I have an old Umbraco website (v4.0.1) that works on Windows Server 2012, IIS 8.5, .net2.0 classic. I now want to deploy the site onto a shared windows server running .net4.7 / .net3.5 in classic or integrated modes. I have tried the configurations in Plesk but I am getting several errors eg 500, object not set to the instance of an object etc. The hosting company are not willing to install .net2.0 is there a way of getting the sites to work on the hosting without .net2.0? Any help is appreciated.
Related
How to manually install umbraco on webhosting?
I purchased asp.net web hosting through arvixe, which provide umbraco installation (one time free, and charge for any additional upgrades like installing extensions).
They provide a one click installer through web gallery, which states that umbraco 4.9
However, I am just as confused to HOW and WHERE to start installing umbraco to web host.
I successfully installed on my local pc thru' web matrix, but what about here (web hosting), there is just web gallery. What should I do? Am I missing anything? Please help.
Just use FTP to copy your local installation to your webserver, modify the web.config to point to the new database and your website should be up and running.
i've successfully created CMS in Umbraco 4.11 and hosted it on web hosting server. Web hosting (arvixe) panel has Web app gallery which had Umbraco 4.9. So i needed to request to install 4.11 version.
Now after they installed it, im again stucked as there is no way of installing uComponents to Umbraco. i installed uComponenets on my local server using webMatrix but on Web hosting panel it is totally different story.
Has any one experience the same problem while making Umbraco App live on web hosting server?
if YES then please help me out with the steps.
You need to login and go to the developer area where you will find a Packages section through which you can install ucomponents.
I'm trying to deploy an mvc 4 project in vs2012 via FTP on 1and1.com
This is what I'm getting.
HTTP Error 403.14 - Forbidden
The Web server is configured to not list the contents of this directory.
Are there settings on 1and1 I need to set somewhere because it's an MVC proj or changes in webconfig?
#dright, Are you still encountering the problem? It appears 1and1.com has updated their hosting package to support 4/4.5 Framework with their Basic Windows hosting plans (https://www.1and1.com/windows-hosting?linkId=hd.subnav.windowshosting). I purchased a plan as a sandbox for deploying little apps that I develop.
I have successfully deployed a Asp.Net application using the WebMatrix IDE. But I have struggled using VS2013 template/default applications' Web.Config. I was curious if you have had any luck.
Thanks!
1and1 windows package doesn't support MVC. You would need to update to their server package. ~59/month
I've seen SO MANY articles that explain how to do this with IIS6, and some that offer SOME guides for IIS 7 but they are ask you to do so much setup and I've tried them all and ALWAYS get errors.
Is there a guide out there that some of you have used that just...works?
All I need is something step by step to setup my local MVC2 app using my local IIS7 server so I can test locally without using VS2010's dev server all the time (gets so annoying).
Assuming you have IIS installed locally you could go to the properties of the project and:
You may also find the following blog post useful.
I have a problem where, on some developer machines, everything resolves correctly and the start page is as expected (/Home/Index), but on other developer machines, it will just render a directory listing of the website root. When creating a virtual directory, it works, but we would prefer to use the development server initially if possible.
It's worth mentioning the OS we are working with is XP.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Are you talking about running your website through IIS or through Visual Studio's built in web server (Cassini)?
It sounds like you are using IIS and it is not configured for running MVC properly but without further information it's hard to say.
I would compare the IIS configuration between a working machine and one that doesn't