There is an option in GWT to obfuscate enum names:
<set-configuration-property name="compiler.enum.obfuscate.names" value="true" />
When I use this option, my compiles produce a warning:
[WARN] Call to Enum method name when enum obfuscation is enabled:
com/google/gwt/dom/client/DataTransfer.java:127
Looking at the DataTransfer source code, I can see that it has an enum DropEffect and the enum names are used in one of the methods (setDropEffect).
I'm using modern JsInterop-oriented GWT, so I'm not using this DataTransfer class (or anything in gwt-user.jar). It's annoying to have a useless warning. Is there an easy way to get rid of it?
I know how to exclude files in my own source folders.
Is it possible to exclude source folders from gwt-user? (Other than by physically deleting files from the jar!)
That looks like a bug - unfortunate too that the compiler doesn't remove this class. This should be easy to fix with a patch to GWT, adding a field to DropEffect for the name, since it must never be removed even when that compiler flag is enabled.
Is it possible to exclude source folders from gwt-user? (Other than by physically deleting files from the jar!)
What you must do is exclude the .gwt.xml file itself, by not inheriting it at all, even transitively. So, for example, if you do avoid all JSNI including Widget types in the User module, your .gwt.xml shouldn't reference the Dom module, or User, or anything else which references Dom. But once a module has been inherited, there is no way to "uninherit" it. And once a module is inherited, its sources are added, and cannot be un-added.
Related
Background
I'm trying to remove resize-observer-polyfill from an nx workspace that I'm working on because it's natively supported in the browsers that we are targeting. Once I removed the polyfill, I needed to add #types/resize-observer-browser because the workspace currently uses typescript#4.0.5 and my understanding is that TypeScript does not have a "native" type for ResizeObserver until v4.2 which I'd love to update to, but can't atm.
Problem
In order to make TypeScript happy, it seems like I have to go in and manually add "resize-observer-browser" to individual tsconfig compilerOptions.types entries. This didn't seem that bad to me at first. I just updated the tsconfig.lib.json file of the libraries that happened to utilize ResizeObserver. However, I soon realized I needed to also add it to the tsconfig.spec.json of the libraries so that the unit tests could run, and then I also needed to add it to the tsconfig.app.json of any applications that happened to import those libraries.
Question
Is there an easier way in an nx workspace to handle this sort of problem?
I think that I could remove the default types overrides in each of the tsconfig files, since that would let TypeScript just utilize everything that exists under node_modules/#types when compiling. I didn't want to take that path since I assume there is a good reason for the default nx library/app generators to add the types override (I assume it's to force you to be explicit and not accidentally get away with accidental imports of test code from business logic).
The docs seem to recommend against this for #types packages, but /// <reference types="..." /> (e.g. /// <reference types="resize-observer-browser" />) can be also be used to include types, and might be easier to manage if the type is only used in a few places.
Docs: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/triple-slash-directives.html#-reference-types-
I have a large library of Hibernate-annotated bean classes with inconsistent variable naming. For example, in one class, a variable might be named "acceptanceDate" but in another it might be named "dateAccepted". Each class has a get/set method as well.
I am wondering if there is an easy way to rename these variables across the board AS WELL AS rename their accessor methods. (And even better: open projects in eclipse would update their own references to use the new names).
This is probably a long shot, but I figured it couldn't hurt to ask.
Such a functionality simply does not exist in Eclipse. If I were you, I would write a utility class that would scan the given directory recursively for .java files and then parse them one by one to rename the getter / setter methods and their fields as per the convention needed. Parsing does not have to be full-fledged as you are interested in only renaming the fields and their getter setters that match a specific criteria.
Other option is to manually refactor each instance variable and its getter setter using the Refactor --> Rename dialog of Eclipse.
How can I get GWT to provide the same dependency insights as mvn dependency:analyze?
Maven can report about dependencies (Used undeclared dependencies and Unused declared dependencies). I'd like to get GWT to do the same because determining missing inherits in my gwt.xml proves difficult.
Is there a good way for the system to analyze dependency state?
Thanks
Peter
I'm not aware of any such tool, and while I think a utility to analyze and report on GWT dependencies could be interesting, I also think it would be difficult to define well.
Used, undeclared dependencies
Before trying to solve this, what is the problem? In maven, this category means that a Class is loaded from a dependency that isn't directly depended on, but instead is transitively loaded. This starts to get into the whole issue of transitive dependencies (which exist in GWT) and scopes (which don't). If A uses a class in C, but only depends on B, which depends on C, this will be listed in the 'used, undeclared dependencies' list.
In GWT however, we very rarely list every single dependency we use directly. Instead, we assume that transitive dependencies will stay transitive - we dont bother to inherit com.google.gwt.user.RemoteService for RPC as long as we already have com.google.gwt.user.User listed.
So how could we tell if we are using an undeclared dependency, the kind that warns when we do a gwt:compile? Perhaps such a tool could find every .gwt.xml file on the classpath, and read through its <source> and <super-source> rules to look for somewhere that a class we are using is declared? Or in the case of invoking GWT.create on something and getting back a non-concrete type, it could look for <replace-with> and <generate-with> rules. As long as your code already compiles in Java, the classes are on the classpath, but you still run the risk that while the class is there, the .java or .gwt.xml files might not be.
Unused, declared dependencies
This seems like an easier problem - analyze the modules we are inheriting, and look through them for any module that could be pruned out. Unfortunately, as the above discussion notes, we can't just look for the classes and which package they are in, which <source> and <super-source> elements are unused - we also would need to look for <replace-with> and <generate-with> rules - consider something like com.google.gwt.user.RemoteService, which only adds a rule and some configuration details, or even com.google.gwt.user.RemoteServiceObfuscateTypeNames, which modifies only a single setting of the RemoteService module. If RemoteServiceObfuscateTypeNames were removed, everything would still compile, but now there might be information about your RPC classes compiled into your app that you don't expect to be there.
With these in mind, perhaps such a tool could watch all possible rebind rules in the current build, and all configuration settings, properties, etc, and see if any of those rules were not using during a gwt:compile process. Then, indicate which modules had unused parts, and if any module (and all of its inherited modules) were unused, it could shown to the user as able to be removed.
One more important piece: order matters, when defining <inherits> statements. If I add a inherits for com.google.gwt.logging.Logging, then follow it with com.google.gwt.logging.LoggingDisabled, logging classes will be on the source path and will compile, but will have no effect. But if those are ordered the other way around, then they will not only be on the source path, but will all be functional. So any analysis of modules used and unused would need to also include transitive inherits statements, and their orders.
I have a legacy java project that we have been moving to buildr/artifactory from ant/jars in svn.
The primary code is in the default (src/main/java) folder, but we have a few external source paths, for various tests that we can't move into the default folder, but we want to have access with it.
Currently, when adding a new library/regenerating IDE fields, it does not pick up these source paths, and I can't find a succinct discussion in the buildr manual for how to actually add them, rather than re-adding everything manually in eclipse (which just gets wiped out on the next regen).
Any idea how to have multiple source paths get picked up explicitly by buildr so that the idea/eclipse targets generate properly?
There are two ways that I know will work with IDEA. The second one might also work with Eclipse, while the first is specific to the idea task.
The IDEA-specific solution:
define 'proj' do
# ...
iml.main_source_directories << _('src/other')
end
iml also has test_source_directories and excluded_directories arrays you can append to.
The possibly eclipse-compatible solution, with more background than you probably want:
The iml object gets its default values for the main and test source directory arrays from project.compile.sources and project.test.compile.sources (slight simplification; resources are considered also). Buildr defines these .sources project attributes from the layout, so instead of explicitly appending to the iml attributes, you could use a custom layout for your project that includes your special source paths. That might work with the eclipse task, but I haven't tried it.
I'm trying to work through groovy's Implementing Local AST Transformations tutorial, but whenever I clean my project I get this error in each file that has the #WithLogging annotation in it:
Groovy:Could not find class for Transformation Processor AC.LoggingASTTransformation declared by AC.WithLogging
So you have a package named "AC" that contains both "WithLogging.groovy" and "LoggingASTTransformation.groovy" classes? Does it also contain any classes that implement the "WithLogging" interface?
If so, I'd suggest you move the class(es) that use your annotation to a location outside of the annotation defining package (the default will suffice, for diagnostic purposes) - Order of compilation matters with transformations. See this post on the groovy users mailing list for more on that.
Also try changing the annotation from #WithLogging to #AC.WithLogging.
As far as cleaning with Eclipse is concerned, I had a similar issue and found that I had to make a trivial modification after a clean to any file that contained my annotation. IE, add a space somewhere. Then save the file. This should rebuild everything properly.