.
In the main page, there's a list of customers. when each customer is clicked, a child windows shows up with information about that customer. the user should be able to open up multiple child windows at the same time and compare information between customers. how do you pass customer object from the main page's ViewModel to the child window's ViewModel in an MVVM-friendly fashion?
In the child window that shows customer information, there are a number of tabs, each showing different areas of information. I've created separate ViewModels for each of the tabs. how can you share the current customer information between each tab's viewmodels?
Thanks a lot!
In my project I'm passing ViewModels to child windows too. I create a dependency property for the ViewModel in my child window's code behind and in the setter of this property I pass the ViewModel along to my child window's ViewModel. This means you're creating a separate ViewModel class just for your child window.
To answer your second question, you could have your child window's ViewModel contain properties that each tab cares about, but have their data context still be the same as the child window's data context so they have access to shared properties. This is actually very easy since they automatically get the child window's data context.
Here's an example illustrating the two concepts above.
The child window view DetailsWindow.xaml (note that I've gotten in the habit of naming my child window views *Window.xaml instead of *View.xaml)
<controls:ChildWindow x:Class="DetailsWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:sdk="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation/sdk"
xmlns:Views="clr-namespace:Views"
Title="Details"
DataContext="{Binding DetailsWindowViewModel, Source={StaticResource Locator}}"
>
<Grid>
<sdk:TabControl>
<sdk:TabItem Header="First Tab" Content="{Binding FirstTabContent}" />
<sdk:TabItem Header="Second Tab" Content="{Binding SecondTabContent}" />
</sdk:TabControl>
</Grid>
</controls:ChildWindow>
The child window view's code behind DetailsWindow.xaml.cs and its interface IDetailsWindow.cs
public partial class DetailsWindow : ChildWindow, IDetailsWindow
{
private IDetailsWindowViewModel ViewModel
{
get { return this.DataContext as IDetailsWindowViewModel; }
}
public DetailsWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
#region Customer dependency property
public const string CustomerViewModelPropertyName = "Customer";
public ICustomerViewModel Customer
{
get
{
return (ICustomerViewModel)GetValue(CustomerViewModelProperty);
}
set
{
SetValue(CustomerViewModelProperty, value);
if (ViewModel != null)
{
ViewModel.Customer = value;
}
}
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty CustomerViewModelProperty = DependencyProperty.Register(
CustomerViewModelPropertyName,
typeof(ICustomerViewModel),
typeof(CustomerDetailsWindow),
null);
#endregion
}
public interface IDetailsWindow
{
ICustomerViewModel Customer { get; set; }
void Show();
}
The child window view model DetailsWindowViewModel.cs and its interface IDetailsWindowViewModel
public class DetailsWindowViewModel : ViewModelBase, IDetailsWindowViewModel
{
public DetailsWindowViewModel(IMessenger messenger)
: base(messenger)
{
}
#region Properties
#region Customer Property
public const string CustomerPropertyName = "Customer";
private ICustomerViewModel _customer;
public ICustomerViewModel Customer
{
get { return _customer; }
set
{
if (_customer == value)
return;
var oldValue = _customer;
_customer = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(CustomerPropertyName, oldValue, value, true);
}
}
#endregion
#region FirstTabContent Property
public const string FirstTabContentPropertyName = "FirstTabContent";
private FrameworkElement _firstTabContent;
public FrameworkElement FirstTabContent
{
get { return _firstTabContent; }
set
{
if (_firstTabContent == value)
return;
_firstTabContent = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(FirstTabContentPropertyName);
}
}
#endregion
#region SecondTabContent Property
public const string SecondTabContentPropertyName = "SecondTabContent";
private FrameworkElement _secondTabContent;
public FrameworkElement SecondTabContent
{
get { return _secondTabContent; }
set
{
if (_secondTabContent == value)
return;
_secondTabContent = value;
RaisePropertyChanged(SecondTabContentPropertyName);
}
}
#endregion
#endregion
}
public interface IDetailsWindowViewModel
{
ICustomerViewModel Customer { get; set; }
FrameworkElement FirstTabContent { get; set; }
FrameworkElement SecondTabContent { get; set; }
void Cleanup();
}
And you can show the child window from your MainPageViewModel.cs like this.
public class MainViewModel : ViewModelBase, IMainViewModel
{
private readonly IDetailsWindow _detailsWindow;
public MainViewModel(IMessenger messenger, IDetailsWindow DetailsWindow)
: base(messenger)
{
_detailsWindow = DetailsWindow;
}
private void DisplayCustomerDetails(ICustomerViewModel customerToDisplay)
{
_detailsWindow.Customer = customerToDisplay;
_detailsWindow.Show();
}
}
Note that I create interfaces for all of my view models and child windows and I use an DI/IoC container in my ViewModelLocator so that all of my ViewModels' dependencies are injected for me. You don't have to do this, but I like how it works.