My login procedure allows admins to select an account that they would like to login-as. For that I can login as that particular user and issue the authorization code, as usual.
Now, what I would like is to extend this setup to allow some other admins to login with "read-only" access. This can easily be mapped to our API by use of certain scopes and removing some other scope.
For the oauth process to work, I do need a way to issue oauth tokens that come with a scope that has been limited server side (less scope than the actual client - server-side because read-only is enforced).
I imagine that I might need to write a new GrantType and probably also have to track state somehow, but I am unclear on how exactly I should use create_authorization_response() in this case.
Ok, after some fiddling around, I found a solution. It essentially creates a custom Oauth2Request (usually client-provided, in our case, modified server-side).
Some rough outline of the code:
from urllib.parse import urlencode, parse_qs, urlparse
# obtain query string as dictionary
query_dict = parse_qs(request.query_string.decode("utf-8"))
# customize scope for this request
query_dict["scope"] = ["profile"]
# We here setup a custom Oauth2Request as we have change the scope in
# the query_dict
req = OAuth2Request(
"POST", request.base_url + "?" + urlencode(query_dict, doseq=True)
)
return authorization.create_authorization_response(grant_user=user, request=req)
Related
I am using Flutter as front end and Django for back end purpose. I am trying to integrate Google and Facebook OAuth in the app and using some flutter libraires I am able to fetch user details and access token in front end. Now the question is how do I handle users and access tokens for them and verify them through drf. I could totally depend on drf for OAuth and create users using http request in front end using OAuth toolikt for Django but is there a way that I handle incoming auth tokens in front end and verify them in drf so as to register them in backend.
#api_view(http_method_names=['POST'])
#permission_classes([AllowAny])
#psa()
def exchange_token(request, backend):
serializer = SocialSerializer(data=request.data)
if serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True):
# This is the key line of code: with the #psa() decorator above,
# it engages the PSA machinery to perform whatever social authentication
# steps are configured in your SOCIAL_AUTH_PIPELINE. At the end, it either
# hands you a populated User model of whatever type you've configured in
# your project, or None.
user = request.backend.do_auth(serializer.validated_data['access_token'])
if user:
# if using some other token back-end than DRF's built-in TokenAuthentication,
# you'll need to customize this to get an appropriate token object
token, _ = Token.objects.get_or_create(user=user)
return Response({'token': token.key})
else:
return Response(
{'errors': {'token': 'Invalid token'}},
status=status.HTTP_400_BAD_REQUEST,
)
There’s just a little more that needs to go in your settings (full code), and then you’re all set:
AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS = (
'social_core.backends.google.GoogleOAuth2',
'social_core.backends.facebook.FacebookOAuth2',
'django.contrib.auth.backends.ModelBackend',
)
for key in ['GOOGLE_OAUTH2_KEY',
'GOOGLE_OAUTH2_SECRET',
'FACEBOOK_KEY',
'FACEBOOK_SECRET']:
# Use exec instead of eval here because we're not just trying to evaluate a dynamic value here;
# we're setting a module attribute whose name varies.
exec("SOCIAL_AUTH_{key} = os.environ.get('{key}')".format(key=key))
SOCIAL_AUTH_PIPELINE = (
'social_core.pipeline.social_auth.social_details',
'social_core.pipeline.social_auth.social_uid',
'social_core.pipeline.social_auth.auth_allowed',
'social_core.pipeline.social_auth.social_user',
'social_core.pipeline.user.get_username',
'social_core.pipeline.social_auth.associate_by_email',
'social_core.pipeline.user.create_user',
'social_core.pipeline.social_auth.associate_user',
'social_core.pipeline.social_auth.load_extra_data',
'social_core.pipeline.user.user_details',
)
Add a mapping to this function in your urls.py, and you’re all set!
I am trying to make a call to an authorization endpoint using OAuth2 with grant type Client Credentials - my call is successful - that is not an issue. However, I, now, want to take the access token that is returned and put it in a variable so I may use it in subsequent calls without having to manually cut-and-paste to my other calls.
When the call returns I see the token I desire to copy in the Access Token field at the bottom of the OAuth2 window (the one shown below that says expires in 42 minutes) AND I see it in the Authorization field on the Timeline tab of the results. I just can't figure out how to get access to it so I may dump it into variable.
The gif on the FAQ goes really fast, and does not provide step by step. Also, I didnt find any answer on YouTube or other websites, so I thought to share step by step for chaining requests on Insomnia.
Create a POST query to obtain your access token. Notice that my access token is returned in the field called "access_token", we will use this in step 3. Your return field may be different.
Create a second GET request for the API that would return the data for you. In my case, I wanted to get all users from a SCIM interface. In the Bearer tab, type in Response => Body Attribute (Insomnia will autofill).
Mouse click on the Request => Body Attribute (the one you just typed in), and select the authentication post in the dropdown "Request" (this is the one you created in step 1), and in the "Filter (JSONPath)" field, type in the $.[attribute name] - where attribute name is the response that returns from authentication call. In my case, it was access_token, see step 1 for yours.
Enjoy!!
Click No Environment > Manage Environments and you will see a base environment in JSON.
Since this is in JSON, create a { "jwt_token": "Response => Body Attribute" }" pair for your token variable. Please note that "Response => Body Attribute" needs to be configured. When you type response, hit space and this option should be available.
Once done choosing "Response => Body Attribute", it will show with some gibberish content and with red background, no worries... just click it to configure. Make sure you have the same setup.
However... you need to change your request to the route where you get the token from the server and another thing is the Filter (JSONPath or XPath) change it depending on your setup.
You should have the token, stored in jwt_token variable and can use the variable on a route that you like.
Example:
If you want to save a token that is returned in a response into an environment variable, you can use request chaining in your environment variable. Take a look at this url for more details on that https://support.insomnia.rest/article/43-chaining-requests...
Here is what you could do (what I did)
Create an environment variable
For the value of the variable, use the Response => Body Attribute and under Filter (JSONPath or XPath), choose the attribute of the token in your response body (if it is "token" then put $.token).
After that just put the token environment variable wherever you need it in the following requests.
I was not able to resolve this question but was able to get around it by defining the fields in the body of the request and bypassing the OAuth2 tab completely.
You can add it as a header, by referencing the outputs of the OAuth2 request:
I'm trying to implement a custom IAuthorizationPolicy in Kinto. The documentation points to https://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/latest/quick_tutorial/authorization.html, which does not make me entirely understand how to add my IAuthorizationPolicy to the Kinto app.
My solution is to make it into a plugin, and implement the includeme function like this:
def includeme(config):
custom_authorization_policy = CustomAuthorizationPolicy()
config.set_authorization_policy(custom_authorization_policy)
But later, in IAuthorizationPolicy#permits, I would like to access the request that is currently being processed. This is because I want to cache the authentication tokens, and, as I understand it, the cache can be accessed from the request.
However, the IAuthorizationPolicy#permits takes the context parameter, and on it I can't find any request or cache.
The cache, if supported, can be accessed on config.registry.cache aswell, so I'm injecting it into my Auth policy:
def includeme(config):
custom_authorization_policy = CustomAuthorizationPolicy(config.registry.cache)
config.set_authorization_policy(custom_authorization_policy)
I have a Web API app, initialized thusly:
app.UseCookieAuthentication();
app.UseExternalSignInCookie(DefaultAuthenticationTypes.ExternalCookie);
app.UseOAuthBearerTokens(OAuthOptions);
app.UseGoogleAuthentication();
For calls to most controllers, it works great. However, it also requires a bit of javascript before client-side service calls are made:
function getSecurityHeaders() {
var accessToken = sessionStorage["accessToken"] || localStorage["accessToken"];
if (accessToken) {
return { "Authorization": "Bearer " + accessToken };
}
return {};
}
The problem is that we have a certain type of controller (one that accesses files) where no javascript can be run during the call. For example, the call might be to:
http://mysite/mycontroller/file/filename.jpg
...where the value is assigned as the src attribute of an img tag. The call works, but Thread.CurrentPrincipal.Identity is unauthenticated with a null name, so there's currently not a way to enforce security.
I'm new to Web API, so it may be a dumb question, but what's the way around this? What switches do I need to flip to not require javascript to add security headers? I was considering trying to find a way to force an authorization header in an IAuthorizationFilter or something, but I'm not even sure that would work.
So I figured out the solution to my problem.
First, I needed to configure the app to use an authentication type of external cookies thusly:
//the line below is the one I needed to change
app.UseCookieAuthentication(AuthenticationType = DefaultAuthenticationTypes.ExternalCookie);
app.UseExternalSignInCookie(DefaultAuthenticationTypes.ExternalCookie);
app.UseOAuthBearerTokens(OAuthOptions);
app.UseGoogleAuthentication();
Second, it turned out there was a line of code in my WebApiConfig file that was disabling reading the external cookie:
//this line needed to be removed
//config.SuppressDefaultHostAuthentication();
After that, I could see the external cookie from Google, which passed along an email address I could identify the user with.
I'm struggling to figure out how I can do role-based authorization depending on what HTTP method a request is using. I use HTTP basic auth and depending on the users role and the HTTP method used a request should succeed or fail.
Example:
a GET request to http://localhost/rest/ should always be allowed, even to non-authenticated users (anon access)
a PUT request to http://localhost/rest/ (same resource!) should only be allowed if user is authenticated
a DELETE request to http://localhost/rest/ (same resource!) should only be allowed if user is authenticated and has the role ADMINISTRATOR
My current (non-working) attempt of configuring shiro.ini looks like this:
/rest = authcBasic[PUT], roles[SERVICE_PROVIDER]
/rest = authcBasic[POST], roles[EXPERIMENTER]
/rest = authcBasic[DELETE], roles[ADMINISTRATOR]
/rest = authcBasic
Update
I've just found https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHIRO-107 and updated my shiro.ini to be
/rest/**:put = authcBasic, roles[SERVICE_PROVIDER]
/rest/**:post = authcBasic, roles[EXPERIMENTER]
/rest/**:delete = authcBasic, roles[ADMINISTRATOR]
/rest/** = authcBasic
but it still doesn't work. It seems that only the last rule matches. Also, the commit comment also seems to indicate that this only works with permission-based authorization. Is there no equivalent implementation for role-based authz?
I think HttpMethodPermissionFilter is the one you need to configure: http://shiro.apache.org/static/1.2.2/apidocs/org/apache/shiro/web/filter/authz/HttpMethodPermissionFilter.html This should enable you to map the HTTP method to Shiro's "create,read,update,delete" permissions as outlined in the javadoc for the class.
I had a similar situation with Shiro and my REST application. While there may be a better way (I hadn't seen SHIRO-107), my solution was to create a custom filter extending the Authc filter (org.apache.shiro.web.filter.authc.FormAuthenticationFilter). You could do something similar extending the authcBasic filter or the Roles filter (although I think authcBasic would be better as it is probably more complicated).
The method you want to override is "protected boolean isAccessAllowed(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, Object mappedValue)". Your argument (e.g. "ADMINISTRATOR") will come in on the mappedValue as String[] where the arguments were split by commas.
Since I needed the possibility of both a method and a role, I ended up have my arguements looks like "-". For example:
/rest/** = customFilter[DELETE-ADMINISTRATOR]
That let me split out the role required to perform a delete from the role required for a POST by doing something like:
/rest/** = customFilter[DELETE-ADMINISTRATOR,POST-EXPERIMENTER]
I think if you play with this, you'll be able to get the functionality you need.
BTW, I hadn't seen SHIRO-107, so I've not tried that technique and probably won't since I've already invented my own custom filter. However that may provide a cleaner solution than what I did.
Hope that helps!