how to daily rolling balance in post gresql using txn table - postgresql

The three tables being used here are
1) customer - cust_id , email
2) account - cust_id, account_id, account_balance
3) Txn - txn_id, account_id, timestamp, credit/debit, amount
i need to calculate the account balance of xyz#abc.com for the past 10 days on a daily basis
eg:
Date | balance
10/6 | 100
09/6 | 100
08/6 | 250
07/6 | 200
.
.
01/6 | 200
txn table would look like this for the above example
account id | txn id | time_stamp | type | amount
1 | 4 | 08/6 | credit | 50
1 | 5 | 09/6 | debit | 150
i wrote the following code by creating another table containing daily_total txns as daily_txn, still only second row is getting generated
with cte as (
select dates, daily_balance, daily_total, row_number() over (order by dates desc) as seqnum
from Daily_txn
)
select t.dates, t.daily_total, tprev.daily_balance - coalesce(tprev.daily_total, 0) as new_balance
from cte t left outer join
cte tprev
on t.seqnum = tprev.seqnum + 1;

Related

how to drop rows if a variale is less than x, in sql

I have the following query code
query = """
with double_entry_book as (
SELECT to_address as address, value as value
FROM `bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces`
WHERE to_address is not null
AND block_timestamp < '2022-01-01 00:00:00'
AND status = 1
AND (call_type not in ('delegatecall', 'callcode', 'staticcall') or call_type is null)
union all
-- credits
SELECT from_address as address, -value as value
FROM `bigquery-public-data.crypto_ethereum.traces`
WHERE from_address is not null
AND block_timestamp < '2022-01-01 00:00:00'
AND status = 1
AND (call_type not in ('delegatecall', 'callcode', 'staticcall') or call_type is null)
union all
)
SELECT address,
sum(value) / 1000000000000000000 as balance
from double_entry_book
group by address
order by balance desc
LIMIT 15000000
"""
In the last part, I want to drop rows where "balance" is less than, let's say, 0.02 and then group, order, etc. I imagine this should be a simple code. Any help will be appreciated!
We can delete on a CTE and use returning to get the id's of the rows being deleted, but they still exist until the transaction is comitted.
CREATE TABLE t (
id serial,
variale int);
insert into t (variale) values
(1),(2),(3),(4),(5);
✓
5 rows affected
with del as
(delete from t
where variale < 3
returning id)
select
t.id,
t.variale,
del.id ids_being_deleted
from t
left join del
on t.id = del.id;
id | variale | ids_being_deleted
-: | ------: | ----------------:
1 | 1 | 1
2 | 2 | 2
3 | 3 | null
4 | 4 | null
5 | 5 | null
select * from t;
id | variale
-: | ------:
3 | 3
4 | 4
5 | 5
db<>fiddle here

Difference of top two values while GROUP BY

Suppose I have the following SQL Table:
id | score
------------
1 | 4433
1 | 678
1 | 1230
1 | 414
5 | 8899
5 | 123
6 | 2345
6 | 567
6 | 2323
Now I wanted to do a GROUP BY id operation wherein the score column would be modified as follows: take the absolute difference between the top two highest scores for each id.
For example, the response for the above query should be:
id | score
------------
1 | 3203
5 | 8776
6 | 22
How can I perform this query in PostgreSQL?
Using ROW_NUMBER along with pivoting logic we can try:
WITH cte AS (
SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY score DESC) rn
FROM yourTable
)
SELECT id,
ABS(MAX(score) FILTER (WHERE rn = 1) -
MAX(score) FILTER (WHERE rn = 2)) AS score
FROM cte
GROUP BY id;
Demo

PostgreSQL Marketing Report

I'm writing out a query that takes ad marketing data from Google Ads, Microsoft, and Taboola and merges it into one table.
The table should have 3 rows, one for each ad company with 4 columns: traffic source (ad company), money spent, sales, and cost per conversion. Right now I'm just dealing with the first 2 till I get those right. The whole table's data should be grouped within that a given month's data.
Right now the results I'm getting are multiple rows from each traffic source, some of them merging months of data into the cost column instead of summing up the costs within a given month.
WITH google_ads AS
( SELECT 'Google' AS traffic_source,
date_trunc('month', "day"::date) AS month,
SUM(cost / 1000000) AS cost
FROM googleads_campaign AS g
GROUP BY month
ORDER BY month DESC),
taboola AS
( SELECT 'Taboola' AS traffic_source,
date_trunc('month', "date"::date) AS month,
SUM(spent) AS cost
FROM taboola_campaign AS t
GROUP BY month
ORDER BY month DESC),
microsoft AS
( SELECT 'Microsoft' AS traffic_source,
date_trunc('month', "TimePeriod"::date) AS month,
SUM("Spend") AS cost
FROM microsoft_campaign AS m
GROUP BY month
ORDER BY month DESC)
SELECT (CASE
WHEN M.traffic_source='Microsoft' THEN M.traffic_source
WHEN T.traffic_source='Taboola' THEN T.traffic_source
WHEN G.traffic_source='Google' THEN G.traffic_source
END) AS traffic_source1,
SUM(CASE
WHEN G.traffic_source='Google' THEN G.cost
WHEN T.traffic_source='Taboola' THEN T.cost
WHEN M.traffic_source='Microsoft' THEN M.cost
END) AS cost,
(CASE
WHEN G.traffic_source='Google' THEN G.month
WHEN T.traffic_source='Taboola' THEN T.month
WHEN M.traffic_source='Microsoft' THEN M.month
END) AS month1
FROM google_ads G
LEFT JOIN taboola T ON G.month = T.month
LEFT JOIN microsoft M ON G.month = M.month
GROUP BY traffic_source1, month1
Here's an example of the results I'm getting. The month column is simply for testing purposes.
| traffic_source1 | cost | month1 |
|:----------------|:-----------|:---------------|
| Google | 210.00 | 01/09/18 00:00 |
| Google | 1,213.00 | 01/10/18 00:00 |
| Google | 2,481.00 | 01/11/18 00:00 |
| Google | 3,503.00 | 01/12/18 00:00 |
| Google | 7,492.00 | 01/01/19 00:00 |
| Microsoft | 22,059.00 | 01/02/19 00:00 |
| Microsoft | 16,958.00 | 01/03/19 00:00 |
| Microsoft | 7,582.00 | 01/04/19 00:00 |
| Microsoft | 76,125.00 | 01/05/19 00:00 |
| Taboola | 37,205.00 | 01/06/19 00:00 |
| Google | 45,910.00 | 01/07/19 00:00 |
| Google | 137,421.00 | 01/08/19 00:00 |
| Google | 29,501.00 | 01/09/19 00:00 |
Instead, it should look like this (Let's say for the month of July this year, for instance):
| traffic_source | cost |
|----------------|-----------|
| Google | 53,901.00 |
| Microsoft | 22,059.00 |
| Taboola | 37,205.00 |
Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
You can try this way:
WITH google_ads AS
( SELECT 'Google' AS traffic_source,
date_trunc('month', "day"::date) AS month,
SUM(cost / 1000000) AS cost
FROM googleads_campaign AS g
GROUP BY month
ORDER BY month DESC),
taboola AS
( SELECT 'Taboola' AS traffic_source,
date_trunc('month', "date"::date) AS month,
SUM(spent) AS cost
FROM taboola_campaign AS t
GROUP BY month
ORDER BY month DESC),
microsoft AS
( SELECT 'Microsoft' AS traffic_source,
date_trunc('month', "TimePeriod"::date) AS month,
SUM("Spend") AS cost
FROM microsoft_campaign AS m
GROUP BY month
ORDER BY month DESC)
SELECT (CASE
WHEN M.traffic_source='Microsoft' THEN M.traffic_source
WHEN T.traffic_source='Taboola' THEN T.traffic_source
WHEN G.traffic_source='Google' THEN G.traffic_source
END) AS traffic_source1,
SUM(CASE
WHEN G.traffic_source='Google' THEN G.cost
WHEN T.traffic_source='Taboola' THEN T.cost
WHEN M.traffic_source='Microsoft' THEN M.cost
END) AS cost,
(CASE
WHEN G.traffic_source='Google' THEN G.month
WHEN T.traffic_source='Taboola' THEN T.month
WHEN M.traffic_source='Microsoft' THEN M.month
END) AS month1
FROM google_ads G
LEFT JOIN taboola T ON G.month = T.month
LEFT JOIN microsoft M ON G.month = M.month
GROUP BY traffic_source1, month1
HAVING EXTRACT(month from month1) = ... desired month (July is 7)
The concept of a different table for each ad source is really a very bad idea. It vastly compounds the complexity of of queries requiring consolidation. It would be much better to have a single table having the source along with the other columns. Consider what happens when marketing decides to use 30-40 or more ad suppliers. If you cannot create a single table then at least standardize column names and types. Also build a view, a materialized view, or a table function (below) which combines all the traffic sources into a single source.
create or replace function consolidated_ad_traffic()
returns table( traffic_source text
, ad_month timestamp with time zone
, ad_cost numeric(11,2)
, ad_sales numeric(11,2)
, conversion_cost numeric(11,6)
)
language sql
AS $$
with ad_sources as
( select 'Google' as traffic_source
, "date" as ad_date
, round(cast (cost AS numeric ) / 1000000.0,2) as cost
, sales
, cost_per_conversion
from googleads_campaign
union all
select 'Taboola'
, "date"
, spent
, sales
, cost_per_conversion
from taboola_campaign
union all
select 'Microsoft'
, "TimePeriod"
, "Spend"
, sales
, cost_per_conversion
from microsoft_campaign
)
select * from ad_sources;
$$;
With a consolidated view of the data you can now write normal selects as though you had a single table. Such as:
select * from consolidated_ad_traffic();
select distinct on( traffic_source, to_char(ad_month, 'mm'))
traffic_source
, to_char(ad_month, 'Mon') "For Month"
, to_char(sum(ad_cost) over(partition by traffic_source, to_char(ad_month, 'Mon')), 'FM99,999,999,990.00') monthly_traffic_cost
, to_char(sum(ad_cost) over(partition by traffic_source), 'FM99,999,999,990.00') total_traffic_cost
from consolidated_ad_traffic();
select traffic_source, sum(ad_cost) ad_cost
from consolidated_ad_traffic()
group by traffic_source
order by traffic_source;
select traffic_source
, to_char(ad_month, 'dd-Mon') "For Month"
, sum(ad_cost) "Monthly Cost"
from consolidated_ad_traffic()
where date_trunc('month',ad_month) = date_trunc('month', date '2019-07-01')
and traffic_source = 'Google'
group by traffic_source, to_char(ad_month, 'dd-Mon') ;
Now this won't do much for updating but will drastically ease selection.

Count the number of consecutive entries fulfilling a condition within a GROUP BY

I've got a list of users who are behind on their bills, and I want to generate an entry for each of them that says how many consecutive bills they've been behind on. So here's the table:
user | bill_date | outstanding_balance
---------------------------------------
a | 2017-03-01 | 90
a | 2016-12-01 | 60
a | 2016-09-01 | 30
b | 2017-03-01 | 50
b | 2016-12-01 | 0
b | 2016-09-01 | 40
c | 2017-03-01 | 0
c | 2016-12-01 | 0
c | 2016-09-01 | 1
And I want a query that would generate the following table:
user | consecutive_billing_periods_behind
-----------------------------------------
a | 3
b | 1
a | 0
In other words, if you've paid up at any point, I want to ignore all of the earlier entries, and only count how many billing periods you've been behind since you've been last paid up. How do I do this most simply?
If I understood the question correctly, first you need to find the last date that any given customer paid their bill so the last date their outstanding balance was 0. You can do this by this subquery:
(SELECT
user1,
bill_date AS no_outstanding_bill_date
FROM table1
WHERE outstanding_balance = 0)
Then you need get the last bill date and create field for each row if they are outstanding bill. Then filter the rows between the last clear day to last bill date of each customer by this where clause:
WHERE bill_date >= last_clear_day AND bill_date <= last_bill_date
Then if you put the pieces together you can have the results by this query:
SELECT
DISTINCT
user1,
sum(is_outstanding_bill)
OVER (
PARTITION BY user1 ) AS consecutive_billing_periods_behind
FROM (
SELECT
user1,
last_value(bill_date)
OVER (
PARTITION BY user1
ORDER BY bill_date
ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING ) AS last_bill_date,
CASE WHEN outstanding_balance > 0
THEN 1
ELSE 0 END AS is_outstanding_bill,
bill_date,
outstanding_balance,
nvl(max(t2.no_outstanding_bill_date)
OVER (
PARTITION BY user1 ), min(bill_date)
OVER (
PARTITION BY user1 )) AS last_clear_day
FROM table1 t1
LEFT JOIN (SELECT
user1,
bill_date AS no_outstanding_bill_date
FROM table1
WHERE outstanding_balance = 0) t2 USING (user1)
) table2
WHERE bill_date >= last_clear_day AND bill_date <= last_bill_date
Since we are using distinct you will not need the group by clause.
select
user,
count(case when min_balance > 0 then 1 end)
as consecutive_billing_periods_behind
from
(
select
user,
min(outstanding_balance)
over (partition by user order by bill_date) as min_balance
from tbl
)
group by user
Or:
select
user,
count(*)
as consecutive_billing_periods_behind
from
(
select
user,
bill_date,
max(case when outstanding_balance = 0 then bill_date) over
(partition by user)
as max_bill_date_with_zero_balance
from tbl
)
where
-- If user has no outstanding_balance = 0, then
max_bill_date_with_zero_balance is null
-- Count all rows in this case.
-- Otherwise
or
-- count rows with
bill_date > max_bill_date_with_zero_balance
group by user

Counting by earliest date found from an inner join?

I have two tables, customerusermap and users. Whenever a user signs up with our product, they immediately get added into a table called users but it isn't until they start paying for a user that they get added to a table called customerusermap.
The users table looks like this:
id | customer_id | firstname | lastname | created_at
-------------------------------------------------------
1725 | cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO | Abby | Smith | 2015-03-19
1726 | cus_7oNweUrE4jbwr2 | Sam | Peters | 2015-06-20
The customerusermap table looks like this:
customer_id | user_id | created_at
------------------------------------------
cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO | 9275 | 2015-09-01
cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO | 2628 | 2015-09-05
cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO | 2358 | 2015-07-05
cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO | 3158 | 2015-08-05
cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO | 2487 | 2015-08-05
cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO | 6044 | 2015-08-05
cus_7oNweUrE4jbwr2 | 8094 | 2015-08-25
cus_7oNweUrE4jbwr2 | 2345 | 2015-09-02
In this example, Abby(cus_3hEmhErE2jbwsO) is paying for 6 users. She started paying for user 2358 2015-07-05 so she should be considered a paying customer 07-2015, not 03-2015. Sam is paying for 2 users and he started paying for user 8094 in 08-2015 so he is considered to be a paying customer for 08-2015, not 06-2015. I have a query that grabs and groups by the number of paying customers each month:
SELECT concat(extract(MONTH from u.created_at),'-',extract(year from u.created_at)) as "Month",
COUNT(distinct u.email) as "Total AB Paying Customers"
FROM customerusermap AS cm, users AS u
WHERE cm.customer_id=u.customer_id AND cm.user_id <> u.id
GROUP BY 1,extract(month from u.created_at),extract(year from u.created_at)
ORDER BY extract(year from u.created_at),extract(month from u.created_at);
But this grabs and counts by the date the customer was added to the users table, not the date they actually started paying. How would I grab the counts so that it grabs for the earliest date in the customerusermap table? What the needed output should look like in this example is:
Month | Total AB Paying Customers
-------------------------------------
07-2015 | 1
08-2015 | 1
You can use the following query:
SELECT CONCAT(EXTRACT(MONTH FROM startedPayingDate), '-',
EXTRACT(YEAR FROM startedPayingDate)) AS "Month",
COUNT(*) AS "Total AB Paying Customers"
FROM (
SELECT customer_id, MIN(created_at) AS startedPayingDate
FROM customerusermap AS cm
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1
FROM users AS u
WHERE cm.user_id = u.id)
GROUP BY customer_id ) AS t
GROUP BY 1
I used a NOT EXISTS operator to exclude records that relate to 'paying for themselves' customers (if that is really your intention).
Once you get the MIN(created_at) date per customer_id, then you can easily count per date in an outer query.
Demo here