I am trying to create a recursive CTE and I wanted to fetch the row in the non recursive term from the table using ORDER BY but it seems impossible to do. Is there any workaround on this?
Example:
CREATE TABLE mytable (
id BIGSERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
ref_id BIGINT NOT NULL,
previous_id BIGINT REFERENCES mytable(id),
some_name TEXT NOT NULL,
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW()
);
INSERT INTO mytable (id, previous_id, ref_id, some_name) VALUES (1, NULL, 1, 'Barry');
INSERT INTO mytable (id, previous_id, ref_id, some_name) VALUES (2, NULL, 1, 'Nick');
INSERT INTO mytable (id, previous_id, ref_id, some_name) VALUES (3, 1, 2, 'Janet');
INSERT INTO mytable (id, previous_id, ref_id, some_name) VALUES (4, 1, 1, 'John');
INSERT INTO mytable (id, previous_id, ref_id, some_name) VALUES (5, 2, 7, 'Ron');
INSERT INTO mytable (id, previous_id, ref_id, some_name) VALUES (6, 1, 1, 'Aaron');
INSERT INTO mytable (id, previous_id, ref_id, some_name) VALUES (7, 4, 1, 'Anna');
The query I am trying to construct
WITH RECURSIVE my_path AS (
SELECT * FROM mytable
WHERE ref_id = 1 AND some_name = 'Anna'
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 1
UNION ALL
SELECT ph.* FROM my_path hp
INNER JOIN mytable ph ON hp.previous_id = ph.id
)
SELECT * FROM my_path;
SQLFIDDLE
Just move it into a starter CTE:
updated fiddle
WITH RECURSIVE base_record as (
SELECT * FROM mytable
WHERE ref_id = 1 AND some_name = 'Anna'
ORDER BY created_at DESC
LIMIT 1
), my_path AS (
SELECT * FROM base_record
UNION ALL
SELECT ph.* FROM my_path hp
INNER JOIN mytable ph ON hp.previous_id = ph.id
)
SELECT * FROM my_path;
Related
I'm trying fill NULL values in multiple columns (different column types INT, VARCHAR) with previous NOT NULL value in a group ordered by date. Considering following table:
I want to get here:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS test (
id VARCHAR,
date DATE,
value_1 INT,
value_2 VARCHAR
);
INSERT INTO test VALUES
(1, '2022-01-01', 5, 'asdf'),
(1, '2022-01-02', NULL, NULL),
(1, '2022-01-03', NULL, 'def'),
(1, '2022-01-04', 4, NULL),
(2, '2022-01-01', 1, 'a'),
(2, '2022-01-02', NULL, NULL),
(2, '2022-01-03', 2, 'b'),
(2, '2022-01-04', NULL, NULL);
One day, PostgreSQL may support the IGNORE NULLS option for LEAD and LAG functions.
In the mean time, you must use window functions to build groups, then select the maximum in each group.
SELECT id, date,
MAX(value_1) OVER (PARTITION BY id, grp_1) AS value_1,
MAX(value_2) OVER (PARTITION BY id, grp_2) AS value_2
FROM(
SELECT *,
COUNT(value_1) OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY Date DESC) as grp_1,
COUNT(value_2) OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY Date DESC) as grp_2
FROM test
) T
ORDER BY ID, date
Given 3 tables. I need to build SQL query to find two actors who CAST TOGETHER THE MOST and list the titles of those movies. Sort alphabetically
https://www.db-fiddle.com/f/r2Y9CpH8n7MHTeBaqEHe9S/0
The data for reproducing below:
create table film_actor
(
actor_id integer,
film_id integer
)
;
create table film
(
film_id integer,
title varchar
)
;
create table actor
(
actor_id integer,
first_name varchar,
last_name varchar
)
;
INSERT INTO public.film_actor (actor_id, film_id) VALUES (1, 1);
INSERT INTO public.film_actor (actor_id, film_id) VALUES (1, 2);
INSERT INTO public.film_actor (actor_id, film_id) VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO public.film_actor (actor_id, film_id) VALUES (2, 1);
INSERT INTO public.film_actor (actor_id, film_id) VALUES (2, 2);
INSERT INTO public.film_actor (actor_id, film_id) VALUES (2, 3);
INSERT INTO public.film_actor (actor_id, film_id) VALUES (3, 1);
INSERT INTO public.film (film_id, title) VALUES (1, 'First');
INSERT INTO public.film (film_id, title) VALUES (2, 'Second');
INSERT INTO public.film (film_id, title) VALUES (3, 'Third');
INSERT INTO public.film (film_id, title) VALUES (4, 'Fourth');
INSERT INTO public.actor (actor_id, first_name, last_name) VALUES (1, 'John', 'Snow');
INSERT INTO public.actor (actor_id, first_name, last_name) VALUES (2, 'Spider', 'Man');
INSERT INTO public.actor (actor_id, first_name, last_name) VALUES (3, 'Mike', 'Kameron');
Is this what you are looking for?
with acting_pairs as (
select a1.actor_id as a1_id, a2.actor_id as a2_id
from film_actor a1
join film_actor a2 on a1.film_id = a2.film_id
where a1.actor_id < a2.actor_id
)
select a1_id, a2_id, count(*) as total
from acting_pairs
group by (a1_id, a2_id)
order by total desc
limit 1
Giving us expected output for the example input would be nice.
Using Postgresql (9.6) i need to execute multiple insert queries into any tables (table1, table2, table3, ...) depending on result of one select query from another tableMain if result has one or more records, like:
{
insert into table1 (id, name) values(1, 'name');
insert into table2 (id, name) values(1, 'name');
insert into table3 (id, name) values(1, 'name');
} if exists (select id from tableMain where id = 1)
You can use a data modifying CTE that first checks if the row in tablemain exists, and then re-uses that result in subsequent INSERT statements.
with idcheck (main_exist) as (
select exists (select * from tablemain where id = 1 limit 1)
), t1 as (
insert into table1 (id, name)
select 1, 'name'
from idcheck
where main_exists
), t2 as (
insert into table2 (id, name)
select 1, 'name'
from idcheck
where main_exists
)
insert into table3 (id, name)
select 1, 'name'
from idcheck
where main_exists;
If you always want to insert the same values in all three tables, you can include those values in the first query so that you don't need to repeat them:
with idcheck (id, name, main_exist) as (
select 1,
'name',
exists (select * from tablemain where id = 1 limit 1)
), t1 as (
insert into table1 (id, name)
select id, name
from idcheck
where main_exists
), t2 as (
insert into table2 (id, name)
select id, name
from idcheck
where main_exists
)
insert into table3 (id, name)
select id, name
from idcheck
where main_exists;
Table Schema
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TblMaster](
[SID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL Primary Key,
[VID] [int] NOT NULL,
[CreatedDate] [datetime] default (getdate()) NOT NULL,
[CharToAdd] [varchar](10) NULL,
[Start] [int] NOT NULL,
[End] [int] NOT NULL
)
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TblDetails](
[DetailsID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL Primary Key,
[SID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Sno] [int] NOT NULL,
[ConcatenatedText] [varchar](20) NOT NULL,
[isIssued] [bit] default (0) NOT NULL,
[isUsed] [bit] default (0) NOT NULL
)
GO
Sample Data:
Insert into dbo.TblMaster Values (1,default, 'CA', 1, 5)
Insert into dbo.TblMaster Values (1,default, 'PA', 1, 5)
GO
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(1, 1, 'CA1', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(1, 2, 'CA2', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(1, 3, 'CA3', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(1, 4, 'CA4', 1,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(1, 5, 'CA5', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(2, 1, 'PA1', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(2, 2, 'PA2', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(2, 3, 'PA3', 1,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(2, 4, 'PA4', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(2, 5, 'PA5', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(3, 1, '1', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(3, 2, '2', 1,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(3, 3, '3', 1,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(3, 4, '4', 0,0)
Insert into dbo.TblDetails values(3, 5, '5', 0,0)
GO
Expected Output:
Query I have built as of now:
Declare #VID INT = 1
;WITH Tmp as
(
SELECT
TM.CharToAdd as Prefix,
sno,
sno - ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY sno) as grp
FROM dbo.TblDetails TD
LEFT JOIN dbo.TblMaster TM on TM.[SID] = TD.[SID]
WHERE isIssued = 0 and isUsed = 0
AND TM.VID = #VID
)
SELECT Prefix,
MIN(sno) as RangeStart,
MAX(sno) as RangeEnd,
COUNT(*) as [Count]
FROM Tmp
GROUP BY grp, Prefix
In the TblDetails table want to find the range of available values and its total counts from all records whose bit columns are 0. If bit column is 1 then it means it is already used so I am trying to skip it and list rest as available records. Doubtful whether am I explaining the problem statement well so have provided the sample data and expected output for better understanding. I did try doing some recursive function but the result isn't matching the expected output. So looking for help to resolve this.
You were very close...
CODE
Declare #VID INT = 1
;with cte as(
select
m.CHarToAdd,
d.sno,
d.sno - ROW_NUMBER() OVER(partition by m.CharToAdd ORDER BY sno) as grp
from
TblMaster m
inner join
TblDetails d on
d.sid = m.sid
where
d.isIssued = 0 and d.isUsed = 0 and m.vid = #VID)
select
CharToAdd,
min(sno) as Start,
max(sno) as [End],
(max(sno) - min(sno) + 1) as [Count]
from cte
group by
CHarToAdd, grp
order by
CHarToAdd
RESULTS
CharToAdd Start End Count
CA 1 3 3
CA 5 5 1
PA 1 2 2
PA 4 5 2
I express the relationship between records and searchtags that can be attached to records like so:
TABLE RECORDS
id
name
TABLE SEARCHTAGS
id
recordid
name
I want to be able to SELECT records based on the searchtags that they have. For example, I want to be able to SELECT all records that have searchtags:
(1 OR 2 OR 5) AND (6 OR 7) AND (10)
Using the above data structure, I am uncertain how to structure the SQL to accomplish this.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
You may want to try the following:
SELECT r.id, r.name
FROM records r
WHERE EXISTS (SELECT NULL FROM searchtags WHERE recordid = r.id AND id IN (1, 2, 5)) AND
EXISTS (SELECT NULL FROM searchtags WHERE recordid = r.id AND id IN (6, 7)) AND
EXISTS (SELECT NULL FROM searchtags WHERE recordid = r.id AND id IN (10));
Test case: Note that only records 1 and 4 will satisfy the query criteria.
CREATE TABLE records (id int, name varchar(10));
CREATE TABLE searchtags (id int, recordid int);
INSERT INTO records VALUES (1, 'a');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (2, 'b');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (3, 'c');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (4, 'd');
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (2, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (6, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 2);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (2, 2);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (3, 2);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 3);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (5, 4);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (7, 4);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 4);
Result:
+------+------+
| id | name |
+------+------+
| 1 | a |
| 4 | d |
+------+------+
2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
SELECT
id, name
FROM
records
WHERE
EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM searchtags WHERE recordid = records.id AND id IN (1, 2, 5)
)
AND EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM searchtags WHERE recordid = records.id AND id IN (6, 7)
)
AND EXISTS (
SELECT 1 FROM searchtags WHERE recordid = records.id AND id IN (10)
)
not sure how to do it in mysql, but in t-sql, you could do something like:
SELECT id, name FROM RECORDS where id in (SELECT recordid from SEARCHTAGS where id in (1,2,5,6,7,10))
I may not be understanding your question entirely... but I gave it my best.
Try:
SELECT R.*
FROM RECORDS R, SEARCHTAGS S
WHERE R.id == S.recordid
AND S.name in (1,2,5,6,7,10);
Don't know if you need S.name or S.id, but this is an example.
select RECORDS.name
from RECORDS join SEARCHTAGS
on RECORDS.id = SEARCHTAGS.recordid
where RECORDS.id in (1,2,...)
I misread the question first time around, and thought it was asking for
(1 AND 2 AND 5) OR (6 AND 7) OR (10)
instead of the correct
(1 OR 2 OR 5) AND (6 OR 7) AND (10)
All the answers so far have concentrated on answering the specific example, rather than addressing the more general question "and suppose I want a different set of criteria next time".
Actual question
I can't do much better than the selected answer for the actual question (Query 1):
SELECT r.id, r.name
FROM Records AS r
WHERE EXISTS(SELECT * FROM SearchTags AS s
WHERE r.id = s.recordid AND s.id IN (1, 2, 5))
AND EXISTS(SELECT * FROM SearchTags AS s
WHERE r.id = s.recordid AND s.id IN (6, 7))
AND EXISTS(SELECT * FROM SearchTags AS s
WHERE r.id = s.recordid AND s.id IN (10));
This could be written as a join to 3 aliases for the SearchTags table.
Alternative question
There are several ways to answer the alternative - I think this is the most nearly neat and extensible. Clearly, the one item (10) is easy (Query 2):
SELECT r.id, r.name
FROM records AS r JOIN searchtags AS t ON r.id = t.recordid
WHERE t.id IN (10) -- or '= 10' but IN is consistent with what follows
The two items (6 or 7) can be done with (Query 3):
SELECT r.id, r.name
FROM records AS r JOIN searchtags AS t ON r.id = t.recordid
WHERE t.id IN (6, 7)
GROUP BY r.id, r.name
HAVING COUNT(*) = 2
The three items (1, 2, 5) can be done with (Query 4):
SELECT r.id, r.name
FROM records AS r JOIN searchtags AS t ON r.id = t.recordid
WHERE t.id IN (1, 2, 5)
GROUP BY r.id, r.name
HAVING COUNT(*) = 3
And the whole collection can be a UNION of the three terms.
Generalizing the solutions
The downside of this solution is that the SQL must be manually crafted for each set of items.
If you want to automate the 'SQL generation', you need the control data - the sets of interesting search tags - in a table:
CREATE TABLE InterestingTags(GroupID INTEGER, TagID INTEGER);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags(1, 1);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags(1, 2);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags(1, 5);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags(2, 6);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags(2, 7);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags(3, 10);
For the query asking for '(1 OR 2 OR 5) AND (...)' (conjunctive normal form), you can write (Query 5):
SELECT r.id, r.name
FROM records AS r JOIN
searchtags AS s ON r.id = s.recordID JOIN
interestingtags AS t ON s.id = t.tagID
GROUP BY r.id, r.name
HAVING COUNT(DISTINCT t.GroupID) = (SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT GroupID)
FROM InterestingTags);
This checks that the number of distinct 'interesting groups of tags' for a given record is equal to the total number of 'interesting groups of tags'.
For the query asking for '(1 AND 2 AND 5) OR (...)' (disjunctive normal form), you can write a join with InterestingTags and check that the Record has as many entries as the group of tags (Query 6):
SELECT i.id, i.name
FROM (SELECT q.id, q.name, c.GroupSize,
COUNT(DISTINCT t.GroupID) AS GroupCount
FROM records AS q JOIN
searchtags AS s ON q.id = s.recordID JOIN
interestingtags AS t ON s.id = t.tagID JOIN
(SELECT GroupID, COUNT(*) AS GroupSize
FROM InterestingTags
GROUP BY GroupID) AS c ON c.GroupID = t.GroupID
GROUP BY q.id, q.name, c.GroupSize
) AS i
WHERE i.GroupCount = i.GroupSize;
Test Data
I took the test data from Daniel Vassalo's answer and augmented it with some extra values:
CREATE TABLE records (id int, name varchar(10));
CREATE TABLE searchtags (id int, recordid int);
INSERT INTO records VALUES (1, 'a');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (2, 'b');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (3, 'c');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (4, 'd');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (11, 'A11');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (21, 'B12');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (31, 'C13');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (41, 'D14');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (51, 'E15');
INSERT INTO records VALUES (61, 'F16');
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (2, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (6, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 1);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 2);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (2, 2);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (3, 2);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 3);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 3);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (5, 4);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (7, 4);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 4);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 11);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (2, 11);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (5, 11);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (6, 21);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (7, 21);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 31);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 41);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (6, 41);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 41);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (2, 51);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (5, 51);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (10, 51);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (7, 61);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (2, 61);
INSERT INTO searchtags VALUES (1, 61);
CREATE TABLE InterestingTags(GroupID INTEGER, TagID INTEGER);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags VALUES(1, 1);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags VALUES(1, 2);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags VALUES(1, 5);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags VALUES(2, 6);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags VALUES(2, 7);
INSERT INTO InterestingTags VALUES(3, 10);
Test results
The outputs that I got were:
Query 1
1 a
4 d
41 D14
Query 2
1 a
3 c
4 d
31 C13
41 D14
51 E15
Query 3
21 B12
Query 4
11 A11
Query 5
1 a
41 D14
4 d
Query 6
4 d
31 C13
3 c
1 a
41 D14
51 E15
Clearly, if I wanted the output in a specific order, I would add an ORDER BY clause to the queries.