During the Bi-weekly sessions I did come across a mentioned fact that "ViewModels can also be used to update data into the database".
To update "changed" data into the database, I usually send the updated data back to the server as a JSON and after deserializing and looping the data, I manually update every attribute of a class to update the data.
To give a basic idea about our project setup, we have built our own "hybrid" ViewModel designer by which we generate the .spans XML by ourselves. Therefore we've never used the ViewModel designer that resides in the Modlr.
We use the below code to load the ViewModel at runtime basis of the current active page
var vmname = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(file);
var path = "<Some File Path Here>";
var xd = XDocument.Load(path + "\\" + file);
var vmc = new ViewModelRTCreator(xd);
ViewModelDefinitionsInApplication.InjectViewModelWithName(vmname, vmc, this.EcoSpace.GetType());
var vm = ViewModelHelper.CreateFromViewModel(<Spans Name>, this.EcoSpace, <Some Root Object>);
Our server has been set up to provide RESTful services to all applications requesting data and therefore, there's a disconnect between data that's being sent as JSON and the ViewModel itself (we aren't using MDriven Turnkey).
Could you point me in the right direction or refer some wiki article that we may have so that I can achieve the same.
Start by reviewing this wiki page: https://wiki.mdriven.net/index.php/Rest_Services_In_MDriven
The second part is about exposing viewmodels as rest interfaces.
That article also points to this video: https://youtu.be/rv31ziYXWME
Related
We have an ASP.NET Core 5 Rest API where we have used a pretty simple route:
[Route("api/[controller]")]
The backend is multi-tenant, but tenant-selection has been handled by user credentials.
Now we wish to add the tenant to the path:
[Route("api/{tenant}/{subtenant}/[controller]")]
This makes cross-tenant queries simpler for tools like Excel / PowerQuery, which unfortunately tend to store credentials per url
The problem is to redirect all existing calls to the old route, to the new. We can assume that the missing pieces are available in the credentials (user-id is on form 'tenant/subtenant/username')
I had hope to simply intercept the route-parsing and fill in the tenant/subtenant route values, but have had not luck so far.
The closes thing so far is to have two Route-attributes, but that unfortunately messes up our Swagger documentation; every method will appear with and without the tenant path
If you want to transparently change the incoming path on a request, you can add a middleware to set Path to a new value, for example:
app.Use(async (context,next) =>
{
var newPath = // Logic to determine new path
// Rewrite and continue processing
context.Request.Path = newPath;
await next();
});
This should be placed in the pipeline after you can determine the tenant and before the routing happens.
I am currently migrating an old Zend 1.1 website and need a replacement for the uses of Zend_Session_Namespace.
Does one exist for Yii2? Or alternatively is there a plugin or something to add this functionality?
-Edit:
Specifically the ability to set expiry timeouts and hop limits like Zend has.
Thank you.
UPDATE
The info you have added in the edit was never mentioned earlier and makes your question too broad you might create a separate question for that.
By default session data are stored in files. The implementation is locking a file from opening a session to the point it's closed either by session_write_close() (in Yii it could be done as Yii::$app->session->close()) or at the end of request. While session file is locked all other requests which are trying to use the same session are blocked i.e. waiting for the initial request to release the session file. this can work for dev or small projects. But when it comes to handling massive concurrent requests, it is better to use more sophisticated storage, such as a database.
Zend_Session_Namespace instances provide the primary API for manipulating session data in the Zend Framework. Namespaces are used to segregate all session data, if you are converting the script to Yii2 framework you might need to look into https://www.yiiframework.com/doc/api/2.0/yii-web-session
A simple example to compare both of the functionalities by example are
Zend Framework 1.1 Counting Page Views
$defaultNamespace = new Zend_Session_Namespace('Default');
if (isset($defaultNamespace->numberOfPageRequests)) {
// this will increment for each page load.
$defaultNamespace->numberOfPageRequests++;
} else {
$defaultNamespace->numberOfPageRequests = 1; // first time
}
echo "Page requests this session: ",
$defaultNamespace->numberOfPageRequests;
Yii2 Framework Counting Page Views
public function actionIndex()
{
$session = new \yii\web\Session();
$session->open();
$visits = $session->get('visits', 0);
$visits = $visits+1;
$session->set('visits', $visits);
return "Total visits $visits";
}
Our API's entry point has a rel named "x:reports" (where x is a prefix defined in the HAL representation, by way of a curie - but that's not important right now).
There are several types of reports. Following "x:report" provides a set of these affordances, each with a rel of its own - one rel is named "x:proofofplay". There is a set of lookup values associated with this type of report (and only this type of report). The representation returned by following "x:proofofplay" has a rel to this set of values "x:artwork".
This results in the following hierarchy
reports
proofofplay
artwork
While the "x:artwork" resource is fairly small, it does take some time to fetch it (10 sec). So the client has opted to async load it at app launch.
In order to get the "x:artwork"'s href the client has to follow the links. I'm not sure whether this is a problem. It seems potentially unRESTful, as the client is depending on out-of-band knowledge of the path to this resource. If ever path to artwork changes (highly unlikely) the client will break (though the hrefs themselves can change with impunity).
To see why I'm concerned, the launch function looks like this:
launch: function () {
var me = this;
Rest.getLinksFromEntryPoint(function(links) {
Rest.getLinksFromHref(links["x:reports"].href, function(reportLinks){
Rest.getLinksFromHref(reportLinks["x:proofofplay"].href, function(popLinks){
me.loadArtworks(popLinks["x:artwork"].href);
});
});
});
}
This hard-coding of the path simultaneously makes me think "that's fine - it's based on a published resource model" and "I bet Roy Fielding will be mad at me".
Is this fine, or is there a better way for a client to safely navigate such a hierarchy?
The HAL answer to this is to embed the resources.
Depending a bit on your server-side technology, this should be good enough in your case because you need all the data to be there before the start of the application, and since you worry about doing this sequentially, you might parallelize this on the server.
Your HAL client should ideally treat things in _links and things in _embedded as the same type of thing, with the exception that in the second case, you are also per-populating the HTTP cache for the resources.
Our js-based client does something like this:
var client = new Client(bookMarkUrl);
var resource = await client
.follow('x:reports')
.follow('x:proofofplay')
.follow('x:artwork')
.get();
If any of these intermediate links are specified in _links, we'll follow the links and do GET requests on demand, but if any appeared in _embedded, the request is skipped and the local cache is used. This has the benefit that in the future we can add new things from _links to _embedded, and speeding up clients who don't have to be aware of this change. It's all seamless.
In the future we intend to switch from HAL's _embedded to use HTTP2 Push instead.
I have been trying to set up a sample AngularJS app with webMethods Integration Server on the backend. Using $resource, I can easily pull normal JSON files and manipulate the data within the file. However, the goal is that I want to create services in webMethods Designer and call them from AngularJS using $resource to display the data in my app. The problem is that from AngularJS I cannot extract the data I need from the service that I'm creating in Designer. In Designer I can use (in WMPublic) documentToJSONString, and output something like:
jsonString {"id":"1", "name":"Dan", "quantity":"3"}
But I cannot extract the data because this is not a pure JSON string. Does anyone know how to (1) extract the JSON string output data using AnularJS or (2) output a JSON document from Designer? I am calling a REST service; something to the effect of
http://localhost:2222/rest/Get/getOrderData
from my services.js file in AngularJS.
Here is my services.js file:
/* Services */
var orderServices = angular.module('orderServices', ['ngResource']);
orderServices.factory('Order', ['$resource',
function($resource){
return $resource('http://localhost:2222/rest/REST/getOrderData', {}, {
query: {method:'GET', isArray:true}
});
}]);
Then, in my app, I want to use an ng-repeat to call things like {{order.id}}, {{order.name}} etc. Is anyone good with webMethods and Angular or done this before?
To force the response that you want, I would have used the service
pub.flow:setResponse mapping the jsonString to it's string parameter and probably hardcoded (eww!) the contentType parameter to 'application/json'
You may also need to use the service pub.flow:setResponseCode to set the response code.
They would be the last services in getOrderData
I would have invoked it using the below (where namespace is the folder structure in designer)
http://localhost:2222/invoke/namespace:getOrderData
The above applies to Integration Server V8 and it looks like you're using V9 since some of the services that you mention didn't exist in V8. This would also apply to a normal flow service, not a specific REST one (assuming they exist in V9).
I have an ASP.NET MVC 2 application which in part allows a user to filter data and view that data in a JQGrid.
Currently this consists of a controller which initialises my filter model and configures how I wish my grid to be displayed. This information is used by a view and a partial view to display the filter and the grid shell. I use an editor template to display my filter. The JQGrid makes use of a JsonResult controller action (GET) to retrieve the results of the filter (with the addition of the paging offered by the grid - only a single page of data is returned by the GET request. The Uri used by the grid to request data contains the filter model as a RouteValue - and currently contains a string representation of the current state of the filter. A custom IModelBinder is used to convert this representation back into an instance of the filter model class.
The user can change the filter and press a submit button to get different results - this is then picked up by an (HttpPost) ViewResult action which takes the filter model - reconstituted by a further model binder and causes the grid shell to be updated.
So I have:
FilterModel
Represents the user's desired filtering characteristics
FilterModelEditorTemplateSubmissionBinder : DefaultModelBinder - used to convert the request information supplied from a user changing their filtering characteristics into the appropriate FilterModel instance.
FilterModelStringRepresentationBinder : IModelBinder - used to convert the encoded filter from the JQGrid GET request for data so the correct request is made of the service which is ultimately performing the query and returning the relevant data.
ViewResult Index() - constructs a default filter, configures the grid specification and returns the view to render the filter's editor template, and the grid shell.
[HttpPost]ViewResult Filter(FilterModel filter) - takes the new filter characteristics and returns the same view as Index(). Uses FilterModelEditorTemplateSubmissionBinder to bind the filter model.
JsonResult GetData(FilterModel filter, string sidx, string sord, int page, int rows) - called from the JQGrid in order to retrieve the data. Uses FilterModelStringRepresentationBinder to bind the filter model.
As a complication, my filter model contains a option to select a single value from a collection of items. This collection is retrieved from a service request and I don't want to keep querying for this data everytime I show the filter, currently I get it if the property is null, and then include the options hidden in the editor template and encoding in the string representation. These options are then reconstituted by the relevant model binder.
Although this approach works I can't help but feel that I am having to basically reinvent viewstate in order to maintain my filter and the included options. As I am new to ASP.NET MVC but am very happy with classic ASP and ASP.NET Web Forms I thought I'd throw this out there for comment and guidance as to find a way which more closely fits with the MVC pattern.
It seems to me that the best way in to divide some actions which provide pure data for the jqGrid from other controller action. Such jqGrid-oriented actions can have prototype like:
JsonResult GetData(string filter, string sidx, string sord, int page, int rows)
I personally prefer to implement this part as WCF service and to have this WCF service as a part of the same ASP.NET site. In general it's much more the matter of taste and depends on your other project requirements.
This part of you ASP.NET site could implement users authentication which you need and can be tested with unit tests exactly like other actions of your controllers.
The views of the ASP.NET MVC site can have empty data for jqGrids, and have only correct URLs and probably generate the HTML code depends on the users permission in the site. Every page will fill the data of jqGrids with respect of the corresponds requests to the server (request to the corresponding GetData action).
You can use HTTP GET for the data for the best data caching. The caching of data is the subject of a separate discussion. If you do this, you should use prmNames: { nd:null } in the definition of jqGrid to remove unique nd parameter with the timestamp added per default to every GET request. To have full control of the data caching on the server side you can for example add in HTTP headers of the server responses both "Cache-Control" set to "max-age=0" and "ETag" header with the value calculated based of the data returned in the response. You should test whether the request from the client has "If-None-Match" HTTP header with the value of "ETag" coresponds the data cached on the client. Then you should verify whether the current data on the server (in the database) are changed and, if there are not changed, generate a response with an empty body (set SuppressEntityBody to true) and return "304 Not Modified" status code (HttpStatusCode.NotModified) instead of default "200 OK". A more detail explanation is much more longer.
If you don't want optimize you site for caching of HTTP GET data for jqGrids you can either use HTTP POST or don't use prmNames: { nd:null } parameter.
The code inside of JsonResult GetData(string filter, string sidx, string sord, int page, int rows) is not very short of cause. You should deserialise JSON data from the filter string and then construct the request to the data model depends on the method of the data access which you use (LINQ to SQL, Entity Model or SqlCommand with SqlDataReader). Because you have this part already implemented it has no sense to discuss this part.
Probably the main part of my suggestion is the usage of clear separation of controller actions which provide the data for all your jqGrids and the usage of MVC views with empty data (having only <table id="list"></table><div id="pager"></div>). You should also has no doubt with having a relative long code for analyzing of filters which come from the Advance Searching feature of the jqGrid and generating or the corresponding requests to your data model. Just implement it one time. In my implementation the code in also relatively complex, but it is already written one time, it works and it can be used for all new jqGrids.
I made this once, very simple.
pseudo code:
Controller
[HttpGet]
public ActionResult getList(int? id){
return PartialView("Index", new ListViewModel(id??0))
}
ViewModel
public class ListViewModel{
//ObjectAmountPerPage is the amount of object you want per page, you can modify this as //parameter so the user
//can choose the amount
public int ObjectAmountPerPage = 20 //you can make this into a variable of any sort, db/configfile/parameter
public List<YourObjectName> ObjectList;
public int CurrentPage;
public ListViewModel(id){
Currentpage = id;
using (MyDataContext db = new MyDataContext()){
ObjectList = db.YourObjectName.OrderBy(object=>object.somefield).getListFromStartIndexToEndIndex(id*ObjectAmountPerPage ,(id*ObjectAmountPerPage) +20).toList();
}
}
}
Now Create A RenderPartial:
PartialView
<#page inherit="IEnumerable<ListViewMode>">
<%foreach(YourObjectName object in Model.ObjectList){%>
Create a table with your fields
<%}%>
And create a view that implements your Jquery, other components+your partialView
View
<javascript>
$(function(){
$("#nextpage").click(function(){
(/controller/getlist/$("#nextpage").val(),function(data){$("#yourlist").html = data});
});
});
</javascript>
<div id="yourlist">
<%=Html.RenderPartial("YourPartialView", new ListViewModel())%>
</div>
<something id="nextpage" value"<%=Model.CurentPage+1%>">next page</something>
I hope this helps, this is according to the MVC- mv-mv-c principle ;)
Model-View -(modelview) - control