I have a gatsby.js application with mapbox-gl and it all worked successfully until I tried to include the mapbox-gl-geocoder package to add search functionality.
I have installed it using npm as the following:
npm install mapbox/mapbox-gl-geocoder --save
then, added it to the React component:
import '#mapbox/mapbox-gl-geocoder/lib/mapbox-gl-geocoder.css';
import MapboxGeocoder from '#mapbox/mapbox-gl-geocoder';
and inside a useEffect hook:
map.addControl(
new MapboxGeocoder({
accessToken: mapboxgl.accessToken,
zoom: 20,
placeholder: 'Enter City',
mapboxgl: mapboxgl
}), 'top-left'
);
locally, when I run gatsby develop it works as it should, but when I deploy it with Netlify, I get the following error:
:24:21 PM: error Generating SSR bundle failed
1:24:21 PM: Can't resolve 'electron' in '/opt/build/repo/node_modules/#mapbox/mapbox-sdk/node_modules/got'
1:24:21 PM: If you're trying to use a package make sure that 'electron' is installed. If you're trying to use a local file make sure that the path is correct.
it seems that mapbox-gl-geocoder has a dependency to #mapbox/mapbox-sdk and the mapbox-sdk has a dependency to got that somehow needs electron ?
The only thing i can read about electron in the got npm page is the following:
Electron support has been removed
The Electron net module is not consistent with the Node.js http module. See #899 for more info.
In any way, I tried to install electron with npm to see if the errors are gone, and the build started to fail with new error indicating that the window object is not available.
10:35:45 AM: error "window" is not available during server side rendering.
Googling that error led me to some answers about not loading the packages in gatsby-node.js but that didn't help either.
When dealing with third-party modules that use window in Gatsby you need to add a null loader to its own webpack configuration to avoid the transpilation during the SSR (Server-Side Rendering). This is because gatsby develop occurs in the browser while gatsby build occurs in the Node server where obviously there isn't a window or other global objects.
exports.onCreateWebpackConfig = ({ stage, loaders, actions }) => {
if (stage === "build-html") {
actions.setWebpackConfig({
module: {
rules: [
{
test: /#mapbox/,
use: loaders.null(),
},
],
},
})
}
}
Keep in mind that the test value is a regular expression that will match a folder under node_modules so, ensure that the /#mapbox/ is the right name.
Using a patch-package may work but keep in mind that you are adding another package, another bundled files which may have a performance effect. The proposed snippet is a built-in solution that happens when you build your application.
Related
I'm trying to add OfficeUI fabric components in a blog build using gatsby js.
As soon as I'm importing any component, the site stop to works.
Using develop command, I can see in the browser console : SyntaxError: export declarations may only appear at top level of a module
How to fix this ? (I'm very new to node dev).
Searches I've done suggest problems with babel not using the es2015 preset. However, I double checked, the .babelrc file is mentioning this preset.
Here's the complete operations I've done (on Windows 10 x64 if it matters):
cloned the gatsby-starter-blog-no-styles repo :
gatsby.cmd new someblog https://github.com/noahg/gatsby-starter-blog-no-styles
cd someblog
npm install
drink a coffee (will move to yarn soon)
Check that works
gatsby develop
Opened the browser (http://localhost:8000). Its Ok
added office ui fabric react components
npm install --save office-ui-fabric-react
Restart gatsby develop. Still working
change src/layouts/index.js file to import an office component
import React from 'react'
import Link from 'gatsby-link'
import { Button } from 'office-ui-fabric-react/lib/Button'
class Template extends React.Component {
....
And voilĂ ! it stop to works. In the browser console, I see an error : SyntaxError: export declarations may only appear at top level of a module
I put in GH a complete reproduction repository : https://github.com/stevebeauge/repro-gatsbyjs-officeui-error
[Edit] Digging a bit I can see in the generated 'common.js' file the error :
/***/ "./node_modules/office-ui-fabric-react/lib/Button.js":
/***/ (function(module, exports) {
export * from './components/Button/index';
//# sourceMappingURL=Button.js.map
/***/ }),
The export here seems to be forbidden, which leads to Babel issue (not found how to solve though)
Recently i stumbled upon the similar error, my solution was to explicitly import from lib-commonjs:
import { Button } from 'office-ui-fabric-react/lib-commonjs/Button';
instead of
import { Button } from 'office-ui-fabric-react/lib/Button'
Seems to be the error occurs since babel isn't converting office-ui-fabric-react to CommonJS module.
I have built a custom element/web component to load and display Unity generated WebGL content. The web component imports the UnityLoader.js module - and works fine when used within an app served with 'polymer serve'.
However, when I build an app that uses my web component via the Polymer-CLI build process, no errors are given, but when I access a page using my component I always end up with an error from within UnityLoader.js:
"ReferenceError: BabelHelpers is not defined"
If I create the element directly within my app (in other words it is no longer managed by bower) then I can exclude the minification and compilation steps within the build section of my application's polymer.json file and the built version of the app works fine.
"builds": [
{
"preset": "es5-bundled",
"js": {
"compile": {"exclude": ["content/**/*","UnityLoader.js"]},
"minify": {"exclude": ["content/**/*","UnityLoader.js"]}
},
"html": {
"minify": {"exclude": ["content/**/*"]}
}
}
]
I've looked at my application's polymer.json file and I can see that the extraDependecies node contains some dependencies that other web components have placed there:
"extraDependencies": [
"bower_components/webcomponentsjs/*.js",
"!bower_components/webcomponentsjs/gulpfile.js",
"manifest.json",
"bower_components/plastic-image/intersection-observer.js",
"bower_components/ua-parser-js/dist/ua-parser.min.js"
],
I have UnityLoader.js within the extraDependencies of the element's polymer.json but that isn't getting cascaded up to an application that imports/consumes the element - which I guess must be possible as plastic-image and ua-parser-js have done it (I've looked at their bower_components folders and nothing seems obvious - other than the latter is installed as a dependency of the former).
Any ideas on how I can make sure that the UnityLoader.js that my web component uses is not compiled or minified during the build process of an application that consumes it?
I was having a similar issue with firebase-auth.js when making an ES5 build using polymer-cli 1.7.0. There might be a problem when compiling/minifying specific files. I had to roll back to 1.6.0 using npm install -g polymer-cli#1.6.0 to fix the problem.
I'm building an ionic app and would like to add unit tests for a couple of services. I'm trying to get jest working with typescript but it doesn't seem to play well.
I'm getting this error:
/myuser/project/node_modules/#ionic/storage/dist/index.js:1
({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,global,jest){import { NgModule } from '#angular/core';
^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Unexpected token import
Now I have read that you have to add the babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs and use that in the test env of babel. However I am using babel 7 and this plugin is not available for babel 7. Is there a different solution?
I will also provide my package.json and .babelrc below.
gist
You just need to add #ionic/storage to your transformIgnorePatterns in jest config. For example, here's mine, take note of the #ionic/storage part:
"transformIgnorePatterns": [
"node_modules/(?!#ngrx|moment|#ionic/storage|#ionic-native)"
]
Additionally, make sure in your tsconfig compiler options you have module: 'commonjs'
Also, if you need localstorage mocks, you can just use the following npm module:
npm install --save-dev jest-localstorage-mock
and then (in your setupJest.ts file)
import 'jest-localstorage-mock
Lastly, I recommend taking a look at:
https://github.com/thymikee/jest-preset-angular
for more help with jest + ionic configurations.
I am trying to set up Jest on a React based project which uses ES6 modules. However I seem to be having issues with ES6 modules, I am using babel-jest and believe I have this set up properly (Jest detects it automatically).
Jest doesn't seem to have a problem using ES6 imports however as soon as it hits on an import statement within one of the imported modules it chokes. It's as if it is only transpiling the initial test script and not any of the imported modules. I have tried various configurations and tried searching Google with no luck. Running tests without any imports works fine.
Here is the error:
({"Object.<anonymous>":function(module,exports,require,__dirname,__filename,global,jest){import Predications from './predications';
^^^^^^
SyntaxError: Unexpected token import
Here are the relevant bits of config:
jest.conf.json
{
"testRegex": "\/test\/spec\/.*\\.js$",
}
.babelrc
{
"presets": ["es2015", "stage-0", "react"]
}
Test script
import React from 'react';
import { mount, shallow } from 'enzyme';
import Slider from 'react-slick';
import Carousel from '../../client/components/carousel/carousel.js'; // test chokes on when I include this module
describe('carousel component', () => {
it('is a test test case', () => {
expect(1 + 2).toEqual(3);
});
});
Update:
As suggested, I have tried running the test without jest.conf.js, however the testRegex is needed in order for Jest to find my tests, I tried moving tests to the default test directory and they still fail.
I would like to clarify that tests themselves are running fine, the issue seems to be where one of my imported modules uses ES6, in my example above, if I don't import my carousel component the test runs fine, as soon as I import that the test chokes on the import statement within that file. It seems as though the imported modules are not getting transpiled.
Update #2
After some investigation it appears the issue is that babel is not transpiling ES6 within node_modules. I have created an example repo to demonstrate this here: https://github.com/jamiedust/babel-jest-example
I understand that third party modules should be handling their own transpiling, however we have a number of modules which are hosted on our own npm registry and are re-used between projects, in these cases Webpack handles transpiling, for the Jest tests we need these node_modules to be transpiled by Babel, or a way of leveraging our webpack set up to do this for us.
Solution
Add the following config in package.json (or Jest config file).
"jest": {
"transformIgnorePatterns": [
"/node_modules/(?!test-component).+\\.js$"
]
}
By default any code in node_modules is ignored by babel-jest, see the Jest config option transformIgnorePatterns. I've also created a PR on your example repo, so you can see it working.
While this works, I've found it to be extremely slow in real applications that have a lot of dependencies containing ES modules. The Jest codebase has a slightly different approach to this as you can find in babel-jest transforming dependencies. This can also take much longer on Windows, see Taking 10 seconds on an empty repo.
If doing "unit" testing, mocking is probably the better way to go.
You could try adding the transform-es2015-modules-commonjs plugin to your babel config file for testing only. Here is an example config file which tells babel to transpile modules only when in a testing environment. You can put it underneath your presets:
{
"presets": [
"react",
["es2015", {"modules": false, "loose": true}]
],
"env": {
"test": {
"plugins": ["transform-es2015-modules-commonjs"]
}
}
}
You can read about the plugin here:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs
Then, when running your Jest tests on the command line specify NODE_ENV=test (you may need to add the --no-cache flag to the command the first time after making the change to the babel config because Jest caches babel output, but after that you can leave it off:
NODE_ENV=test jest --no-cache
I learned about this issue in a React seminar by Brian Holt at Frontend Masters. https://frontendmasters.com/courses/
faced the same issue, followed the steps to resolve,
install babel-jest
in jest config add this configuration
transform: {
'^.+\\.js?$': require.resolve('babel-jest')
}
make sure you have babel.config.js present (your config might be different than provided below)
module.exports = {
"env": {
"test": {
presets: [
[
'#babel/preset-env',
{
targets: {
node: 'current',
},
},
],
]
}
}
};
I faced the same problem (node_module not transpiled by babel-jest), without being able to solve it.
Instead, I finally succeed by mocking the node_module, like described here https://facebook.github.io/jest/docs/manual-mocks.html
NB: setting mocks in __mocks__ subfolders did not work for me. So I passed the mock as the second parameter of the jest.mock() function. Something like :
jest.mock('your_node_module', () => {})
Another possible cause. Babel now ignores your .babelrc inside node_modules and uses the one provided by the dependency. If you have control of the dependency you would have to add a .babelrc to it and babel would use those settings for it.
this can cause problems though if your dependency and your project use different babel versions or modules.
I'm using blueimp-file-upload in my website, and I'm using webpack to organize my js code.
I installed blueimp-file-upload and jquery.ui.widget from NPM
npm install --save blueimp-file-upload
npm install --save jquery.ui.widget
and I require blueimp-file-upload in my entry file
require('blueimp-file-upload')
but when I run webpack, I get thie error:
ERROR in ./~/blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload.js
Module not found: Error: Cannot resolve module 'jquery.ui.widget' in E:\app-parent\cooka-common-web\src\main\resources\static\node_modules\blueimp-file-upload\js
# ./~/blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload.js 19:8-22:19
If you're working with images:
Webpack was complaining about some modules that weren't in the blueimp-file-upload package. Here is the way I got this working:
Install missing dependencies:
npm i -S blueimp-load-image
npm i -S blueimp-canvas-to-blob
Configure Webpack:
config.resolve = {
extensions: ['', '.js'],
alias: {
'load-image': 'blueimp-load-image/js/load-image.js',
'load-image-meta': 'blueimp-load-image/js/load-image-meta.js',
'load-image-exif': 'blueimp-load-image/js/load-image-exif.js',
'canvas-to-blob': 'blueimp-canvas-to-blob/js/canvas-to-blob.js',
'jquery-ui/widget': 'blueimp-file-upload/js/vendor/jquery.ui.widget.js'
}
};
Include scripts in your app:
import "blueimp-file-upload/js/vendor/jquery.ui.widget.js";
import "blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.iframe-transport.js";
import "blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload.js";
import "blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload-image.js";
Disable both AMD and CommonJS and use the Browser Global jQuery.
/* The jQuery UI widget factory, can be omitted if jQuery UI is already included */
require('imports?define=>false&exports=>false!blueimp-file-upload/js/vendor/jquery.ui.widget.js');
/* The Iframe Transport is required for browsers without support for XHR file uploads */
require('imports?define=>false&exports=>false!blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.iframe-transport.js');
/* The basic File Upload plugin */
require('imports?define=>false&exports=>false!blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload.js');
/* The File Upload processing plugin */
require('imports?define=>false&exports=>false!blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload-process.js');
/* The File Upload validation plugin */
require('imports?define=>false&exports=>false!blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload-validate.js');
/* The File Upload Angular JS module */
require('imports?define=>false&exports=>false!blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload-angular.js');
This is the configuration I'm using to integrate webpack, blueimp-fileupload with angular. Alternatively you can configure in your webpack.config.js as a regex to avoid repeating loaders.
resolve: {
extensions: ['', '.js'],
alias: {
'jquery-ui/widget': 'blueimp-file-upload/js/vendor/jquery.ui.widget.js'
}
}
I had almost identical problem, except that Error announced not 'jquery.ui.widget' but 'jquery/ui/widget'.
For me #Gowrav answer was wrong way.
After days of straying I've solved it in the simple way. Just did:
npm install jquery-ui
The fact is that jquery.fileupload.js searching for its vendor:
But in context where jquery.fileupload.js is trying to import dependency, of course, it can't be found (resolved). So I add it to project instead.
P.S. It's just my opinion about how does all work. But this way has helped me.
jquery.fileupload.js checks for AMD require first which results in this error. You can teach webpack not to use AMD style for this file. (Make sure to npm install imports-loader for this method to work.):
require('imports?define=>false!blueimp-file-upload')
It should correctly register the module as CommonJS and will require the jquery.ui.widget from the right location.
Read more here: http://webpack.github.io/docs/shimming-modules.html#disable-some-module-styles
You can add an alias to jquery.ui.widget's main file - it unfortunately doesn't specify one in its package.json, so webpack can't find it otherwise.
resolve: {
alias: {
"jquery.ui.widget": "node_modules/jquery.ui.widget/jquery.ui.widget.js"
}
},
first install two plugins
npm i blueimp-file-upload --save
npm i jquery-ui --save
then require in web pack
require('blueimp-file-upload/js/jquery.fileupload')
actually you can solve this by changing your webpack config, just add the path to resolve (for example I am using bower)
resolve: {
extensions: [ '', '.js', '.jsx' ],
modulesDirectories: [
'node_modules',
'bower_components',
'bower_components/blueimp-file-upload/js/vendor'
]
}
In webpack 3.x, the syntax will look like this:
{
test: require.resolve("blueimp-file-upload"),
use: "imports-loader?define=>false"
}