how to store enterprise hierarchy in mongo? - mongodb

I'm not good at documents DB, wanna improve myself.
The task is: to store an enterprise hierarchy into Mongo DB.
There are employers and departments. Every employer belongs to a particular department ( BTW what if someone belongs to multiple departments?). Sure, there is employees hierarchy: Director is a root. So everyone except director has a direct boss ( what if someone has multiple bosses which are not from the same branch?)
The structure could be changed ( lets say not more often than once per a day) and has a timestamp.
So how to store it into Mongo DB? Multiple collection? Or one collection and many documents?
All viable ideas are appreciated.

Store each employee as a single document. In that document store an array of departments and an array of direct reports. ICs have a direct reports array that is empty. Index the reports array so queries are efficient.
This structure supports multiple departments per employee and multiple managers per employee.
Most hierarchies change atomically so I would suggest changes be applied to a new collection and that collection replace the old collection.
You can use the MongoDB $graphLookup operator to query the graph of employees.

Related

Search Document from multiple collection using Flutter

Can anyone tell me if it is possible to search multiple collections at once in Firebase?
What I need to do is search the data in both the 2009 and 2010 collections in bio_data (more collections will need to be added in the future) and extract the document from one of them.
Or it doesn't matter if there is a way to get a name list of the collections inside a document
Firestore does not have the concept of server-side joins or projections across collections. Each query or document read can only take data from a single collection, or from all collections that have the same name with collection group queries.
If you need to load data from two collections, you'll need at least two reads.
For a better understanding I highly recommend watching the Get to know Cloud Firestore playlist.
Michel's answer is correct.
In addition, I would suggest a change to your data model: Instead of having one sub-collection per year, you could have one unique sub-collection and add a year field to the docs in this unique collection.
This way it would be easy to query by year: For one year, for several years with the in operator (up to 10 equality (==) clauses) or for all the years.
And with a Collection Group query you could even query all the data for all the students.

Collection or documents for multiple projects?

I want to manage multiple projects data in mongoDB. Each project contains multiple users from multiple departments with multiple role assigned to them. plus certain task is assigned to each user. Now I am confused about schema, not able to decide which entity should be kept as collection & which one as document ? What is the best efficient way to store ?
should I keep all under single collection as embedded documents or in separate collection ?
Thanks
First of all if you are using mongodb you should know why are you using it. MongoDB is not about normalize stuff. If you are able to create data structure is de-normalize way then and only then go for MongoDB.
I think you should maintain one single document containing all the mentioned things above. But the scenario which you have mentioned above is good for relational database. you need only 3 entities in relational database and your problem is solved.
Still if you want to go for mongodb you can go with one collection only. which contains project details number of users working there and their roles and department.

MongoDb about 2 million entries in about 100 collections

I want to move customer surveys for different products and survey types into mongodb.
A product can have multiple survey types.
The existing data consists of about 2 million surveys and growing.
There will be a need of querying the data for stats and reports and the structure of the surveys and their questions can change over time. Which means that the documents wont always be the same.
What will suite the best:
One big collection with product_id and type overhead within one db
Multiple collections per product and type within one db
Or a mix of multiple dbs and collections for product and type
I read about advantages and disadvantages and also that every case has its own solution that suits the usage and purpose.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure what applies the best for my case.
It all depends on how you will access you data, it is by customer, survey or product?.
You can make a product collection and put the surveys as an array of subdocuments or you can make a customer collection and do the same thing.
It is not something we can help you with here without knowing the details of the business requirement.
Just keep in mind, MongoDB is schemaless and how you will design your documents and collections depends on how you will access your data.

Querying collections and relationships using waterline and mongodb

Using mongodb and waterline, how can I query a collection taking in count a relationship with other?
For example, let's say I have two collections, Employer and Employee. An employer can have one or more employees. How could I get a list of employers based in a property of an employee, like getting the list of employers that have employees with an age above of 25 years.
I know that could be done with two queries specifying the required parameters, but I wonder if that could be done in one query, like mysql using joins.
Thanks for your time.
No. MongoDB does not support joins so if you need if your data is not embedded in a single collection you will need to use two queries to achieve the result you want

MongoDB Schema Design ordering service

I have the following objects Company, User and Order (contains orderlines). User's place orders with 1 or more orderlines and these relate to a Company. The time period for which orders can be placed for this Company is only a week.
What I'm not sure on is where to place the orders array, should it be a collection of it's own containing a link to the User and a link to the Company or should it sit under the Company or finally should the orders be sat under the User.
Numbers wise I need to plan for 50k+ in orders.
Queries wise, I'll probably be looking at Orders by Company mainly but I would need to find an Order by Company based for a specific user.
1) For folks coming from the SQL world (such as myself) one of the hardest learn about MongoDB is the new style of schema design. In the SQL world, everything goes into third normal form. Folks come to think that there is a single right way to design their schema, because there typically is one.
In the MongoDB world, there is no one best schema design. More accurately, in MongoDB schema design depends on how the application is going to access the data.
2) Here are the key questions that you need to have answered in order to design a good schema for MongoDB:
How much data do you have?
What are your most common operations? Will you be mostly inserting new data, updating existing data, or doing queries?
What are your most common queries?
How many I/O operations do you expect per second?
What you're talking about here is modeling Many-to-One relationships:
Company -> User
User -> Order
Order -> Order Lines
Company -> Order
Using SQL you would create a pair of master/detail tables with a primary key/foreign key relationship. In MongoDB, you have a number of choices: you can embed the data, you can create a linked relationship, you can duplicate and denormalize the data, or you can use a hybrid approach.
The correct approach would depend on a lot of details about the use case of your application, many of which you haven't provided.
3) This is my best guess - and it's only a guess - as to a good schema for you.
a) Have separate collections for Users, Companies, and Orders
If you're looking at 50k+ orders, there are too many to embed in a single document. Having them as a separate collection will allow you to reference them from both the Company and the User documents.
b) Have an array of references to the Order documents in both the Company and the User documents. This makes the query "Find all Orders for this Company" a single-document query
c) If your query pattern supports it, you might also have a duplicate link from Orders back to the owning Company and/or User.
d) Assuming that the order lines are unique to the individual Order, you would embed the Order Lines in an array within the Order documents.
e) If your order lines refer back to individual Products, you might want to have a separate Product collection, and include a reference to the Product document in the order line sub-document
4) Here are some good general references on MongoDB schema design.
MongoDB presentations:
http://www.10gen.com/presentations/mongosf2011/schemabasics
http://www.10gen.com/presentations/mongosv-2011/schema-design-by-example
http://www.10gen.com/presentations/mongosf2011/schemascale
Here are a couple of books about MongoDB schema design that I think you would find useful:
http://www.manning.com/banker/ (MongoDB in Action)
http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920018391.do
Here are some sample schema designs:
http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/use-cases/
Note that the "MongoDB in Action" book includes a sample schema for an e-commerce application, which is very similar to what you're trying to build -- I recommend you check it out.