We have an unbounded PCollection PCollection<TableRow> source that we are inserting to BigQuery.
An easy "by the book" way to fire windows every 500 thousand messages or five minutes would be:
source.apply("GlobalWindow", Window.<TableRow>into(new GlobalWindows())
.triggering(Repeatedly.forever(AfterFirst.of(
AfterPane.elementCountAtLeast(500000),
AfterProcessingTime.pastFirstElementInPane().plusDelayOf(Duration.standardMinutes(5))))
).withAllowedLateness(Duration.standardMinutes(1440)).discardingFiredPanes())
You would think that applying the following to the fired window/pane would allow you to write contents of the fired pane to BigQuery:
.apply("BatchWriteToBigQuery", BigQueryIO.writeTableRows()
.to(destination)
.withMethod(BigQueryIO.Write.Method.FILE_LOADS)
.withNumFileShards(NUM_FILE_SHARDS)
.withCreateDisposition(BigQueryIO.Write.CreateDisposition.CREATE_IF_NEEDED)
.withWriteDisposition(BigQueryIO.Write.WriteDisposition.WRITE_APPEND));
But this would yield a compile error An exception occured while executing the Java class. When writing an unbounded PCollection via FILE_LOADS, triggering frequency must be specified
Relatively easy fix would be to add .withTriggeringFrequency(Duration.standardMinutes(5)) to the above, which would essentially render the idea of inserting either every five minutes or every N messages completely void, and you might as well get rid of the windowing in that case anyway.
Is there a way to actually accomplish this?
FILE_LOADS requires triggering frequency.
If you want more realtime results then you can use STREAMING_INSERTS
Reference https://beam.apache.org/releases/javadoc/2.19.0/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/bigquery/BigQueryIO.Write.Method.html#FILE_LOADS
Related
I'm working with code that uses a tumbling window of one day, and would like to send early results to a different DataStream on an hourly basis.
I understand that triggers are a way to go here, but don't really see how it would work.
The current code is as follows:
myStream
.keyBy(..)
.window(TumblingEventTimeWindows.of(Time.days(1)))
.aggregate(new MyAggregateFunction(), new MyProcessWindowFunction())
In my understanding, I should register a trigger, and then on its onEventTime method get a hold of a TriggerContext and I can send data to the labeled output from there. But how do I get the current state of MyAggregateFunction from there? Or would I need to my own computation here inside of onEventTime()?
Also, the documentation states that "By specifying a trigger using trigger() you are overwriting the default trigger of a WindowAssigner.". Would my one day window then still fire correctly, or do I need to trigger it somehow differently?
Another way of doing this is creating two different operators - one that windows by 1 hour, and another that windows by 1 day. Would triggers be a preferred approach to that?
Rather than using a custom Trigger, it would be simpler to have two layers of windowing, where the hourly results are further aggregated into daily results. Something like this:
hourlyResults = myStream
.keyBy(...)
.window(TumblingEventTimeWindows.of(Time.hours(1)))
.aggregate(new MyAggregateFunction(), new MyProcessWindowFunction())
dailyResults = hourlyResults
.keyBy(...)
.window(TumblingEventTimeWindows.of(Time.days(1)))
.aggregate(new MyAggregateFunction(), new MyProcessWindowFunction())
hourlyResults.addSink(...)
dailyResults.addSink(...)
Note that the result of a window is not a KeyedStream, so you will need to use keyBy again, unless you can arrange to leverage reinterpretAsKeyedStream (docs).
Normally when I get to more complex behavior like this, I use a KeyedProcessFunction. You can aggregate (and save in state) hourly and daily results, set timers as needed, and use a side output for the hourly results versus the regular output for the daily results.
There are quite a few questions here. I will try to ask all of them. First of all, if You specify Your own trigger using trigger() this means You are going to effectively override the default trigger and thus the window may not work the way it would by default. So, if You for example if You create the 1 day event time tumbling window, but override a trigger so that it fires for every 20th element, it will never fire based on event time.
Now, after Your custom trigger fires, the output from MyAggregateFunction will be passed to MyProcessWindowFunction, so It will work the same as for the default trigger, you don't need to access the MyAggregateFunction from inside the trigger.
Finally, while it may be technically possible to implement trigger to trigger partial results every hour, my personal opinion is that You should probably go with the two separate windows. While this solution may create a slightly larger overhead and may result in a larger state, it should be much clearer, easier to implement, and finally much more error resistant.
While sending events to the runtime if some condition applies I want to ignore all past events and start fresh (with the same runtime, pattern, listeners, etc.), and that could happen many times so i need a relatively fast way of doing that. Is there a function that deletes from the runtime all the events that were already sent (I couldn't find such function in the documentation)? (I know I could create a new runtime but that is very time consuming)
Yes the contexts; You define the start condition and end condition. When the end condition is reached the runtime throws away all state, doc link.
I'm trying to do a simple Sliding Window aggregation based on a Kafka source.
The events on Kafka all contain a timestamp element and are in ascending order. I've tried using different Periodic Watermarkers (ascending, bounded and a custom one to more easily debug what was going on internally). I can tell that the extractTimestamp method is always being called, but the getCurrentWatermark method is never called.
I've set the autoWatermarkInterval to even 1ms and even then, the watermark for each subtask is never updated. I've verified this by using the Flink UI and looking at the metric available.
I've read quite a few similar questions around this topic on SO and most were about the window never emitting due to several reasons. I haven't been able to identify a reason why it would never advance the watermark.
I've also confirmed that no data is being side outputted as late data.
The stream in it's most basic form:
val rfq = kafkaDataStream
.assignAscendingTimestamps(_.timestamp.toEpochMilli)
.keyBy("id")
val lateTag = new OutputTag[RFQ]("late") {}
val predictions: DataStream[RFQPrediction] = rfq
.window(SlidingEventTimeWindows.of(5,3))
.sideOutputLateData(lateTag)
.aggregate(new PricePredictionsAggregate)
.name("windowed-predictions")
I've verified that it works fine with an AssignerWithPunctuatedWatermarks.
What could be the cause of the getCurrentWatermark method to never get called, even though the interval is set to 1ms?
The test data that I'm feeding through uses a limited list of ids for which events are continually being generated with an ever-increasing timestamp.
Thanks a lot!
I have a Dataflow pipeline reading from unbounded source. My window size is 10 hours, I am trying to test my trigger using a TestStream. My trigger will emit early result if element count reaches at least 2 for the same key within a Window. I have following trigger to achieve this:
input.apply(Window.into(FixedWindows.of(Duration.standardHours(12))) .triggering(AfterWatermark.pastEndOfWindow()
.withEarlyFirings(AfterPane.elementCountAtLeast(2)))
.apply(Count.perElement())
We also tried:
Repeatedly.forever(AfterPane.elementCountAtLeast(2)).orFinally(AfterWatermark.pastEndOfWindow())
I expect early firing when asserting the result, however I don't get all the result in
PAssert.that(pipeline).inWindow(..)..
What am I doing wrong? Also running same test repeatedly yields different result meaning different values are returned from the trigger.
Triggering is non-deterministic. It will give you an early firing some time after the trigger condition is satisfied. It will then give you another early firing some time after the trigger condition is satisfied again.
The actual choice to emit after the trigger is determined by the runner. If you are using a batch runner, it may wait until all the data is available. How much input are you expecting for each key/window? Which runner are you using?
In our production org, we have a system of uploading sales data into Salesforce using command line data loader. This data is loaded into a temporary object Temp. We have created a formula field (which combines three fields) to form a unique key. The purpose of the object is to reduce user efforts for creating the key manually.
There is an after insert trigger on Temp which calls an asynchronous method which upserts the data to another object SalesData using the key. The insert/update trigger on SalesData checks the various fields and creates/updates the records in another object SalesRecords. After the insertion/updation is complete, all the records in temp object Temp are deleted. The SalesRecords object does not have any trigger on it and is a child of another object Sales. The Sales object has some rollup fields which are summing up fields from SalesRecords object.
Lately, we are getting the below error for some of the records which are updated.
UNABLE_TO_LOCK_ROW, unable to obtain exclusive access to this record
Please provide some pointers to resolve the issue
this could either be caused by conflicting DML operations in the various trigger execution or some recursive trigger execution. i would assume that the async executions cause multiple subsequent updates on the same records, probably on the SalesRecords object. I would recommend to try to simplify the process to avoid too many related trigger executions.
I'm a little surprised you were able to get this to work in the first place. After triggers should be used with caution and only when before triggers can't be. One reason for this is that you don't need to perform additional DML to make changes to records, since in before triggers you simply change the values and the insert/update commit happens automatically. But recursive trigger firings is the main problem with after triggers.
One quick way to avoid trigger re-entry is to use a public static Boolean in a class that states whether you're already in this trigger from the same thread of execution.
Something like:
public static Boolean isExecuting = false;
Once set to true, any trigger code that is a re-fire can be avoided with:
if(Class.isExecuting == false)
{
Class.isExecuting = true;
// Perform trigger logic
// ...
}
Additionally, since the order of trigger execution cannot be determined up front, you might be seeing an issue with deletions or other data changes that depend on other parts of your flow to finish first.
Also, without knowing the details of your custom unique 3-part key, I'd wonder if there's a problem there too such as whether it's truly unique or not. Case insensitivity is a common mistake and it's the reason there are 15 AND 18 character Ids in Salesforce. For example, when people export to Excel (a case-insensitive environment) and do VLOOKUPs, they would occasionally find the wrong record. The 3-digit calculated suffix was added to disambiguate for case-insensitive environments.
Googling for this same error lead me to this post:
http://boards.developerforce.com/t5/General-Development/Unable-to-obtain-exclusive-access-to-this-record/td-p/345319
Which points out some common causes for this to happen:
Sharing Rules are being calculated.
A picklist value has been replaced and replacement is in progress.
A custom index creation/removal is in progress.
Most unlikely one - someone else is already editing the same record that you are trying to access at the same time.
Posting here in case somebody else needs it.
I got this error multiple times today. Turned out one of our vendors was updating their installed package during that time in the same org. All kinds of things were going wrong also - some object validation exceptions were being thrown on DMLs, without any error message content.
Resolution
The error is shown when a field update such as a roll-up summary field is being attempted on a parent object that already had a field update to cause the roll-up summary field to calculate. This could also occur if a trigger or another apex job running on the master object and it also attempting to do an update.
You can either reduce the batch size and try again or create separate smaller files to be imported if this issue occurs.