I'm writing a function that wraps a cmdlet using ValueFromRemainingArguments (as discussed here).
The following simple code demonstrates the problem:
works
function Test-WrapperArgs {
Set-Location #args
}
Test-WrapperArgs -Path C:\
does not work
function Test-WrapperUnbound {
Param(
[Parameter(ValueFromRemainingArguments)] $UnboundArgs
)
Set-Location #UnboundArgs
}
Test-WrapperUnbound -Path C:\
Set-Location: F:\cygwin\home\thorsten\.config\powershell\test.ps1:69
Line |
69 | Set-Location #UnboundArgs
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| A positional parameter cannot be found that accepts argument 'C:\'.
I tried getting to the issue with GetType and EchoArgs from the PowerShell Community Extensions to no avail. At the moment I'm almost considering a bug (maybe related to this ticket??).
The best solution for an advanced function (one that uses a [CmdletBinding()] attribute and/or a [Parameter()] attribute) is to scaffold a proxy (wrapper) function via the PowerShell SDK, as shown in this answer.
This involves essentially duplicating the target command's parameter declarations (albeit in an automatic, but static fashion).
If you do not want to use this approach, your only option is to perform your own parsing of the $UnboundArgs array (technically, it is an instance of [System.Collections.Generic.List[object]]), which is cumbersome, however, and not foolproof:
function Test-WrapperUnbound {
Param(
[Parameter(ValueFromRemainingArguments)] $UnboundArgs
)
# (Incompletely) emulate PowerShell's own argument parsing by
# building a hashtable of parameter-argument pairs to pass through
# to Set-Location via splatting.
$htPassThruArgs = #{}; $key = $null
switch -regex ($UnboundArgs) {
'^-(.+)' { if ($key) { $htPassThruArgs[$key] = $true } $key = $Matches[1] }
default { $htPassThruArgs[$key] = $_; $key = $null }
}
if ($key) { $htPassThruArgs[$key] = $true } # trailing switch param.
# Pass the resulting hashtable via splatting.
Set-Location #htPassThruArgs
}
Note:
This isn't foolproof in that your function won't be able to distinguish between an actual parameter name (e.g., -Path) and a string literal that happens to look like a parameter name (e.g., '-Path')
Also, unlike with the scaffolding-based proxy-function approach mentioned at the top, you won't get tab-completion for any pass-through parameters and the pass-through parameters won't be listed with -? / Get-Help / Get-Command -Syntax.
If you don't mind having neither tab-completion nor syntax help and/or your wrapper function must support pass-through to multiple or not-known-in-advance target commands, using a simple (non-advanced) function with #args (as in your working example; see also below) is the simplest option, assuming your function doesn't itself need to support common parameters (which requires an advanced function).
Using a simple function also implies that common parameters are passed through to the wrapped command only (whereas an advanced function would interpret them as meant for itself, though their effect usually propagates to calls inside the function; with a common parameter such as -OutVariable, however, the distinction matters).
As for what you tried:
While PowerShell does support splatting via arrays (or array-like collections such as [System.Collections.Generic.List[object]]) in principle, this only works as intended if all elements are to be passed as positional arguments and/or if the target command is an external program (about whose parameter structure PowerShell knows nothing, and always passes arguments as a list/array of tokens).
In order to pass arguments with named parameters to other PowerShell commands, you must use hashtable-based splatting, where each entry's key identifies the target parameter and the value the parameter value (argument).
Even though the automatic $args variable is technically also an array ([object[]]), PowerShell has built-in magic that allows splatting with #args to also work with named parameters - this does not work with any custom array or collection.
Note that the automatic $args variable, which collects all arguments for which no parameter was declared - is only available in simple (non-advanced) functions and scripts; advanced functions and scripts - those that use the [CmdletBinding()] attribute and/or [Parameter()] attributes - require that all potential parameters be declared.
Related
issue
the called powershell script will accept parameters but not all of them:
Current Set-Up and code:
I have a common folder where two .ps1 scripts are located:
DoWork.ps1
Workmanager.ps1
Workmanager.ps1 calls the Dowork.ps1:
$targetPath="M:\target"
echo "target path: $targetPath"
start powershell {.\DoWork.ps1 -target $targetPath -tempdrive D:\}
output (as expected):
target path: M:\target
DoWork.ps1 contains some start code:
param
(
[string]$tempdrive,
[string]$target,
[int] $threads = 8,
[int] $queuelength = -1
)
echo "variables:"
echo "temp drive: $tempdrive"
echo "target path: $target"
Unexpectedly, the $target is not beeing assigned. Previously I had the variable named $targetpath, which did not work either.
variables:
temp drive: D:\
target path:
Findings
It appears that the issue relies in Workmanager.ps1. Spcifying the parameter as fixed string rather than as variable will load the parameter. Any solution for this?
start powershell {.\DoWork.ps1 -target "foo" -tempdrive D:\}
When you use a ScriptBlock as an argument to powershell.exe, variables aren't going to be evaluated until after the new session starts. $targetPath has not been set in the child PowerShell process called by Workmanager.ps1 and so it has no value. This is actually an expected behavior of a ScriptBlock in general and behaves this way in other contexts too.
The solution is mentioned in the help text for powershell -?:
[-Command { - | <script-block> [-args <arg-array>] <========== THIS GUY
| <string> [<CommandParameters>] } ]
You must provide the -args parameter which will be passed to the ScriptBlock on execution (separate multiple arguments with a ,). Passed arguments are passed positionally, and must be referenced as though you were processing the arguments to a function manually using the $args array. For example:
$name = 'Bender'
& powershell { Write-Output "Hello, $($args[0])" } -args $name
However, especially with more complicated ScriptBlock bodies, having to remember which index of $args[i] contains the value you want at a given time is a pain in the butt. Luckily, we can use a little trick with defining parameters within the ScriptBlock to help:
$name = 'Bender'
& powershell { param($name) Write-Output "Hello, $name" } -args $name
This will print Hello, Bender as expected.
Some additional pointers:
The ScriptBlock can be multiline as though you were defining a function. way. The examples above are single line due to their simplicity.
A ScriptBlock is just an unnamed function, which is why defining parameters and referencing arguments within one works the same way.
To exemplify this behavior outside of powershell.exe -Command, Invoke-Command requires you to pass variables to its ScriptBlock in a similar fashion. Note however that answer uses an already-defined function body as the ScriptBlock (which is totally valid to do)
You don't need to use Start-Process here (start is its alias), at least as demonstrated in your example. You can simply use the call operator & unless you need to do something more complex than "run the program and wait for it to finish". See this answer of mine for more information.
If you opt to pass a string to powershell.exe instead, you don't need to provide arguments and your variables will get rendered in the current PowerShell process. However, so will any other unescaped variables that might be intended to set within the child process, so be careful with this approach. Personally, I prefer using ScriptBlock regardless, and just deal with the extra parameter definition and arguments.
Using the call & operator is optional when you are not executing a path rendered as a string. It can be omitted in the examples above, but is more useful like so:
& "C:\The\Program Path\Contains\spaces.exe"
& $programPathAsAVariable
Questions
How can you access the parameters sent to PowerShell script (.ps1 file)?
Can you access parameters A: by name, B: by position, C: a mix of either?
Context
I recently tried to write a PowerShell script (.ps1) that would be called from a Windows batch file (.bat) (or potentially cmd shell, or AutoHotKey script) - which would pass parameters into the .ps1 script for it to use (to display a toast notification). Thanks to the instructions on ss64.com, I have used $args to do this kind of thing in the past, however for some reason I could access the parameters this way (despite passing parameters, $args[0] = '' (empty string) and $args.Count = 0) so eventually had to remove all the $args code, and replace it with Param() script instead.
I'm still not quite sure why, but thought this is something I should get to the bottom of before I try to write my next script...
Code Example 1: Args (un-named parameters)
ToastNotificationArgs.ps1
-------------------------
Write-Debug "The script has been passed $($args.Count) parameters"
If (!$args[0]) { # Handle first parameter missing }
If (!$args[1]) { # Handle second parameter missing }
Import-Module -Name BurntToast
New-BurntToastNotification -Text "$args[0], $args[1]"
^ I thought the above code was correct, but like I say, I kept struggling to access the parameters for some reason and could not figure out why. (If anyone can spot what I was doing wrong, please shout!)
Is $args[] a valid approach? I assume so given it's use of ss64.com, but maybe there are some pitfalls / limitations I need to be aware of?
Code Example 2: Param (named parameters)
ToastNotificationParams.ps1
---------------------------
Param(
[Parameter(Mandatory=$false, Position=0, ValueFromPipeline=$true)] [string]$Title,
[Parameter(Mandatory=$false, Position=1, ValueFromPipeline=$true)] [string]$Message
)
Import-Module -Name BurntToast
New-BurntToastNotification -Text "$Title, $Message"
^ This was the only way to get my script working in the end. However when I passed the parameters in, my calling cmd script sent the parameters by position i.e. (pwsh.exe -File "ToastNotificationParams.ps1" "This is the title" "Message goes here") rather than by named pairs. (Not sure if this is best practice, but is how my script was initially intended to be used to left it for now).
While Param() got my script working this time (and I also realise the inherent dangers of position-based parameters), there are times when a position-based approach might be necessary (e.g. the number of parameter is unknown)...
Code Example 3: Hybrid
ToastNotificationMix.ps1
------------------------
Param(
[Parameter(Mandatory=$false, Position=0, ValueFromPipeline=$true)] [string]$Title
)
Import-Module -Name BurntToast
For ( $i = 1; $i -lt $args.count; $i++ ) {
New-BurntToastNotification -Text "$Title, $args[i]"
}
Is something like this valid?.. If not (or there is a better solution), any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
The automatic $args variable is only available in simple (non-advanced) functions / scripts. A script automatically becomes an advanced one by using the [CmdletBinding()] attribute and/or at least one per-parameter [Parameter()] attribute.
Using $args allows a function/script to accept an open-ended number of positional arguments, usually instead of, but also in addition to using explicitly declared parameters.
But it doesn't allow passing named arguments (arguments prefixed by a predeclared target parameter name, e.g., -Title)
For robustness, using an advanced (cmdlet-like) function or script is preferable; such functions / scripts:
They require declaring parameters explicitly.
They accept no arguments other than ones that bind to declared parameters.
However, you can define a single catch-all parameter that collects all positional arguments that don't bind to any of the other predeclared parameters, using [Parameter(ValueFromRemainingArguments)].
Explicitly defined parameters are positional by default, in the order in which they are declared inside the param(...) block.
You can turn off this default with [CmdletBinding(PositionalBinding=$false)],
which then allows you to selectively enable positional binding, using the Position property of the individual [Parameter()] attributes.
When you call a PowerShell script via the PowerShell's CLI's -File parameter, the invocation syntax is fundamentally the same as when calling script from inside PowerShell; that is, you can pass named arguments and/or - if supported - positional arguments.
Constraints:
The arguments are treated as literals.
Passing array arguments (,-separated elements) is not supported.
If you do need your arguments to be interpreted as they would be from inside PowerShell, use the -Command / -c CLI parameter instead
See this answer for guidance on when to use -File vs. `-Command.
To put it all together:
ToastNotificationMix.ps1:
[CmdletBinding(PositionalBinding=$false)]
Param(
[Parameter(Position=0)]
[string]$Title
,
[Parameter(Mandatory, ValueFromRemainingArguments)]
[string[]] $Rest
)
Import-Module -Name BurntToast
foreach ($restArg in $Rest) {
New-BurntToastNotification -Text "$Title, $restArg"
}
You can then call your script from cmd.exe as follows, for instance (I'm using pwsh.exe, the PowerShell (Core) CLI; for Windows PowerShell, use powershell.exe):
Positional binding only:
:: "foo" binds to $Title, "bar" to $Rest
pwsh -File ./ToastNotificationMix.ps1 foo bar
Mix of named and positional binding:
:: "bar" and "baz" both bind to $Rest
pwsh -File ./ToastNotificationMix.ps1 -Title foo bar baz
I was wondering if there's any simple way to make aliases for powershell like cmd.
For example: In cmd, doskey art=php artisan $* where $* is optional. Currently, I'm using the following alias in powershell.
function runArtisanCommand
{
param(
[Parameter(Mandatory=$false, Position = 0, ValueFromRemainingArguments = $true)]
$command
)
php artisan $command
}
Set-Alias art runArtisanCommand
This works somewhat but don't take flags. For example: I can't write art -h or art route:list -c. In art -h command, it prints the output of php artisan and don't read flag at all but in art route:list -c command, it errors out with.
runArtisanCommand : Missing an argument for parameter 'command'. Specify a parameter of type 'System.Object' and try again.
At line:1 char:16
+ art route:list -c
+ ~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidArgument: (:) [runArtisanCommand], ParameterBindingException
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : MissingArgument,runArtisanCommand
I would love a simpler solution than this. Thanks in advance.
The simplest and most convenient way to pass unknown arguments through is by spatting
the automatic $args array - as #args - in a simple function or script (one that neither uses a [CmdletBinding()] nor [Parameter()] attributes):
# Note: #args rather than $args makes the function work with named
# arguments for PowerShell commands too - see explanation below.
function runArtisanCommand { php artisan #args }
# As in your question: Define alias 'art' for the function
# Note: Of course, you could directly name your *function* 'art'.
# If you do want the function to have a longer name, consider one
# that adheres to PowerShell's Verb-Noun naming convention, such as
# 'Invoke-ArtisanCommand'.
Set-Alias art runArtisanCommand
As an aside: Since the target executable, php, is neither quoted nor specified based on a variable or expression, it can be invoked as-is; otherwise, you would need &, the call operator - see this answer for background information.
As for what you tried:
The problem was that use of -c as a pass-through argument only works if you precede it with --:
# OK, thanks to '--'
art -- route:list -c
-- tells PowerShell to treat all remaining arguments as unnamed (positional) arguments, instead of trying to interpret tokens such as -c as parameter names.
Without --, -c is interpreted as referring to your -command parameter (the parameter you declared as $command with ValueFromRemainingArguments = $true), given that PowerShell allows you to specify name prefixes in lieu of full parameter names, as long as the given prefix is unambiguous.
Because a parameter of any type other than [switch] requires an associated argument, -c (aka -command) failed with an error message to that effect.
You could have avoided the collision by naming your parameter so that it doesn't collide with any pass-through parameters, such as by naming it -_args (with parameter variable $_args):
function runArtisanCommand
{
param(
# Note: `Mandatory = $false` and `Position = 0` are *implied*.
[Parameter(ValueFromRemainingArguments)]
$_args
)
php artisan #_args
}
However, given that use of a [Parameter()] attribute implicitly makes your function an advanced function, it invariably also accepts common parameters, such as -ErrorAction, -OutVariable, -Verbose... - all of which can be passed by unambiguous prefix / short alias too; e.g., -outv for -OutVariable, or alias -ea for ErrorAction; collisions with them cannot be avoided.
Therefore, intended pass-through arguments such as -e still wouldn't work:
# FAILS, because -e ambiguously matches common parameters -ErrorAction
# and -ErrorVariable.
PS> art router:list -e
Parameter cannot be processed because the parameter name 'e' is ambiguous.
Possible matches include: -ErrorAction -ErrorVariable.
Again, -- is needed:
# OK, thanks to '--'
art -- router:list -e
Summary:
Especially for functions wrapping calls to external programs, such as php.exe, using a simple function with #args, as shown at the top, is not only simpler, but also more robust.
For functions wrapping PowerShell commands (with explicitly declared parameters):
a simple function with #args works too,
but if you also want support for tab-completion and showing a syntax diagram with the supported parameters, by passing -?, or via Get-Help, consider defining an (invariably advanced) proxy (wrapper) function via the PowerShell SDK - see below.
Optional background information: Pass-through arguments in PowerShell
As Mathias R. Jessen points out, the simplest way to pass (undeclared) arguments passed to a function or script through to another command is to use the automatic $args variable, which is an automatically populated array of all the arguments passed to a simple function or script (one that isn't advanced, through use of the [CmdletBinding()] and/or [Parameter()] attributes).
As for why #args (splatting) rather than $args should be used:
Using $args as-is in your wrapper function only works for passing positional arguments through (those not prefixed by the parameter name; e.g., *.txt), as opposed to named arguments (e.g., -Path *.txt).
If the ultimate target command is an external program (such as php.exe in this case), this isn't a problem, because PowerShell of necessity then treats all arguments as positional arguments (it cannot know the target program's syntax).
However, if a PowerShell command (with formally declared parameters) is ultimately called, only splatting the $args array - which syntactically means us of #args instead - supports passing named arguments through.[1]
Therefore, as a matter of habit, I suggest always using #args in simple wrapper functions, which equally works with external programs.[2]
To give an example with a simple wrapper function for Get-ChildItem:
# Simple wrapper function for Get-ChildItem that lists recursively
# and by relative path only.
function dirTree {
# Use #args to make sure that named arguments are properly passed through.
Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Name #args
}
# Invoke it with a *named* argument passed through to Get-ChildItem
# If $args rather than #args were used inside the function, this call would fail.
dirTree -Filter *.txt
Using a proxy function for more sophisticated pass-through processing:
The use of #args is convenient, but comes at the expense of not supporting the following:
tab-completion, given that tab-completion only works with formally declared parameters (typically with a param(...) block).
showing a syntax diagram with the supported parameters, by passing -?, or via Get-Help
To overcome these limitations, the parameter declarations of the ultimate target command must be duplicated in the (then advanced) wrapper function; while that is cumbersome, PowerShell can automate the process by scaffolding a so-called proxy (wrapper) function via the PowerShell SDK - see this answer.
Note:
With respect to common parameters such as -ErrorAction, it is the proxy function itself that (automatically) processes them, but that shouldn't make a difference to the caller.
Scaffolding a proxy function only works with PowerShell commands, given that PowerShell has no knowledge of the syntax of external programs.
However, you can manually duplicate the parameter declarations of the external target program.
[1] Note that the automatic $args array has built-in magic to support this; passing named arguments through with splatting is not supported with a custom array and requires use of a hash table instead, as discussed in the help topic about splatting linked to above.
[2] In fact, only #args also supports the correct interpretation of --%, the stop-parsing symbol.
I'm struggling to understand the outputs of the below function
function testApp
{
param(
[string] $appName,
[switch] $sw = $false,
[string[]] $test,
[string[]] $test2
)
Write-Host $appName - $sw - $test - $test2
}
testApp -appName "TestApp" -sw $true -test "one", "two" -test2 "three","four"
Output: TestApp - True - one two - three four
testApp -appName "TestApp" -sw $true -test "one", "two"
Output: TestApp - True - one two - True
The first output is as expected. But I cannot understand why the second output has "True" for the test2 array when I did not pass it. Can anyone help me in understanding the reason for the behavior? Thanks.
To summarize and complement the helpful comments on the question by Lee_Dailey, Matthew and mclayton:
[switch] parameters in PowerShell (aka flags in other shells):
switch parameters are meant to imply $true vs. $false by their presence in an invocation: e.g., passing -sw by itself signals $true, whereas omitting -sw signals $false.
It is possible to pass a Boolean value explicitly, for the purpose of passing a programmatically determined value; e.g.: -sw:$var
Note the required : following the switch name, which tells PowerShell that the Boolean value belongs to the switch parameter; without it, PowerShell thinks the value is a positional argument meant for a different parameter (see below).
Caveat: Commands may interpret -sw:$false differently from omitting -sw; a prominent example is is the use of common parameter -Confirm:$false to override the effective $ConfirmPreference value.
If you need to make this distinction in your own code, use $PSBoundParameters.ContainsKey('sw') -and -not $sw to detect the -sw:$false case.
Do not assign a default value to a switch parameter variable: while technically possible, the convention is that switches default to $false (which is a [switch] instance's default value anyway); that is, a [switch] parameter should always have opt-in logic.
A [switch] parameter variable effectively behaves like a Boolean value in most contexts:
That is, you can say if ($sw) { ... }, for instance.
If you need to access the wrapped Boolean value explicitly, access the .IsPresent property (note that the property name is somewhat confusing, because in a -sw:$false invocation the switch is still present, but its value, as reflected in .IsPresent, is $false).
An example of where .IsPresent is needed is the use of a Boolean as an implicit array index, notably to emulate a ternary conditional[1]: ('falseValue', 'trueValue')[$sw.IsPresent]; without the .IsPresent, the effective Boolean value wouldn't be recognized as such and wouldn't automatically be mapped to index 0 (from $false) or 1 (from $true).
Ultimately, your problem was that you thought $true was an argument for -sw, whereas it became a positional argument implicitly bound to the -test2 parameter.
[switch] parameters never need a value, so the next argument becomes a separate, positional argument - unless you explicitly indicate that the argument belongs to the switch by following the switch name with :, as shown above.[2]
Positional vs. named argument passing in PowerShell:
Terminology note: For conceptual clarity the term argument is used to refer to a value passed to a declared parameter. This avoids the ambiguity of using parameter situationally to either refer to the language construct that receives a value vs. a given value.
Named argument passing (binding) refers to explicitly placing the target parameter name before the argument (typically separated by a space, but alternatively also and / or by :); e.g., -AppName foo.
The order in which named arguments are passed never matters.
Positional (unnamed) argument passing refers to passing an argument without preceding it by the name of its target parameter; e.g., foo.
The passing is positional in the sense that the relative position (order) among other unnamed arguments determines what target parameter is implied.
[switch] parameters are the exception in that they:
are typically passed by name only (-sw), implying value $true, and if a value is passed, require : to separate the name from the value.
never support positional binding.
You may combine named passing with positional passing, in which case the named arguments are bound first, after which the positional ones are then considered (in order) for binding to the not-yet-bound parameters.
PowerShell functions are simple functions by default. In order to exercise control over positional binding, use of the [CmdletBinding()] and / or [Parameter()] attributes is necessary (see below), which invariably turn a simple function into an advanced function.
Making a simple function an advanced one has larger behavioral implications (mostly beneficial ones), which are detailed in this answer.
By default, PowerShell functions accept positional arguments for any parameter (other than those of type [switch]), in the order in which the parameters were declared.
Additionally, simple functions accept arbitrary additional arguments for which no parameters were declared, which are collected in the automatic $args array variable.
To prevent your function from accepting any positional arguments by default, place a [CmdletBinding(PositionalBinding=$false, ...)] attribute above the param(...) block.
Since this makes your function an advanced one, this also disables passing arbitrary additional arguments ($args no longer applies and isn't populated).
As an aside: when you implement a cmdlet (a command implemented as a binary, typically via C#), this behavior is implied.
To selectively support positional arguments, decorate individual parameter declarations with a [Parameter(Position=<n>, ...)] attribute (e.g, [Parameter(Position=0)] [string] $Path)
Note: Whether you start your numbering with 0 or 1 doesn't matter, as long as the numbers used reflect the desired ordering among all positional parameters; 0 is advisable as a self-documenting convention, because it is unambiguous.
Attribute [Parameter(Position=<n>)] is an explicit opt-in that selectively overrides [CmdletBinding(PositionalBinding=$false)]: that is, the latter disables positional binding unless explicitly indicated by individual parameter declarations; in fact, the latter is implied by the former, in that once you use one [Parameter(Position=<n>)] attribute, you must use it on all other parameters you want to bind positionally as well.
[1] Note that PowerShell [Core] 7.0+ supports ternary conditionals natively: $sw ? 'trueValue' : 'falseValue'
[2] In effect, [switch] parameters are the only type for which PowerShell supports an optional argument. See this answer for more information.
I’m trying to write a wrapper function in PowerShell that basically evaluates the first parameter and based on that runs a program on the computer. All the remaining parameters to the wrapper function should then be passed to the program that is ran as well.
So it should look something like this:
function test ( [string] $option )
{
if ( $option -eq 'A' )
{
Write-Host $args
}
elseif ( $option -eq 'B' )
{
. 'C:\Program Files\some\program.exe' $args
}
}
Now just adding $args does not work, so what do I have to do to make it work? Another option would probably be using Invoke-Expression, but it feels a bit like eval so I want to avoid if possible, and in addition I think doing it like that would limit me to string-only parameters right? If possible I would want to have the full support for the wrapped program/cmdlet - basically like a dynamic alias. Is that even possible?
This sort of does what you ask. You may run into trouble if you need to pass dash-prefixed options to the executable that conflict or cause ambiguity with the PowerShell common parameters. But this may get you started.
function Invoke-MyProgram
{
[CmdletBinding()]
Param
(
[parameter(mandatory=$true, position=0)][string]$Option,
[parameter(mandatory=$false, position=1, ValueFromRemainingArguments=$true)]$Remaining
)
if ($Option -eq 'A')
{
Write-Host $Remaining
}
elseif ($Option -eq 'B')
{
& 'C:\Program Files\some\program.exe' #Remaining # NOTE: # not $ (splatting)
}
}
What you have written does work. Note that what is there is $args is the unnamed arguments that are over and above the parameters expected by the function.
So if you call test as
test -option "A" 1 2 3
$args will have 1,2,3
Note that if you call test as
test -option "A" -other "B" 1 2 3
$args will have -other,B,1,2,3
Your solution works as-is for external programs (such as your C:\Program Files\some\program.exe example): you can always pass an array of values (which is what $args is) to an external program, and its elements will be passed as individual arguments (stringified, if necessary).
You can make your solution work with any command if you change $args to #args[1], to take advantage of a PowerShell parameter-passing technique called splatting:
function test ( [string] $option )
{
if ( $option -eq 'A' )
{
Write-Host $args
}
elseif ( $option -eq 'B' )
{
# Use #args to also support passing *named* arguments
# through to *PowerShell* commands.
& $someCommand #args
}
}
Caveats:
The automatic $args variable, which collects all arguments for which no parameter was declared, is only available in simple (non-advanced) functions and scripts; advanced functions and scripts - those that use the [CmdletBinding()] attribute and/or [Parameter()] attributes - require that all potential parameters be declared.
PowerShell has built-in magic that makes the automatic array variable $args also support passing named parameters through via splatting, which no custom array or collection supports.
By contrast, custom arrays and collections only support splatting positional (unnamed) arguments, which, however, covers all calls to external programs.
When calling PowerShell commands, this limitation is problematic, however: For instance, if you wanted to pass the named argument -Path C:\ through to the Set-Location cmdlet via splatting, using a custom collection parameter declared via ValueFromRemaining Arguments, as shown in OldFart's answer (Set-Location #Remaining), would not work; to support passing through named arguments (other than via #args, if available), you must use hashtable-based splatting.
Therefore, if your function is an advanced one and you need to support passing named arguments through to other PowerShell commands, a different approach is required: this answer shows two alternatives.
[1] With external programs, there is a corner case where #args behaves differently from $args, namely if the $args array contains --%, the stop-parsing symbol: #args recognizes it, $args treats it as a literal.