I was trying to make file before application gets up in kubernetes cluster with initcontainers,
But when i am setting up the pod.yaml and trying to apply it with "kubectl apply -f pod.yaml" it throws below error
error-image
Like the error says, you cannot update a Pod adding or removing containers. To quote the documentation ( https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/pods/#pod-update-and-replacement )
Kubernetes doesn't prevent you from managing Pods directly. It is
possible to update some fields of a running Pod, in place. However,
Pod update operations like patch, and replace have some limitations
This is because usually, you don't create Pods directly, instead you use Deployments, Jobs, StatefulSets (and more) which are high-level resources that defines Pods templates. When you modify the template, Kubernetes simply delete the old Pod and then schedule the new version.
In your case:
you could delete the pod first, then create it again with the new specs you defined. But take into consideration that the Pod may be scheduled on a different node of the cluster (if you have more than one) and that may have a different IP Address as Pods are disposable entities.
Change your definition with a slightly more complex one, a Deployment ( https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/ ) which can be changed as desired and, each time you'll make a change to its definition, the old Pod will be removed and a new one will be scheduled.
From the spec of your Pod, I see that you are using a volume to share data between the init container and the main container. This is the optimal way but you don't necessarily need to use a hostPath. If the only needs for the volume is to share data between init container and other containers, you can simply use emptyDir type, which acts as a temporary volume that can be shared between containers and that will be cleaned up when the Pod is removed from the cluster for any reason.
You can check the documentation here: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/volumes/#emptydir
I'm new to Kubernetes and learning it.
have deployment kind of pods and replcas=3.
Is there any way I can mount separate volume for each pod and one volume for all pods.
Requirements:
case 1- My application that is generating some temp file name tempfile.txt, So there is three replica pod, each one will generate tempfile.txt but content might be different. So If I use shared volume that will override each other .
case-2: I have a common file that is not part of image, that will be used by all pods starting the application i.e copy files from host to all pods's container
Thanks in Advance.
There are multiple ways to achieve the first part. Here is mine:
Instead of a deployment, use a statefulSet to create the replicas. statefulSets allow you to include a volume template which each pod have created with it, thus each new pod will have a new PV created specificlaly for it.
This does require your cluster to allow for dynamically provisioned volumes.
Depending on the size of your tempfile.txt, your use case, and your cluster/node configuration, you might also want to consider using a hostPath volume which will use the local storage of your node.
For the second part of your question, using any readWriteMany volume will work (such as any NFS option).
On the note of subPath, this should also work, so long as you define different subPaths for each pod. the example in the link provided by DT does this by creating a subpath based off the pod name.
Let's say that you wanted to create a Jenkins Deployment. As Jenkins uses a local XML file for configuration and state, you would want to create a PersistentVolume so that your data could be saved across Pod evictions and Deployment deletions. I know that the Retain reclaimPolicy will result in the data persisting on the detached PersistentVolume, but the documentation says this is just so that you can manually reclaim the data on it later on, and seems to say nothing about the volume being automatically reused if its mounting Pods are ever brought back up.
It is difficult to articulate what I am even trying to ask, so forgive me if this seems like a nebulous question, but:
If you delete the Jenkins deployment, then later decide to recreate it where you left off, how do you get it to re-mount that exact PersistentVolume on which that specific XML configuration is still stored?
Is this a case where you would want to use a StatefulSet? It seems like, in this case, Jenkins would be considered "stateful."
Is the PersistentVolumeClaim the basis of a volume's "identity"? In other words, is the expectation for the PersistentVolumeClaim to be the stable identifier by which an application can bind to a specific volume with specific data on it?
you can use stateful sets. scaling down deletes the pod, leaving the claims alone. Persistent volume claims can be deleted only manually, in order to release the underlying PersistentVolume
a scale-up can reattach the same claim along with the bound Persistent Volume and its contents to the newly created pod instance.
If you have accidentally scaled down a StatefulSet, you can scale up again and the new pod will have the same persisted state again.
If you delete the Jenkins deployment, then later decide to recreate it
where you left off, how do you get it to re-mount that exact
PersistentVolume on which that specific XML configuration is still
stored?
By using the PersistentVolumeClaim that was bound to that PersistentVolume, assuming the PersistentVolumeClaim and its PersistentVolume haven't been deleted. You should be able to try it :-)
Is this a case where you would want to use a StatefulSet? It seems
like, in this case, Jenkins would be considered "stateful."
Yes, you could use StatefulSet for its stable storage. With no need for persistent identities and stable hostnames, though, I'm not sure of the benefits compared to a master and dynamic slaves Deployment. Unless the idea is to partition the work (e.g. "areas" of the source control repo) across several Jenkins masters and their slaves...
Is the PersistentVolumeClaim the basis of a volume's "identity"? In
other words, is the expectation for the PersistentVolumeClaim to be
the stable identifier by which an application can bind to a specific
volume with specific data on it?
Yes (see my answer to the first question) - the PersistentVolumeClaim is like a stable identifier by which an application can mount the specific volume the claim is bound to.
I'm trying to get my head around Persistent Volumes & Persistent Volume Claims and how it should be done in Helm...
The TLDR version of the question is: How do I create a PVC in helm that I can attach future releases (whether upgrades or brand new installs) to?
My current understanding:
PV is an interface to a piece of physical storage.
PVC is how a pod claims the existence of a PV for its own use. When the pod is deleted, the PVC is also deleted, but the PV is maintained - and is therefore persisted. But then how I do use it again?
I know it is possible to dynamically provision PVs. Like with Google Cloud as an example if you create ONLY a PVC, it will automatically create a PV for you.
Now this is the part I'm stuck on...
I've created a helm chart that explicitly creates the PVC & thus has a dynamically created PV as part of a release. I then later delete the release, which will then also remove the PVC. The cloud provider will maintain the PV. On a subsequent install of the same chart with a new release... How do I reuse the old PV? Is there a way to actually do that?
I did find this question which kind of answers it... However, it implies that you need to pre-create PVs for each PVC you're going to need, and the whole point of the replicas & auto-scaling is that all of those should be generated on demand.
The use case is - as always - for test/dev environments where I want my data to be persisted, but I don't always want the servers running.
Thank you in advance! My brain's hurting a bit cause I just can't figure it out... >.<
It will be a headache indeed.
Let's start with how you should do it to achieve scalable deployments with RWO storages that are attached to your singular pods when they are brought up. This is where volumeClaimTemplates come into play. You can have PVC created dynamicaly as your Deployment scales. This however suits well situation when your pod needs storage that is attached to a pod, but not really needed any longer when pod goes away (volume can be reused following reclaim policy.
If you need the data like this reatached when pod fails, you should think of StatefulSets which solve that part at least.
Now, if you precreate PVC explicitly, you have more control over what happens, but dynamic scalability will have problems with this for RWO. This and manual PV management as in the response you linked can actually achieve volume reuse, and it's the only mechanism that would allow it that I can think of.
After you hit a wall like this it's time to think about alternatives. For example, why not use a StatefulSet that will give you storage retention in running cluster and instead of deleting the chart, set all it's replicas to 0, retaining non-compute resources in place but scaling it down to nothing. Then when you scale up a still bound PVC should get reattached to rescaled pods.
I'm running a MySQL deployment on Kubernetes however seems like my allocated space was not enough, initially I added a persistent volume of 50GB and now I'd like to expand that to 100GB.
I already saw the a persistent volume claim is immutable after creation, but can I somehow just resize the persistent volume and then recreate my claim?
Yes, as of 1.11, persistent volumes can be resized on certain cloud providers. To increase volume size:
Edit the PVC (kubectl edit pvc $your_pvc) to specify the new size. The key to edit is spec.resources.requests.storage:
Terminate the pod using the volume.
Once the pod using the volume is terminated, the filesystem is expanded and the size of the PV is increased. See the above link for details.
It is possible in Kubernetes 1.9 (alpha in 1.8) for some volume types: gcePersistentDisk, awsElasticBlockStore, Cinder, glusterfs, rbd
It requires enabling the PersistentVolumeClaimResize admission plug-in and storage classes whose allowVolumeExpansion field is set to true.
See official docs at https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/persistent-volumes/#expanding-persistent-volumes-claims
Update: volume expansion is available as a beta feature starting Kubernetes v1.11 for in-tree volume plugins. It is also available as a beta feature for volumes backed by CSI drivers as of Kubernetes v1.16.
If the volume plugin or CSI driver for your volume support volume expansion, you can resize a volume via the Kubernetes API:
Ensure volume expansion is enabled for the StorageClass (allowVolumeExpansion: true is set on the StorageClass) associated with your PVC.
Request a change in volume capacity by editing your PVC (spec.resources.requests).
For more information, see:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/persistent-volumes/#expanding-persistent-volumes-claims
https://kubernetes-csi.github.io/docs/volume-expansion.html
No, Kubernetes does not support automatic volume resizing yet.
Disk resizing is an entirely manual process at the moment.
Assuming that you created a Kubernetes PV object with a given capacity and the PV is bound to a PVC, and then attached/mounted to a node for use by a pod. If you increase the volume size, pods would continue to be able to use the disk without issue, however they would not have access to the additional space.
To enable the additional space on the volume, you must manually resize the partitions. You can do that by following the instructions here. You'd have to delete the pods referencing the volume first, wait for it to detach, than manually attach/mount the volume to some VM instance you have access to, and run through the required steps to resize it.
Opened issue #35941 to track the feature request.
There is some support for this in 1.8 and above, for some volume types, including gcePersistentDisk and awsBlockStore, if certain experimental features are enabled on the cluster.
For other volume types, it must be done manually for now. In addition, support for doing this automatically while pods are online (nice!) is coming in a future version (currently slated for 1.11):
For now, these are the steps I followed to do this manually with an AzureDisk volume type (for managed disks) which currently does not support persistent disk resize (but support is coming for this too):
Ensure PVs have reclaim policy "Retain" set.
Delete the stateful set and related pods. Kubernetes should release the PVs, even though the PV and PVC statuses will remain Bound. Take special care for stateful sets that are managed by an operator, such as Prometheus -- the operator may need to be disabled temporarily. It may also be possible to use Scale to do one pod at a time. This may take a few minutes, be patient.
Resize the underlying storage for the PV(s) using the Azure API or portal.
Mount the underlying storage on a VM (such as the Kubernetes master) by adding them as a "Disk" in the VM settings. In the VM, use e2fsck and resize2fs to resize the filesystem on the PV (assuming an ext3/4 FS). Unmount the disks.
Save the JSON/YAML configuration of the associated PVC.
Delete the associated PVC. The PV should change to status Released.
Edit the YAML config of the PV, after which the PV status should be Available:
specify the new volume size in spec.capacity.storage,
remove the spec.claimref uid and resourceVersion fields, and
remove status.phase.
Edit the saved PVC configuration:
remove the metadata.resourceVersion field,
remove the metadata pv.kubernetes.io/bind-completed and pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller annotations, and
change the spec.resources.requests.storage field to the updated PV size, and
remove all fields inside status.
Create a new resource using the edited PVC configuration. The PVC should start in Pending state, but both the PV and PVC should transition relatively quickly to Bound.
Recreate the StatefulSet and/or change the stateful set configuration to restart pods.
In terms of PVC/PV 'resizing', that's still not supported in k8s, though I believe it could potentially arrive in 1.9
It's possible to achieve the same end result by dealing with PVC/PV and (e.g.) GCE PD though..
For example, I had a gitlab deployment, with a PVC and a dynamically provisioned PV via a StorageClass resource. Here are the steps I ran through:
Take a snapshot of the PD (provided you care about the data)
Ensure the ReclaimPolicy of the PV is "Retain", patch if necessary as detailed here: https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/administer-cluster/change-pv-reclaim-policy/
kubectl describe pv <name-of-pv> (useful when creating the PV manifest later)
Delete the deployment/pod (probably not essential, but seems cleaner)
Delete PVC and PV
Ensure PD is recognised as being not in use by anything (e.g. google console, compute/disks page)
Resize PD with cloud provider (with GCE, for example, this can actually be done at an earlier stage, even if the disk is in use)
Create k8s PersistentVolume manifest (this had previously been done dynamically via the use of the StorageClass resource). In the PersistentVolume yaml spec, I had "gcePersistentDisk: pdName: <name-of-pd>" defined, along with other details that I'd grabbed at step 3. make sure you update the spec.capacity.storage to the new capacity you want the PV to have (although not essential, and has no effect here, you may want to update the storage capacity/value in your PVC manifest, for posterity)
kubectl apply (or equivalent) to recreate your deployment/pod, PVC and PV
note: some steps may not be essential, such as deleting some of the existing deployment/pod.. resources, though I personally prefer to remove them, seeing as I know the ReclaimPolicy is Retain, and I have a snapshot.
The first thing you can do is, check for the storage class that you are using, see if allowVolumeExpansion is set to `true. If yes then simply update PVC with requested volume and check for status in PVCs.
If this doesn't work for you then try this (for AWS users).
Check for the attached volume id in the PV (under awsElasticBlockStore -> `volume).
Go to Volumes in AWS, and modify volume to whatever is required
SSH into the node to which is volume is currently attached (to find node name describe pod and check for node key)
use lsblk to list the volume attached
Run resize2fs or xfs_growfs based on what type of volume you have.
exec into the pod run df -h and check the volume.
Note: You can only modify a volume once in 6 hours.
Edit the PVC (kubectl edit pvc $your_pvc) to specify the new size. The key to edit is spec.resources.requests.storage:
Even though this answer worked quite well for one pvc of my statefulset, the others didn't managed to resize. I guess it's because the pods restarted too quick, leaving no time for the resizing process to start due to the backoff. In fact, the pods started fast but took some time to be considered as ready (increasing backoff).
Here's my workaround:
Update the pvc
Backup the sts spec
k get sts <sts-name> -o yaml > sts.yaml
Then delete the sts with cascade=orphan. Thus, the pods will still run
kubectl delete sts --cascade=orphan <sts-name>
Then delete one of the pod whose pvc wouldn't resize
kubectl delete pod <pod-name>
Wait for the pvc to resize
kubectl get pvc -w
Reapply the sts so the pod comes back
kubectl apply -f sts.yaml
Wait for the pod to come back
Repeat until all pvc are resized!
Below is how we can expand the volume size of azure disks mounted on statefulset(STS) pod when storage class is used.(AWS EBS and GCP Persistent volumes should be similar).
Summary:
Delete the statefulset.
Update the volume size on the PVC. Wait till the condition message prompts to start up the pods.
Apply new statefulset with updated volume size and you should see the volume getting resized when the pod starts up.
Complete Steps:
Check if volume resize is enabled in the storage class.
kubectl get storageclass
First, delete the statefulset. This is required because
The volumes should be unmounted and detached from the node before it can be resized.
The volume size on the STS YAML is immutable (cant be updated).
We will have to create a new STS with higher volume size later on. Don't forget to backup the STS YAML if you don't have it in your repo's.
After deleting the STS, wait for some time so that k8s can detach the volume from the node.
Next, modify the PVC with higher value for volume size.
At this point, if the volume is still attached, you will see below warning message in the PVC events.
Either the volume is still mounted to the pod or you just have to wait and give some time to k8s.
Next, run the describe command on the PVC, you should now see a message(in conditions) prompting you to start up the pod.
kubectl describe pvc app-master-volume-app-master-0
In the earlier step, we had deleted the statefulset. Now we need to create and apply a new STS with higher volume size. This should match the value earlier modified in the PVC spec.
When the new pod gets created, you will see pod event like shown below which indicates that the volume resize is successful.
Yes, it can be, after version 1.8, have a look at volume expansion here
Volume expansion was introduced in v1.8 as an Alpha feature
I have persistent volume with self created StorageClass (allowVolumeExpansion: true).
PV spec: accessMode: readWriteOnce
PVC spec: same
When I upgrade PV, changes are not reflected in PVC.