I want to show message by bot for that normally we use dispatcher.utter_message(), but how can I use in requested_slot function of form?
def required_slots(tracker: Tracker) -> List[Text]:
//some_code
dispatcher.utter_message("any text")
//return [requested_slot]
Add in domain file utter_ask_[slotname]: The bot will prompt this message whenever the requested slot is missing
Related
I want Keycloak to send an e-mail to a user whenever a user is blocked due to too many failed login attempts (see section Realm Settings -> Security defenses -> Brute force detection).
The event in question has the following properties:
Error (org.keycloak.events.Event#getError) = user_temporarily_disabled
Type (org.keycloak.events.Event#getType) = LOGIN_ERROR
How can I do that, i. e. make Keycloak send an e-mail to the user when such event occurs?
Known ways to implement it
One obvious way to do it is to write a class that implements the org.keycloak.events.EventListenerProvider interface, detect the event in its onEvent method and trigger sending of the e-mail at some custom server (i. e. send a request to that server and it will contact an SMTP server).
Second is a variation: Detect the event in the same method and somehow make Keycloak send the e-mail using Keycloak SMTP settings ("Realm settings -> Email -> Connection & Authentication").
The screenshot in this answer made met think (possibly wrongly) that there may be a way to make Keycloak send emails upon the occurrence of certain events "out of the box," i. e. without writing custom event listeners.
Update 1: If someone else wants to do this, I recommend to look at this answer. The code below worked for me.
RealmModel realm = this.model.getRealm(event.getRealmId());
UserModel user = this.session.users().getUserById(event.getUserId(), realm);
if (user != null && user.getEmail() != null) {
System.out.println(">>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>" + user.getEmail());
org.keycloak.email.DefaultEmailSenderProvider senderProvider = new org.keycloak.email.DefaultEmailSenderProvider(session);
try {
senderProvider.send(session.getContext().getRealm().getSmtpConfig(), user, "test", "body test",
"html test");
} catch (EmailException e) {
// TODO Auto-generated catch block
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
Keycloak does indeed support sending emails for events out of the box. However, it can only be configured by event (LOGIN_ERROR), and not by further filtered types (user_temporarily_disabled).
For this, you will need to implement your own EventListener, but it should be easy to heavily copy code from Keycloak's existing EmailEventListener, which you can find here: https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/blob/main/services/src/main/java/org/keycloak/events/email/EmailEventListenerProvider.java
In there, you'd change the implementation of L59 in onEvent(Event event) to check your two conditions (event type and error), rather than checking against some list of configured fixed events. Your event will be added to the currently running transaction, and when the transaction ends (in success or error), Keycloak will send an email via the SMTP settings that are configured in the realm.
If you want to customize the template and subject lines of the email, you'll have to provide your own freemarker templates in src/main/resources/theme-resources/templates/{html,text}. Both the html and text folder need to contain an .ftl file of the same name. Message keys for use in the template and the subject go in src/main/resources/messages/messages_{en,fr,de,...}.properties files.
With the template and messages configured, you can use one of the 2 send(...) methods available in the EmailTemplateProvider class
I would like to switch my application to a configuration where email isn't actually send, but instead saved to a log file.
This way I can test my application normally without being afraid of accidentally emailing to hundreds of users and without spamming myself.
I figured something with EmailTransports could be a solution. For instance, when using the DebugTransport the emails aren't send at all, the mail content is instead only returned by the ->send() function.
The downside of this transport is than I have to modify controller code in order to display the content, which I would like to avoid.
So is there a configuration such that email is stored to files instead of being sent, e.g.:
[root]
logs/
emails/
2019-10-01_15:32_email#example.com.txt
2019-10-01_16:54_another_recipient#example.com.txt
...
There is no such built-in configuration, no, but you can easily create your own custom transport that logs emails to files instead of sending them.
Here's a very basic example transport that extends the debug transport, and writes the data to a custom logging scope:
namespace App\Mailer\Transport;
use Cake\Log\LogTrait;
use Cake\Mailer\Email;
use Cake\Mailer\Transport\DebugTransport;
use Psr\Log\LogLevel;
class TestTransport extends DebugTransport
{
use LogTrait;
public function send(Email $email)
{
$data = parent::send($email);
$this->log(json_encode($data), LogLevel::DEBUG, ['scope' => ['emails']]);
return $data;
}
}
See also
Cookbook > Email > Using Transports > Creating Custom Transports
While Defining the Dialog in the Watson Conversation I'm not able to greet user with his/her name or I'm not able to detect contact number sent by the user and rephrase it to the user. Is it possible to do it in the Watson Conversation Api or not.
Although Mitch's response is correct, here is an example of doing a personalised response.
1. Set your conversation_start node text to "Hello <? context.username ?>".
2. In your code you would do something like this (Python).
import json
from watson_developer_cloud import ConversationV1
conversation = ConversationV1(
username='SERVICE_USERNAME',
password='SERVICE_PASSWORD',
version='2016-07-11')
workspace_id = 'WORKSPACE_ID_CONVERSATION'
response = conversation.message(workspace_id=workspace_id, context= {'username':'Simon'})
print json.dumps(response)
3. When you run this, it should output the following, with the "text" part being what the user sees.
{
"entities":[],
"intents":[],
"output":{
"log_messages":[],
"nodes_visited":["node_1_1472298724972],
"text":["Hello Simon"]
},
"context":{
"username":"Simon",
"conversation_id":"9dc1501b-ac53-4b51-a299-37f5314ebf89",
"system":{
"dialog_turn_counter":1,
"dialog_stack":["root"],
"dialog_request_counter":1
}
},
"input":{}
}
One thing to be aware is that, the context object is used to maintain the state of the conversation. So if you plan to use just REST API's then you need to merge your context variables into the preceding context object before sending it. You do only need to do this at points where you do know the conversation needs that context.
Do you already have access to this information? You can send these values through as context, and refer to them using $context_variable
The same goes for collecting information from a user. You can capture things using regular expressions via your application, or using some Spring Expressions, you can see the text.matches here:
https://www.ibm.com/watson/developercloud/doc/conversation/dialog_reference.shtml
You would store this as context, and then refer to it using $context_variable again.
Information like names and phone numbers is quite open ended, so can be difficult to capture without using an open entity extraction engine, which we are researching best ways to incorporate this.
To get the user's input, use:
"context": {"yourVariable": "<?input.text?>"}
And to show:
"output": {"text": "You entered this $yourVariable"}
Or more precisely...
I already have an error page route defined like so:
GET /error controllers.pages.ErrorController.page(msg: String, returnTo: String)
And a controller method like this:
object ErrorController extends Controller {
def page(msg: String, returnTo: String) = ReceiverRestricted { implicit req =>
val action = List(Button(F8, "Continue", Call("GET", returnTo)))
Results.Ok(views.html.base(Html("Oops"), List(Html(msg)), None, action))
}
}
If I programmatically call, say, ErrorController.page("You did something daft!", "/home") I get to a page that looks like I want, ie:
Oops
You did something daft!
F8 Continue
However the url is ugly:
http://localhost:9000/error?msg=You%20did%20something%20daft!&returnTo=/home
I want to change this so the msg= query parameter doesn't appear in the url. How can I accomplish this? I tried removing the query parameter and redirecting to the error page with the message passed in via the flash cookie - that worked but reloading the browser page loses the message. I can't use the session cookie because I already store other data in the session almost upto its limit.
You can use flash feature.
Here is a sample:
In your controller you can redirect the user to error page with:
Redirect("/error").flashing(
"reason" -> "The item has been created"
)
And in Error action:
def error = Action { implicit request =>
Ok {
val reason = flash.get("reason").getOrElse("General Error")
//DO your stuff with reason variable
}
}
Obviously you can have as many as flash variables you want.
Since Play is restful and stateless, I can't see an easy way to pass on an error message during a redirect without using Play's flash. Of course you could store the message in an temporary cookie in the browser. Another possibility could be to store it in your database (or whatever persistence technology you use), but this seems to be like cracking a nut with a sledgehammer.
I'm using the MVVM Light Toolkit. I could not find any Ctor of Messenger or Notification class to send a empty message.
ViewModel1:
private int _selectedWeeklyRotation;
public int SelectedWeeklyRotation
{
get { return _selectedWeeklyRotation; }
set
{
if(_selectedWeeklyRotation == value)
return;
_selectedWeeklyRotation = value;
this.OnPropertyChanged("SelectedWeeklyRotation");
if(value > 1)
Messenger.Default.Send();
}
}
ViewModel2:
Ctor:
Messenger.Default.Register(this, CreateAnotherTimeTable);
private void CreateAnotherTimeTable()
{
}
I just need to send a Notification to another ViewModel, no sending of data at all.
Is that possible with MVVM Light Toolkit library?
Unless I'm misunderstanding something, couldn't you accomplish this by creating and sending a custom "signal message" type via the Messenger?
public class WeeklyRotationSignal {}
Messenger.Default.Send(new WeeklyRotationSignal());
Then register to that in another view model:
Messenger.Default.Register<WeeklyRotationSignal>(this, msg => doWork);
You can try sending a simple message with a string tag and receive that message by matching the string tag. Something like this:
Sender portion of the code located possibly in something like ViewModel1.cs
Messenger.Default.Send<string>("Dummy text message", "String_ToHelpMatchTheMsg");
Receiving end portion of the code responding to that message above, possibly located in some other file, something like ViewModel2.cs
...
Messenger.Default.Register<string>(this, "String_ToHelpMatchTheMsg", executeThisFunction);
private void executeThisFunction(string strMsg)
{
//your code would go here to run upon receiving the message
// The following line will display: "Dummy text message"
System.Windows.Browser.HtmlPage.Window.Alert("msg passed: " + strMsg);
}
Please note that you dont have to do anything with the text message that is passed around with the messaging code above. Just one part of the code sending some ping to another part of the code to ask some other section to execute some code. The important string is the one where I used "String_ToHelpMatchTheMsg" because that is the key used to match the sender and the receiver. Almost like creating your own quasi-event, once the Send method runs, the Register method is notified and fire its own function to run also.
I used this with a Close button on a Child Window to close it. The Close button on the View of the Child Window binds to a relay command on its childWindowViewModel. That relay command has the code above to send a message to the ParentViewModel. The Register portion on the ParentViewModel responds to that message by firing a method that closes the ChildWindow which was initially instantied from that parentViewModel.
Once you get more familiar with messaging, there are more attributes that you will be able to use so that the receiver can call back the sender to give a status or some data back. Look for Delegates and lambda function to achieve this.
All this to avoid placing code in the code behind to close the child window! :-)
Use as you see fit.
Cheers.
Mario
There really isn't a way to accomplish this and in someways defies the point of the messenger class. I didn't want to write a your doing it wrong post, but I feel I am stuck. The way the messenger class works is that you have two parties that both subscribe to the same concept, its an observer model. Without that similar concept or message there really isn't a way to tie the two objects together. The generic message whether a simple string or custom message act as the meeting point of the Subscribing and Publishing classes.
If the ViewModel publishing knows the type of ViewModel its trying to Send to it could...
Messenger.Default.Send<Type>(typeof(ViewModelToSendTo);
This would act as a very simple interaction point, you also wouldn't have to create a custom class. Some purist may have an issue with this approach as it couples the publishing class to the subscriber.
I don't think that it is possible and frankly I don't see the point of having that kind of message. You could just as well send a string "SelectedWeeklyRotation". It seems strange to have an empty message that has some kind of meaning as you increase the number of broadcast messages - and receivers in your application.
In the version of MVVM Light that I'm using it is not even possible to send an empty message.
However I did see a method in the ViewModelBase that is :
// Update bindings and broadcast change using GalaSoft.MvvmLight.Messenging
RaisePropertyChanged(MyPropertyPropertyName, oldValue, value, true);
This might be of interest for you.