Is there anyway I can just call into a define such as LIBFOO_DIRCLEAN, and just do what was implemented in the define?
Inside HOST_LIBFOO_INSTALL_CMDS, I copy files to the target directory, and would like the 'make package-dirclean' to delete what was copied into the target directory. 'make clean', would obviously do this(any many more), but that is much more than I want to do.
I see the following buildroot variables. LIBFOO_EXTRACT_CMDS, LIBFOO_CONFIGURE_CMDS, LIBFOO_BUILD_CMDS, HOST_LIBFOO_INSTALL_CMDS, LIBFOO_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS, etc.
make foo-dirclean is a simple tool that just deletes the package build directory. In most cases, when the list of files installed by a package does not change over time (only files content changes) you can simply rebuild the package and the target directory will be rebuilt correctly.
If you want you can implement your own foo-myclean step that implements your own logic. However you must understand deleting files in the target directory is not supported by Buildroot and thus you are on your own.
Related
What is the proper way of delivering temporary build-time assets using nuget?
I am making a nuget package with a single file, which dependent projects require during the build phase. I would like the content of the file to be copied to obj\$(Configuration) folder inside a dependent project before proceeding with the rest of the build. Of course, the obj folder is temporary, so I would like my file to be copied there again as part of the next build if obj gets cleared out.
I tried contentFiles approach described here. This takes care of packaging my file inside nupkg file, but I was unable to set it up so that my file gets delivered (and re-delivered) to obj\$(Configuration).
You're looking for NuGet's MSBuild extensibility. Unfortunately it means you'll need to learn a bit about MSBuild if you don't already know it. I recommend running msbuild -bl or dotnet build -bl, which will create a msbuild.binlog file, which you can view with the msbuild structured log viewer.
One option is to have a target that creates the file in the intermediate output directory at an appropriate time (probably need to use BeforeTargets). You could use the Inputs and Outputs attributes to have msbuild do incremental build checks and skip copying when it doesn't need to, possibly making the build a little faster.
However, unless the file is has dynmanic content, copying the file is a waste. it's just going to be included as an item in another part of the build process. So, if it's static content, you could just create the relevant item in your targets file from your package's extracted directory, and then it's just as good as if it was copied to the intermediate output directory, without wasted time and duplicated disk space.
I'm using buildroot 2018.05 and I'm noticing that if I remove some files in my overlay that the files are still being copied into the rootfs. I thought that any changes made in the overlay would automatically propagate when running make again without requiring me to do make clean and then make again?
I want to avoid having to re-download all packages and at least avoid re-compiling the toolchain each time I make changes to the overlay.
Buildroot cannot "know" when files have been removed from the overlay; it just copies the files from the overlay into the target rootfs.
Although Buildroot does do some tracking of where each file comes from, this information is not definitive so it can't be used to remove files again. In particular, files created or overwritten by the rootfs overlay or by a post-build script are (currently) not tracked.
It is true that the information in the (current) manual is misleading: "when changes to the root filesystem overlay, a post-build script or a post-image script are made, there is no need for a full rebuild". This is a bug in the manual and should be fixed. Feel free to submit a patch.
I'm new to yocto. I'm trying to learn how the packages are added, how to create new layers and so on... just poking around. Started by cloning poky and playing around.
To my understanding, the bblayers.conf file is critical to the project configuration and what you end up building (what layers and packages go into your final image).
This might be the wrong assumption, but I also have a feeling that the build/ folder is where things you build (bitbake) stay. Images, lots of things needed to build them, a big cache of stuff... You can delete it and rebuild it if you somehow broke it. Or you can just copy everything without the build/ folder and continue working on a different computer.
Apparently it's not quite the case. The build/conf/ folder has the important .conf files like the bblayers.conf.
Can someone explain why is this the case? Is there an elegant way to separate the project config and the build folder?
There are a couple layers to the Yocto Project, mainly:
-BSPDIR: TOPDIR (build),sources,setup-environment
-BSPDIR/setup-environment: initial all the variable to for bitbake;
-BSPDIR/sources: meta-data/
-TOPDIR: conf/ sstate-cache/ cache/ tmp/ downloads/
-TOPDIR/downloads: recipe fetched packages;
-TOPDIR/conf/ : stored all the configuration. Mainly bblayers.conf, local.conf, sanity_info;
-TOPDIR/conf/bblayers.conf: stored all the path to meta-data that will be loaded;
-TOPDIR/conf/local.conf: configuration to build
-TOPDIR/conf/sanity_info: path double check to make sure that all the path used in the last compile match the current compile;
-TOPDIR/tmp/: Where all the compiling and building work happen
In BSPDIR/sources/poky/meta/conf/bitbake.conf
sources/poky/meta/conf/bitbake.conf:TMPDIR ?= "${TOPDIR}/tmp"
sources/poky/meta/conf/bitbake.conf:PERSISTENT_DIR = "${TOPDIR}/cache"
sources/poky/meta/conf/bitbake.conf:DL_DIR ?= "${TOPDIR}/downloads"
sources/poky/meta/conf/bitbake.conf:SSTATE_DIR ?= "${TOPDIR}/sstate-cache"
TOPDIR is where you initialize when run setup-environment or oe-init-build-env; All the other bitbake configuration environment variable can be changed based on your need in conf/local.conf;
e.g. modify conf/local.conf to change the downloads directory from TOPDIR/downloads;
DL_DIR ?= "/home/downloads/"
To create new layer, please watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HsaoVqX7dg
You might have followed the Yocto Project Quick Start Guide.
The earliest step in yocto after installing (cloning git repositories and installing packages) is to create your OE (OpenEmbedded) environment, which is done via:
source oe-init-build-env
This automatically creates and leads you to the build folder.
Matter that you can give any directory of your system as parameter for this call (Reference Manual - Build Overview):
source oe-init-build-env [build_dir]
⤑ This is also the step, where your 'project config' is separated from the actual build folder.
⤑ As you assumed, in practice you would at most copy the layers and not the build folder. Even better is to leave sources from others in their git repositories and only copy and maintain your own layers.
it is true an issue in the modern Yocto build system.
file bblayers.conf has to be synthesized based on MACHINE and DISTRO information using all provided (usually with the help of repo manifest file) layers by: collecting data from each available layer file layer.conf as well as conf/machine, conf/distro, images.
Instead bblayers.conf is usually copied over from the base layer conf/bblayers.conf location with the help of setup-environment script.
this approach provides no "one click" buildable environment but require maintainer/developer to look into readme to identify what layers are missing to be added to the build/conf/bblayers.conf.
I am new to bitbake. and I have multiple questions all related to each other.
I am trying to remove all the packages that are GPLv3 from my package. i see that there are .bb files for both versions (gplv2 and gplv3 or other license types as applicable), of packages in meta/recipes-*/ folders. If I use INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE=GPLv3 it removes all the packages that are GPLv3. But I want to include some packages that are GPLv3. where do i specify this.
I do see a BBFILES flag in the bblayers.conf in poky/build/conf dir. is this this place to add the specific recipes?
Another question i have is, If i want to use a specific .bb file out of the multiple .bb files in the recipes-/ folder how do i do that. for example
/recipes-extended/tar/tar_1.17.bb
/tar_1.27.1.bb
In this case, how do i pick tar_1.17.bb and ignore 1.27.bb. This is just one example. There is a "bitbake -b" command that takes .bb file as input but that will build only that .bb file and ignore dependencies according to the documentation. I want to build the complete package and be able to pick and ignore a specific .bb file.
So, how does bitbake pick and more pricisely which .bb file does bitbake pick when there are multiple .bb files in the recipe folder.
1 There's no way to do that. What would the purpose be? Normally, if you want to avoid GPLv3, you want a completely GPLv3 free image
There's one way to circumvent the system. You can set
INCOMPATIBLE_LICENSE_pn-<package/recipe name> = ""
That will allow you to build the package. However, don't use this for production, unless you really know what you're doing.
2/3: Normally the highest version will be built. You can use
PREFERRED_VERSION_<package name>
in local.conf or in your distro, to select another version. Another way is to add
DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1"
to the recipe you don't want to build.
You should be able to set
WHITELIST_<spdx_license> += "<name of the package which you want to white list>"
Not very well documented but the code is in poky/meta/base.bbclass
I currently have a buildroot configuration that outputs a U-Boot-wrapped root filesystem. Part of that process overlays files from a outside directory, which contains things like network interfaces, profile.d scripts, and some custom executables.
My question is this: what is the best way to recreate the root filesystem image, without rebuilding all the extra packages? Just deleting the output/images and output/target directories, followed by a "make all" doesn't seem to work. For the most common usage, I don't need to rebuild the toolchain, or any other packages. I just need the root filesystem recreated, with the overlay performed. However, there doesn't seem to be a good make target to do a clean on the output only, or a build of the target filesystem/images.
Thanks,
-D
Every time you invoke "make", the root filesystem image is completely re-created from the contents of output/target/, the post-build scripts are executed and the rootfs overlays are copied.
So if you make a change to a rootfs overlay, a change to a post-build script, or you add/remove stuff from output/target/, simply running "make" is sufficient.
However, if your aim is to remove output/target/ completely with the hope that it will reinstall all packages, then indeed this doesn't work, and we have good reasons for not supporting this, because there are many situations where this can give an incorrect result.