For a visualization I need an optical satellite image for a specific rectangular AOI, that is defined by two lat/long coordinates. I tried Mapbox Static Images API, which takes a lat/long bounding box and a resolution in width/height pixel for the output. The problem is that it looks like to me that if ratio of the lat/long box is not the same as the w/h pixels, it will add padding to the lat/long bounding box to fill the w/h of the pixel image.
And this would prevent me from combining the optical image with the other data, because I would not know which image pixel would (roughly) correspond to which lat/long coordinate.
I see three "solutions", but I don't know how to achive any of them.
"Make" Mapbox return the images with out padding.
Compute the ratio for the correct w/h pixel ratio using the lat/long coordinate, so there would be no padding. Maybe with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equirectangular_projection like discussed here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/16271669/380038?
Find a way to determine the lat/long coordinates of the optical satellite image so I can cut off the possible padding.
I checked How can I extract a satellite image from google maps given a Lat Long Rectangle?, but I would prefer to use my existing paid Mapbox account and I got the impression that I still wouldn't get the exact optical image or the exact corner coordinates of the optical image.
Mapbox Static Images API serves maps
You have optical image from other source
You want to overlay these data
Right?
Note the Red and Green pins: the waypoints are at opposite corners on Mapbox.
After Equirectangular correction Mapbox matches Openstreetmaps (little wonder), but Google coordinates are quite close too.
curl -g "https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/mapbox/streets-v11/static/[17.55490,47.10434,17.55718,47.10543]/600x419?access_token=YOUR_TOKEN_HERE" --output example-walk-600x419-nopad.png
What is your scale? 1 km - 100 km?
What is your source of optical image?
What is the required accuracy?
Just to mention, optical images have their own sources of distortions.
In practice:
You must have the extent of your non optical satellite data (let's preserve the mist around...) I'll call it ((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) We are coders, not cartographers - right!?
If you feed your extent to https://docs.mapbox.com/playground/static/ as
min longitude = x1, min lattitude = y1, max longitude = x2, max lattitude = y2
Select "Bounding box" entry! Do you see mapbox around your data!? Don't mind the exact dimensions, just check if mapbox is related to your data! May be you have to swap some values to get to the right corner of the globe.
If you have the right ((x1, y1), (x2, y2)) coordinates, do the equirectangular transformation to get the right pixel size.
You've called it Solution #2.
Let's say the with of your non optical satellite data is Wd, the height is Hd.
The mapbox image will fit your data, if you ask for Wm widht, and Hm height of mapbox data where
Wm = Wd
Hm = Wd * (y2 - y1) * cos(x1) / (x2 - x1)
Now you can pull the mapbox by
curl -g "https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/mapbox/streets-v11/static/[<x1>,<y1>,<x2>,<y2>]/<Wm>x<Hm>?access_token=<YOUR_TOKEN>" --output overlay.png
If (Hd == Hm)
then {you are lucky :) the two images just fit each other}
else { the two images are for the same area, but you have to scale the height of one of the images to make match }
Well... almost. You have not revealed what size of area you want to cover. The equation above is just an approximation which works up to the size of a smaller country (~100 km or so). For continent scale you probably have to apply more accurate formulas.
In my opinion, your #2 idea is the way to go. You do have the LLng bbox, so all that remains is calculate its "real" size in pixels.
Let us say that you want (or can allow, or can afford) a resolution of 50m per pixel, and the area is small enough not to have distortions (i.e., a rectangle of say 1 arcsecond of latitude and 1 arcsecond of longitude has top and bottom sides of the same length, with an error less than your chosen resolution). These are, I believe, very loose requisites and easy to fulfill.
Then, you just need to calculate the distance between the (Lat1, Lon1) and (Lat1, Lon2) points, and betwen (Lat1, Lon1) and (Lat2, Lon1). Divide that distance in meters by 50, and you'll get the exact number of pixels:
Lon1 Lon2
Lat1 +---------------+
| |
| |
Lat2 +---------------+
And you have a formula for that - the haversine formula.
If you need a higher precision, you could recourse to the Vincenty oblate spheroid (here a Javascript library). On the MT site (first link) there is a live calculator that you can use to plug data from your calls, and verify whether the approach is indeed working. I.e. you plug in your bounding box, get the distance in meters, divide and get the pixel size of the image (if the image is good, chances are that you can go with the simpler haversine. If it isn't, then there has to be some further quirk in the maps API - its projection, perhaps - that doesn't return the expected bounding box. But it seems unlikely).
I've had this exact problem when using a satellite image on an apple watch. I overlay some markers and a path. I convert everything from coordinates to pixels. Below is my code to determine the exact bbox result
var maxHoleLat = 52.5738902
var maxHoleLon = 4.9577606
var minHoleLat = 52.563994
var minHoleLon = 4.922364
var mapMaxLat = 0.0
var mapMaxLon = 0.0
var mapMinLat = 0.0
var mapMinLon = 0.0
let token = "your token"
var resX = 1000.0
var resY = 1000.0
let screenX = 184.0
let screenY = 224.0 // 448/2 = 224 - navbarHeight
let navbarHeight = 0.0
var latDist = 111000.0
var lonDist = 111000.0
var dx = 0.0
var dy = 0.0
func latLonDist(){
//calgary.rasc.ca/latlong.htm
let latRad = maxHoleLat * .pi / 180
//distance between 1 degree of longitude at given latitude
self.lonDist = 111412.88 * cos(latRad) - 0.09350*cos(3 * latRad) + 0.00012 * cos(5 * latRad)
print("lonDist = \(self.lonDist)")
//distance between 1 degree of latitude at a given longitude
self.latDist = 111132.95 - 0.55982 * cos(2 * latRad) + 0.00117 * cos(4 * latRad)
print("latDist = \(self.latDist)")
}
func getMapUrl(){
self.dx = (maxHoleLon - minHoleLon) * lonDist
self.dy = (maxHoleLat - minHoleLat) * latDist
//the map is square, but the hole not
//check if the hole has less x than y
if dx < dy {
mapMaxLat = maxHoleLat
mapMinLat = minHoleLat
let midLon = (maxHoleLon + minHoleLon ) / 2
mapMaxLon = midLon + dy / 2 / lonDist
mapMinLon = midLon - dy / 2 / lonDist
} else {
mapMaxLon = maxHoleLon
mapMinLon = minHoleLon
let midLat = (maxHoleLat + minHoleLat ) / 2
mapMaxLat = midLat + dx / 2 / latDist
mapMinLat = midLat - dx / 2 / latDist
}
self.imageUrl = URL(string:"https://api.mapbox.com/styles/v1/mapbox/satellite-v9/static/[\(mapMinLon),\(mapMinLat),\(mapMaxLon),\(mapMaxLat)]/1000x1000?logo=false&access_token=\(token)")
print("\(imageUrl)")
}
I'm using the ios-charts library and I would like to add some horizontal padding to my line charts so that the line does not start immediately at the border of the graph.
This is my current chart:
but I would like the blue line to have some padding as shown below. The rest should remain as it is. The reference gray lines should still take the entire width as they currently do.
I found it. This "padding" is actually ruled by the chart.xAxis.axisMinimum and chart.xAxis.axisMaximum. Those values are automatically set to the data min x and max x.
So if I want a left padding I just have to set a chart.xAxis.axisMinimum
In my case, I want around 10% of the x values to be padded, so I calculate it as
// dates is an array of Date representing my x values
if let maxX = dates
.map(\.timeIntervalSince1970)
.max(),
let minX = dates
.map(\.timeIntervalSince1970)
.min() {
let spanX = maxX - minX
let padding = spanX * 0.1
let axisMinimum = minX - padding
// set the left padding
chart.xAxis.axisMinimum = axisMinimum
}
I am working on an ARKit playground project and I just can't get an SCNNode to move along the axis of sceneView.pointofview. When I try with constants like 0.04 etc it adjusts the position properly but when I provide the coordinates relative to the frame of pointOfView I can't get to position it anywhere else but in the centre.
Here is the code for that part:
let winglevMain = button(ButtonType: .wing)
let wingLevButton = winglevMain.button1
wingLevButton.name = "wing"
let x = (sceneView.pointOfView?.frame.width)!
let y = x/2
let z = x/5
let total = y+z
wingLevButton.position = SCNVector3(total, 0.12, -0.5)
sceneView.pointOfView?.addChildNode(wingLevButton)
P.S I used separate constants to store each value because when I tried putting em as it is into the arguments for position, I got an error signifying that it was hard for playground to calculate it that way.
I've managed to get a cube (SCNNode) placed on a surface where the camera is pointed, however I am finding it very difficult to do the simple (?) task of also placing text in the same position.
I've created the SCNText and subsequent SCNNode, however when I add it to the rootNode the text always seems to be added above my head and off the camera to the right (which tells me thats the global origin point).
Even when I use the exact same values of position I used for the the cube, the SCNText node still gets placed above my head in the same spot.
Apologies if this is a basic question, I've never worked in SceneKit before.
The coordinate center for an SCNGeometry is its center point. But when you are creating a SCNText the center point is somewhere in the bottom left corner:
You need to center the text first. This can be done by checking the bounding box of the node containing your text and setting a pivot transform to change the texts center to its actual center:
func center(node: SCNNode) {
let (min, max) = node.boundingBox
let dx = min.x + 0.5 * (max.x - min.x)
let dy = min.y + 0.5 * (max.y - min.y)
let dz = min.z + 0.5 * (max.z - min.z)
node.pivot = SCNMatrix4MakeTranslation(dx, dy, dz)
}
Edit:
Also note this answer that explains some additional pitfalls:
A text with 16 pts font size is 16 SceneKit units tall. But in ARKit 1 SceneKit units = 1 meter!
I want to use ImageOverlays as markers, because I want the images to scale with zoom. Markers icons always resize to keep their size the same when you zoom.
My problem is that I can't figure out how to transform pixels to cords, so my image isn't stretched.
For instance, I decided my south-west LatLng to be [50, 50]. My image dimensions are 24px/24px.
How do I calculate the north-east LatLng based on the image pixels?
You are probably looking for map conversion methods.
In particular, you could use:
latLngToContainerPoint: Given a geographical coordinate, returns the corresponding pixel coordinate relative to the map container.
containerPointToLatLng: Given a pixel coordinate relative to the map container, returns the corresponding geographical coordinate (for the current zoom level).
// 1) Convert LatLng into container pixel position.
var originPoint = map.latLngToContainerPoint(originLatLng);
// 2) Add the image pixel dimensions.
// Positive x to go right (East).
// Negative y to go up (North).
var nextCornerPoint = originPoint.add({x: 24, y: -24});
// 3) Convert back into LatLng.
var nextCornerLatLng = map.containerPointToLatLng(nextCornerPoint);
var imageOverlay = L.imageOverlay(
'path/to/image',
[originLatLng, nextCornerLatLng]
).addTo(map);
Demo: http://playground-leaflet.rhcloud.com/tehi/1/edit?html,output