kubernetes - nginx ingress - How to access - kubernetes

I could not access my application from the k8s cluster.
With nodePort everything works. If I use ingress controller, I could see that it is created successfully. I am able to ping IP. If I try to telnet, it says connection refused. I am also unable to access the application. What do i miss? I do not see any exception in the ingress pod.
kubectl get ing -n test
NAME CLASS HOSTS ADDRESS PORTS AGE
web-ingress <none> * 192.168.0.102 80 44m
ping 192.168.0.102
PING 192.168.0.102 (192.168.0.102) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.795 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.860 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.102: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.631 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.102 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2038ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.631/0.762/0.860/0.096 ms
telnet 192.168.0.102 80
Trying 192.168.0.102...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
kubectl get all -n ingress-nginx
shows this
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
pod/ingress-nginx-admission-create-htvkh 0/1 Completed 0 99m
pod/ingress-nginx-admission-patch-cf8gj 0/1 Completed 0 99m
pod/ingress-nginx-controller-7fd7d8df56-kll4v 1/1 Running 0 99m
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
service/ingress-nginx-controller NodePort 10.102.220.87 <none> 80:31692/TCP,443:32736/TCP 99m
service/ingress-nginx-controller-admission ClusterIP 10.106.159.230 <none> 443/TCP 99m
NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
deployment.apps/ingress-nginx-controller 1/1 1 1 99m
NAME DESIRED CURRENT READY AGE
replicaset.apps/ingress-nginx-controller-7fd7d8df56 1 1 1 99m
NAME COMPLETIONS DURATION AGE
job.batch/ingress-nginx-admission-create 1/1 7s 99m
job.batch/ingress-nginx-admission-patch 1/1 8s 99m

Answer
The IP from kubectl get ing -n test is not an externally accessible address that you should be using.
Your NGINX Ingress Controller Deployment has a Service deployed alongside it. You can use the external IP of this Service (if it has one) to hit your Ingress Controller.
Because your Service is of NodePort type (and does not show an external IP), you must address the Ingress Controller Pods through your cluster's Node IPs. You would need to track which Node the Pod is on, then find the Node's IP. Here is an example of doing this:
NODE=$(kubectl get pods -o wide | grep "ingress-nginx-controller" | awk {'print $8'})
NODE_IP=$(kubectl get nodes "$NODE" -o wide | grep Ready | awk {'print $7'})
More Info
If your cluster is managed (i.e. GKE/Azure/AWS), you can use a LoadBalancer Service to provide an external IP to hit the Ingress Controller.

Related

Kubernetes coredns is not reachable from the pod

I have a pod deployed named 'sample_pod' in rancher cluster having a container named 'sample_container'. The sample pod has a service named 'test'. Inside the sample_container, if I try to resolve the cluster domain names using 'host' or 'dig' or 'nslookup' command, I am always getting connection refused; no servers could be reached.
I have coredns pods running inside my cluster
user#abc$ kubectl get pods -n kube-system
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
calico-kube-controllers-7fbff695b4-f7vxc 1/1 Running 0 21h
canal-928m6 2/2 Running 0 21h
canal-d7vjr 2/2 Running 0 20h
coredns-6f85d5fb88-9txmx 1/1 Running 0 21h
coredns-autoscaler-79599b9dc6-ndgfj 1/1 Running 0 21h
kube-multus-ds-769n6 1/1 Running 0 20h
metrics-server-8449844bf-jz66w 1/1 Running 0 21h
rke-coredns-addon-deploy-job-dlvlh 0/1 Completed 0 21h
rke-ingress-controller-deploy-job-jcj6w 0/1 Completed 0 21h
rke-metrics-addon-deploy-job-wnhbq 0/1 Completed 0 21h
rke-network-plugin-deploy-job-wzqfb 0/1 Completed 0 21h
whereabouts-p6vcc 1/1 Running 0 20h
I am not touching the default Corefile of coredns
Corefile:
.:53 {
log
errors
health {
lameduck 5s
}
ready
kubernetes cluster.local in-addr.arpa ip6.arpa {
pods insecure
fallthrough in-addr.arpa ip6.arpa
}
prometheus :9153
forward . "/etc/resolv.conf"
cache 30
loop
reload
loadbalance
}
/etc/hosts file of sample_container:
[root#sample_container]# cat /etc/hosts
# Kubernetes-managed hosts file.
127.0.0.1 localhost
::1 localhost ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
fe00::0 ip6-localnet
fe00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
fe00::1 ip6-allnodes
fe00::2 ip6-allrouters
10.42.1.18 sample_pod
# Entries added by HostAliases.
127.0.0.1 localhost
10.94.66.8 netboot.com
/etc/resolv.conf of sample_container:
[root#sample_container]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 10.43.0.10
search default.svc.cluster.local svc.cluster.local cluster.local openstacklocal
options ndots:5
Host or dig command I used to resolve following domains and got the error:
[root#sample_container]# ping 10.43.0.10
PING 10.43.0.10 (10.43.0.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 10.43.0.10 ping statistics ---
99 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 98003ms
[root#sample_container]# host kube-dns.kube-system
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
[root#sample_container]# host localhost
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
I tried to resolve test service in the default namespace (where sample_container, sample_pod resides in same namespace)
[root#sample_container]# host test
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
dig or nslookup command also returns same
[root#sample_container]# nslookup localhost
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
[root#sample_container]# dig localhost
; <<>> DiG 9.11.4-P2-RedHat-9.11.4-26.P2.el7_9.8 <<>> localhost
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
Additional information on pod ip and service ip:
root#user$ kubectl get all -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
pod/sample_pod 1/1 Running 0 177m 10.42.1.18 dsc-worker-node <none> <none>
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE SELECTOR
service/test ClusterIP 10.43.19.85 <none> 80/TCP,443/TCP 177m role=test
Note: I deployed this pod such a way that some containers will access the baremetal machine to serve its purpose. And I need to achieve forwarding certain domain names to that baremetal server which will reply for that dns query. Also I am aware of forward plugin which does this job. But without touching the Corefile, I am unable to reach coredns for cluster domain names itself.
Could someone help me to solve this issue? It would be really helpful for me. Thanks in advance!!!
I solved this issue after changing the route. By default, the dns queries are sent to kubernetes nameserver via private interface instead of sending via default gateway (public interface). After changing the route to make dns queries to be sent via default gateway, it was solved.

Rancher: kubernetes cluster stuck in pending. "No route to host"

I built a kubernetes cluster on CentOS 8 first. I followed the how-to found here: https://www.tecmint.com/install-a-kubernetes-cluster-on-centos-8/
And then I built an Ubuntu 18.04 VM and installed Rancher on it. I can access the Rancher website just fine and all appears to be working on the rancher side, except I can't add my kubernetes cluster to it.
When I use the "Add Cluster" feature, I chose the "Other Cluster" option, give it a name, and then click create. I then copy the insecure "Cluster Registration Command" to the master node. It appears to take the command just fine.
In troubleshooting, I've issued the following command: kubectl -n cattle-system logs -l app=cattle-cluster-agent
The output I get is as follows:
INFO: Environment: CATTLE_ADDRESS=10.42.0.1 CATTLE_CA_CHECKSUM=94ad10e756d390cdf8b25465f938c04344a396b16b4ff6c0922b9cd6b9fc454c CATTLE_CLUSTER=true CATTLE_CLUSTER_REGISTRY= CATTLE_FEATURES= CATTLE_INTERNAL_ADDRESS= CATTLE_IS_RKE=false CATTLE_K8S_MANAGED=true CATTLE_NODE_NAME=cattle-cluster-agent-7b9df685cf-9kr4p CATTLE_SERVER=https://192.168.188.189:8443
INFO: Using resolv.conf: nameserver 10.96.0.10 search cattle-system.svc.cluster.local svc.cluster.local cluster.local options ndots:5
ERROR: https://192.168.188.189:8443/ping is not accessible (Failed to connect to 192.168.188.189 port 8443: No route to host)
INFO: Environment: CATTLE_ADDRESS=10.40.0.0 CATTLE_CA_CHECKSUM=94ad10e756d390cdf8b25465f938c04344a396b16b4ff6c0922b9cd6b9fc454c CATTLE_CLUSTER=true CATTLE_CLUSTER_REGISTRY= CATTLE_FEATURES= CATTLE_INTERNAL_ADDRESS= CATTLE_IS_RKE=false CATTLE_K8S_MANAGED=true CATTLE_NODE_NAME=cattle-cluster-agent-7bc7687557-tkvzt CATTLE_SERVER=https://192.168.188.189:8443
INFO: Using resolv.conf: nameserver 10.96.0.10 search cattle-system.svc.cluster.local svc.cluster.local cluster.local options ndots:5
ERROR: https://192.168.188.189:8443/ping is not accessible (Failed to connect to 192.168.188.189 port 8443: No route to host)
[root#k8s-master ~]# ping 192.168.188.189
PING 192.168.188.189 (192.168.188.189) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.188.189: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.432 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.188.189: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.400 ms
^C
--- 192.168.188.189 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.400/0.416/0.432/0.016 ms
As you can see I'm getting a "No route to host" error message. But, I can ping the rancher VM using its IP address.
It appears to be attempting to use resolv.conf inside the cluster and looking to use a 10.96.0.10 to resolve the ip address of 192.168.188.189 (my Rancher VM). But it appears to be failing to resolve it.
I'm thinking I have some sort of DNS issue that's preventing me from using hostnames. Though I've edited the /etc/hosts file on the master and worker nodes to include entries for each of the devices. I can ping devices using their hostname, but I can't reach a pod using :. I get a "No route to host" error message when I try that too. See here:
[root#k8s-master ~]# ping k8s-worker1
PING k8s-worker1 (192.168.188.191) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from k8s-worker1 (192.168.188.191): icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.478 ms
64 bytes from k8s-worker1 (192.168.188.191): icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.449 ms
^C
--- k8s-worker1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.449/0.463/0.478/0.025 ms
[root#k8s-master ~]# kubectl get svc
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
hello-world NodePort 10.103.5.49 <none> 8080:30370/TCP 45m
kubernetes ClusterIP 10.96.0.1 <none> 443/TCP 26h
nginx NodePort 10.97.172.245 <none> 80:30205/TCP 3h43m
[root#k8s-master ~]# kubectl get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
hello-world-7884c6997d-2dc9z 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.40.0.4 k8s-worker3 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-562lh 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.35.0.8 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-78dmm 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.36.0.3 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-7vt4f 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.40.0.6 k8s-worker3 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-bpq5g 1/1 Running 0 49m 10.36.0.2 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-c529d 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.35.0.6 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-ddk7k 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.36.0.5 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-fq8hx 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.35.0.7 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-g5lxs 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.40.0.3 k8s-worker3 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-kjb7f 1/1 Running 0 49m 10.35.0.3 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-nfdpc 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.40.0.5 k8s-worker3 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-nnd6q 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.36.0.7 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-p6gxh 1/1 Running 0 49m 10.40.0.1 k8s-worker3 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-p7v4b 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.35.0.4 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-pwpxr 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.36.0.4 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-qlg9h 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.40.0.2 k8s-worker3 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-s89c5 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.35.0.5 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-vd8ch 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.40.0.7 k8s-worker3 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-wvnh7 1/1 Running 0 28m 10.36.0.6 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
hello-world-7884c6997d-z57kx 1/1 Running 0 49m 10.36.0.1 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
nginx-6799fc88d8-gm5ls 1/1 Running 0 4h11m 10.35.0.1 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
nginx-6799fc88d8-k2jtw 1/1 Running 0 4h11m 10.44.0.1 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
nginx-6799fc88d8-mc5mz 1/1 Running 0 4h12m 10.36.0.0 k8s-worker1 <none> <none>
nginx-6799fc88d8-qn6mh 1/1 Running 0 4h11m 10.35.0.2 k8s-worker2 <none> <none>
[root#k8s-master ~]# curl k8s-worker1:30205
curl: (7) Failed to connect to k8s-worker1 port 30205: No route to host
I suspect this is the underlying reason why I can't join the cluster to rancher.
EDIT: I want to add additional details to this question. Each of my nodes (master & worker nodes) have the following ports open on the firewall:
firewall-cmd --list-ports
6443/tcp 2379-2380/tcp 10250/tcp 10251/tcp 10252/tcp 10255/tcp 6783/tcp 6783/udp 6784/udp
For the CNI, the Kubernetes cluster is using Weavenet.
Each node (master & worker) is configured to use my main home DNS server (which is also an active directory domain controller) in their networking configuration. I've created AAA records for each node in the DNS server. The nodes are NOT joined to the domain. However, I've also edited each node's /etc/hosts file to contain the following records:
# more /etc/hosts
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4 localhost4.localdomain4
::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6 localhost6.localdomain6
192.168.188.190 k8s-master
192.168.188.191 k8s-worker1
192.168.188.192 k8s-worker2
192.168.188.193 k8s-worker3
I've found that I CAN use "curl k8s-worker1.mydomain.com:30370" with about 33% success. But I would have thought that the /etc/hosts file would take precedence over using my home DNS server.
And finally, I noticed an additional anomaly. I've discovered that the cluster is not load balancing across the three worker nodes. As shown above, I'm running a deployment called "hello-world" based on the bashofmann/rancher-demo image with 20 replicas. I've also created a nodeport service for hello-world that maps nodeport 30370 to port 8080 on each respective pod.
If I open my web browser and go to http://192.168.188.191:30370 then it'll load the website but only served up by pods on k8s-worker1. It'll never load the website served up by any pods on any of the other worker nodes. This would explain why I only get ~33% success, as long as it's served up by the same worker node that I've specified in my url.
OP confirmed that the issue is found to be due to firewall rules. This was debugged by disabling the firewall, that lead to desired operation(cluster addition) to be successful.
In order to nodePort service to work properly, port range 30000 - 32767 should be reachable on all the nodes of the cluster.
I also found that disabling the firewall "fixes" the issue, but that's not a great fix. Also, adding ports 30000-32767 for tcp/udp didn't work for me. Still no route to host.

How to configure Kubernetes so the failed pod did not reply to ICMP echo-requests?

I've noticed that even failed pods replays to ICMP pings ( pods in not Ready state ). Is there a way to configure CNI ( or Kubernetes ) in the way so failed pods didn't generate ICMP replies ?
#kubectl get pods -o wide
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP NODE NOMINATED NODE READINESS GATES
multitool-1 1/1 Running 0 20m 172.17.0.3 minikube <none> <none>
multitool-2 0/1 ImagePullBackOff 0 20m 172.17.0.4 minikube <none> <none>
multitool-3 1/1 Running 0 3m9s 172.17.0.5 minikube <none> <none>
#kubectl exec multitool-3 -it bash
bash-5.0# ping 172.17.0.4
PING 172.17.0.4 (172.17.0.4) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 172.17.0.4: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.048 ms
64 bytes from 172.17.0.4: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.107 ms
^C
--- 172.17.0.4 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1041ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.048/0.077/0.107/0.029 ms
bash-5.0#
No, that's not how ICMP works. The kernel handles those, it only checks if the networking interface is operational, which it is regardless of how broken the container process might be.

Can't resolve dns from inside k8s pod

In dnsutils pod exec ping stackoverflow.com
/ # ping stackoverflow.com
ping: bad address 'stackoverflow.com'
The /etc/resolve.conf file looks fine from inside the pod
/ # cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 10.96.0.10
search weika.svc.cluster.local svc.cluster.local cluster.local
options ndots:5
10.96.0.10 is the kube-dns service ip:
[root#test3 k8s]# kubectl -n kube-system get service
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
kube-dns ClusterIP 10.96.0.10 <none> 53/UDP,53/TCP,9153/TCP 75d
core dns
[root#test3 k8s]# kubectl -n kube-system get pod -o wide | grep core
coredns-6557d7f7d6-5nkv7 1/1 Running 0 10d 10.244.0.14 test3.weikayuninternal.com <none> <none>
coredns-6557d7f7d6-gtrgc 1/1 Running 0 10d 10.244.0.13 test3.weikayuninternal.com <none> <none>
when I change the nameserver ip to coredns ip. resolve dns is ok.
/ # cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 10.244.0.14
#nameserver 10.96.0.10
search weika.svc.cluster.local svc.cluster.local cluster.local
options ndots:5
/ # ping stackoverflow.com
PING stackoverflow.com (151.101.65.69): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 151.101.65.69: seq=0 ttl=49 time=100.497 ms
64 bytes from 151.101.65.69: seq=1 ttl=49 time=101.014 ms
64 bytes from 151.101.65.69: seq=2 ttl=49 time=100.462 ms
64 bytes from 151.101.65.69: seq=3 ttl=49 time=101.465 ms
64 bytes from 151.101.65.69: seq=4 ttl=49 time=100.318 ms
^C
--- stackoverflow.com ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 100.318/100.751/101.465 ms
/ #
Why is it happening?
You have not mentioned how kubernetes was installed. You should restart coredns pods using below command.
kubectl -n kube-system rollout restart deployment coredns
This might only apply to you if there was trouble during either your initial installation of microk8s or enablement of the dns addon, but it might still be worth a shot. I've invested so much gd time in this I couldn't live with myself if I didn't at least share to help that one person out there.
In my case, the server I provisioned to set up a single-node cluster was too small - only 1GB of memory. When I was setting up microk8s for the first time and enabling all the addons I wanted (dns, ingress, hostpath-storage), I started running into problems that were remedied by just giving the server more memory. Unfortunately though, screwing that up initially seems to have left the addons in some kind of undefined, partially initialized/configured state, such that everything appeared to be running normally as best I could tell (i.e. CoreDNS was deployed and ready, and the kube-dns service showed CoreDNS's ClusterIP as it's backend endpoint) but none of my pods could resolve any DNS names, internal or external to the cluster, and I would get these annoying event logs when I ran kubectl describe <pod> suggesting there was a DNS issue of some kind.
What ended up fixing it is resetting the cluster (microk8s reset --destroy-storage) and then re-enabling all my addons (microk8s enable dns ingress hostpath-storage) now that I had enough memory to do so cleanly do so. After that, CoreDNS and the kube-dns service appeared ready just like before, but DNS queries actually worked like they should from within the pods running in the cluster.
tl;dr; - Your dns addon might have have been f'd up during cluster installation. Try resetting your cluster, re-enabling the addons, and re-deploying your resources.

Can't ping other pods by hostname on minikube

I have a statefulSet with two replicas.
It's headless service name is "gov-svc"
It's ->
.metadata.name: sts
.metadata.namespace: default
.spec.serviceName: gov-svc
.spec.template.spec.subdomain: gov-svc
.spec.replicas: 2
Before running statefulSet
kubectl get pods --all-namespaces
NAMESPACE NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
kube-system coredns-99b9bb8bd-qdnsb 1/1 Running 0 4h
kube-system etcd-minikube 1/1 Running 0 4h
kube-system kube-addon-manager-minikube 1/1 Running 0 4h
kube-system kube-apiserver-minikube 1/1 Running 0 4h
kube-system kube-controller-manager-minikube 1/1 Running 1 4h
kube-system kube-proxy-b9np6 1/1 Running 0 4h
kube-system kube-scheduler-minikube 1/1 Running 0 4h
kube-system kubernetes-dashboard-7db4dc666b-bsk8k 1/1 Running 0 4h
kube-system storage-provisioner
After running both of the pods of this statefulSet, from pod sts-0, ping results:
$ ping sts-0.gov-svc.default.svc.cluster.local
PING sts-0.gov-svc.default.svc.cluster.local (172.17.0.11): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 172.17.0.11: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.051 ms
64 bytes from 172.17.0.11: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.444 ms
^C
--- redis-cluster-exp-0-0.redis-cluster-exp.default.svc.cluster.local ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 0.051/0.247/0.444 ms
But when I try to ping sts-1 from sts-0, it says:
$ ping sts-1.gov-svc.default.svc.cluster.local
ping: bad address 'sts-1.gov-svc.default.svc.cluster.local'
I need to ping other pods successfully by hostname. How can I do it?
You need to create headless service to be able to ping replicas from each to other within a StatefulSet. Something like:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: gov-svc-headless
labels:
your_label: your_value
spec:
selector:
your_label: your_value
ports:
- port: your_port
name: transport
protocol: TCP
clusterIP: None <---
Note:
With selectors For headless services that define selectors, the
endpoints controller creates Endpoints records in the API, and
modifies the DNS configuration to return A records (addresses) that
point directly to the Pods backing the Service.
Note:
or headless services that do not define selectors, the endpoints
controller does not create Endpoints records. However, the DNS system
looks for and configures either:
CNAME records for ExternalName-type services. A records for any
Endpoints that share a name with the service, for all other types.
More info: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/service/#headless-services