Related
I wrote an extension for vscode. After installation the extension folder contains documentation in a markdown file. I want to provide a command that loads this file into the preview pane so it displays rendered with images and hyperlinks etc.
You can do this sort of thing interactively:
and I have the full path to the markdown file, so now all I need is details of the command that implements this context menu item.
Web search does not produce complete or usable results.
After cloning the VS Code repo and trawling through the source I discovered the markdown.showPreview and associated commands.
To give credit where due, Lex Li reported the corresponding package.json entry in a comment while I was looking.
Without parameters this previews the content of the active editor, but as I said in a comment, it supports an optional Uri parameter and the code looks like this:
let pathToManual = path.join(context.extensionPath, "manual.md");
let uriManual: vscode.Uri = vscode.Uri.file(pathToManual);
vscode.commands.executeCommand('markdown.showPreview', uriManual);
For information on constructing workspace relative paths see the answer from Mark. The joinPath method he uses requires a base path as a Uri which is conveniently available for the workspace but not for the extension path.
If you need information on things like showing preview to one side then given the dearth of documentation I recommend cloning the repo and searching it for "markdown.showPreview", then exploring nearby code. If you fold the methods it gets easier to survey your options.
Try:
vscode.commands.executeCommand("markdown.showPreview", vscode.Uri.joinPath(vscode.workspace.workspaceFolders[0].uri,'test.md'));
Your fileName there at the end of course. And that assumed you are in the first or only root of a workspace. You might be able to simplify it using:
vscode.Uri.path(<path to file)
instead of the joinPath that I used.
I'm trying to add a few images to the wiki in 1 of my Azure DevOps projects. When I use the absolute path as mentioned here https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/project/wiki/markdown-guidance?view=azure-devops#images in the article, the images are not showing up. Any help?
The wiki pages get created in their own Git repository and the image files are also added there. You can browse the repos from within DevOps at; https://dev.azure.com/MyOrganisation/MyProject/_git/MyProject.wiki
The markdown path for the image should begin /.attachments/ and make sure if you are adding dimension you use =500x and not =500 if you exclude the height e.g.
Add image from local machine:
In the wiki page editor, click 'Insert a file' icon and select image from your local pc, you will see mark-up something like: 
This will also displays preview in the editor.
Actually, you can now use the "Insert a file" button (represented by a paperclip icon) when editing a wiki page to upload an image.
When you upload an image this way, the image is automatically stored in the "/.attachments/" folder
For my side I just copy the image in the clipboard and after that on paste it generate automatically the markdown code
TLDR
CTRL+C and CTRL+V
When inserting a file in a Wiki, you initially get an image-url like blob:https://dev.azure.com/SOME-GUID. This url (when including the blob:-prefix, can be used to display the attached image in an img-tag.
<img src="blob:https://dev.azure.com/SOME-GUID" />
If the image is important enough to be inside a Wiki page, it's probably important enough to host it somewhere you can use it inside your wiki. Have a look at creating a public container/blob in an Azure Storage account.
EDIT:
For your specific image: right-click the image and select Copy image address. You'll get an URL like this that you can use as the src of the img-tag.
https://dev.azure.com/rubdevopson/c53ed56f-c130-470b-a6ae-3c4a93266530/_apis/git/repositories/88df06c2-f627-4953-9438-0f762d4cad3a/Items?path=%2FPartsUnlimited_docs%2Fhome.png&versionDescriptor%5BversionOptions%5D=0&versionDescriptor%5BversionType%5D=0&versionDescriptor%5Bversion%5D=master&download=false&resolveLfs=true&%24format=octetStream&api-version=5.0-preview.1
Github helpfully renders Markdown (.md) files to HTML when viewing on github.com (for example, this README.md).
When viewing any other source file, it is shown as unrendered source code (for example, this .gitignore). A handy feature this gives is linking directly to a line in the source by clicking the line number (for example, like this).
How can I view the unrendered source of Markdown files on Github (so I can link to a particular line in the source)?
note: I know of the "Raw" button, however it does not provide any of the nice UI Github has.
If you don't want to use the "raw" button, you can (since June 2021) add ?plain=1 to your GitHub markdown file URL:
Appending ?plain=1 to the url for any Markdown file will now display the file without rendering.
As with other code files, it will also show line numbers, and can be used to link other users to a specific line or lines.
For example, appending ?plain=1#L52 will highlight line 52 of a plain text Markdown file.
Example:
https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/README.md?plain=1#L49-L51
Since Sept. 2021, there is a button which adds the ?plain=1 for you:
Use the "Raw" button. For instance, if you were looking at README.md there is a Raw button in the Navigation. This can be simple URL change (from blob to raw), but in this case becomes a separate link.
Edit: There is no "pretty" view for the Markdown source. There's the converted HTML view, the Raw view without the UI, and the Blame view. Only the Blame view provides you with the ability to link to a specific line within the source.
Edit 2: The other option is to use Anchors within the README.md. If you take the Installation title for example, you can directly link within the content of the Markdown file. Assuming you don't have anything hidden within the Markdown itself, this is closer still to solving your original question.
Using the "Blame" button, you are able to see the source of the Markdown (for example, like this).
Unfortunately, "Blame" comes with extra UI elements which make the source more cluttered.
Refined Github provides an additional "Raw" button to view the raw source and link to a specific line:
I ran into this issue, as a complete surprise to me, on a file with a .wiki extension. It appears that files with .wiki, .mediawiki, and .wikitext extensions are recognized and rendered as HTML, with a table of contents even. I guess it makes sense, what with GitHub projects having wikis and all.
That's nifty, but this one particular case, I really wanted the raw wikitext to be visible and copy-pasteable, not some rendered representation of it.
The only half-way solution I found was to use a bogus file extension that isn't one of the ones recognized by GitHub, and then a .gitattributes to tell GitHub how to syntax highlight it, e.g.:
*.wiki_ linguist-language=mediawiki
I'm not thrilled about this, but all the good extensions were already "taken" according to the languages.yml linked above.
The Github wikis are backed by a separate git repository then the main project repository.
This post by the Github team makes it sound like you should be able to link to images stored in the wiki repository inside the wiki markup.
Images and Folders
You can now reference images hosted inside the Git repository.
I've checked out my wiki's repository and pushed a resource folder and an image into it. My question is, how do I go about using this image?
Is this even possible or have I misunderstood something?
For viewers wishing to view images on a github wiki I've found the following method to work:
Go to the "Git Access" tab inside the wiki page of your repository and retrieve the SSH path which should be some thing like: git#github.com:USER/REPO.wiki.git where USER is your account name and REPO is the repository name.
On your local machine use whichever Git command line tool you wish to cd into your local directory of choice and get the repository via
git clone git#github.com:USER/REPO.wiki.git
Now within this repository create an image directory, I'll call it "images" and put whatever images you want into the directory
And then push your wiki git directory to github
You will not be able to physically see the images in say the "Pages" tab, but if you simply reference the images in a local link you should be able to see them. Example with Markdown below:
You may also embed the image as a link itself by wrapping it further like so:
[](http://Yoursite.com)
You can also add subdirectories within your local copy to help organize the wiki since the "pages" tab simply lists them out. Keep in mind, however, that even when the new directory is pushed the "pages" tab doesn't list the directory.
To use relative paths do:
[[foo.jpg]]
For more info, see the demo wiki's page on images.
None of answers seem to work when adding an image in readme.md. I've got a solution though:
If the URL of the image is:
https://github.com/Username/Repository-Name/blob/master/Directory-Inside-Repository/image.png
Replacing blob with raw gives you the URL of the raw image:
https://github.com/Username/Repository-Name/raw/master/Directory-Inside-Repository/image.png
Now, you'd embed the image using normal markdown:
UPDATE: As of now, GitHub also serves raw images from a different sub-domain raw.github.com. So, you can also use:
https://raw.github.com/Username/Repository-Name/master/Directory-Inside-Repository/image.png
EXAMPLE: https://raw.github.com/Automattic/liveblog/master/screenshot-1.png
Relative path work for me like this:
home page of the wiki:
sub page of the wiki:
Note that when doing a preview the image will not show, I had save it.
If you want to quickly upload an image with drag/drop, you can perform the following (albeit hackish):
Create a dummy issue; drag & drop your image there; copy/paste the uploaded markdown image code to your wiki;
After you create the issue once, you can use it any number of times to do this.
Hope this helps anyone looking for a quick fix, without needing to have the image reside in the repo.
Here is a practical way to do it:
Go to any issue on github
In the comment section you can attach files, just drag/drop, select or paste your image
Copy the code/link displayed in the textarea
Paste it in the wiki
Profit !
You don't even have to create or modify any issue compared to #tiby solution !
Figured it out.
The url is formatted as follows
https://raw.github.com/wiki/username/project/pathtoimage/imagename.extension
pathtoimage is optional
James' URL format did not work for me, perhaps it has been changed. I have used:
https://github.com/username/project/wiki/pathtoimage/image.extension
Where pathtoimage is optional.
Finally got the images into repository using the method described by nerdwin and got them to display in the wiki using 
The following markdown will reference an image in your GitHub repo from within your corresponding GitHub wiki
The above example assumes that you have the following file structure in your repo
Path
ToAssets
In
Repo.png
For a real world example, if I wanted to reference this image in github from the corresponding wiki, I'd use this markdown
Caveats
Case matters
If you are on the special Home page of the wiki, you do not need to go up a level with the ../ In my example above, the correct link would be
For Home Page:
Use the relative path
the Wiki is located at [repositoryname]/wiki
The files in the repository are located at [repositoryname]/raw/master/[file path in repository]
So just use the relative path: ../raw/master/[file path in repository]
I put both images and PDFs in my wikis. I clone the wiki and add an images and a files directory, then use the following markdown to embed image links and add file links:
Images:
[[/images/path/to/image.ext|ALT TEXT]]
The leading slash isn't necessary if your wiki pages are all at the root level, but I use subdirectories and an absolute path resolves correctly and keeps things simple.
Files:
[link text](files/path/to/file.ext "ALT TEXT")
Note, no leading slash for the wiki files path to resolve correctly as a link in this format.
I documented this with more detail in a GitHub gist
Since Feb. 2022, you can simply drag and drop, select or paste the file.
That will upload the image to your Wiki pages, and store it in https://user-images.githubusercontent.com
To embed an external image thumbnail, use the following,
The comment from #Drew Noakes to the original question did it for me:
The syntax for the image I wanted to be displayed:
[[/images/imageName.png]]
This image was only displayed when renaming:
wikiPage.md --> wikiPage.wiki
The following folder structure was used in the wiki repository:
repository.wiki
|--wikiPage.wiki
|--images
|--imageName.png
BUT:
The syntax in .wiki differs from .md files.
Many of the answers didn't work for me, here's what finally worked:
Using the "Markdown" editor mode and a sub-page such as:
https://github.com/project/repo/wiki/MyPage
Is there a way to create a URL anchor, <a>, link from within a Markdown file, to another file within the same repository and branch (aka a link relative to the current branch)?
For example, in the master branch I have a README.md file, which I would like do something like:
# My Project
is really really cool. My Project has a subdir named myLib, see below.
## myLib documentation
see documentation [here](myLib/README.md)
This would allow me to link from one .md to another within the same branch and not have to worry about which branch I'm in (avoid having to do an absolute URL that includes the github.com branch name).
Here is a working example of what I mean:
GOTO http://github.com/rynop/testRel, link does not work.
GOTO http://github.com/rynop/testRel/blob/master/README.md, link works.
This is expected because at this point the starting URL is in the branch. Now how do I get it to pick up the current branch in the README.md at the root of the repository?
Update: I opened an issue against GitHub for this feature request.
Update 30th, January 2013, 16 months later:
GitHub Blog Post Relative links in markup files:
Starting today, GitHub supports relative links in markup files.
Now you can link directly between different documentation files, whether you view the documentation on GitHub itself, or locally, using a different markup renderer.
You want examples of link definitions and how they work? Here's some Markdown for you.
Instead of an absolute link:
[a link](https://github.com/user/repo/blob/branch/other_file.md)
…you can use a relative link:
[a relative link](other_file.md)
[a relative link](path%20with%20spaces/other_file.md)
and we'll make sure it gets linked to user/repo/blob/branch/other_file.md.
If you were using a workaround like [a workaround link](repo/blob/master/other_file.md), you'll have to update your documentation to use the new syntax.
This also means your documentation can now easily stand on its own, without always pointing to GitHub.
Marcono1234 adds in the comments
Also useful: When the link starts with a /, it is relative to the root of the repository (regardless of whether the markdown file is nested in subdirectories)
Update December 20th, 2011:
The GitHub markup issue 84 is currently closed by technoweenie, with the comment:
We tried adding a <base> tag for this, but it causes problems with other relative links on the site.
October 12th, 2011:
If you look at the raw source of the README.md of Markdown itself(!), relative paths don't seem to be supported.
You will find references like:
[r2h]: http://github.com/github/markup/tree/master/lib/github/commands/rest2html
[r2hc]: http://github.com/github/markup/tree/master/lib/github/markups.rb#L13
As noted in InvisibleWolf's answer, if the target link is a directory and it has space, then you need to use %20 for each space.
For example, you have a repo like the following:
project/
text.md
subpro/
subtext.md
subsubpro/
subsubtext.md
subsubpro2/
subsubtext2.md
The relative link to subtext.md in text.md might look like this:
[this subtext](subpro/subtext.md)
The relative link to subsubtext.md in text.md might look like this:
[this subsubtext](subpro/subsubpro/subsubtext.md)
The relative link to subtext.md in subsubtext.md might look like this:
[this subtext](../subtext.md)
The relative link to subsubtext2.md in subsubtext.md might look like this:
[this subsubtext2](../subsubpro2/subsubtext2.md)
The relative link to text.md in subsubtext.md might look like this:
[this text](../../text.md)
GitHub could make this a lot better with minimal work. Here is a work-around.
I think you want something more like
[Your Title](your-project-name/tree/master/your-subfolder)
or to point to the README itself
[README](your-project-name/blob/master/your-subfolder/README.md)
As of January 31, 2013 Github markdown supports relative links to files.
[a relative link](markdown_file.md)
However, there are a few deficiencies that have been discussed in this comment thread.
As an alternative, you can use Gitdown to construct full URLs to the repository and even make them branch aware, e.g.
{"gitdown": "gitinfo", "name": "url"} // https://github.com/gajus/gitdown
{"gitdown": "gitinfo", "name": "branch"} // master
Gitdown is a GitHub markdown preprocessor. It streamlines common tasks associated with maintaining a documentation page for a GitHub repository, e.g. generating table of contents, including variables, generating URLs and getting information about the repository itself at the time of processing the input. Gitdown seamlessly integrates with your building scripts.
I am the author of the Gitdown library.
Just wanted to add this because none of the above solutions worked if target link is directory with spaces in it's name. If target link is a directory and it has space then even escaping space with \ doesn't render the link on Github. Only solution worked for me is using %20 for each space.
e.g.: if directory structure is this
Top_dir
|-----README.md
|-----Cur_dir1
|----Dir A
|----README.md
|----Dir B
|----README.md
To make link to Dir A in README.md present in Top_dir you can do this:
[Dir 1](Cur_dir1/Dir%20A)
You can link to file, but not to folders, and keep in mind that, Github will add /blob/master/ before your relative link(and folders lacks that part so they cannot be linked, neither with HTML <a> tags or Markdown link).
So, if we have a file in myrepo/src/Test.java, it will have a url like:
https://github.com/WesternGun/myrepo/blob/master/src/Test.java
And to link it in the readme file, we can use:
[This is a link](src/Test.java)
or: This is a link.
(I guess, master represents the master branch and it differs when the file is in another branch.)
You can use relative URLs from the root of your repo with <a href="">. Assuming your repo is named testRel, put the following in testRel/README.md:
# My Project
is really really cool. My Project has a subdir named myLib, see below.
## myLib docs
see documentation:
* myLib/
* myLib/README.md
This question is pretty old, but it still seems important, as it isn't easy to put relative references from readme.md to wiki pages on Github.
I played around a little bit and this relative link seems to work pretty well:
[Your wiki page](../../wiki/your-wiki-page)
The two ../ will remove /blob/master/ and use your base as a starting point. I haven't tried this on other repositories than Github, though (there may be compatibility issues).
In .md file when you want to create a link to any related files which is related to same project folder or URL based links:
Existing file link:
In .md file add showing name in [] box then open () in this box add / after that it will auto fetch all existing folders name form which you choose your folder then add '/' it will show inner file or 'folders`. This means it will auto fetch the paths and at the end, your URL is created.
Example:
[Enter Showing Name](/users/4000266/heysushil)
This line show like this:
Enter Showing Name
Add URLs on .md file
Follow the same process only change the () box path with URL like this:
[HeySushil - YouTube](https://youtube.com/heysushil)
This looks like HeySushil - YouTube
Note: Remember no need to add force manually after adding / on () box it will auto fetch all existing folders and files.
I am not sure if I see this option here. You can just create a /folder in your repository and use it directly:
[a relative link](/folder/myrelativefile.md)
No blob or tree or repository name is needed, and it works like a charm.
If you want a relative link to your wiki page on GitHub, use this:
Read here: [Some other wiki page](path/to/some-other-wiki-page)
If you want a link to a file in the repository, let us say, to reference some header file, and the wiki page is at the root of the wiki, use this:
Read here: [myheader.h](../tree/master/path/to/myheader.h)
The rationale for the last is to skip the "/wiki" path with "../", and go to the master branch in the repository tree without specifying the repository name, that may change in the future.
The behaviour in Github directory links in markdown files could create some headaches.
All files have an url are starting with blob,
blob/<branch>/<path>/<fileName>
whereas directories have an url starting with tree:
tree/<branch>/<path>
So no relative link to a directory should work. It points to an url that starts with a blob. Magically Github changes some relative path automatically to the tree path. Unfortunately not urls containing ".."
I investigate some time to examine the strange behaviour with Github directory links on https://github.com/fluentcodes/GitSamples-GIT/tree/github-readme-links.
Just follow the format below.
[TEXT TO SHOW](actual URL to navigate)
Here is what I found for relative links in github's .md files:
Relative links without ../ (aka. link to file in the same level, or in sub dir), seems always work.
Relative links that contains ../ works only when you are already in a page whose url contains substring /blob/.
Otherwise need to use full url that contains /blob/, to link.
Actually except top level /README.md, when view any other files, their url already contains /blob/.
Thus probably you can always use relative links that contains ../ in files, except /README.md.
But /README.md is in top level, thus it shouldn't need a relative link that contains ../.
So, you should never need a full path link (that contains github domain) to link to files in the same github repo.
Example (links among multiple language doc)
In /README.md, can use relative links without ../.
[中文](doc/cn/README.md) |
[日本語](doc/jp/README.md)
In /doc/cn/README.md, since when we view it, the url already contains /blob/, thus could use relative links with ../.
[English](../../README.md) |
[日本語](../jp/README.md)
(BTW, the example come from this git-merge-flow repo.)
What I found to work for relative folders:
[link text](subfolder/subsubfolder/relevantfolder/)
where relevant folder is the folder you are trying to link to. The backslash is needed after the folder name. I tried including the project name and tree/main in the path and the other things suggested in previous answers, that lead to a nonexistent page error. The subfolder is a folder within the overall repo project folder.
Thus, file links would be in the form of:
[link text](subfolder/subsubfolder/relevantfolder/index.html)
If the desired file is not in any folder or subfolder the link is simply:
[link text](README.md)
for example the README file is not in any subfolders, so that could be the exact relative link you use for the README file.
You can also insert your links (relative or absolute) at the bottom to reduce clutter in text.
It can also be a good option for repetitive links.
This is [my linked text].
[my linked text]: relative/path/in/repo/to/file.txt "Optional title for mouse hover"
This is my linked text.