EDITED:
I have a requirement to skip records that are created before 10s and 20s after if a gap in incoming data occurs.
(A gap is said to occur when the event-time1 - event-time2 > 3 seconds)
the resulting data is used to calculate average or median in a timewindow,
Is this possible to be done with Kinesis analytics, Dataflow, flink API, or some solution that works?
If I understand correctly, you want to find the median and average of records that are created between 10 and 20 seconds after a gap of at least 3 seconds.
Using Flink (or Kinesis Analytics, which is a managed Flink service), you could do that with session windows, or with a ProcessFunction. Process functions are more flexible, and are capable of handling pretty much anything you might need. However, in this case, session windows are probably simpler, especially if you are willing to wait until a session ends (i.e., until the next gap) to get the results. You could avoid this delay by implementing a custom window Trigger.
window tutorial
process function tutorial
Related
I am looking a way to trigger my Databricks notebook once to process Kinesis Stream and using following pattern
import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.Trigger
// Load your Streaming DataFrame
val sdf = spark.readStream.format("json").schema(my_schema).load("/in/path")
// Perform transformations and then write…
sdf.writeStream.trigger(Trigger.Once).format("delta").start("/out/path")
It looks like it's not possible with AWS Kinesis and that's what Databricks documentation suggest as well. My Question is what else can we do to Achieve that?
As you mentioned in the question the trigger once isn't supported for Kinesis.
But you can achieve what you need by adding into the picture the Kinesis Data Firehose that will write data from Kinesis into S3 bucket (you can select format that you need, like, Parquet, ORC, or just leave in JSON), and then you can point the streaming job to given bucket, and use Trigger.Once for it, as it's a normal streaming source (For efficiency it's better to use Auto Loader that is available on Databricks). Also, to have the costs under the control, you can setup retention policy for your S3 destination to remove or archive files after some period of time, like 1 week or month.
A workaround is to stop after X runs, without trigger. It'll guarantee a fix number of rows per run.
The only issue is that if you have millions of rows waiting in the queue you won't have the guarantee to process all of them
In scala you can add an event listener, in python count the number of batches.
from time import sleep
s = sdf.writeStream.format("delta").start("/out/path")
#by defaut keep spark.sql.streaming.numRecentProgressUpdates=100 in the list. Stop after 10 microbatch
#maxRecordsPerFetch is 10 000 by default, so we will consume a max value of 10x10 000= 100 000 messages per run
while len(s.recentProgress) < 10:
print("Batchs #:"+str(len(s.recentProgress)))
sleep(10)
s.stop()
You can have a more advanced logic counting the number of message processed per batch and stopping when the queue is empty (the throughput should lower once it's all consumed as you'll only get the "real-time" flow, not the history)
Our team is trying to build a predictive maintenance system whose task is to look at a set of events and predict whether these events depict a set of known anomalies or not.
We are at the design phase and the current system design is as follows:
The events may occur on multiple sources of an IoT system (such as cloud platform, edge devices or any intermediate platforms)
The events are pushed by the data sources into a message queueing system (currently we have chosen Apache Kafka).
Each data source has its own queue (Kafka Topic).
From the queues, the data is consumed by multiple inference engines (which are actually neural networks).
Depending upon the feature set, an inference engine will subscribe to
multiple Kafka topics and stream data from those topics to continuously output the inference.
The overall architecture follows the single-responsibility principle meaning that every component will be separate from each other and run inside a separate Docker container.
Problem:
In order to classify a set of events as an anomaly, the events have to occur in the same time window. e.g. say there are three data sources pushing their respective events into Kafka topics, but due to some reason, the data is not synchronized.
So one of the inference engines pulls the latest entries from each of the kafka topics, but the corresponding events in the pulled data do not belong to the same time window (say 1 hour). That will result in invalid predictions due to out-of-sync data.
Question
We need to figure out how can we make sure that the data from all three sources are pushed in-order so that when an inference engine requests entries (say the last 100 entries) from multiple kakfa topics, the corresponding entries in each topic belong to the same time window?
I would suggest KSQL, which is a streaming SQL engine that enables real-time data processing against Apache Kafka. It also provides nice functionality for Windowed Aggregation etc.
There are 3 ways to define Windows in KSQL:
hopping windows, tumbling windows, and session windows. Hopping and
tumbling windows are time windows, because they're defined by fixed
durations they you specify. Session windows are dynamically sized
based on incoming data and defined by periods of activity separated by
gaps of inactivity.
In your context, you can use KSQL to query and aggregate the topics of interest using Windowed Joins. For example,
SELECT t1.id, ...
FROM topic_1 t1
INNER JOIN topic_2 t2
WITHIN 1 HOURS
ON t1.id = t2.id;
Some suggestions -
Handle delay at the producer end -
Ensure all three producers always send data in sync to Kafka topics by using batch.size and linger.ms.
eg. if linger.ms is set to 1000, all messages would be sent to Kafka within 1 second.
Handle delay at the consumer end -
Considering any streaming engine at the consumer side (be it Kafka-stream, spark-stream, Flink), provides windows functionality to join/aggregate stream data based on keys while considering delayed window function.
Check this - Flink windows for reference how to choose right window type link
To handle this scenario, data sources must provide some mechanism for the consumer to realize that all relevant data has arrived. The simplest solution is to publish a batch from data source with a batch Id (Guid) of some form. Consumers can then wait until the next batch id shows up marking the end of the previous batch. This approach assumes sources will not skip a batch, otherwise they will get permanently mis-aligned. There is no algorithm to detect this but you might have some fields in the data that show discontinuity and allow you to realign the data.
A weaker version of this approach is to either just wait x-seconds and assume all sources succeed in this much time or look at some form of time stamps (logical or wall clock) to detect that a source has moved on to the next time window implicitly showing completion of the last window.
The following recommendations should maximize success of event synchronization for the anomaly detection problem using timeseries data.
Use a network time synchronizer on all producer/consumer nodes
Use a heartbeat message from producers every x units of time with a fixed start time. For eg: the messages are sent every two minutes at the start of the minute.
Build predictors for producer message delay. use the heartbeat messages to compute this.
With these primitives, we should be able to align the timeseries events, accounting for time drifts due to network delays.
At the inference engine side, expand your windows at a per producer level to synch up events across producers.
I'm reviewing the StructuredNetworkWordCountWindowed example in Apache Spark Structured Streaming and am having trouble finding information about how I can update the example to control the output intervals. When I run the example I receive output every time a micro batch is processed. I understand that this is intended because the main case is to process data and emit results in real time but what about the case where I want to process data in real time but output the state at some specific interval? Does Spark Structured Streaming support this scenario? I reviewed the programming guide and the only similar concept that is mentioned is the Trigger.ProcessingTime option. Unfortunately, this option is not quite what is needed since it applies to the batch processing time and the scenario described above still requires processing data in real time.
Is this feature supported? More specifically, how do I only output the state at the time the window ends assuming there are no late arrivals and using a tumbling window?
I have an aggregated store via DSL via windowed aggregation over a stream.
Then, I get a stream from it via toStream, do some small transformation and send to another topic.
In my tests, from the publishing time to the time when the data is in the destination stream, it may well spend 10-20 seconds. Which makes my tests having to wait for it that long.
How can I reduce this waiting time so computations are triggered faster in my tests?
Which settings are involved?
I tried setting commit.interval.ms to 100 but it is of no help.
I have time series data in Kafka. The schema is quite simple - the key is the channel name, and the values are Long/Double tuples of the timestamp and the value (in reality it's a custom Avro object but it boils down to this). They always come in correct chronological order.
The wanted end result is data packaged in 10 minute batches, aligned at 10 minutes (i.e., 00:00 < t <= 00:10, 00:10 < t <= 00:20, ..., 23: 50 < t <= 00:00). Each package is to contain only data of one channel.
My idea is to have two Spark Streaming jobs. The first one takes the data from the Kafka topics and dumps it to a table in a Cassandra database where the key is the timestamp and the channel name, and every time such an RDD hits a 10 minute boundary, this boundary is posted to another topic, alongside the channel whose boundary is hit.
The second job listens to this "boundary topic", and for every received 10 minute boundary, the data is pulled from Cassandra, some calculations like min, max, mean, stddev are done and the data and these results are packaged to a defined output directory. That way, each directory contains the data from one channel and one 10 minute window.
However, this looks a bit clunky and like a lot of extra work to me. Is this a feasible solution or are there any other more efficient tricks to it, like some custom windowing of the Kafka data?
I agree with your intuition that this solution is clunky. How about simply using the time windowing functionality built into the Streams DSL?
http://kafka.apache.org/11/documentation/streams/developer-guide/dsl-api.html#windowing
The most natural output would be a new topic containing the windowed aggregations, but if you really need it written to a directory that should be possible with Kafka Connect.
I work with the Flink Stream Processing, not Spark-streaming but I guess the programming concept of both of them is alike. So supposing data are ordered chronologically and you want to aggregate data for every 10 minutes and do some processing on aggregated data, I think the best approach is to use the Streaming Window Functions. I suggest to define a function to map every incoming data's timestamp to the last 10 minutes:
12:10:24 ----> 12:10:00
12:10:30 ----> 12:10:00
12:25:24 ----> 12:20:00
So you can create a keyed stream object like:
StreamObject<Long, Tuple<data>>
That the Long field is the mapped timestamp of every message. Then you can apply a window. You should search what kind of window is more appropriate for your case.
Point: Setting a key for the data stream will cause the window function to consider a logical window for every key.
In the most simple case, you should define a time window of 10 minutes and aggregate all data incoming on that period of time.
The other approach, if you know the rate of generating of data and how many messages will be generated in a period of 10 minutes, is to use Count window. For example, a window with the count of 20 will listen to the stream and aggregate all the messages with the same key in a logical window and apply the window function just when the number of messages in the window reaches 20.
After messages aggregated in a window as desired, you could apply your processing logic using a reduce function or some action like that.