How I can get the other part after a division with a modulo operator - matlab

When I divide 13 with 3 and use integer numbers the result will be 4.
With mod(13,3) I receive the remainder 1. But how can I get the 4 in Matlab? I think it is not possible to switch to integer numbers for this calculation, isn't it?

You can use the floor function:
result = floor(13/3)
This function always rounds down to the lower integer

You can explicitly use integers:
result = uint32(13)/unit32(3);
You can also use hex numbers:
result = 0xDu32 / 0x3u32;
Note that result will be of type uint32.

Use idivide:
result = idivide(13, 3);
You can specify the rounding method with a third argument, with the default being 'fix', or rounding towards zero. For example, this would round towards negative infinity:
result = idivide(13, 3, 'floor');

Related

Dividing UInt64 always returns 0 [duplicate]

I'm trying print the result of division for example:
let division = (4/6)
print(division)
In this case the print out is 0.
How can I print the numeric value of the division without losing the numeric value. I mean without casting the output to string.
You are performing integer division. You need to perform floating point division.
In your code, division is an Int value. 4 / 6 is zero in integer division.
You need:
let division = 4.0/6.0
print(division)
ans = Double(no1)/Double(no2)
return ans
If you want the value should be correct, then try as
let division = Float(v1) / Float(v2)
print(division)

Swift: Print decimal precision of division

I'm trying print the result of division for example:
let division = (4/6)
print(division)
In this case the print out is 0.
How can I print the numeric value of the division without losing the numeric value. I mean without casting the output to string.
You are performing integer division. You need to perform floating point division.
In your code, division is an Int value. 4 / 6 is zero in integer division.
You need:
let division = 4.0/6.0
print(division)
ans = Double(no1)/Double(no2)
return ans
If you want the value should be correct, then try as
let division = Float(v1) / Float(v2)
print(division)

How can I extract a specific bit from a 16-bit register using math ONLY?

I have a 16-bit WORD and I want to read the status of a specific bit or several bits.
I've tried a method that divides the word by the bit that I want, converts the result to two values - an integer and to a real, and compares the two. if they are not equal, then it it equates to false. This appears to only work if i am looking for a bit that the last 'TRUE' bit in the word. If there are any successive TRUE bits, it fails. Perhaps I just haven't done it right. I don't have the ability to use code, just basic math, boolean operations, and type conversion. Any ideas? I hope this isn't a dumb question but i have a feeling it is.
eg:
WORD 0010000100100100 = 9348
I want to know the value of bit 2. how can i determine it from 9348?
There are many ways, depending on what operations you can use. It appears you don't have much to choose from. But this should work, using just integer division and multiplication, and a test for equality.
(psuedocode):
x = 9348 (binary 0010000100100100, bit 0 = 0, bit 1 = 0, bit 2 = 1, ...)
x = x / 4 (now x is 1000010010010000
y = (x / 2) * 2 (y is 0000010010010000)
if (x == y) {
(bit 2 must have been 0)
} else {
(bit 2 must have been 1)
}
Every time you divide by 2, you move the bits to the left one position (in your big endian representation). Every time you multiply by 2, you move the bits to the right one position. Odd numbers will have 1 in the least significant position. Even numbers will have 0 in the least significant position. If you divide an odd number by 2 in integer math, and then multiply by 2, you loose the odd bit if there was one. So the idea above is to first move the bit you want to know about into the least significant position. Then, divide by 2 and then multiply by two. If the result is the same as what you had before, then there must have been a 0 in the bit you care about. If the result is not the same as what you had before, then there must have been a 1 in the bit you care about.
Having explained the idea, we can simplify to
((x / 8) * 2) <> (x / 4)
which will resolve to true if the bit was set, and false if the bit was not set.
AND the word with a mask [1].
In your example, you're interested in the second bit, so the mask (in binary) is
00000010. (Which is 2 in decimal.)
In binary, your word 9348 is 0010010010000100 [2]
0010010010000100 (your word)
AND 0000000000000010 (mask)
----------------
0000000000000000 (result of ANDing your word and the mask)
Because the value is equal to zero, the bit is not set. If it were different to zero, the bit was set.
This technique works for extracting one bit at a time. You can however use it repeatedly with different masks if you're interested in extracting multiple bits.
[1] For more information on masking techniques see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mask_(computing)
[2] See http://www.binaryhexconverter.com/decimal-to-binary-converter
The nth bit is equal to the word divided by 2^n mod 2
I think you'll have to test each bit, 0 through 15 inclusive.
You could try 9348 AND 4 (equivalent of 1<<2 - index of the bit you wanted)
9348 AND 4
should give 4 if bit is set, 0 if not.
So here is what I have come up with: 3 solutions. One is Hatchet's as proposed above, and his answer helped me immensely with actually understanding HOW this works, which is of utmost importance to me! The proposed AND masking solutions could have worked if my system supports bitwise operators, but it apparently does not.
Original technique:
( ( ( INT ( TAG / BIT ) ) / 2 ) - ( INT ( ( INT ( TAG / BIT ) ) / 2 ) ) <> 0 )
Explanation:
in the first part of the equation, integer division is performed on TAG/BIT, then REAL division by 2. In the second part, integer division is performed TAG/BIT, then integer division again by 2. The difference between these two results is compared to 0. If the difference is not 0, then the formula resolves to TRUE, which means the specified bit is also TRUE.
eg: 9348/4 = 2337 w/ integer division. Then 2337/2 = 1168.5 w/ REAL division but 1168 w/ integer division. 1168.5-1168 <> 0, so the result is TRUE.
My modified technique:
( INT ( TAG / BIT ) / 2 ) <> ( INT ( INT ( TAG / BIT ) / 2 ) )
Explanation:
effectively the same as above, but instead of subtracting the two results and comparing them to 0, I am just comparing the two results themselves. If they are not equal, the formula resolves to TRUE, which means the specified bit is also TRUE.
eg: 9348/4 = 2337 w/ integer division. Then 2337/2 = 1168.5 w/ REAL division but 1168 w/ integer division. 1168.5 <> 1168, so the result is TRUE.
Hatchet's technique as it applies to my system:
( INT ( TAG / BIT )) <> ( INT ( INT ( TAG / BIT ) / 2 ) * 2 )
Explanation:
in the first part of the equation, integer division is performed on TAG/BIT. In the second part, integer division is performed TAG/BIT, then integer division again by 2, then multiplication by 2. The two results are compared. If they are not equal, the formula resolves to TRUE, which means the specified bit is also TRUE.
eg: 9348/4 = 2337. Then 2337/2 = 1168 w/ integer division. Then 1168x2=2336. 2337 <> 2336 so the result is TRUE. As Hatchet stated, this method 'drops the odd bit'.
Note - 9348/4 = 2337 w/ both REAL and integer division, but it is important that these parts of the formula use integer division and not REAL division (12164/32 = 380 w/ integer division and 380.125 w/ REAL division)
I feel it important to note for any future readers that the BIT value in the equations above is not the bit number, but the actual value of the resulting decimal if the bit in the desired position was the only TRUE bit in the binary string (bit 2 = 4 (2^2), bit 6 = 64 (2^6))
This explanation may be a bit too verbatim for some, but may be perfect for others :)
Please feel free to comment/critique/correct me if necessary!
I just needed to resolve an integer status code to a bit state in order to interface with some hardware. Here's a method that works for me:
private bool resolveBitState(int value, int bitNumber)
{
return (value & (1 << (bitNumber - 1))) != 0;
}
I like it, because it's non-iterative, requires no cast operations and essentially translates directly to machine code operations like Shift, And and Comparison, which probably means it's really optimal.
To explain in a little more detail, I'm comparing the bitwise value to a mask for the bit I am interested in (value & mask) using an AND operation. If the bitwise AND operation result is zero, then the bit is not set (return false). If the AND operation result is not zero, then the bit is set (return true). The result of the AND operation is either zero or the value of the bit (1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32...). Hence the boolean evaluation comparing the AND operation result and 0. The mask is created by taking the number 1 and shifting it left (bit wise), by the appropriate number of binary places (1 << n). The number of places is the number of the bit targeted minus 1. If it's bit #1, I want to shift the 1 left by 0 and if it's #2, I want to shift it left 1 place, etc.
I'm surprised no one rates my solution. It think it's most logical and succinct... and works.

arc4random throwing out huge numbers

In a cocos2d game, I use arc4random to generate random numbers like this:
float x = (arc4random()%10 - 5)*delta;
(delta is the time between updates in the scheduled update method)
NSLog(#"x: %f", x);
I have been checking them like that.
Most of the numbers that I get are like this:
2012-12-29 15:37:18.206 Jumpy[1924:907] x: 0.033444
or
2012-12-29 15:37:18.247 Jumpy[1924:907] x: 0.033369
But for some reason I get numbers like this sometimes:
2012-12-29 15:37:18.244 Jumpy[1924:907] x: 71658664.000000
Edit: Delta is almost always:
2012-12-29 17:01:26.612 Jumpy[2059:907] delta: 0.016590
I thought it should return numbers in a range of -5 to 5 (multiplied by some small number). Why I am getting numbers like this?
arc4random returns a u_int32_t. The u_ part tells you that it's unsigned. So all of the operators inside the parentheses use unsigned arithmetic.
If you perform the subtraction 2 - 5 using unsigned 32-bit arithmetic, you get 232 + 2 - 5 = 232 - 3 = 4294967293 (a “huge number”).
Cast to a signed type before performing the subtraction. Also, prefer arc4random_uniform if your deployment target is iOS 4.3 or later:
float x = ((int)arc4random_uniform(10) - 5) * delta;
If you want the range to include -5 and 5, you need to use 11 instead of 10, because the range [-5,5] (inclusive) contains 11 elements:
float x = ((int)arc4random_uniform(11) - 5) * delta;
arc4random returns a u_int32_t, an unsigned type. The modulus is also performed using unsigned arithmetic, which yields a number between 0 and 9, as expected (by the way, don't ever do this; use arc4random_uniform instead). You then subtract 5, which is interpreted as an unsigned value, yielding a possibly huge positive value due to underflow.
The solution is to explicitly type the 5 by storing it in a variable of signed type or with a suffix (like 5L).
Looks like arc4random % 10 becomes less than 5, and you are working with negative integer later.
What is the value of delta?

how do I round numbers with NSNumberFormatter

I've got a calculation for example 57 / 30 so the solution will be 1,766666667..
How do i first of all get the 1,766666667 i only get 1 or 1.00 and then how do i round the solution (to be 2)?
thanks a lot!
57/30 performs integer division. To obtain a float (or double) result you should make 1 of the operands a floating point value:
result = 57.0/30;
To round result have a look at standard floor and ceil functions.