Grafana greyed out Button Panel - grafana

I wonder if you can help me with that problem.
I downloaded the latest Grafana and plugin called Button Panel.
I am working on Linux for ARM.
CLI command below:
docker run -it -d -p 3000:3000 --network=grafana_network --name=grafana --restart=always -e "GF_INSTALL_PLUGINS=https://github.com/cloudspout/cloudspout-button-panel/releases/download/7.0.4/cloudspout-button-panel.zip;cloudspout-button-panel" grafana
and this is what i got after loggin in.
What I should see is well shown here: https://grafana.com/grafana/plugins/cloudspout-button-panel.
Do you know what cause the problem or how to solve it?

Type in:
docker run -it -d -p 3000:3000 --network=grafana_network --name=grafana --restart=always -e "GF_INSTALL_PLUGINS=cloudspout-button-panel " grafana
no more greyed out.

Related

How to specify default extensions while running gitpods' openvscode-server

Using https://github.com/gitpod-io/openvscode-server is there a way to set default VSCode extensions using their Docker command? (docker run -it --init -p 3000:3000 -v "$(pwd):/home/workspace:cached" gitpod/openvscode-server)
you can pass extra arguments to your docker command to install extensions, for example:
docker run -it --init -p 3000:3000 gitpod/openvscode-server --install-extension gitpod.gitpod-theme --install-extension vscodevim.vim --start-server
Feel free to drop by our community at https://gitpod.io/chat !

Getting error in configuring s3 Sink conector

I have cloned landoop fast-data-dev docker repo from this GitHub repo.
and built the image using command docker build --tag=landoop .
After building the image, I ran it using:
docker run --rm -p 2181:2181 -p 3030:3030 -p 8081-8083:8081-8083 -p 9581-9585:9581-9585 -p 9092:9092 -e ADV_HOST=10.10.X.X -e DEBUG=1 -e AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID=XXX -e AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY=XXX landoop
Once the UI was up, I tried to create a s3 sink connection but it failed saying:
Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: /usr/lib/libnss3.so
Also I don't see the libnss3.so file in the location. However if I run the docker container directly using the command below, I can see the file in the location and there is no error when creating the s3 sink connector.
docker run --rm --net=host landoop/fast-data-dev
Has anyone faced this error?
Answering my own question so that others can benefit,if it's not appropriate please leave a comment and I will make it a comment. I figured out that the libnss3 library was missing from debian image and had to install while building the image. For this I edited the setp-and-run.sh and added the libnss3, the script looks like :
FROM debian as compile-lkd
RUN apt-get update \
&& apt-get install -y \
unzip \
wget \
libnss3 \

Running new meteorhacks/meteord application, don't have meteor app

I try to create a new project based on the meteor with docker.
I found the repository for this:
https://github.com/meteorhacks/meteord
I created Dockerfile and put there
FROM meteorhacks/meteord:onbuild
And then run:
docker run meteorhacks/meteord
docker run mongo
After downloading all packages so finally I run
docker run -i -t 807754a01782 -d
-e ROOT_URL=http://localhost:3000
-e MONGO_URL=mongodb://127.0.0.1:27017/
-e MONGO_OPLOG_URL=mongodb://127.0.0.1:27017/
-p 8080:80 myapp
Based on this example:
docker run -d \
-e ROOT_URL=http://yourapp.com \
-e MONGO_URL=mongodb://url \
-e MONGO_OPLOG_URL=mongodb://oplog_url \
-p 8080:80 \
yourname/app
Inside myapp folder, I have fresh meteor project.
But as a result, I received
> You don't have an meteor app to run in this image.
Can anyone help me and give me some clues what I'm doing wrong? Or I misunderstanding how Docker with this repository works?
EDIT:
The problem was in command correct command is:
docker run -d
-e ROOT_URL=http://localhost:3000
-e MONGO_URL=mongodb://127.0.0.1:27017/
-e MONGO_OPLOG_URL=mongodb://127.0.0.1:27017/ -p 8080:80
meteorhacks/meteord:base
But now when I check the status of this container I see it is excited. How Can I check what causing the problem?

Creating multiple PostgreSQL containers in docker in fedora

I want to create 2 containers of postgrSQL so that one can be used as DEV and other as DEV_STAGE.
I was able to successfully create one container and it is been assigned to port 5432. But when I'm trying to the second container, it is getting created(sometimes shows the status as EXITED) but not getting started because of the port number issue.
The below are the commands which I ran.
sudo docker run -v "pwd/data:/var/lib/pgsql/data:Z" -e POSTGRESQL_USER=user1 -e POSTGRESQL_PASSWORD=password -e POSTGRESQL_DATABASE=test_db -d -p 5432:5432 fedora/postgresql
sudo docker run -v "pwd/data_stage:/var/lib/pgsql/data_stage:Z" -e POSTGRESQL_USER=user1 -e POSTGRESQL_PASSWORD=password -e POSTGRESQL_DATABASE=test_db -d -p 5432:5433 fedora/postgresql
I think the port mapping which I'm using is incorrect. But not able to get the correct one.
You have an error in volume definition of the second container. Don't change path after colon, it is mandatory the path is set to /var/lib/pgsql/data.
Also you fliped ports mapping. The correct command is like this:
sudo docker run -v "`pwd`/data_stage:/var/lib/pgsql/data:Z" -e POSTGRESQL_USER=user1 -e POSTGRESQL_PASSWORD=password -e POSTGRESQL_DATABASE=test_db -d -p 5433:5432 fedora/postgresql
If anything goes wrong inspect container logs with docker logs CONTAINER_ID
Thanks for the answer. I corrected the path. I think flipping the port number will not work too. Because I already have one container which is mapped to 5432. So I can't map the port to 5432 again. The below command with worked for me. First, I modified Postgres default port to 5433 using export variable PGPORT=5433.
sudo docker run -v "`pwd`/data_stg:/var/lib/pgsql/data:Z" -e PGPORT=5433 -e POSTGRESQL_USER=user1 -e POSTGRESQL_PASSWORD=password -e POSTGRESQL_DATABASE=test_db -d -p 5433:5433 fedora/postgresql

Why can't you start postgres in docker using "service postgres start"?

All the tutorials point out to running postgres in the format of
docker run -d -p 5432 \
-t <your username>/postgresql \
/bin/su postgres -c '/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/postgres \
-D /var/lib/postgresql/9.2/main \
-c config_file=/etc/postgresql/9.2/main/postgresql.conf'
Why can't we in our Docker file have:
ENTRYPOINT ["/etc/init.d/postgresql-9.2", "start"]
And simply start the container by
docker run -d psql
Is that not the purpose of Entrypoint or am I missing something?
the difference is that the init script provided in /etc/init.d is not an entry point. Its purpose is quite different; to get the entry point started, in the background, and then report on the success or failure to the caller. that script causes a postgres process, usually indirectly via pg_ctl, to be started, detached from the controlling terminal.
for docker to work best, it needs to run the application directly, attached to the docker process. that way it can usefully and generically terminate it when the user asks for it, or quickly discover and respond to the process crashing.
Exemplify that IfLoop said.
Using CMD into Dockerfiles:
USE postgres
CMD ["/usr/lib/postgresql/9.2/bin/postgres", "-D", "/var/lib/postgresql/9.2/main", "-c", "config_file=/etc/postgresql/9.2/main/postgresql.conf"]
To run:
$docker run -d -p 5432:5432 psql
Watching PostgeSQL logs:
$docker logs -f POSTGRES_CONTAINER_ID