Well known commands like make, rsync, and, git use -n option for dry-run.
What does -n stand for in this context?
My guess is that it's because dry-run contains the letter n and because d and r are already used:
$ make --help | grep '^ *-[dr]'
-d Print lots of debugging information.
-r, --no-builtin-rules Disable the built-in implicit rules.
$ rsync --help | grep '^ *-[dr]'
-r, --recursive recurse into directories
-d, --dirs transfer directories without recursing
Related
I want to rename all the files in my home directory (example abc), in the format (abc_bkp) without using any loops and it should be a single line command in unix (bash script).
If the directory contains nothing but files, this should do it:
ls | xargs -I {} mv {} {}_bkp
If it contains subdirectories, links, and other things you don't want to rename, you must filter the output of ls. Here is a crude way to do it; maybe someone can suggest a more elegant approach:
ls -l | grep ^- | cut -d' ' -f 13 | xargs -I {} mv {} {}_bkp
If you don't want to use loops then I believe the BEST way could be find command, try following command as a DRY run first and once you are satisfy with results then you could remove echo from it to give a real shot.
find -type f -or -type d | xargs -I % echo mv % %_bkp
-I: From man xargs page:
-I replace-str
Replace occurrences of replace-str in the initial-arguments with names read from standard input. Also, unquoted blanks do not
terminate
input items; instead the separator is the newline character. Implies -x and -L 1.
sed -i is creating a backup of all files in subdirectories before editing in place (as expected) but it's not actually editing files in subdirectories.
$ mkdir -p a/b
$ echo "A" > a/a.txt
$ echo "B" > a/b/b.txt
Now I have two text files, one in a one in a subdirectory of a
$ sed -i.bac "1s/^/PREPENDED /" a/**/*.txt
Backups are created for both:
$ find a
a
a/a.txt
a/a.txt.bac
a/b
a/b/b.txt
a/b/b.txt.bac
Only a.txt is edited:
$ cat a/a.txt
PREPENDED A
$ cat a/b/b.txt
B
I'm using ZSH (so I have globstar support) and I'm on Mac.
Why is this happening and how can I fix it?
It's happening because your sed invocation only has a single line 1, which happens to be in a.txt. If you want it to do it for each file then you need to invoke sed multiple times.
for f in a/**/*.txt
do
sed ... "$f"
done
Since you are needing to descend through several levels of directories, a single invocation of sed alone is not sufficient. However, using find you can accomplish what you want in a single line. If you are not familiar with find ... -exec '{}' \; it is worth taking a few minutes with startpage.com and do a quick search. In your case, the following invocation works well:
find a -type f -name "*.txt" -exec sed -i.bac 's/^/PREPENDED /' '{}' \;
Here find searches directory a and all below for any file (-type f) matching *.txt, then for each file (indicated by '{}') -exec executes sed -i.bac 's/^/PREPENDED /' and lastly an escaped \; is given to indicate the end of the -exec command.
results:
$ ls -1 a
b
a.txt
a.txt.bac
$ ls -1 a/b
b.txt
b.txt.bac
$ cat a/a.txt
PREPENDED A
$ cat a/b/b.txt
PREPENDED B
As was correctly pointed out, with globstar set shopt -s globstar it is unnecessary to use find as the following invocation of sed is sufficient:
sed -i.bac 's/^/PREPENDED /' a/**/*.txt
In a folder I have many files with several parameters in filenames, e.g (just with one parameter) file_a1.0.txt, file_a1.2.txt etc.
These are generated by a c++ code and I'd need to take the last one (in time) generated. I don't know a priori what will be the value of this parameter when the code is terminated. After that I need to copy the 2nd line of this last file.
To copy the 2nd line of the any file, I know that this sed command works:
sed -n 2p filename
I know also how to find the last generated file:
ls -rtl file_a*.txt | tail -1
Question:
how to combine these two operation? Certainly it is possible to pipe the 2nd operation to that sed operation but I dont know how to include filename from pipe as input to that sed command.
You can use this,
ls -rt1 file_a*.txt | tail -1 | xargs sed -n '2p'
(OR)
sed -n '2p' `ls -rt1 file_a*.txt | tail -1`
sed -n '2p' $(ls -rt1 file_a*.txt | tail -1)
Typically you can put a command in back ticks to put its output at a particular point in another command - so
sed -n 2p `ls -rt name*.txt | tail -1 `
Alternatively - and preferred, because it is easier to nest etc -
sed -n 2p $(ls -rt name*.txt | tail -1)
-r in ls is reverse order.
-r, --reverse
reverse order while sorting
But it is not good idea when used it with tail -1.
With below change (head -1 without r option in ls), performance will be better, that you needn't wait to list all files then pipe to tail command
sed -n 2p $(ls -t1 name*.txt | head -1 )
I was looking for a similar solution: taking the file names from a pipe of grep results to feed to sed. I've copied my answer here for the search & replace, but perhaps this example can help as it calls sed for each of the names found in the pipe:
this command to simply find all the files:
grep -i -l -r foo ./*
this one to exclude this_shell.sh (in case you put the command in a script called this_shell.sh), tee the output to the console to see what happened, and then use sed on each file name found to replace the text foo with bar:
grep -i -l -r --exclude "this_shell.sh" foo ./* | tee /dev/fd/2 | while read -r x; do sed -b -i 's/foo/bar/gi' "$x"; done
I chose this method, as I didn't like having all the timestamps changed for files not modified. Feeding the grep result allows only the files with target text to be looked at (thus likely may improve performance / speed as well)
be sure to backup your files & test before using. May not work in some environments for files with embedded spaces. (?)
fwiw - I had some problems using the tail method, it seems that the entire dataset was generated before calling tail on just the last item.
I have a big file which is composed of alot of different lines which only have one commen keyword, storaged.
PROC:storage123:0702:2108:0,1,2,3,4,5:storage:vers:storaged:storage123:Storage
123:storage123:-R /etc/orc/storage123 -e emr123#localhost -p Xxx::
PROC:storageabc:0606:2108:0,1,2,3,4,5:storage:vers:storaged:storageabc:Storage
abc:storageabc: -e emabc#localhost -R /etc/orc/storageabc -p 654::
What i need to do is grep for the path that can be found on all storaged keywords that comes after -R. But I only want the path, nothing after that. -R can be found on different places so there is no pattern to it.
I created one espressionen which seemed to work, but I think I made it much for complex (and not 100% sure to match) than it should have to be.
[root:~/scripts/] <conf.txt grep -o 'R *[^ ]*' | grep -o '[^ ]*$' | sed 's/.*R\///'
/etc/orc/storage123
/etc/orc/storagerabc
The espression also is hard to implement in a bash script so something simpler would be great. I need these paths in the script later on.
Cheers
Your attempt is nice, but you can simplify it by using a look-behind:
$ grep -Po '(?<=-R )[^ ]*' file
/etc/orc/storage123
/etc/orc/storageabc
Basically it looks for the string -R (note the space) and from that, it prints everything up to a space.
$ sed 's/.*-R \([^ ]*\).*/\1/' file
/etc/orc/storage123
/etc/orc/storageabc
The following command is correctly changing the contents of 2 files.
sed -i 's/abc/xyz/g' xaa1 xab1
But what I need to do is to change several such files dynamically and I do not know the file names. I want to write a command that will read all the files from current directory starting with xa* and sed should change the file contents.
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the -exec argument to find, which is intended for this type of use-case, although it will start a process for each matching file name:
find . -type f -name 'xa*' -exec sed -i 's/asd/dsg/g' {} \;
Alternatively, one could use xargs, which will invoke fewer processes:
find . -type f -name 'xa*' | xargs sed -i 's/asd/dsg/g'
Or more simply use the + exec variant instead of ; in find to allow find to provide more than one file per subprocess call:
find . -type f -name 'xa*' -exec sed -i 's/asd/dsg/g' {} +
Better yet:
for i in xa*; do
sed -i 's/asd/dfg/g' $i
done
because nobody knows how many files are there, and it's easy to break command line limits.
Here's what happens when there are too many files:
# grep -c aaa *
-bash: /bin/grep: Argument list too long
# for i in *; do grep -c aaa $i; done
0
... (output skipped)
#
You could use grep and sed together. This allows you to search subdirectories recursively.
Linux: grep -r -l <old> * | xargs sed -i 's/<old>/<new>/g'
OS X: grep -r -l <old> * | xargs sed -i '' 's/<old>/<new>/g'
For grep:
-r recursively searches subdirectories
-l prints file names that contain matches
For sed:
-i extension (Note: An argument needs to be provided on OS X)
Those commands won't work in the default sed that comes with Mac OS X.
From man 1 sed:
-i extension
Edit files in-place, saving backups with the specified
extension. If a zero-length extension is given, no backup
will be saved. It is not recommended to give a zero-length
extension when in-place editing files, as you risk corruption
or partial content in situations where disk space is exhausted, etc.
Tried
sed -i '.bak' 's/old/new/g' logfile*
and
for i in logfile*; do sed -i '.bak' 's/old/new/g' $i; done
Both work fine.
#PaulR posted this as a comment, but people should view it as an answer (and this answer works best for my needs):
sed -i 's/abc/xyz/g' xa*
This will work for a moderate amount of files, probably on the order of tens, but probably not on the order of millions.
Another more versatile way is to use find:
sed -i 's/asd/dsg/g' $(find . -type f -name 'xa*')
I'm using find for similar task. It is quite simple: you have to pass it as an argument for sed like this:
sed -i 's/EXPRESSION/REPLACEMENT/g' `find -name "FILE.REGEX"`
This way you don't have to write complex loops, and it is simple to see, which files you are going to change, just run find before you run sed.
u can make
'xxxx' text u search and will replace it with 'yyyy'
grep -Rn '**xxxx**' /path | awk -F: '{print $1}' | xargs sed -i 's/**xxxx**/**yyyy**/'
There's some good answers above. I thought I'd throw in one more that is succinct and parallelizable, using GNU parallel, which I often prefer to xargs:
parallel sed -i 's/abc/xyz/g' {} ::: xa*
Combine this with the -j N option to run N jobs in parallel.
If you are able to run a script, here is what I did for a similar situation:
Using a dictionary/hashMap (associative array) and variables for the sed command, we can loop through the array to replace several strings. Including a wildcard in the name_pattern will allow to replace in-place in files with a pattern (this could be something like name_pattern='File*.txt' ) in a specific directory (source_dir).
All the changes are written in the logfile in the destin_dir
#!/bin/bash
source_dir=source_path
destin_dir=destin_path
logfile='sedOutput.txt'
name_pattern='File.txt'
echo "--Begin $(date)--" | tee -a $destin_dir/$logfile
echo "Source_DIR=$source_dir destin_DIR=$destin_dir "
declare -A pairs=(
['WHAT1']='FOR1'
['OTHER_string_to replace']='string replaced'
)
for i in "${!pairs[#]}"; do
j=${pairs[$i]}
echo "[$i]=$j"
replace_what=$i
replace_for=$j
echo " "
echo "Replace: $replace_what for: $replace_for"
find $source_dir -name $name_pattern | xargs sed -i "s/$replace_what/$replace_for/g"
find $source_dir -name $name_pattern | xargs -I{} grep -n "$replace_for" {} /dev/null | tee -a $destin_dir/$logfile
done
echo " "
echo "----End $(date)---" | tee -a $destin_dir/$logfile
First, the pairs array is declared, each pair is a replacement string, then WHAT1 will be replaced for FOR1 and OTHER_string_to replace will be replaced for string replaced in the file File.txt. In the loop the array is read, the first member of the pair is retrieved as replace_what=$i and the second as replace_for=$j. The find command searches in the directory the filename (that may contain a wildcard) and the sed -i command replaces in the same file(s) what was previously defined. Finally I added a grep redirected to the logfile to log the changes made in the file(s).
This worked for me in GNU Bash 4.3 sed 4.2.2 and based upon VasyaNovikov's answer for Loop over tuples in bash.
The Silver Searcher Solution
I'm adding another option for those people who don't know about the amazing tool called The Silver Searcher (command line tool is ag).
Note: You can use grep and other tools to do the same thing here, but The Silver Searcher is fantastic :)
TLDR
ag -l 'abc' | xargs sed -i 's/abc/xyz/g'
Install The Silver Searcher
sudo apt install silversearcher-ag # Debian / Ubuntu
sudo pacman -S the_silver_searcher # Arch / EndeavourOS
sudo yum install epel-release the_silver_searcher # RHEL / CentOS
Demo Files
Paste the following into your terminal to create some demonstration files:
mkdir /tmp/food
cd /tmp/food
content="Everybody loves to abc this food!"
echo "$content" > ./milk
echo "$content" > ./bread
mkdir ./fastfood
echo "$content" > ./fastfood/pizza
echo "$content" > ./fastfood/burger
mkdir ./fruit
echo "$content" > ./fruit/apple
echo "$content" > ./fruit/apricot
Using 'ag'
The following ag command will recursively find all the files that contain the string 'abc'. It ignores the .git directory, .gitignore files, and other ignore files:
$ ag 'abc'
milk
1:Everybody loves to abc this food!
bread
1:Everybody loves to abc this food!
fastfood/burger
1:Everybody loves to abc this food!
fastfood/pizza
1:Everybody loves to abc this food!
fruit/apple
1:Everybody loves to abc this food!
fruit/apricot
1:Everybody loves to abc this food!
To just list the files that contain the string 'abc', use the -l switch:
$ ag -l 'abc'
bread
fastfood/burger
fastfood/pizza
fruit/apricot
milk
fruit/apple
Changing Multiple Files
Finally, using xargs and sed, we can replace the 'abc' string with another string:
ag -l 'abc' | xargs sed -i 's/abc/eat/g'
In the above command, ag is listing all the files that contain the string 'abc'. The xargs command is splitting the file names and piping them individually into the sed command.