I am new to NoSQL and I'm trying to figure out a good way to represent my data. I have a series of workers that need to request vacations via mobile app.
When I try to write a Firebase query with Flutter, I can do this:
Firestore.instance
.collection("ferie_permessi")
.document("worker1#test.com")
.snapshot();
It works but there are two main errors:
If I try to create another collection called "Woker info" I cannot use worker1#test.com as document ID as it already esists;
I have to sort data client side because firestore doesn't give me the possibility (with this setup I've made).
I'm quite sure that this structure isn't good at all. Each worker needs to have 2 lists: vacations and other. What is wrong?
My guess is that I should move worker1#test.com together with vacations and other so that I can make a query of this kind:
Firestore.instance
.collection("ferie_permessi")
.where("user", "==", "worker1#test.com)
.snapshot();
But now the id? Is an automatic one good?
I had a chance to recently explore creating an app using a firebase-firestore. A couple of things will help here:
Yes, the autogenerated id is good since it is unique, for example, you can have a collections vacation_requests, users you can then use that user_id as a document in vaccation_requests -> user_id -> vacations, instead of using email as a document key.
Or
You can do it like this collections users, vacation_requests, and requests.
store user details in users.
store requests in requests with from and to dates.
store reference of User and Request in vaccation_requests.
Hope this helps!
Related
I'm currently working on an application where users can create groups and invite others in it.
I would like people in the same group to be able to see their first and last names.
To do that, I have a collection named Users where each of the users have a document contains all their personnal data, like first and last names, phone, position , ...
I have also another collection named Groups, where all of my groups are stored, with their name, and an array contaning the ID of the members.
When an user open the app, a first request is done for request his groups (he recieve the groups names and the arrays of members). After, if he want to know the user in a certain group, another request is done for search only the first and last name of all the members.
So, I imagine that there is a query that will return me only the fields that I would like to retrieve, and that there is a rule allowing a potential hacker to be refused access to the entire user document except if the user is the owner of the document.
// For retrieving my user's groups
Stream<List<Group>?> get organizations {
return firestore
.collection('Groups')
.where('members', arrayContains: this.uid)
.snapshots()
.map(_groupsFromSnapshot);
}
// For retrieving names of the members of a group
Stream<List<Member>?> getMembers(Group group){
return firestore
.collection('Users')
// and i dont know what to do here ...
}
With the Client SDKs and the Flutter plugin it is not possible to get only a subset of the fields of a Document. When you fetch a Document you get it with all its fields.
If you want to get only a subset of the fields of a document, you can implements the two following approaches:
Denormalize your data: You create another collection which contains documents that only contain the fields you want to expose. You need to synchronize the two collections (the Users collection, which is the "master", and the new collection): for that it's quite common to use a Cloud Function. Note also that it's a good idea to use the same documentID for the linked documents in the two collections.
Use the Firestore REST API to fetch the data: With the REST API you can use a DocumentMask when you fetch one document with the get method or a Projection when you query a Collection. The DocumentMask or the Projection will "restrict a get operation on a document to a subset of its fields". You can use the http package for calling the API from your Flutter app.
HOWEVER, the second approach is not valid if you want to protect the other users data: a malicious user could call the Firestore REST API with the same request but without a DocumentMask or a Projection. In other words, this approach is interesting if you just want to minimize the network traffic, not if you want to keep secret certain fields of a document.
So, for your specific use case, you need to go for the first solution.
i am building a small web app with MERN, i have a collection that holds "name, email, password, avatar url, and date" and i am going to add to the users some info like a "bio, hobbies(array), "visited countries(array), and another array"
question is, should i create a diffrent model for the users info, and add owner field that refers to the other model?. or should i put all of them there,
also i might add the following and followers option in the future.
The user's info should be in the user collection, I could see there is no reason to have a separate collection for it. If you want to reduce the responses from listing users, you could use populate to remove unnecessary fields.
Regards to the following and followers, I think there are 2 approaches:
Adding a new field which used to store id and necessary metadata (name, avatar) of users to the existing collection
Create a new collection which is a combination of users and users they are following, or are followed. You then could use Virtual to get this information from the User collection.
Personally, I prefer the first approach although it requires more effort to maintain the list to be accurate. E.g remove an item out of the list when your follower stops following you.
I have 2 collections. One of them is named "USERS", and the other one "MATCHES". USERS, can join in the MATCHES, appearing the avatar of the user who has joined in the match. The problem is that when the user changes their avatar image after joining in the match, the match avatar doesn't changed, because the match has the old avatar.
The avatar is saved as Base64 in Firestore, but I will change it to "Storage" in the near future.
I have been trying to set the reference, but that only gives me the path.
If I have to do a Database Api Call for each match which is joined the user, maybe I have to do 20 Api calls updating the matches. It can be a solution, but not the best.
Maybe the solution is in the Google Functions?
I'm out of ideas.
Maybe the solution is in the Google Functions?
Cloud Functions also access Firestore through an SDK, so they can't magically do things that the SDK doesn't allow.
If you're duplicating data and you update one of the duplicates, you'll have to consider updating the others. If they all need to be updated, that indeed requires a separate call for each duplicate.
If you don't want to have to do this, don't store duplicate data.
For more on the strategies for updating duplicated data, see How to write denormalized data in Firebase
I've only worked with mySQL in the past and I'm really unsure on how to design the tables in mongodb.
I'm basically trying to write the backend for a little chat application.
Is there something like a best practice for the structure for a case like this? How would you advice me to do it?
At the moment I'm thinking about something like this:
users
{
id,
name,
status,
lastActivity,
chartRoomIds
}
chatRooms
{
id,
name
}
messages
{
id,
timeSent,
content,
userId,
chatRoomId
}
But that would mean you'd have to go through all the messages to find only the ones for a specific chat room. So maybe it would be better to store the messages directly in the chat room object?
I'd really like to see how the experienced ones of you would structure this example.
I think, that you simply have to read the MongoDB documentation.
Here are described basic mongoDB data modelling patterns: http://docs.mongodb.org/manual/data-modeling/
you for an chat app, where you need some real time capabilities you could try/prototype something with meteor. Meteor uses mongo by default and gives you some really good tutorials about Mongo with meteor and so on.
To answer your question:
you'd have to go through all the messages
Right, but if you use proper indexing it will also be no problem.
If you store the messages in the chatRooms, you would need to aggregate the massages from it and so on..
Your structure is ok, you can create an index with
db.messages.ensureIndex('roomId', 1)
The index is stored in the memory, so the it will filter the messages by roomId in no-time. Try http://robomongo.org/ which let you query your db like PHPMyAdmin or Sequel Pro for MySQL.
I'm not much of a backend guy and even worse when it comes to MongoDB, however, I've been taken with Meteor.js so I'm giving it a try as I play around.
I'm creating a project management/ticketing app and would like your opinion on the data model design. In my app you create a ticket, assign other team members to the ticket and allow people to access it and manipulate the data like a todo list, attachments, comments, etc. Pretty basic.
From my research, it appears that a normalized data model with references makes sense. In that case, is a good model:
A collection for all my users.
A collection for tickets (each ticket/project its own document) with a field for team members in which I insert them into an array using a reference. Then I'd have fields for comments, todos, etc.
Or would this be best:
A collection for all my users.
A unique collection for each ticket with a field for team members kept in an array.
Sorry if this seems rather basic. I'm taking the MongoDB University classes for Node, so I hope I don't have to rely on too many basic questions for too long.
Thanks everyone!
You should store each ticket/project in its own document in a single collection (the first option).
If you give each ticket its own collection you have no effective way to index and query tickets.