Write correct JSON about PlanDefinition and ActivityDefinition on FHIR - hapi-fhir

I want to write a JSON to create a PlanDefinition resource with some ActivityDefinition resources inside it to persiste on FHIR r4 server these resources.
My sandbox server is Hapi FHIR
Two questions:
The first: How can I write it
The second: When I'll wirte the correct JSON, the result will be the creation of one PlanDefinition resource and some ActivityDefinition resources, or will be created only one PlanDefinition resource with these informations inside it?
This is my JSON to create a simple PlanDefinition, but I donìt know how to add ActivityDefinition inside it
{
"resourceType": "PlanDefinition",
"id": "999999",
"meta": {
"versionId": "1",
"lastUpdated": "2020-04-16T11:10:45.868+00:00",
"source": "#YS2h8QIqvGKHDy4x"
},
"url": "www.myserver.it",
"identifier": [ {
"system": "www.myserver.it",
"value": "jtr-pd1"
} ],
"version": "versione 1",
"status": "active",
"action": [ {
"title": "A",
"definitionCanonical": "#Process_Alex1"
}, {
"title": "B",
"definitionCanonical": "#Process_Alex2"
}, {
"title": "C",
"definitionCanonical": "ActivityDefinition"
} ]
}

Typically in FHIR we don't contain resources inside each other. References instead point to other independently maintained resource instances. For example, multiple PlanDefinitions might point to the same ActivityDefinition because that one activity is a 'step' in multiple protocols/order sets.
If you have a situation where an activity definition is tied to a single PlanDefinition and can't exist independent of that PlanDefinition (e.g. if the PlanDefinition were deleted, the ActivityDefinition would go too; no other PlanDefinition can point to the Activity, any update to the activity would be considered an update to the plan, etc.), you can send the ActivityDefinition as a 'contained' resource. Your instance would look like this:
{
"resourceType": "PlanDefinition",
"id": "999999",
"meta": {
"versionId": "1",
"lastUpdated": "2020-04-16T11:10:45.868+00:00",
"source": "#YS2h8QIqvGKHDy4x"
},
"contained": [ {
"resourceType": "ActivityDefinition",
"id": "Process_Alex1",
...
},
{
"resourceType": "ActivityDefinition",
"id": "Process_Alex2",
...
} ],
{
"url": "www.myserver.it",
"identifier": [ {
"system": "www.myserver.it",
"value": "jtr-pd1"
} ],
"version": "versione 1",
"status": "active",
"action": [ {
"title": "A",
"definitionCanonical": "#Process_Alex1"
}, {
"title": "B",
"definitionCanonical": "#Process_Alex2"
}, {
"title": "C",
"definitionCanonical": "http://somewhere.org/ActivityDefinition/foo"
} ]
}

Related

How to check if a changeType is "merge" or "branch" when retrieving git changes through Azure DevOps REST Api

I am fetching Git changes from Azure DevOps REST Api and want to distinguish if a specific commit was a merge/branch operation. The default changeTypes are: add, edit, delete and I couldn't find any reference for "merge" or "branch".
Is there a built in way to achieve this?
My query uses the following syntax from the official doc:
GET https://{instance}/{collection}/_apis/git/repositories/{repositoryId}/commits/{commitId}?api-version=4.1
And the response is like:
{
"parents": [],
"treeId": "7fa1a3523ffef51c525ea476bffff7d648b8cb3d",
"push": {
"pushedBy": {
"id": "8c8c7d32-6b1b-47f4-b2e9-30b477b5ab3d",
"displayName": "Chuck Reinhart",
"uniqueName": "fabrikamfiber3#hotmail.com",
"url": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/Identities/8c8c7d32-6b1b-47f4-b2e9-30b477b5ab3d",
"imageUrl": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_api/_common/identityImage?id=8c8c7d32-6b1b-47f4-b2e9-30b477b5ab3d"
},
"pushId": 1,
"date": "2014-01-29T23:33:15.2434002Z"
},
"commitId": "be67f8871a4d2c75f13a51c1d3c30ac0d74d4ef4",
"author": {
"name": "Chuck Reinhart",
"email": "fabrikamfiber3#hotmail.com",
"date": "2014-01-29T23:32:09Z"
},
"committer": {
"name": "Chuck Reinhart",
"email": "fabrikamfiber3#hotmail.com",
"date": "2014-01-29T23:32:09Z"
},
"comment": "First cut\n",
"changeCounts": {
"Add": 2
},
"changes": [
{
"item": {
"gitObjectType": "blob",
"path": "/.gitattributes",
"url": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/git/repositories/278d5cd2-584d-4b63-824a-2ba458937249/items/.gitattributes?versionType=Commit"
},
"changeType": "add"
},
{
"item": {
"gitObjectType": "blob",
"path": "/.gitignore",
"url": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/git/repositories/278d5cd2-584d-4b63-824a-2ba458937249/items/.gitignore?versionType=Commit"
},
"changeType": "add"
}
],
"url": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/git/repositories/278d5cd2-584d-4b63-824a-2ba458937249/commits/be67f8871a4d2c75f13a51c1d3c30ac0d74d4ef4",
"remoteUrl": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_git/Fabrikam-Fiber-Git/commit/be67f8871a4d2c75f13a51c1d3c30ac0d74d4ef4",
"_links": {
"self": {
"href": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/git/repositories/278d5cd2-584d-4b63-824a-2ba458937249/commits/be67f8871a4d2c75f13a51c1d3c30ac0d74d4ef4"
},
"repository": {
"href": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/git/repositories/278d5cd2-584d-4b63-824a-2ba458937249"
},
"changes": {
"href": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/git/repositories/278d5cd2-584d-4b63-824a-2ba458937249/commits/be67f8871a4d2c75f13a51c1d3c30ac0d74d4ef4/changes"
},
"web": {
"href": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_git/Fabrikam-Fiber-Git/commit/be67f8871a4d2c75f13a51c1d3c30ac0d74d4ef4"
},
"tree": {
"href": "https://fabrikam:8080/tfs/_apis/git/repositories/278d5cd2-584d-4b63-824a-2ba458937249/trees/7fa1a3523ffef51c525ea476bffff7d648b8cb3d"
}
}
}
If there is no built in way to achieve this, should the parent be used as a guidance? Like if it is empty it is a 'branch' operation and if there is two entries in it it is a 'merge'?
Update 1
I can see in the documentation referenced above that there are merge and branch changeTypes, but when I query a change that was merged the result only contains edit or add.
You will have to use the parents collection to determine whether it was a merge. Since normal commits just have 1 parent, more than 1 indicates a merge.
From the git documentation here
A commit object may have any number of parents. With exactly one parent, it is an ordinary commit. Having more than one parent makes the commit a merge between several lines of history. Initial (root) commits have no parents.

AWS Stepfunction: Substring from input

As a general question is it possible do a substring function within step functions?
I receive the following event:
{
"input": {
"version": "0",
"id": "d9c5fec0-d08d-6abd-4ea5-0107fbbce47d",
"detail-type": "EBS Multi-Volume Snapshots Completion Status",
"source": "aws.ec2",
"account": "12345678",
"time": "2021-11-12T12:08:16Z",
"region": "us-east-1",
"resources": [
"arn:aws:ec2::us-east-1:snapshot/snap-0a98c2a42ee266123"
]
}
}
but need the snapshot id as input to DescribeInstances, therefore I need to extract snap-0a98c2a42ee266123 from arn:aws:ec2::us-east-1:snapshot/snap-0a98c2a42ee266123
Is there any simple way to do this within step functions?. That is to say without having to pass it to a lambda or something equally convoluted?
This has recently become possible with the addition of new intrinsic functions. ArrayGetItem gets an item by its index. StringSplit splits a string at a delimeter. Use a Pass state to extract the snapshot name from the resource ARN:
{
"StartAt": "ExtractSnapshotName",
"States": {
"ExtractSnapshotName": {
"Type": "Pass",
"Parameters": {
"input.$": "$.input",
"snapshotName.$": "States.ArrayGetItem(States.StringSplit(States.ArrayGetItem($.input.resources,0), '/'),1)"
},
"ResultPath": "$",
"End": true
}
}
}
output:
{
"input": {
"version": "0",
"id": "d9c5fec0-d08d-6abd-4ea5-0107fbbce47d",
"detail-type": "EBS Multi-Volume Snapshots Completion Status",
"source": "aws.ec2",
"account": "12345678",
"time": "2021-11-12T12:08:16Z",
"region": "us-east-1",
"resources": [
"arn:aws:ec2::us-east-1:snapshot/snap-0a98c2a42ee266123"
]
},
"snapshotName": "snap-0a98c2a42ee266123"
}

Google Action / Dialogflow : how to ask for geolocation

I'm trying to implement a simple app for Google Assistant.
All works fine, but now I have a problem with the "permission" helper :
https://developers.google.com/actions/assistant/helpers#helper_intents
I have an intent connected with webhook to my java application. When an user types a sentence similar to "near to me", I want to ask to him his location and then use lat/lon to perform a search.
es: Brazilian restaurant near to me
my intent "searchRestaurant" is fired
I receive the webhook request and I parse it
if I find a parameter that is connected to a sentence like "near to me", so instead to response with a "Card" or a "List" I return a JSON that represent the helper request :
{
"conversationToken": "[]",
"expectUserResponse": true,
"expectedInputs": [
{
"inputPrompt": {
"initialPrompts": [
{
"textToSpeech": "PLACEHOLDER_FOR_PERMISSION"
}
],
"noInputPrompts": []
},
"possibileIntents": [
{
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"inputValueData": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "Posso accedere alla tua posizione?",
"permission": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
]
}
]
}
but something seems to be wrong, and I receive an error:
"{\n \"responseMetadata\": {\n \"status\": {\n \"code\": 10,\n \"message\": \"Failed to parse Dialogflow response into AppResponse because of empty speech response\",\n \"details\": [{\n \"#type\": \"type.googleapis.com/google.protobuf.Value\",\n \"value\": \"{\\"id\\":\\"1cc45c5e-c398-4ea7-98a5-408f31ce142d\\",\\"timestamp\\":\\"2018-08-02T14:45:05.752Z\\",\\"lang\\":\\"it\\",\\"result\\":{},\\"alternateResult\\":{},\\"status\\":{\\"code\\":206,\\"errorType\\":\\"partial_content\\",\\"errorDetails\\":\\"Webhook call failed. Error: Failed to parse webhook JSON response: Cannot find field: conversationToken in message google.cloud.dialogflow.v2.WebhookResponse.\\"},\\"sessionId\\":\\"1533221100163\\"}\"\n }]\n }\n }\n}"
The "conversationToken" is filled, so I don't understand the error message.
Maybe I'm trying to perform the operation in a wrong way.
So, which is the correct way to call this helper?
--> I've created a second intent "askGeolocation" that have "actions_intent_PERMISSION" as "Event", and ... if I understand correctly the documentation, should be trigger if the request for helper is correct.
How can I get this working?
UPDATE :
I find some example of the json response for ask permission and seems that it should be different from the one above that i'm using :
https://github.com/dialogflow/fulfillment-webhook-json/blob/master/responses/v2/ActionsOnGoogle/AskForPermission.json
{
"payload": {
"google": {
"expectUserResponse": true,
"systemIntent": {
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"data": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "To deliver your order",
"permissions": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
}
}
}
so, i've implemented it and now the response seems to be good (no more error on parsing it), but i still receive an error on it validation :
UnparseableJsonResponse
API Version 2: Failed to parse JSON response string with 'INVALID_ARGUMENT' error: "permission: Cannot find field."
so, a problem still persist.
Anyone know the cause?
Thanks
After some tests i found the problem.
I was returning a wrong json repsonse with "permission" instead of "permissions":
"permission**s**": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
So the steps to ask for location are correct. I report them here as a little tutorial in order to help who is facing on it for the first time:
1) In DialogFlow, add some logic to your Intent, in order to understand when is ok to ask to user his location. In my case, i've added a "parameter" that identify sentences like "nearby" and so on.
2) When my Intent is fired i receive to my java application a request like this :
...
"queryResult": {
"queryText": "ristorante argentino qui vicino",
"action": "bycategory",
"parameters": {
"askgeolocation": "qui vicino",
"TipoRistorante": ["ristorante", "argentino"]
},
...
3) If "askgeolocation" parameter is filled, instead to return a "simple message" o other type of message, i return a json for ask the permission to geolocation :
{
"payload": {
"google": {
"expectUserResponse": true,
"systemIntent": {
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION",
"data": {
"#type": "type.googleapis.com/google.actions.v2.PermissionValueSpec",
"optContext": "To deliver your order",
"permissions": [
"NAME",
"DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"
]
}
}
}
}
}
4) You MUST have a second Intent that is configured with "actions_intent_PERMISSION " event :
No training phrases
No Action and params
No Responses
But with Fulfillment active :
5) Once your response arrive to Google Assistant this is the message that appear :
6) Now, if user answer "ok" you receive this json on your webhook :
{
"responseId": "32cf46cf-80d8-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"queryResult": {
"queryText": "actions_intent_PERMISSION",
"action": "geoposition",
"parameters": {
},
"allRequiredParamsPresent": true,
"fulfillmentMessages": [{
"text": {
"text": [""]
}
}],
"outputContexts": [{
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"parameters": {
"PERMISSION": true
}
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}, {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}],
"intent": {
"name": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"displayName": "geoposition"
},
"intentDetectionConfidence": 1.0,
"languageCode": "it"
},
"originalDetectIntentRequest": {
"source": "google",
"version": "2",
"payload": {
"isInSandbox": true,
"surface": {
"capabilities": [{
"name": "actions.capability.MEDIA_RESPONSE_AUDIO"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
}]
},
"requestType": "SIMULATOR",
"inputs": [{
"rawInputs": [{
"inputType": "KEYBOARD"
}],
"arguments": [{
"textValue": "true",
"name": "PERMISSION",
"boolValue": true
}],
"intent": "actions.intent.PERMISSION"
}],
"user": {
"lastSeen": "2018-08-03T08:55:20Z",
"permissions": ["NAME", "DEVICE_PRECISE_LOCATION"],
"profile": {
"displayName": ".... full name of the user ...",
"givenName": "... name ...",
"familyName": "... surname ..."
},
"locale": "it-IT",
"userId": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
},
"device": {
"location": {
"coordinates": {
"latitude": 45.xxxxxx,
"longitude": 9.xxxxxx
}
}
},
"conversation": {
"conversationId": "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx",
"type": "ACTIVE",
"conversationToken": "[]"
},
"availableSurfaces": [{
"capabilities": [{
"name": "actions.capability.SCREEN_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.AUDIO_OUTPUT"
}, {
"name": "actions.capability.WEB_BROWSER"
}]
}]
}
},
"session": "projects/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
}
that contains, name/surname and latitude/longitude. This information can be saved in your application, in order to not perform again this steps.
I hope this helps.
Davide
In your intent, you can ask for a parameter with a custom Entity. This you can do like this:
entity you can define as "near"
put all the synonyms for near for which you want to trigger location permission in this entity
do not mark this parameter as "required"
do not put any prompt
in the training phrases, add some phrases with this parameter
in your webhook, keep a check on the parameter, if present ask for permission if not continue.
add a permission event to another intent
do your post permission processing in that intent
Entity
Intent
I hope you get it.
There are samples on this topic specifically that guide you through exactly what's needed for requesting permissions in Node and Java.
Note: There are helper intents samples available in Node and Java as well.

Swagger UI doesn't show embedded json properties model

I am using the swagger tool for documenting my Jersey based REST API (the swaggerui I am using was downloaded on June 2014 don't know if this issue has been fixed in later versions but as I made a lot of customization to its code so I don't have the option to download the latest without investing lot of time to customize it again).
So far and until now, all my transfer objects have one level deep properties (no embedded pojos). But now that I added some rest paths that are returning more complex objects (two levels of depth) I found that SwaggerUI is not expanding the JSON model schema when having embedded objects.
Here is the important part of the swagger doc:
...
{
"path": "/user/combo",
"operations": [{
"method": "POST",
"summary": "Inserts a combo (user, address)",
"notes": "Will insert a new user and a address definition in a single step",
"type": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto",
"nickname": "insertCombo",
"consumes": ["application/json"],
"parameters": [{
"name": "body",
"description": "New user and address combo",
"required": true,
"type": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto",
"paramType": "body",
"allowMultiple": false
}],
"responseMessages": [{
"code": 200,
"message": "OK",
"responseModel": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto"
}]
}]
}
...
"models": {
"UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto": {
"id": "UserAndAddressWithIdSwaggerDto",
"description": "",
"required": ["user",
"address"],
"properties": {
"user": {
"$ref": "UserDto",
"description": "User"
},
"address": {
"$ref": "AddressDto",
"description": "Address"
}
}
},
"UserDto": {
"id": "UserDto",
"properties": {
"userId": {
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64"
},
"name": {
"type": "string"
},...
},
"AddressDto": {
"id": "AddressDto",
"properties": {
"addressId": {
"type": "integer",
"format": "int64"
},
"street": {
"type": "string"
},...
}
}
...
The embedded objects are User and Address, their models are being created correctly as shown in the json response.
But when opening the SwaggerUI I can only see:
{
"user": "UserDto",
"address": "AddressDto"
}
But I should see something like:
{
"user": {
"userId": "integer",
"name": "string",...
},
"address": {
"addressId": "integer",
"street": "string",...
}
}
Something may be wrong in the code that expands the internal properties, the javascript console doesn't show any error so I assume this is a bug.
I found the solution, there is a a line of code that needs to be modified to make it work properly:
In the swagger.js file there is a getSampleValue function with a conditional checking for undefined:
SwaggerModelProperty.prototype.getSampleValue = function(modelsToIgnore) {
var result;
if ((this.refModel != null) && (modelsToIgnore[this.refModel.name] === 'undefined'))
...
I updated the equality check to (removing quotes):
modelsToIgnore[this.refModel.name] === undefined
After that, SwaggerUI is able to show the embedded models.

OData REST Filter for deeply nested data

I have a working REST request that returns a large results collection. (trimmed here)
The original URL is:
http://intranet.domain.com//_api/SP.UserProfiles.PeopleManager/GetPropertiesFor(accountName=#v)?#v='domain\kens'&$select=AccountName,DisplayName,Email,Title,UserProfileProperties
The response is:
{
"d": {
"__metadata": {
"id": "stuff",
"uri": "morestuff",
"type": "SP.UserProfiles.PersonProperties"
},
"AccountName": "domain\\KenS",
"DisplayName": "Ken Sanchez",
"Email": "KenS#domain.com",
"Title": "Research Assistant",
"UserProfileProperties": {
"results": [
{
"__metadata": {
"type": "SP.KeyValue"
},
"Key": "UserProfile_GUID",
"Value": "1c419284-604e-41a8-906f-ac34fd4068ab",
"ValueType": "Edm.String"
},
{
"__metadata": {
"type": "SP.KeyValue"
},
"Key": "SID",
"Value": "S-1-5-21-2740942301-4273591597-3258045437-1132",
"ValueType": "Edm.String"
},
{
"__metadata": {
"type": "SP.KeyValue"
},
"Key": "ADGuid",
"Value": "",
"ValueType": "Edm.String"
},
{
"__metadata": {
"type": "SP.KeyValue"
},
"Key": "AccountName",
"Value": "domain\\KenS",
"ValueType": "Edm.String"
}...
Is it possible to change the REST request with a $filter that only returns the Key Values from the results collection where Key=SID OR Key= other values?
I only need about 3 values from the results collection by name.
In OData, you can't filter an inner feed.
Instead you could try to query the entity set that UserProfileProperties comes from and expand the associated SP.UserProfiles.PersonProperties entity.
The syntax will need to be adjusted for your scenario, but I'm thinking something along these lines:
service.svc/UserProfileProperties?$filter=Key eq 'SID' and RelatedPersonProperties/AccountName eq 'domain\kens'&$expand=RelatedPersonProperties
That assumes you have a top-level entity set of UserProfileProperties and each is tied back to a single SP.UserProfiles.PersonProperties entity via a navigation property called (in my example) RelatedPersonProperties.