I am a beginner in thunderbird addons so I really appreciate if you can help me. I am trying to find a way in my background javascript to check whenever a user has opened the window for create a new message, reply a message and forward a message. I want to put a default text in the message window before the user is gonna send it. I know thunderbird 78+ should only uses web extension APIs and i found this Compose API but how to use it in my background script.
https://thunderbird-webextensions.readthedocs.io/en/78/compose.html
It looks like setComposeDetails() is what you want.
setComposeDetails(tabId, details)
Updates the compose window. Specify only fields that you want to change. Currently only the to/cc/bcc/replyTo/followupTo/newsgroups fields and the subject are implemented.
tabId (integer)
details (ComposeDetails)
I have note tried it, but I suppose that either details.body or details.plainTextBody from the ComposeDetails object can be used to pass the default text you want to use. So I would try something like this in the background script:
let details = {
body: "This is my default text",
};
browser.messages.setComposeDetails(tabId, details);
You might have to combine it with a call to messages.getComposeDetails() if empty fields in details reset the values in the composer window (I don't know).
If you want to call this when the user opens a new compose window, I would look at the window.onCreated event. If you want to do it right before the message is sent instead, you should look at the compose.onBeforeSend event. All of them are described in the API documentation.
Related
I want to start Form conversation chat in Microsoft Bot framework.
if(user says hello)
{
reply = what u want to listen hi or hello
if(user says order)
{
reply= start a formbuilder.form with order form workflow
}
if(user says hello)
{
reply= hello
}
}
My problem is the first thing i do always works
example: if i say first chat line as order it starts order form but it never goes to the normal conversation mode even if the form ends.
if i start hi then it always goes in hi mode never goes or create order form on typing order.
Need it to be dynamic
you can use below code to end your conversation when you are in a dialog or a conversation flow ends.
context.Done<object>(new object());
or
context.Done(true);
do let me know if you need any help further
Per my understanding, you want start specific dialogs while triggering different words like "hollo" for greeting dialog, "order" for form dialog.
I think there are two methods to achieve this in C#:
You can leverage Recognize intents to implement LUIS, which can identify your users' intent from their spken or textual input, or utterances. Trigger specific dialogs for each LUIS intent.
For this solution you can refer to the official document Recognize intents and entities with LUIS using a prebuilt domain for details, and refer to https://github.com/Microsoft/BotBuilder-Samples/tree/master/CSharp/intelligence-LUIS for a sample for your reference.
You also can build Global message handlers using scorables in your bot application for yourself. With which, you can route users to certain fuctionality by using words like "help," "cancel," or "start over" in the middle of a conversation when the bot is expecting a different response.
Please refer to https://github.com/Microsoft/BotBuilder-Samples/tree/master/CSharp/core-GlobalMessageHandlers for the sample for this solution.
Hope it helps.
Is it possible to receive the previous message that the user have send to the chatbot (without using quick replies or postback buttons). Example:
User: "Can you call a friend?"
Bot: "Who should I call?"
User: "Tim"
In the API I now have just the information "Tim", without knowing if I should call him or text him or make him a sandwich or whatever. So I basically I want to add some Postbackdata or metadata additionally to the text "Can you call a friend" (intent: 'CALL'), so the message "Tim" will come with that data.
Is there a way without storing the data into a database? AWS Lambda with ClaudiaJs.
I found the metadata field in the FB API which turns out to be the wrong field for that since it is only for communicating between several apps?!
What you are looking for a called a "slot-based bot", or slot-filling, basically meaning that you have a "slot", or blank that needs to be filled in before your bot can perform an action. In your example you have two slots: action and person
Actions could be: call, text, message
Person: name of a person, friend, etc.
I don't think any of the message frameworks (Slack, Facebook, etc) will provide you with the information you need. You will need to build this logic out yourself.
You can look at using wit.ai stories to achieve this.
Look to this similar Stack Overflow question and answer.
You can reverse order of conversation, and at beginning user writes some text or send you something else. After receiving, you should send to user buttonsTemplate, where postbacks will be like "CallTo&Tim" where instead of Tim you can put every text you need to pass to next executor(and you also can store previous user message here). Than just make substring of postback, check it`s type and do whatever you want.
TLDR; # bottom
I asked the following question in the Facebook bugs section
NOTE: This is more of a platform design suggestion than a bug, as I failed to find a Chat API feedback portal
Currently I'm building a Chat bot that allows the user to track a goal. It will say something like "Did you go for a walk on July 12, 2016 ?" and have Yes/NO buttons below.
Currently in order to pass the intent, the day and the achievement boolean I need to template a string like this "==GOAL== achieved? <<<{goal_achieved}>>>, date tracked [[[{date_tracked}]]]" and use regex to capture the delimited variables. This is prone to parsing error in other cases where the templated strings in the payload are user-input variables i.e. if the '{goal_achieved}' were replaced with the goal variable '>>meditated" then the regex that captures the templated variable could fail.
One could use the postback payload to store a JSON-encoded string but the problem with this is that the payload string gets logged into the user output and JSON strings are a bit ugly and confusing. The challenges I face could be easily remedied if the payload was not logged to the user Instead log the text for the button to help the user confirm the button was clicked.
If that is not possible, is there any other advice for encoding data into button payload ?
The following answer was offered (Mark Wiltse)
Hi Justin,
Unfortunately at this time our payload structure does not support the functionality that you are trying to implement. From my understanding you want to use the Payload to inform your backend if the user accomplished their 'goal' on that specific date. I would suggest that you create your payload response for the button on your end before passing it to us, which is basically the JSON idea that you had initially.
I know this is a bit cumbersome to handle but the payload response passed back is independent of the text that was provided with the messenger thread.
I would suggest that you also attempt to sanitize your strings if you are worried a user has previously provided you would cause an issue with your regex. You should be able to implement this functionality if the prior user data is sanitized to avoid any issues with regex/json parsing.
Since this is an implementation question I will have to close this report as Invalid. If you are still looking for additional insights and concrete tips for implementing this flow please post to our stack overflow where we have Facebook Engineers and a wide range of community members who also contribute.
http://facebook.stackoverflow.com/
Take care and best wishes with your messenger bot.
Mark
This sentence was particularly unclear:
I know this is a bit cumbersome to handle but the payload response
passed back is independent of the text that was provided with the
messenger thread.
TLDR;
Can anyone inform me of how to prevent the button from logging the payload string so that I can use it to pass JSON to my app without the user seeing it ?
Make sure to comment out sendTextMessage() in your receivedPostback() call :
function receivedPostback(event){
sendTextMessage(senderID, event.postback.payload);
}
From my understanding you're saying that when you press a button the PAYLOAD instead of the button's text is showing up.
Are you defining your buttons like this?
{
type: "postback",
title: "View Details",
payload: "details:12345"
}
I'd recommend removing any special characters that would mess with the parsing of your payload. As long as the special characters are not crucial to the user experience this is probably a fine solution.
If this doesn't solve your issue:
Can you add a screenshot showing the button you are pressing, and the log message you are talking about? From my understanding you're saying that when you press a button the PAYLOAD instead of the button's text is showing up. That's not the case for me, my buttons text shows up when I press a button.
I have a situation in which I need to reuse an action that has its functionality wrapped in a withForm closure.
Everything works well when submitting the form but when I try to reuse that action in another way I get redirect errors from my browser. Specifically, I need to redirect another action to it, possibly call it with chain, and I also want to call it from a hyperlink.
I'd really like to avoid creating a redundant action or having the invalidToken closure execute the same code. I've tried to find some more details about how withForm works and find out what happens if no token is passed to the closure but the Googles have let me down.
Is this possible? Am I trying to make it do something it can't?
More info:
I have a user edit controller action. It is wrapped with the withForm closure. There are three different cases in which I need to call this controller to render the user edit page:
An admin enters the user's id into an input and clicks the form
submit button (this form uses useToken). This needs to be secured
and protected from duplicate form submission.
An admin selects a user to edit from a list of employees by clicking
on the user's name (a hyperlink). Its possible I could turn this into a form submission with useToken and do some CSS styling to make it look like a link.
An admin creates a new user. When the user is successfully created
the create controller redirects (or uses chain) to the edit
controller. I can't find a work around for this, except to create a redundant controller.
If your code is used in more than one place a controller action isn't the best place to put it. I suggest you to move that piece of code to a service and call it from both actions.
Here is my solution. If anyone has some insight into other methods of solving this please contribute. I'm sure I'm not the only one that has had this problem.
The answer is due, in large part to #Sergio's response. It was far more simple than what I was thinking it would be. I created my edit action without withFormthen call it from another action that wraps the edit action in the withForm.
def editWT(Long uid, Long pid){
withForm{
edit(uid, pid)
}
}
def edit(Long uid, Long pid){
// Do lots of stuff to prep the data for rendering the view
}
This answer isn't innovative or ground-breaking but it works. I hope this helps someone else.
I have an issue with a task management application where occasionally users close their browsers/tabs and the information which they type goes away because they accidentally close a browser/tab, resulting in the loss of the text which they've entered ( and some can spend half an hour entering in text ).
So I have to provide a solution, I have a couple ideas but wanted input on the best to go with, or if you have a better solution let me hear ya.
Option 1:
On the window.onunload or possibly window.onbeforeunload event invoke a confirm() dialog and first test whether the task logging area has any text in it and is not blank. If it's not blank, invoke window.confirm() and ask whether the user wants to close the tab/window without saving a log.
My concern with option #1 is that it may be user intrusive.
Option 2:
On the same event, don't invoke any confirm() but instead forcefully save the text in the task logging area in a cookie. Then possibly offer a button that tries to restore any saved task information from the cookie on the same page, so hitting that button would make it parse the cookies and retrieve the information.
The window.onbeforeunload event works a little strangely. If you define a handler for it, the browser will display a generic message about losing data by navigating away from the page, with the string you return from the handler function inserted into the middle of the message. See here:
alt text http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/8724/windowonbeforeunload.png
So what we do: when we know something on the page is unsaved, we set:
window.onbeforeunload = function(){
return "[SOME CUSTOM MESSAGE FROM THE APP]";
}
and once the user saves, and we know we don't need to show them the message, we set:
window.onbeforeunload = null;
It is a little intrusive, but it's better than your users losing data accidentally.
If the user is daft enough to navigate away before submitting what they have been doing, then they shouldn't mind an intrusion to ask if they mean to do something that is apparently stupid.
Also, SO uses a confirmation dialog on navigating away, and most (some) users here are pretty smart.
This is the easiest to use, and will probably help the users more.
If someone writes a long piece of text, then closes the browser without submitting it, they might be more pleased to sort the problem there and then rather than finding out the next morning they didn't do it...
I would research AJAX frameworks for the particular web server/languages you are using. AJAX would allow you to save form data as it is typed (for example, this is how Google Docs works).