Require assistance in calculating the Total Active Users from March 16 2020 to Feb 16 2020.
I have tried using calculated fields, but not getting the correct results. Please advise.
Thank you,
Nirmal
To find the number of unique values that appear in a field, say [user_code], you can use the COUNT DISTINCT function, COUNTD() as in COUNTD([user_code])
To restrict the data to a particular time range, one way is put your date field on the Filter shelf and choose the settings that include only the data rows you want — say the range from 2/16 to 3/16 as you stated.
Alternatively, you can push the filtering condition into the calculation with an IF function call, as in COUNTD(IF <data is relevant> THEN [user_code] END) Thus effectively combining the two techniques. That works because if there is no ELSE clause and the IF condition is False then the IF statement evaluates to null. Since COUNTD() silently ignores nulls, like other aggregation functions, the expression acts as if the irrelevant data rows were filtered.
So, for example,
COUNTD(IF [dates] >= #2/16/2020# AND [dates] <= #3/16/2020# THEN [user_code] END)
Will tell you then number of unique user codes during the period between 2/16 and 3/16. The DateDiff() function will probably be useful in more elaborate tests.
Finally, what if you want more flexibility? You could easily use Parameters or Filter controls to let the user choose the date range interactively.
If you want this calculation repeated for each possible day, showing the unique users in the preceding 30 day period, as some sort of rolling calculation, then you’ll need to learn about some more advanced features. Either multiple calculations as above for different time ranges, using Table Calculations, or some data prep and/or data padding with Tableau Prep Builder, Python or some other technique — mostly because in that scenario each data row contributes to multiple rolling counts, rather than one count when partitioning the data by some dimension.
Related
I have a table of users and another table of transactions.
The transactions all have a date against them. What I am trying to ascertain for each user is the average time between transactions.
User | Transaction Date
-----+-----------------
A | 2001-01-01
A | 2001-01-10
A | 2001-01-12
Consider the above transactions for user A. I am basically looking for the distance from one transaction to the next chronologically to determine the distances.
There are 9 days between transactions one and two; and there are 2 days between transactions three and four. The average of these is obviously 4.5, so I would want to identify the average time between user A's transactions to be 4.5 days.
Any idea of how to achieve this in Tableau?
I am trying to create a calculated field for each transaction to identify the date of the "next" transaction but I am struggling.
{ FIXED [user id] : MIN(IF [Transaction Date] > **this transaction date** THEN [Transaction Date]) }
I am not sure what to replace this transaction date with or whether this is the right approach at all.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
LODs dont have access to previous values directly, so you need to create a self join in your data connection. Follow below steps to achieve what you want.
Create a self join with your data with following criteria
Create an LOD calculation as below
{FIXED [User],[Transaction Date]:
MIN(DATEDIFF('day',[Transaction Date],[Transaction Date (Data1)]))
}
Build the View
PS: If you want to improve the performance, Custom SQL might be the way.
The only type of calculation that can take order sequence into account (e.g., when the value for a calculated field depends on the value of the immediately preceding row) is a table calc. You can't use an LOD calc for this kind of problem.
You'll need to understand how partitioning and addressing works with table calcs, along with specifying your sort order criteria. See the online help. You can then do something like, for example, define days_since_last_transaction as:
if first() > 0 then min([Transaction Date]) -
lookup(min([Transaction Date]), -1) end
If you have very large data or for other reasons want to do your calculations at the database instead of in Tableau by a table calc, then you use SQL windowing (aka analytical) queries instead via Tableau's custom SQL.
Please attach an example workbook and anything you tried along with the error you have.
This might not be useful if you cannot set User ID Field as a filter.
So, you can set
User ID
as a filter. Then following the steps mentioned in here will lead you to calculating difference between any two dates. Ideally if you select any one value in the filter, the calculated field from the link should give you the difference in the dates that you have in the transaction dates column.
I will try to explain the problem on an abstract level first:
I have X amount of data as input, which is always going to have a field DATE. Before, the dates that came as input (after some process) where put in a table as output. Now, I am asked to put both the input dates and any date between the minimun date received and one year from that moment. If there was originally no input for some day between this two dates, all fields must come with 0, or equivalent.
Example. I have two inputs. One with '18/03/2017' and other with '18/03/2018'. I now need to create output data for all the missing dates between '18/03/2017' and '18/04/2017'. So, output '19/03/2017' with every field to 0, and the same for the 20th and 21st and so on.
I know to do this programmatically, but on powercenter I do not. I've been told to do the following (which I have done, but I would like to know of a better method):
Get the minimun date, day0. Then, with an aggregator, create 365 fields, each has that "day0"+1, day0+2, and so on, to create an artificial year.
After that we do several transformations like sorting the dates, union between them, to get the data ready for a joiner. The idea of the joiner is to do an Full Outer Join between the original data, and the data that is going to have all fields to 0 and that we got from the previous aggregator.
Then a router picks with one of its groups the data that had actual dates (and fields without nulls) and other group where all fields are null, and then said fields are given a 0 to finally be written to a table.
I am wondering how can this be achieved by, for starters, removing the need to add 365 days to a date. If I were to do this same process for 10 years intead of one, the task gets ridicolous really quick.
I was wondering about an XOR type of operation, or some other function that would cut the number of steps that need to be done for what I (maybe wrongly) feel is a simple task. Currently I now need 5 steps just to know which dates are missing between two dates, a minimun and one year from that point.
I have tried to be as clear as posible but if I failed at any point please let me know!
Im not sure what the aggregator is supposed to do?
The same with the 'full outer' join? A normal join on a constant port is fine :) c
Can you calculate the needed number of 'dublicates' before the 'joiner'? In that case a lookup configured to return 'all rows' and a less-than-or-equal predicate can help make the mapping much more readable.
In any case You will need a helper table (or file) with a sequence of numbers between 1 and the number of potential dublicates (or more)
I use our time-dimension in the warehouse, which have one row per day from 1753-01-01 and 200000 next days, and a primary integer column with values from 1 and up ...
You've identified you know how to do this programmatically and to be fair this problem is more suited to that sort of solution... but that doesn't exclude powercenter by any means, just feed the 2 dates into a java transformation, apply some code to produce all dates between them and for a record to be output for each. Java transformation is ideal for record generation
You've identified you know how to do this programmatically and to be fair this problem is more suited to that sort of solution... but that doesn't exclude powercenter by any means, just feed the 2 dates into a java transformation, apply some code to produce all dates between them and for a record to be output for each. Java transformation is ideal for record generation
Ok... so you could override your source qualifier to achieve this in the selection query itself (am giving Oracle based example as its what I'm used to and I'm assuming your data in is from a table). I looked up the connect syntax here
SQL to generate a list of numbers from 1 to 100
SELECT (MIN(tablea.DATEFIELD) + levquery.n - 1) AS Port1 FROM tablea, (SELECT LEVEL n FROM DUAL CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 365) as levquery
(Check if the query works for you - haven't access to pc to test it at the minute)
Tough problem I am working on here.
I have a table of CustomerIDs and CallDates. I want to measure whether there is a 'repeat call' within a certain period of time (up to 30 days).
I plan on creating a parameter called RepeatTime which is a range from 0 - 30 days, so the user can slide a scale to see the number/percentage of total repeats.
In Excel, I have this working. I sort CustomerID in order and then sort CallDate from earliest to latest. I then have formulas like:
=IF(AND(CurrentCustomerID = FutureCustomerID, FutureCallDate - CurrentCallDate <= RepeatTime), 1,0)
CurrentCustomerID = the current row, and the FutureCustomerID = the following row (so it is saying if the customer ID is the same).
FutureCallDate = the following row and the CurrentCallDate = the current row. It is subtracting the future call time from the first call time to measure the time in between.
The goal is to be able to see, dynamically, how many customers called in for a specific reason within maybe 4 hours or 1 day or 5 days, etc. All of the way up until 30 days (this is our actual metric but it is good to see the calls which are repeats within a shorter time frame so we can investigate).
I had a similar problem, see here for detailed version Array calculation in Tableau, maxif routine
In your case, that is basically the same thing as mine, so you could apply that solution, but I find it easier to understand the one I'm about to give, I would do:
1) Create a calculated field called RepeatTime:
DATEDIFF('day',MAX(CallDates),LOOKUP(MAX(CallDates),-1))
This will calculated how many days have passed since the last call to the current. You can add a IFNULL not to get Null values for the first entry.
2) Drag CustomersID, CallDates and RepeatTime to the worksheet (can be on the marks tab, don't need to be on rows or column).
3) Configure the table calculation of RepeatTIme, Compute using Advanced..., partitioning CustomersID, Adressing CallDates
Also Sort by Field CallDates, Maximum, Ascending.
This will guarantee the table calculation works properly
4) Now you have a base that you can use for what you need. You can either export it to csv or mdb and connect to it.
The best approach, actually, is to have this RepeatTime field calculated outside Tableau, on your database, so it's already there when you connect to it. But this is a way to use Tableau to do the calculation for you.
Unfortunately there's no direct way to do this directly with your database.
A record in a table contains a range of valid dates, say:
*tbl1.start_date* and *tbl1.end_date*. So to ensure I get all records that are valid for a specific date range, the selection logic is: <...> WHERE end_date >= #dtFrom AND start_date < #dtTo (the #dtTo parameter used in the SQL statement is actually the calculated next day of the *#prmDt_To* parameter used in the report).
Now in a report I need to count the number of records for each day within the specified data range and include the days, if any, for which there were no valid records. Thus a retrieved record may be counted in several different days. I can do it relatively easily with a recursive CTE within the data set, but my rule of thumb is to avoid the unnecessary load on the SQL database and instead return just the necessary raw data and let the Report engine handle groupings. So is there a means to do this within SSRS?
Thank you,
Sergey
You might be able to do something in SSRS with custom code, but I recommend against it. The place to do this is in the dataset. SSRS is not designed to fill in groups that don't exist in the dataset. That sounds like what you are trying to do: SSRS would need to create the groups for each date whether or not that date is in the dataset.
If you don't have a number or date table in your database, I would just create a recursive CTE with a record for every date in the range that you are interested as you mention. Then outer join this to your table and use COUNT(tbl1.start_date) to find the appropriate days. This shouldn't be too painful a query for SQL server.
If you really need to avoid the CTE, then I would create a date or number table to use to generate the dates in your range.
I have used iReport to create a simple JasperReport which I run on a JasperServer. It queries some fields from a number of MySQL tables based on their creation timestamp. I am providing the start and end timestamps of the period to cover in the report as parameters of type java.sql.Timestamp. This works fine.
I was asked to introduce the ability to show a break-down on weeks or days of the report data. I would like to get some ideas on where to start with this. At this point I don't think I can accommodate this 'break-down' in the report query, since this feature seems beyond what SQL is designed to do. I know this sounds like an OLAP drill through, but I would like to avoid OLAP if possible (steep learning curve, tight deadlines).
My first thought was to create a subreport for each week or day . But this would leave me with an arbitrary number of subreports (depending on the overall time period covered by the report, which varies at each execution), and as far as I can tell iReport does not support this.
Here is one way to break the report down.
Create another parameter, groupby, which holds the a value that designates the grouping requirement. The values can be numeric, string or whatever else as long as it corresponds to day, week, month, etc.. grouping available.
Create a report group, breakdown, which will provide the breakdown. The group expression will depend on the groupby parameter. The expression is the date on the record except any detail finer than groupby value will be trimmed.
Create a variable, total, that will sum the data in the records. The variable should be reset on breakdown group and can be printed in the breakdown trailer band.
Make sure the sql queries sortby the date so that the groupby expression works.
Let me know if you have questions.