Related
I have created a codeceptJS project by following the mobile testing setup steps located here: https://codecept.io/mobile/#setting-up
So far, I'm unable to test any apps via simulator; I instead get the following error:
1) login
I should be able to login with the correct username and password:
>> The requested resource could not be found, or a request was received using an HTTP method that is not supported by the mapped resource <<
at Object.getErrorFromResponseBody (node_modules/webdriver/build/utils.js:189:12)
at NodeJSRequest._request (node_modules/webdriver/build/request/index.js:157:31)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:93:5)
I have verified my appium config using appium-doctor, and there are no issues found.
My codecept.conf.js is as follows:
const path = require('path');
const { setHeadlessWhen } = require('#codeceptjs/configure');
// turn on headless mode when running with HEADLESS=true environment variable
// export HEADLESS=true && npx codeceptjs run
setHeadlessWhen(process.env.HEADLESS);
exports.config = {
tests: './*_test.js',
output: './output',
helpers: {
Appium: {
platform: 'Android',
device: 'emulator',
desiredCapabilities: {
avd: 'Pixel_5_API_28',
app: path.resolve('./sample_apps/Android.apk'),
appActivity: 'com.swaglabsmobileapp.MainActivity'
}
},
},
include: {
I: './steps_file.js'
},
bootstrap: null,
mocha: {},
name: 'appium-codecept-android-POC',
plugins: {
pauseOnFail: {},
retryFailedStep: {
enabled: true
},
tryTo: {
enabled: true
},
screenshotOnFail: {
enabled: true
}
}
}
And here's my package.json as created by codeceptjs init:
{
"name": "appium-codecept-android-POC",
"version": "1.0.0",
"description": "",
"main": "index.js",
"scripts": {
"test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
},
"keywords": [],
"author": "",
"license": "ISC",
"dependencies": {
"codeceptjs": "^3.0.7",
"webdriverio": "^7.9.0"
}
}
Finally, my test file is as follows:
Feature('login');
Scenario('I should be able to login with the correct username and password', ({ I }) => {
setTimeout(() => {
I.see('Username');
}, 3000);
I.click('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Username"]');
I.fillField('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Username"]', 'standard_user');
I.click('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Password"]');
I.fillField('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Password"]', 'secret_sauce');
I.click('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-LOGIN"]');
I.waitForElement('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-Cart drop zone"]/android.view.ViewGroup/android.widget.TextView', 3)
I.dontSeeElement('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-Error message"]/android.widget.TextView');
});
Scenario('I should not be able to login with an incorrect username or password', ({ I }) => {
setTimeout(() => {
I.see('Username');
}, 3000);
I.click('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Username"]');
I.fillField('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Username"]', 'bob');
I.click('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Password"]');
I.fillField('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Password"]', 'secret_sauce');
I.click('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-LOGIN"]');
I.waitForElement('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-Cart drop zone"]/android.view.ViewGroup/android.widget.TextView', 3)
I.dontSeeElement('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-Error message"]/android.widget.TextView');
});
Scenario('I should be able to see details', ({ I }) => {
// login
setTimeout(() => {
I.see('Username');
}, 3000);
I.click('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Username"]');
I.fillField('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Username"]', 'standard_user');
I.click('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Password"]');
I.fillField('//android.widget.EditText[#content-desc="test-Password"]', 'secret_sauce');
I.click('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-LOGIN"]');
I.waitForElement('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-Cart drop zone"]/android.view.ViewGroup/android.widget.TextView', 3)
// should be able to click a label to see details
I.click('(//android.widget.TextView[#content-desc="test-Item title"])[2]');
I.seeElement('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-Description"]/android.widget.TextView[2]');
I.click('//android.view.ViewGroup[#content-desc="test-BACK TO PRODUCTS"]');
});
I'm at a loss here, as I haven't done anything except follow the setup instructions. Executing against ios works; it is only the android execution that fails. Appium is installed and running, env vars are set, etc. Any help would be appreciated, as this could be a deal breaker for me in terms of whether or not I can use codeceptjs. I love the project and really want to use it, but I must be able to test both ios and android native apps.
One final note: If anyone wants to try this config, the app I am using for the above test can be found here: https://github.com/saucelabs/sample-app-mobile/releases/download/2.7.1/Android.SauceLabs.Mobile.Sample.app.2.7.1.apk
I created a Gatsby blog using the Netlify one-click button but wish to have my own home landing page using index.html and then then the Gatsby blog be built in the /blog directory of my site (example.com/blog)
I have looked into the config.js and gatsby-config.js files for settings to change the build location plus I have also tried a few different build commands in Netlify such as
Build command : gatsby build
Publish directory: public/articles
Can anyone help build this in a specific folder(directory) whilst leaving my own index.html in the root directory?
Have a look at this starter and have a read of Gatsby tutorial Part 7
gatsby-node.js
const replacePath = path => (path === `/` ? path : path.replace(/\/$/, ``))
const { createFilePath } = require(`gatsby-source-filesystem`)
const path = require("path")
exports.onCreateNode = ({ node, getNode, actions }) => {
const { createNodeField } = actions
if (node.internal.type === `MarkdownRemark`) {
const slug = createFilePath({ node, getNode, basePath: `blog` })
createNodeField({
node,
name: `slug`,
value: replacePath(slug),
})
}
}
exports.createPages = ({ actions, graphql }) => {
const { createPage } = actions
const postTemplate = path.resolve(`src/templates/postTemplate.js`)
return graphql(`
{
allMarkdownRemark(
sort: { order: DESC, fields: [frontmatter___date] }
limit: 1000
) {
edges {
node {
fields {
slug
}
}
}
}
}
`).then(result => {
if (result.errors) {
return Promise.reject(result.errors)
}
result.data.allMarkdownRemark.edges.forEach(({ node }) => {
createPage({
path: replacePath(node.fields.slug),
component: postTemplate
})
})
})
}
Here in onCreateNode, if the node's internal type is MarkdownRemark, a filepath is created with a base path of blog, and that new filepath is added to a new node field called slug.
This new field is now available in any graphQL queries.
So later in createPages, the new slug field is queried and used in the createPage path option.
So pages in your src/blog folder will remain to be served from the root, while posts generated by MarkdownRemark will be served from /blog/
In gatsby-config.js add this
module.exports = {
pathPrefix: `/blog`,
and while you building your app:
gatsby build --prefix-paths
You’ll need to tell Gatsby where you want the file. Netlify just wants to know where your public folder is.
gatsby build --output-dir public/articles
You can either then move your own index.html file into the directory created (public), or have it already there*.
I would also recommend looking at letting Gatsby run your whole site, and create a static file for your homepage, then your build process is much simplier, and you can run it locally.
* Not sure if that is allowed, Gatsby may require an empty or non-exisiting folder to build into.
We have an application and testing this locally shows an invalid SSL certificate warning. Normally I would just add an exception and get on with it. However is there anyway for protractor to ignore this?
I've seen some capabilities in selenium where SSL can be ignored but can't seem to find any in protractor.
This works for me, (in conf file):
capabilities: {
browserName : 'firefox',
marionette : true,
acceptInsecureCerts : true
}
Hope that helps.
capabilities: {
browserName: 'chrome',
chromeOptions: {
// for ci test
args: ['--headless', 'no-sandbox', "--disable-browser-side-navigation",
"--allow-insecure-localhost"
/// for https sites: ignore ssl on https://localhost...
/// further args please see https://peter.sh/experiments/chromium-command-line-switches/
]
}
}
maybe you want to take some screenshots to test where the error occurs
import fs from 'fs';
function writeScreenShot(data, filename) {
const stream = fs.createWriteStream(filename);
stream.write(new Buffer(data, 'base64'));
stream.end();
}
export function takeScreenshot(browser, path){
browser.takeScreenshot().then((png) => {
writeScreenShot(png, path);
});
}
But for the long run, I would suggest migrating to cypress (https://www.cypress.io/), because it have many other features out of the box: video, screenshot, etc. And believe me, it is worth it ;)
try
webdriver-manager update --ignore_ssl
or configure protractor.conf.js for firefox
var makeFirefoxProfile = function(preferenceMap) {
var profile = new FirefoxProfile();
for (var key in preferenceMap) {
profile.setPreference(key, preferenceMap[key]);
}
return q.resolve({
browserName: 'firefox',
marionette: true,
firefox_profile: profile
});
};
exports.config = {
seleniumAddress: 'http://localhost:4444/wd/hub',
framework: 'jasmine2',
getMultiCapabilities: function() {
return q.all([
makeFirefoxProfile(
{
'browser.acceptSslCerts': true
}
)
]);
},
}
I want to use grunt for deployment and therefore want to read in configuration of remote hosts based on the already existing ~/.ssh/config file.
To load that configuration I'm using sshconf but need to include the grunt.initConfig() call in the callback to have the configuration when defining environments.
var sshconf = require('sshconf');
module.exports = function(grunt) {
// Read in ssh configuration
sshconf.read(function(err, sshHosts) {
if (err)
console.log(err);
// SSH config loaded, now init grunt
grunt.initConfig({
sshconfig: {
staging: {
privateKey: grunt.file.read(sshHosts['project_staging'].properties.IdentityFile),
host: sshHosts['project_staging'].properties.HostName,
username: sshHosts['project_staging'].properties.User,
port: sshHosts['project_staging'].properties.Port || 22,
path: "/var/www/project"
},
production: {
// ...
}
},
// Tasks to be executed on remote server
sshexec: {
example_task: {
command: 'uptime && hostname'
}
},
sftp: {
deploy: {
files: {
"./": ["*.json", "*.js", "config/**", "controllers/**", "lib/**", "models/**", "public/**", "views/**"]
},
options: {
//srcBasePath: "test/",
createDirectories: true
}
}
}
// More tasks
// ...
});
grunt.loadNpmTasks('grunt-ssh');
// More plugins ...
});
};
When I call grunt --help it states:
> grunt --help
Grunt: The JavaScript Task Runner (v0.4.1)
…
Available tasks
(no tasks found)
If I do not wrap the grunt initiation in that callback (sshconf.read(function(err, sshHosts) {})) everything is working fine (except for the ssh config not loaded or not yet ready to be used).
Is what I am trying even possible and if so, how? Am I missing something obvious?
Grunt init cannot be used in an async fashion like this. Either read the sshconf synchronously, or use a task, as described in this answer: How can I perform an asynchronous operation before grunt.initConfig()?
I'm using Yeoman, Grunt, and Bower, to construct a platform for building a frontend independently of a a backend. The idea would be that all of my (AngularJS) controller, services, factories, etc live in this project, and get injected afterwards into my serverside codebase based off the result of grunt build.
My question is:
How can I mock endpoints so that the Grunt server responds to the same endpoints as my (Rails) App will?
At the moment I am using:
angular.module('myApp', ['ngResource'])
.run(['$rootScope', function ($rootScope) {
$rootScope.testState = 'test';
}]);
And then in each of my individual services:
mockJSON = {'foo': 'myMockJSON'}
And on every method:
if($rootScope.testState == 'test'){
return mockJSON;
}
else {
real service logic with $q/$http goes here
}
Then after grunt build, testState = 'test' gets removed.
This is clearly a relatively janky architecture. How can I avoid it? How can I have Grunt respond to the same endpoints as my app (some of which have dynamic params) apply some logic (if necessary), and serve out a json file (possibly dependent on path params)?
I've fixed this issue by using express to write a server that responds with static json.
First I created a directory in my project called 'api'. Within that directory I have the following files:
package.json:
{
"name": "mockAPI",
"version": "0.0.0",
"dependencies": {
"express": "~3.3.4"
}
}
Then I run npm install in this directory.
index.js:
module.exports = require('./lib/server');
lib/server.js:
express = require('express');
var app = express();
app.get('/my/endpoint', function(req, res){
res.json({'foo': 'myMockJSON'});
});
module.exports = app
and finally in my global Gruntfile.js:
connect: {
options: {
port: 9000,
hostname: 'localhost',
},
livereload: {
options: {
middleware: function (connect, options) {
return [
lrSnippet,
mountFolder(connect, '.tmp'),
mountFolder(connect, yeomanConfig.app),
require('./api')
];
}
}
},
Then the services make the requests, and the express server serves the correct JSON.
After grunt build, the express server is simply replaced by a rails server.
As of grunt-contrib-connect v.0.7.0 you can also just add your custom middleware to the existing middleware stack without having to manually rebuild the existing middleware stack.
livereload: {
options: {
open: true,
base: [
'.tmp',
'<%= config.app %>'
],
middleware: function(connect, options, middlewares) {
// inject a custom middleware into the array of default middlewares
middlewares.push(function(req, res, next) {
if (req.url !== '/my/endpoint') {
return next();
}
res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'application/json' });
res.end("{'foo': 'myMockJSON'}");
});
return middlewares;
}
}
},
See https://github.com/gruntjs/grunt-contrib-connect#middleware for the official documentation.
Alternatively you can use the grunt-connect-proxy to proxy everything that is missing in your test server to an actual backend.
It's quite easy to install, just one thing to remember when adding proxy to your livereload connect middleware is to add it last, like this:
middleware: function (connect) {
return [
lrSnippet,
mountFolder(connect, '.tmp'),
mountFolder(connect, yeomanConfig.app),
proxySnippet
];
}
grunt-connect-prism is similar to the Ruby project VCR. It provides an easy way for front end developers to record HTTP responses returned by their API (or some other remote source) and replay them later. It's basically an HTTP cache, but for developers working on a Single Page Application (SPA). You can also generate stubs for API calls that don't exist, and populate them the way you want.
It's useful for mocking complex & high latency API calls during development. It's also useful when writing e2e tests for your SPA only, removing the server from the equation. This results in much faster execution of your e2e test suite.
Prism works by adding a custom connect middleware to the connect server provided by the grunt-contrib-connect plugin. While in 'record' mode it will generate a file per response on the filesystem with content like the following:
{
"requestUrl": "/api/ponies",
"contentType": "application/json",
"statusCode": 200,
"data": {
"text": "my little ponies"
}
}
DISCLAIMER: I'm the author of this project.
You can use Apache proxy and connect your REST server with gruntjs.
Apache would do this:
proxy / -> gruntjs
proxy /service -> REST server
you would use your application hitting Apache and angular.js application would think that is talking with itself so no cross domain problem.
Here is a great tutorial on how to set this up:
http://alfrescoblog.com/2014/06/14/angular-js-activiti-webapp-with-activiti-rest/
Just my alternative way that based on Abraham P's answer. It does not need to install express within 'api' folder. I can separate the mock services for certain files. For example, my 'api' folder contains 3 files:
api\
index.js // assign all the "modules" and then simply require that.
user.js // all mocking for user
product.js // all mocking for product
file user.js
var user = function(req, res, next) {
if (req.method === 'POST' && req.url.indexOf('/user') === 0) {
res.end(
JSON.stringify({
'id' : '5463c277-87c4-4f1d-8f95-7d895304de12',
'role' : 'admin'
})
);
}
else {
next();
}
}
module.exports = user;
file product.js
var product = function(req, res, next) {
if (req.method === 'POST' && req.url.indexOf('/product') === 0) {
res.end(
JSON.stringify({
'id' : '5463c277-87c4-4f1d-8f95-7d895304de12',
'name' : 'test',
'category': 'test'
})
);
}
else {
next();
}
}
module.exports = product;
index.js just assigns all the "modules" and we simply require that.
module.exports = {
product: require('./product.js'),
user: require('./user.js')
};
My Gruntfile.js file
connect: {
options: {
port: 9000,
// Change this to '0.0.0.0' to access the server from outside.
hostname: 'localhost',
livereload: 35729
},
livereload: {
options: {
open: true,
middleware: function (connect) {
return [
connect.static('.tmp'),
connect().use(
'/bower_components',
connect.static('./bower_components')
),
connect.static(appConfig.app),
require('./api').user,
require('./api').product,
];
}
}
}