I'm trying to use a UploadCollection in my SAPUI5 App, to upload files and display them to the user. My page has two UploadCollections. One to upload and display PDF-Documents and one for JPG-Image files. The upload via a Odata V2 Service works perfectly well, but I ran into a difficulty displaying the uploaded files in the correct UploadCollection.
After the successful Upload of all files in both UploadCollections I'm triggering a refresh on the binding Items of both Upload Collections. Sadly this refresh is ignoring the filters which are applied to the items of each UploadCollection. This leads to the unfortunate situation, that the pdf and image files are displayed in both UploadCollections and not only in the correct Image- or PDF-UploadCollection. I would love to know why this is the case.
I've already tried to filter the binding items again, but then the request magically remembers that there has been a filter applied to the UploadCollection items from the beginning and therefore is executed with the same filter applied two times which leads to an error.
The only solution I found this far is to completely reload the page to reapply the correct filter to each Upload Collection. It would be fantastic if someone could help me with issue and possibly supply any solutions.
UploadColelction items Binding:
UC1: items="{path:'ImageSet', filters:[{path: 'Filetype', operator: 'EQ' , value1: 'IBR'}]}"
UC2: items="{path:'ImageSet', filters:[{path: 'Filetype', operator: 'EQ' , value1: 'DBR'}]}"
Related
Years ago, I wrote a small app in itext2 to gather reports on a weekly basis and concatenate them into one PDF. The app used com.lowagie.text.pdf.PdfCopy to copy and merge the PDFs. And it worked fine. Performed exactly as expected.
A few weeks ago I looked into migrating the application to itex7. To that end, I used the copyPagesTo method of com.itextpdf.kernel.pdf.PdfDocument. When run on the same file set, this produces warnings like:
WARN PdfNameTree - Name "section.1" already exists in the name tree; old value will be replaced by the new one.
When I click on the link to "section.1" in the first document of the merged PDF, I am taken to "section.1" of the last document. Not what I expected and not what happens when using the itext2 app. In the PDF's produced by itext2, if I click on the link to "section.1" of the first document in the combined PDF, I am taken to section 1 of the first document.
There is a hint in Javadocs for copyPagesTo saying
If outlines destination names are the same in different documents, all
such outlines will lead to a single location in the resultant
document. In this case iText will log a warning. This can be avoided
by renaming destinations names in the source document.
There is however, no explanation of how this should be done. I find it odd that this should be necessary in itext7, although it wasn't in itext2.
Is there a simple way to get around his problem?
I've also tried the Sejda desktop app and it produces correct results, but I would prefer to automate the process through a batch script.
My guess is iText 2 didn't even know it might be a problem.
If iText can't deduplicate destination names, the procedure is roughly:
Follow /Catalog -> /Names -> /Dests in each document to find the destination name tree.
Deduplicate the names, by adding suffixes. Remember that a name with a suffix added might be equal to an existing name in the same or another document. Be careful!
Now you can rewrite the destination name trees. Since you have only used suffixes, you can do this in place - the lexicographic ordering of the names is unaltered so the search tree structure is not broken.
Now, rewrite destination links in each PDF for the new names. For example any dictionary entry with key /Dest, or any /D in a /GoTo action.
Now, after all this preprocessing, the files will merge without name clashes.
(I know all this because I've just implemented it for my own PDF software. It's slightly hairy stuff, but not intractable.)
If you like, I can provide a devel version of cpdf with this functionality, if you would like to test it.
I am attempting to remove all references of a managed package that is going to be uninstalled that spans throughout code base in VS Code
I have using a query to find the field permissions but am wondering if there is a way to search for the reference outside of specifying the exact field name compared to the field containing only "agf" since they are all using it.
Below is the search query:
<fieldPermissions>
<editable>false</editable>
<field>User.agf_Certified_Product_Owner__c</field>
<readable>false</readable>
</fieldPermissions>
In the field, I want to be able to find and delete the 5 associated lines from multiple files if they match "agf" in any combination. Something like the below:
<fieldPermissions>
<editable>false</editable>
<field>agf</field>
<readable>false</readable>
</fieldPermissions>
With any combination of agf in the field, delete all from any file it appears in.
Not an answer but too long for a comment
You don't have to? Profiles/perm sets don't block package's delete. Probably neither do reports.
You'd use your time better by searching for all instances of agf__ (that's with double underscore), should find fields, objects... used in classes, flows, page layouts etc. And search for agf. (with dot) should find all instances where your Apex code calls their classes marked as global.
Alternatively Apex / VF pages with dependencies on package will have it listed in their "meta.xml", for example
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ApexClass xmlns="http://soap.sforce.com/2006/04/metadata">
<apiVersion>54.0</apiVersion>
<packageVersions>
<majorNumber>236</majorNumber>
<minorNumber>1</minorNumber>
<namespace>SBQQ</namespace>
</packageVersions>
<status>Active</status>
</ApexClass>
Last but not least - why not just spawn a dev sandbox and attempt the delete there? If it succeeds - great. If not - it'll list the dependencies that blocked the delete. It'll be "the real thing", it'll smite you even if your VSCode project doesn't contain all flows, layouts and thus could lull you into false sense of security. I'd seriously do it in sandbox and then run all tests for good measure, just in case there are some dynamic soql queries that don't count as hard, delete-blocking references.
After delete's done - fetch Profiles / Permsets from this org and the field references will be gone from the xml.
I have an endpoint, you can have información about products
{{URL_API}}/products/
If i perform a GET method over that endpoint i will obtain the information of every product
BUT i can also specify the product that i want to know about, i.e:
{{URL_API}}/products/9345TERFER (the last code is the id of the product, called SKU)
The problem is that if i want to make a CSV in order to update the information of different products i have to define a variable called sku in the endpoint so i will be able to pass the corresponding SKU
I want to create the variable {{sku}} but i do not understand how to do that.. i tried so many times and i failed, i've searched a lot but i do not really understand
Also, should i use ":" before the declaration of the variable? i mean:
{{URL_API}}/products/:{{sku}}
or simply:
{{URL_API}}/ns/products/{{sku}}
Can you help me?
I'm super lost :(
EDIT:
I want to perform a PUT method, i want to pass different values to the body and then.. send the request (it throws an error: 404 not found)
This is what i did:
PUT|{{URL_API}}/products/{{sku}}
body:
{
"tax_percentage":"{{tax_percentage}}",
"store_code":"{{store_code}}",
"markup_top":"{{markup_top}}",
"status":"{{status}}",
"group_prices": [
{
"group":"{{class_a}}",
"price":"{{price_a}}",
"website":"{{website_a}}"
}
]
}
CSV:
POSTMAN:
Your issue seems to be just a basic understanding of how data files work with variables in Postman, here's a simple example that will work the same way for you too.
This is a basic request I'm using to resolve the variable from the data file - It's a GET request but that doesn't matter as all we're look at here is using a data file to resolve variables. All you need to do is ensure the URL is correct and that you SAVE the request before using the runner.
Here's a simple CSV file created in a text editor. The heading sku in the name on the variable it will reference inside the Postman request. Each value under that is the value that will be used for each iteration.
In the Runner, select your Collection from the list (If you have more than one) then select the CSV file. Once imported, you will be able to see a preview of the data.
If that's correct, press the Run button. The Runner will then iterate through the file and pick up the sku value in the CSV file and use it in the request. I've expanded one of the requests so you can see that the value was used in the request.
I'm trying to crawl a site and to do so, I'm using Scrapy. So, when doing requests to nested pages, the procedure usually gets the the information correctly on the first trials, but, on later requests the nodes starts to return None. I'm using xpath's functionality. Below I'm pasting some lines of the parse function:
(I tried this one with the approach of explicitly comparing the class value)
title = response.xpath('//span[#class="inlineFree"]/text()').extract_first()
(With this one I used the contains function)
view = response.xpath('//span[contains(#class,"count")]/text()').extract_first()
(I've also used this one when I found more suitable)
comments = response.css('div.commentMessage > span::text').extract()
Am I doing something wrong on paths?
Is there any reason for the crawler to stop reading the nodes correctly?
Cannot say what the problem is without the log messages or the spider code but..
What happens most of the time is that websites fo not follow a strict html structure .For some properties the 'title' may be inside the span
but for the next iteration it may be
span[#class="inlineFree"]/h1/text() or or any other tag
so you should check the html for those returning None
I have tried my best to search for an existing question with smiliar issue but was not able to find one. Here's my situation
I have a controller named search which accepts a parameter "search term", when this controller is called directly from URL like www.xyz.com/search/red+car it returns results and the URL in browser address bar is www.xyz.com/search/red+car but when the user submits the search from a from in webpage with same term, the results are coming fine but the URL does not reflect the search term.
If I do a redirect the form POST data is lost, although resubmitting the POSt is not a solution in my case either. I need a way to change the URL so that it shows the search term.
Thanks in advance for your help, please be gentle as this is my first question.
#Vlakarados - I am trying to use same controller to provide search results from post data and controller parameter. Both work fine but when using search form on webpage the search parameter is not reflected in URL.
#Rakesh Shetty - The actual method is very long, but here is the compressed format
build query as per post data and passed parameter.
populate view with results
render the view
Thanks everyone for suggesting various solution.
I used jquery to change the form action parameter, now when ever the dropdown selection is changed the value is appended to the action parameter. I also took out the dropdown from being part of post data.
There are 2 dropdowns one for area and other for zip code. This new approach works with bot dropdowns and my exsting code of controller works without any major change.
I used the following javascript code to create new action parameter when ever user changes the area. Same goes for ZIP code.
$("#cityname").change(function(){
var action = $(this).val();
alert(action);
$("#searchform").attr("action", "search/" + action);
});
I think I was not able to clearly explain my situation otherwise you people would have suggested this long ago.
The better way to do it is in your controller:
function search($search_query) {
// .. use your query as you normally would - display products, posts, messages
$data = array('search_query' => $search_query);
$this->load->view('search', $data);
}
// use this method as the form action
function search_proxy() {
$search_query = $this->input->post('search');
// if needed urlencode or other search query manipulation
redirect('controller/search/'.$search_query);
}
This way you will have no problems and will only work with data in your url.
Edit: The second option is yo use JavaScript - when user submit's the form, change the form's action to include the searched query in form action