this is my schema:
new Schema({
code: { type: String },
toy_array: [
{
date:{
type:Date(),
default: new Date()
}
toy:{ type:String }
]
}
this is my db:
{
"code": "Toystore A",
"toy_array": [
{
_id:"xxxxx", // automatic
"toy": "buzz"
},
{
_id:"xxxxx", // automatic
"toy": "pope"
}
]
},
{
"code": "Toystore B",
"toy_array": [
{
_id:"xxxxx", // automatic
"toy": "jessie"
}
]
}
I am trying to update an object. In this case I want to update the document with code: 'ToystoreA' and add an array of subdocuments to the array named toy_array if the toys does not exists in the array.
for example if I try to do this:
db.mydb.findOneAndUpdate({
code: 'ToystoreA,
/*toy_array: {
$not: {
$elemMatch: {
toy: [{"toy":'woddy'},{"toy":"buzz"}],
},
},
},*/
},
{
$addToSet: {
toy_array: {
$each: [{"toy":'woddy'},{"toy":"buzz"}],
},
},
},
{
new: false,
}
})
they are added and is what I want to avoid.
how can I do it?
[
{
"code": "Toystore A",
"toy_array": [
{
"toy": "buzz"
},
{
"toy": "pope"
}
]
},
{
"code": "Toystore B",
"toy_array": [
{
"toy": "jessie"
}
]
}
]
In this example [{"toy":'woddy'},{"toy":"buzz"}] it should only be added 'woddy' because 'buzz' is already in the array.
Note:when I insert a new toy an insertion date is also inserted, in addition to an _id (it is normal for me).
As you're using $addToSet on an object it's failing for your use case for a reason :
Let's say if your document look like this :
{
_id: 123, // automatically generated
"toy": "buzz"
},
{
_id: 456, // automatically generated
"toy": "pope"
}
and input is :
[{_id: 789, "toy":'woddy'},{_id: 098, "toy":"buzz"}]
Here while comparing two objects {_id: 098, "toy":"buzz"} & {_id: 123, "toy":"buzz"} - $addToSet consider these are different and you can't use $addToSet on a field (toy) in an object. So try below query on MongoDB version >= 4.2.
Query :
db.collection.updateOne({"_id" : "Toystore A"},[{
$addFields: {
toy_array: {
$reduce: {
input: inputArrayOfObjects,
initialValue: "$toy_array", // taking existing `toy_array` as initial value
in: {
$cond: [
{ $in: [ "$$this.toy", "$toy_array.toy" ] }, // check if each new toy exists in existing arrays of toys
"$$value", // If yes, just return accumulator array
{ $concatArrays: [ [ "$$this" ], "$$value" ] } // If No, push new toy object into accumulator
]
}
}
}
}
}])
Test : aggregation pipeline test url : mongoplayground
Ref : $reduce
Note :
You don't need to mention { new: false } as .findOneAndUpdate() return old doc by default, if you need new one then you've to do { new: true }. Also if anyone can get rid of _id's from schema of array objects then you can just use $addToSet as OP was doing earlier (Assume if _id is only unique field), check this stop-mongoose-from-creating-id-property-for-sub-document-array-items.
Related
I am trying to run a MongoDB query to update the value of one field with the value of another nested field. I have the following document:
{
"name": "name",
"address": "address",
"times": 10,
"snapshots": [
{
"dayTotal": 2,
"dayHit": 2,
"dayIndex": 2
},
{
"dayTotal": 3,
"dayHit": 3,
"dayIndex": 3
}
]
}
I am trying like this:
db.netGraphMetadataDTO.updateMany(
{ },
[{ $set: { times: "$snapshots.$[elem].dayTotal" } }],
{
arrayFilters: [{"elem.dayIndex":{"$eq": 2}}],
upsert: false,
multi: true
}
);
but got an error:
arrayFilters may not be specified for pipeline-syle updates
You can't use arrayFilters with aggregation pipeline for update query at the same time.
Instead, what you need to do:
Get the dayTotal field from the result 2.
Take the first matched document from the result 3.
Filter the document from snapshots array.
db.netGraphMetadataDTO.updateMany({},
[
{
$set: {
times: {
$getField: {
field: "dayTotal",
input: {
$first: {
$filter: {
input: "$snapshots",
cond: {
$eq: [
"$$this.dayIndex",
2
]
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
],
{
upsert: false,
multi: true
})
Demo # Mongo Playground
I have a collection in the following format:
[
{
"postId": ObjectId("62dffd0acb17483cf015375f"),
"userId": ObjectId("62dff9584f5b702d61c81c3c"),
"state": [
{
"id": ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153220"),
"notes": "these are my custom notes!",
"lvl": 3,
},
{
"id": ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153221"),
"notes": "hello again",
"lvl": 0,
},
]
},
]
My goal is to be able to update and add an element in this array in the following situation:
If the ID of the new element is not in the state array, push the new element in the array
If the ID of the new element is in the state array and its lvl field is 0, update that element with the new information
If the ID of the new element exists in the array, and its lvl field is not 0, then nothing should happen. I will throw an error by seeing that no documents were matched.
Basically, to accomplish this I was thinking about using findOneAndUpdate with upsert, but I am not sure how to tell the query to update the state if lvl is 0 or don't do anything if it is bigger than 0 when the match is found.
For solving (1) this is what I was able to come up with:
db.collection.findOneAndUpdate(
{
"postId": ObjectId("62dffd0acb17483cf015375f"),
"userId": ObjectId("62dff9584f5b702d61c81c3c"),
"state.id": {
"$ne": ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153222"),
},
},
{
"$push": {"state": {"id": ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153222"), "lvl": 1}}
},
{
"new": true,
"upsert": true,
}
)
What is the correct way to approach this issue? Should I just split the query into multiple ones?
Edit: as of now I have done this in more than one query (one to fetch the document, then I iterate over its state array to check if the ID exists in it, and then I perform (1), (2) and (3) in a normal if-else clause)
If the ID of the new element exists in the array, and its lvl field is not 0, then nothing should happen. I will throw an error by seeing that no documents where matched.
First thing FYI,
upsert is not possible in the nested array
upsert will not add new elements to the array
upsert can add a new document with the new element
if you want to throw an error if the record does not present then you don't need upsert
Second thing, you can achieve this in one query by using an update with aggregation pipeline in MongoDB 4.2,
Note: Here i must inform you, this query will respond updated document but there will be no flag or any clue if this query fulfilled your first situation or second situation, or the third situation out of 3, you have to check in your client-side code through query response.
check conditions for postId and userId fields only
we are going to update state field under $set stage
check the condition if the provided id is present in state's id?
true, $map to iterate loop of state array
check conditions for id and lvl: 0?
true, $mergeObjects to merge current object with the new information
false, it will not do anything
false, then add that new element in state array, by $concatArrays operator
db.collection.findOneAndUpdate(
{
postId: ObjectId("62dffd0acb17483cf015375f"),
userId: ObjectId("62dff9584f5b702d61c81c3c")
},
[{
$set: {
state: {
$cond: [
{ $in: [ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153221"), "$state.id"] },
{
$map: {
input: "$state",
in: {
$cond: [
{
$and: [
{ $eq: ["$$this.id", ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153221")] },
{ $eq: ["$$this.lvl", 0] }
]
},
{
$mergeObjects: [
"$$this",
{
// update your new fields here
"notes": "new note"
}
]
},
"$$this"
]
}
}
},
{
$concatArrays: [
"$state",
[
// add new element
{
"id": ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153221"),
"lvl": 1
}
]
]
}
]
}
}
}],
{ returnNewDocument: true }
)
Playrgound
Third thing, you can execute 2 update queries,
The first query, for the case: element does not present and it will push a new element in state
let response = db.collection.findOneAndUpdate({
postId: ObjectId("62dffd0acb17483cf015375f"),
userId: ObjectId("62dff9584f5b702d61c81c3c"),
"state.id": { $ne: ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153221") }
},
{
$push: {
state: {
id: ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153221"),
lvl: 1
}
}
},
{
returnNewDocument: true
})
The second query on the base of if the response of the above query is null then this query will execute,
This will check state id and lvl: 0 conditions if conditions are fulfilled then execute the update fields operation, it will return null if the document is not found
You can throw if this will return null otherwise do stuff with response data and response success
if (response == null) {
response = db.collection.findOneAndUpdate({
postId: ObjectId("62dffd0acb17483cf015375f"),
userId: ObjectId("62dff9584f5b702d61c81c3c"),
state: {
$elemMatch: {
id: ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153221"),
lvl: 0
}
}
},
{
$set: {
// add your update fields
"state.$.notes": "new note"
}
},
{
returnNewDocument: true
});
// not found and throw an error
if (response == null) {
return {
// throw error;
};
}
}
// do stuff with "response" data and return result
return {
// success;
};
Note: As per the above options, I would recommend you that I explained in the Third thing that you can execute 2 update queries.
What you're trying became possible with the introduction pipelined updates, here is how I would do it by using $concatArrays to concat the exists state array with the new input and $ifNull in case of an upsert to init the empty value, like so:
const inputObj = {
"id": ObjectId("62dffc49cb17483cf0153222"),
"lvl": 1
};
db.collection.findOneAndUpdate({
"postId": ObjectId("62dffd0acb17483cf015375f"),
"userId": ObjectId("62dff9584f5b702d61c81c3c")
},
[
{
$set: {
state: {
$ifNull: [
"$state",
[]
]
},
}
},
{
$set: {
state: {
$concatArrays: [
{
$map: {
input: "$state",
in: {
$mergeObjects: [
{
$cond: [
{
$and: [
{
$in: [
inputObj.id,
"$state.id"
]
},
{
$eq: [
inputObj.lvl,
0
]
}
]
},
inputObj,
{},
]
},
"$$this"
]
}
}
},
{
$cond: [
{
$not: {
$in: [
inputObj.id,
"$state.id"
]
}
},
[
],
[]
]
}
]
}
}
}
],
{
"new": true,
"upsert": true
})
Mongo Playground
Prior to version 4.2 and the introduction of this feature what you're trying to do was not possible using the naive update syntax, If you are using an older version then you'd have to split this into 2 separate calls, first a findOne to see if the document exists, and only then an update based on that. obviously this can cause stability issue's if you have high update volume.
My requirement is to write a Mongo aggregation which returns a List of "virtual" Documents by grouping some existing "actual" Documents from the collection.
I intend to use this result as-is on my UI project, I'm looking for ways I can add a unique and decodable ID to it during the aggregation itself.
Example:
[
{... pipeline stages},
{
$group: {
_id: {
bookCode: '$bookCode',
bookName: '$bookName'
}
books: {
$push: '$bookId'
}
}
},
{
$project: {
//virtual unique Id by combining bookCode and bookName
virtualId: {
$concat: [
{
$ifNull: [ '$_id.bookCode', '~' ]
},
'-',
{
$ifNull: [ '$_id.bookName', '~' ]
}
]
},
books: '$books'
}
}
]
Sample Output:
[
{
virtualId: 'BC01-BOOKNAME01'
books: ['BID01', 'BID02']
},
{
virtualId: 'BC02-BOOKNAME01'
books: ['BID03', 'BID04']
},
{
virtualId: '~-BOOKNAME01'
books: ['BID05', 'BID06']
},
{
virtualId: 'BC02-~'
books: ['BID07', 'BID08']
},
{
virtualId: '~-~'
books: ['BID09', 'BID10']
},
]
This method of concatenating grouping fields to generate virtualId works, but is there a way to make it more terse?
Perhaps some way I could convert this to an unreadable by human but decodable format.
TLDR: I'm looking for ways to create an ID for each result document in the aggregation query itself, that would give back it's contributing fields if I decode it later.
MongoDB Version: 4.0.0
use this aggregation we use funtion and generate code with js function
db.collection.aggregate([
{
"$project": {
books: 1,
virtualId: {
"$function": {
"body": "function(a){var t = '';for(i=0;i<a.length;i++){t=a.charCodeAt(i)+t;};return t;}",
"args": [
"$virtualId"
],
"lang": "js"
}
}
}
}
])
https://mongoplayground.net/p/Lm_VjIG54BG
I'm trying to return a specific collection, however, I want to filter an array within the collection. I'm not sure if this is possible. In the example below I'm trying to return the collection with _id: 7ARk3dc2JA8g5pamA and filter out the array object for "candidateUserId": "2". I'm doing this in a Meteorjs application.
Eg: `Collection'
{
"_id": "7ARk3dc2JA8g5pamA",
"jobTitle": "Developer",
"candidateApplication": [
{
"candidateUserId": "1",
"applied": true
},
{
"candidateUserId": "2",
"applied": false
}
]
}
Path: Publish command
return Jobs.find({ _id: 7ARk3dc2JA8g5pamA }, {
$filter: {
input: candidateApplication,
cond: { candidateUserId: { $eq: 1 } }
}
});
Jobs.find({ _id: 7ARk3dc2JA8g5pamA }, { candidateApplication: { $elemMatch: { candidateUserId: 2 } } }
This should return the document with only the _id and the candidateUserId array, but that array will now only contain the object that you want.
{ "_id" : 7ARk3dc2JA8g5pamA, "candidateApplication" : [ { "candidateUserId": 2, "applied": false } ] }
You can then get to the data with candidateApplication[0].candidateUserId and candidateApplication[0].applied
As mentioned in the comments above, if there are more instances of that same candidateUserId, only the first will be returned.
I have the following documents:
[{
"_id":1,
"name":"john",
"position":1
},
{"_id":2,
"name":"bob",
"position":2
},
{"_id":3,
"name":"tom",
"position":3
}]
In the UI a user can change position of items(eg moving Bob to first position, john gets position 2, tom - position 3).
Is there any way to update all positions in all documents at once?
You can not update two documents at once with a MongoDB query. You will always have to do that in two queries. You can of course set a value of a field to the same value, or increment with the same number, but you can not do two distinct updates in MongoDB with the same query.
You can use db.collection.bulkWrite() to perform multiple operations in bulk. It has been available since 3.2.
It is possible to perform operations out of order to increase performance.
From mongodb 4.2 you can do using pipeline in update using $set operator
there are many ways possible now due to many operators in aggregation pipeline though I am providing one of them
exports.updateDisplayOrder = async keyValPairArr => {
try {
let data = await ContestModel.collection.update(
{ _id: { $in: keyValPairArr.map(o => o.id) } },
[{
$set: {
displayOrder: {
$let: {
vars: { obj: { $arrayElemAt: [{ $filter: { input: keyValPairArr, as: "kvpa", cond: { $eq: ["$$kvpa.id", "$_id"] } } }, 0] } },
in:"$$obj.displayOrder"
}
}
}
}],
{ runValidators: true, multi: true }
)
return data;
} catch (error) {
throw error;
}
}
example key val pair is: [{"id":"5e7643d436963c21f14582ee","displayOrder":9}, {"id":"5e7643e736963c21f14582ef","displayOrder":4}]
Since MongoDB 4.2 update can accept aggregation pipeline as second argument, allowing modification of multiple documents based on their data.
See https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/method/db.collection.update/#modify-a-field-using-the-values-of-the-other-fields-in-the-document
Excerpt from documentation:
Modify a Field Using the Values of the Other Fields in the Document
Create a members collection with the following documents:
db.members.insertMany([
{ "_id" : 1, "member" : "abc123", "status" : "A", "points" : 2, "misc1" : "note to self: confirm status", "misc2" : "Need to activate", "lastUpdate" : ISODate("2019-01-01T00:00:00Z") },
{ "_id" : 2, "member" : "xyz123", "status" : "A", "points" : 60, "misc1" : "reminder: ping me at 100pts", "misc2" : "Some random comment", "lastUpdate" : ISODate("2019-01-01T00:00:00Z") }
])
Assume that instead of separate misc1 and misc2 fields, you want to gather these into a new comments field. The following update operation uses an aggregation pipeline to:
add the new comments field and set the lastUpdate field.
remove the misc1 and misc2 fields for all documents in the collection.
db.members.update(
{ },
[
{ $set: { status: "Modified", comments: [ "$misc1", "$misc2" ], lastUpdate: "$$NOW" } },
{ $unset: [ "misc1", "misc2" ] }
],
{ multi: true }
)
Suppose after updating your position your array will looks like
const objectToUpdate = [{
"_id":1,
"name":"john",
"position":2
},
{
"_id":2,
"name":"bob",
"position":1
},
{
"_id":3,
"name":"tom",
"position":3
}].map( eachObj => {
return {
updateOne: {
filter: { _id: eachObj._id },
update: { name: eachObj.name, position: eachObj.position }
}
}
})
YourModelName.bulkWrite(objectToUpdate,
{ ordered: false }
).then((result) => {
console.log(result);
}).catch(err=>{
console.log(err.result.result.writeErrors[0].err.op.q);
})
It will update all position with different value.
Note : I have used here ordered : false for better performance.