There are 2 commands I am confused for some time:
gcloud iam service-accounts get-iam-policy
gcloud iam service-accounts set-iam-policy
from the --help command, these 2 commands treat service account as a resource, most often I use service account as an identity, for example, in a project, set policy by binding role with service account so this service account can operate on something in that project.
Can someone please point out what is the usage to attach the policy to service account? how does service account act as a resource rather than an identity?
As explained in this below part of the official documentation Managing service accounts
:
When thinking of a service account as a resource, you can grant roles to other users to access or manage that service account.
So, use it as a resource has to goal for you to manage who can use and control the service account. To provide some additional details, as in this example here, with the policies attached to them, you can configure the level of access that different users can have within service accounts - as mentioned there, you can configure that some users have viewer access, while others have editor level.
To summarize, the functinality of attaching policies to a service account is for you to set different levels of access and permissions to users who can access the service account.
Related
I have the following script I'd like to execute to create my service account and give it a Cloud Build Service Account role.
# create service account for github actions
gcloud iam service-accounts create github-actions --display-name="Github Actions"
# add iam permissions to github actions service account
gcloud iam service-accounts add-iam-policy-binding github-actions#project-id.iam.gserviceaccount.com --member='serviceAccount:github-actions#project-id.iam.gserviceaccount.com' --role='roles/cloudbuild.builds.builder'
The execution fails on the last command with
ERROR: Policy modification failed. For a binding with condition, run "gcloud alpha iam policies lint-condition" to identify issues in condition.
ERROR: (gcloud.iam.service-accounts.add-iam-policy-binding) INVALID_ARGUMENT: Role roles/cloudbuild.builds.builder is not supported for this resource.
I don't know what that means or better said what I can do to solve that. I need that service account to have that role so I can start Cloud Build through my Github Actions pipeline with that service account.
This can be confusing. Service Accounts have a "dual nature". They can be treated as resources and identities just not at the same time. See Managing Service Accounts
You're attempting to grant a Service Account (github-actions#project-id.iam.gserviceaccount.com) an IAM binding. In this case, the Service Account is a resource. The binding you're attempting to make references the same Service Account (github-actions#project-id.iam.gserviceaccount.com), this time as an identity. This is not possible.
You possibly (!?) want to grant the binding (as it is) to the project (!) not the Service Account:
PROJECT=[[YOUR-PROJECT]]
ACCOUNT=github-actions
EMAIL="${ACCOUNT}#${PROJECT}.iam.gserviceaccount.com"
gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding ${PROJECT} \
--member="serviceAccount:${EMAIL}" \
--role='roles/cloudbuild.builds.builder'
But, please ensure that is your intent before issuing that command.
In the quickstart it talks about creating a service principle for the current user. I want to have more of a hierarchical security structure. I would be the current user and I want to have "super-user" or admin rights to this key vault. However I have created another user that would have lower access rights. For both of these scenarios I gather I need to generate a unique service principle name. How do I generate a service principle name for an arbitrary Azure User?
You can just create another service principal name under your current account for this created user. And you just need to assign the lower access rights to the key vault for this service principal. Then the user can access to the key vault with this service principal which has lower access permission.
An Azure service principal is an identity created for use with applications, hosted services, and automated tools to access Azure resources. You can create as many as service principals as you want for different access permissions. If you want to generate a service principal under the created user account, you might have to login as this created user. Otherwise, i am afraid it cannot be done.
You can also set the access permission for this user to this key vault directory without using service principal. See here
az keyvault set-policy --name keyVaultName --object-id userObjectId --secret-permissions permissions --key-permissions permissions
You can get the user's Object id with below command: See here
az ad user show --id <email-address-of-user>
I recently created a VM, but mistakenly gave the default service account Storage: Read Only permissions instead of the intended Read Write under "Identity & API access", so GCS write operations from the VM are now failing.
I realized my mistake, so following the advice in this answer, I stopped the VM, changed the scope to Read Write and started the VM. However, when I SSH in, I'm still getting 403 errors when trying to create buckets.
$ gsutil mb gs://some-random-bucket
Creating gs://some-random-bucket/...
AccessDeniedException: 403 Insufficient OAuth2 scope to perform this operation.
Acceptable scopes: https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform
How can I fix this? I'm using the default service account, and don't have the IAM permissions to be able to create new ones.
$ gcloud auth list
Credentialed Accounts
ACTIVE ACCOUNT
* (projectnum)-compute#developer.gserviceaccount.com
I will suggest you to try add the scope "cloud-platform" to the instance by running the gcloud command below
gcloud alpha compute instances set-scopes INSTANCE_NAME [--zone=ZONE]
[--scopes=[SCOPE,…] [--service-account=SERVICE_ACCOUNT
As a scopes put "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform" since it give Full access to all Google Cloud Platform resources.
Here is gcloud documentation
Try creating the Google Cloud Storage bucket with your user account.
Type gcloud auth login and access the link you are provided, once there, copy the code and paste it into the command line.
Then do gsutil mb gs://bucket-name.
The security model has 2 things at play, API Scopes and IAM permissions. Access is determined by the AND of them. So you need an acceptable scope and enough IAM privileges in order to do whatever action.
API Scopes are bound to the credentials. They are represented by a URL like, https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform.
IAM permissions are bound to the identity. These are setup in the Cloud Console's IAM & admin > IAM section.
This means you can have 2 VMs with the default service account but both have different levels of access.
For simplicity you generally want to just set the IAM permissions and use the cloud-platform API auth scope.
To check if you have this setup go to the VM in cloud console and you'll see something like:
Cloud API access scopes
Allow full access to all Cloud APIs
When you SSH into the VM by default gcloud will be logged in as the service account on the VM. I'd discourage logging in as yourself otherwise you more or less break gcloud's configuration to read the default service account.
Once you have this setup you should be able to use gsutil properly.
I have been confused for a long time about how the user of kubectl being authorized. I bootstrap a k8s cluster from scratch and use 'RBAC' as the authorization mode. The user kubectl used is authenticated by certificate first, then it should be authorized by RBAC when accessing the api-server. I did nothing about granting permissions to the user, however, it is allowed to access all the apis(creating pod or listing pods).
Kubernetes has no built in user management system. It expects you to implement that part on your own. In this sense, a common way to implement user auth is to create a certificate sign request and have it signed by the cluster certificate authority. By reading that newly generated certificate, the cluster will extract the username and the groups it belongs to. Then, after that, it will apply the RBAC policies you implemented. In this sense, if the user can access everything, then it can be one of the following:
You are still using the admin user account instead of the newly created user account.
The user account you created belongs to an admin group
You did not enable RBAC correctly
This guide should help you with an easy example of user auth in Kubernetes: https://docs.bitnami.com/kubernetes/how-to/configure-rbac-in-your-kubernetes-cluster/
I want to create a service account on GCP using a python script calling the REST API and then give it specific roles - ideally some of these, such as roles/logging.logWriter.
First I make a request to create the account which works fine and I can see the account in Console/IAM.
Second I want to give it the role and this seems like the right method. However, it is not accepting roles/logging.logWriter, saying HttpError 400, "Role roles/logging.logWriter is not supported for this resource.">
Conversely, if I set the desired policy in console, then try the getIamPolicy method (using the gcloud tool), all I get back is response etag: ACAB, no mention of the actual role I set. Hence I think these roles refer to different things.
Any idea how to go about scripting a role/scope for a service account using the API?
You can grant permissions to a GCP service account in a GCP project without having to rewrite the entire project policy!
Use the gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding ... command for that (docs).
For example, given the environment variables GCP_PROJECT_ID and GCP_SVC_ACC the following command grants all privileges in the container.admin role to the chosen service account:
gcloud projects add-iam-policy-binding ${GCP_PROJECT_ID} \
--member=serviceAccount:${GCP_SVC_ACC} \
--role=roles/container.admin
To review what you've done:
$ gcloud projects get-iam-policy $GCP_PROJECT_ID \
--flatten="bindings[].members" \
--format='table(bindings.role)' \
--filter="bindings.members:${GCP_SVC_ACC}"
Output:
ROLE
roles/container.admin
(or more roles, if those were granted before)
Notes:
The environment variable GCP_SVC_ACC is expected to contain the email notation for the service account.
Kudos to this answer for the nicely formatted readout.
You appear to be trying to set a role on the service account (as a resource). That's for setting who can use the service account.
If you want to give the service account (as an identity) a particular role on the project and its resources, see this method: https://cloud.google.com/resource-manager/reference/rest/v1/projects/setIamPolicy