I have used one multi instance subprocess which includes an workflow with human task. When executing, its creating the number of human tasks as to the number of elements present inside the collection object. But all tasks have same process instance id. How the relation is working between parent process and multi instance subprocess?
If there are multiple elements in collection list, then it will create those many tasks inside the multi instance sub process. As all the tasks have same process instance id, how to identify the respective process variable values for each task and the uniqueness of each flow afterwards? And is there a way to make it create an different instance id for each task of the multi instance subprocess?
I did not get all the question, but I will try to answer what I got:
Human tasks have their own task instance id
What is collection object? If you mean tasks in bpmn model, then it is as expected: process instance flow starts after start node and when it reaches a human task, it will create an task instance with id. You can see it in the tasks in UI and with api you can claim, work on, complete , populate data etc.
it is wise to have a separate/different variable for every tasks that can execute in parallel. Then the input will be kept in distinguished data placeholders and you can use it accordingly.
you can create a different instance(task instance) for each task or have repeatable tasks
well the answer was to put the multi-instance into a sub-process, this will allow me to have a separate process instance id per each element of the my List (the input of the multi-instance )
Related
Suppose I have 3 separate user classes. I want to allocate fix number of users for each class. My code is as below.
class User_1(TaskSet):
# I need 3 users to execute the tasks within this user class
class User_2(TaskSet):
# I need only 1 user to execute the tasks within this user class
class User_3(TaskSet):
# I need only 1 user to execute the tasks within this user class
class API_User_Test(HttpUser):
#I already tried weighting the classes as below.
tasks = {Site_User_1: 3, User_2: 1, User_3: 1}
I've already tried weighting the classes as shown in the code above. But it doesn't work. Some times it will allocate more than 1 users for class User_2 or class User_3. Can someone tell me how to fix this issue.
A weight in Locust is just a statistical weight and is not guarantee. The weights determine how many times a task/user are put into a list to be selected from. When a new task/user is spawned, Locust randomly selects a task from the list. Given your weights:
tasks = {Site_User_1: 3, User_2: 1, User_3: 1}
Statistically speaking, spawning 5 users with weights 3/1/1 would get you 3/1/1 but it may not be that precise every time. While less likely, it's possible you could get 4/0/1 or 3/2/0 or 5/0/0.
From the Locust docs:
If the tasks attribute is specified as a list, each time a task is to be performed, it will be randomly chosen from the tasks attribute. If however, tasks is a dict - with callables as keys and ints as values - the task that is to be executed will be chosen at random but with the int as ratio. So with a task that looks like this:
{my_task: 3, another_task: 1}
my_task would be 3 times more likely to be executed than another_task.
Internally the above dict will actually be expanded into a list (and the tasks attribute is updated) that looks like this:
[my_task, my_task, my_task, another_task]
and then Python’s random.choice() is used pick tasks from the list.
If you absolutely have to have full control over exactly what users are running, I'd probably recommend having a single Locust user with a single task that contains your own logic on what to run. Create your own list of functions to call and iterate through it each time a new user is created. Might have to be external to the user as a global or something. But the idea is you manage the logic yourself and not Locust.
Edit:
Using the single user method to control what's running won't work well if you run on multiple workers as the workers don't communicate with each other. You may consider doing some more advanced things like sending messages between master and workers to coordinate, or use an external source like a database or other service the workers talk to to know what they should run.
I am solving a job shop scheduling problem resorting to anylogic. I have 20 jobs (agents) and 5 machines(resources) and each job as a specific order to visit the machines. My question is: how can I make sure that each job follows its order.
This is what I have done. One agent called 'jobs' and 5 agents, each one corresponding to a machine. One resource pool associated to each one of the service blocks. In the collection enterblocks I selected the 5 enter blocks.
In the agent 'jobs' I have this. The parameters associated to each job, read from the database file, and the collection 'enternames' where I selected the machine(1,2,3,4,5) parameters and the collection 'ptimes' where I put the processing times of the job (This two colletions is where I am not sure I have done it correctly)
My database file
I am not sure how to use the counter used here How to store routings in job shop production in Anylogic. In the previous link the getNextService function is used in the exit blocks but I am also not sure how to use it in my case due to the counter.
Firstly, to confirm that based on the Job agent and database view, the first line in the database will result in a Job agent with values such as:
machine1 = 1 and process1=23
machine2 = 0 and process2=82 and so on
If that is the intent, then a better way is to restructure the database, so there are two tables:
Table of jobs to machine sequence looking something like this:
job
op1
op2
op3
op4
op5
1
machine2
machine1
machine4
machine5
machine3
2
machine4
machine3
machine5
machine1
machine2
3
...
...
...
...
...
Table of jobs to processing time
Then, add a collection of type ArrayList of String to Job (let's call this collection col_machineSequence) and when the Job agents get created their on startup code should be:
for (String param : List.of("op1","op2","op3","op4","op5")) {
col_machineSequence.add(getParameter(param));
}
As a result, col_machineSequence will contain sequence of machines each job should visit in the order defined in the database.
NOTE: Please see help on getParameter() here.
Also:
Putting a Queue in front of the Service isn't necessary
Repeating Enter-Queue-Service-Exit isn't necessary, this can be simplified using this method
Follow-up clarifications:
Collections - these will be enclosed in each Job agent
Queue sorting - Service block has Priorities / preemption which governs the ordering on the queue
Create another agent for the second table (call the agent ProcessingTime and table processing_time) and add it to the Job agent and then load it from database filtering on p_jobid as shown in the picture
I have a requirement to dynamically set the assignee to tasks of process instance created from a process definition id.So,i get my assignee values from UI side and submitted for approval workflow.Now i will start the process and assign those assignee to the respective tasks.The problem is i get only one task on start of process as activiti gives only the current tasks/active tasks.As i don't get rest of task list i am unable to set the assignee to those tasks.
I also have to find pending tasks and completed tasks for a assignee from process instance,as there is query for task which i can use but as i am not able to set the assignee for all tasks ,this query seems not much of help for me.
So how can i get all tasks under a process instance and set the assignee to each user tasks and then complete the user tasks whenever needed using process instance and task query.
Below is my workflow
Workflow describing above scenario
To leverage the full power of the process engine, you would not pass runtime information at process start, you would dynamically determine the assignee at runtime, by using a taskListener on the „create“ event.
But if you have to stick to your approach: put the assignees in a map with the taskDefinitionKey
As key and pass that map to the process instance as process variables.
Afterwards, in your Bpmn model use „${taskDefintionKey}“ in the assigned field (taskdefkey being the I’d of your user task of course).
I am trying to create a Quartz scheduler using Java which will be able to call an API and pass in data.
I am totally new to Quartz but now I understand the Job concept and how to create one. I understand the trigger concept and how to trigger one
and I understand how the scheduler works.
What I am having difficult with is how can I pass in the information which is required to be passed to the API. I have an example of an API being called and the data is entered into the DB but the information has been hard coded into the class be passed into the JobDetails.
Ie. the user passes a message to the system which needs to be sent to the user in 12 hours and not before, so what i was planning was create a Job and a trigger in to set the execute time to 12 hours. How to do i pass the message into the scheduler? Where should this message be stored? Is what I am trying to do possible? Have i misunderstood what Quartz is capable of doing?
Thank you for your time. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
Take a look at JobDataMap. If you are creating a new job for each user action you can store the message in there which will be available during the execution.
JobDataMap Holds state information for Job instances.
JobDataMap instances are stored once when the Job is added to a scheduler. They are also re-persisted after every execution of jobs annotated with #PersistJobDataAfterExecution.
JobDataMap instances can also be stored with a Trigger. This can be useful in the case where you have a Job that is stored in the scheduler for regular/repeated use by multiple Triggers, yet with each independent triggering, you want to supply the Job with different data inputs.
The JobExecutionContext passed to a Job at execution time also contains a convenience JobDataMap that is the result of merging the contents of the trigger's JobDataMap (if any) over the Job's JobDataMap (if any).
In case you have a single job but for each user action you are creating a new trigger, you can follow the solution given here.
Third option will be, for each user action, persist the message and time to send email to the database. Have a job that runs periodically and scans through database for eligible records for which email has to be sent
There is a way to pass the candidate users dynamically to Activiti workflow as described in .
How do I pass a list of candidate users to an activiti workflow task in alfresco?
When candidateUser/candidateGroup is set for a UserTask using a variable, when is the expression evaluated ? Is the task id -> user/group persisted in database for fast query of like, list all the tasks a particular use can claim ? What table is it stored in ?
When human tasks are created there are two distinct events that fire.
Create : When the task itself is created and most of the task metadata is associated with the task.
Assign : When the task assignment is evaluated and the task is assigned to either an assignee or candidateGroup.
As such, the candidateGroup expression is evaluated during the assign phase.
This means we can easily manipulate the list of candidates based on a rule, database result or some other business logic prior to the task actually being assigned using a task listener that fires on the create phase.
Hope this helps,
G
Concerning the "What table is it stored in ?" part of your question:
Candidate start groups/users for a given task or process are stored in the ACT_IDENTITY_LINK table.