Related
I have the below dataframe .
scala> df.show
+---+------+---+
| M|Amount| Id|
+---+------+---+
| 1| 5| 1|
| 1| 10| 2|
| 1| 15| 3|
| 1| 20| 4|
| 1| 25| 5|
| 1| 30| 6|
| 2| 2| 1|
| 2| 4| 2|
| 2| 6| 3|
| 2| 8| 4|
| 2| 10| 5|
| 2| 12| 6|
| 3| 1| 1|
| 3| 2| 2|
| 3| 3| 3|
| 3| 4| 4|
| 3| 5| 5|
| 3| 6| 6|
+---+------+---+
created by
val df=Seq( (1,5,1), (1,10,2), (1,15,3), (1,20,4), (1,25,5), (1,30,6), (2,2,1), (2,4,2), (2,6,3), (2,8,4), (2,10,5), (2,12,6), (3,1,1), (3,2,2), (3,3,3), (3,4,4), (3,5,5), (3,6,6) ).toDF("M","Amount","Id")
Here I have a base column M and is ranked as ID based on Amount.
I am trying to compute the percentile keeping M as a group but for every last three values of Amount.
I am Using the below code to find the percentile for a group. But how can I target the last three values. ?
df.withColumn("percentile",percentile_approx(col("Amount") ,lit(.5)) over Window.partitionBy("M"))
Expected Output
+---+------+---+-----------------------------------+
| M|Amount| Id| percentile |
+---+------+---+-----------------------------------+
| 1| 5| 1| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1) |
| 1| 10| 2| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1,2) |
| 1| 15| 3| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1,3) |
| 1| 20| 4| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-2,4) |
| 1| 25| 5| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-3,5) |
| 1| 30| 6| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-4,6) |
| 2| 2| 1| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1) |
| 2| 4| 2| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1,2) |
| 2| 6| 3| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1,3) |
| 2| 8| 4| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-2,4) |
| 2| 10| 5| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-3,5) |
| 2| 12| 6| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-4,6) |
| 3| 1| 1| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1) |
| 3| 2| 2| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1,2) |
| 3| 3| 3| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-1,3) |
| 3| 4| 4| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-2,4) |
| 3| 5| 5| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-3,5) |
| 3| 6| 6| percentile(Amount) whose (Id-4,6) |
+---+------+---+----------------------------------+
This seems to be little bit tricky to me as I am still learning spark.Expecting answers from enthusiasts here.
Adding orderBy("Amount") and rowsBetween(-2,0) to the Window definition gets the required result:
orderBy sorts the rows within each group by Amount
rowsBetween takes only the current row and the two rows before into account when calculating the percentile
val w = Window.partitionBy("M").orderBy("Amount").rowsBetween(-2,0)
df.withColumn("percentile",PercentileApprox.percentile_approx(col("Amount") ,lit(.5))
.over(w))
.orderBy("M", "Amount") //not really required, just to make the output more readable
.show()
prints
+---+------+---+----------+
| M|Amount| Id|percentile|
+---+------+---+----------+
| 1| 5| 1| 5|
| 1| 10| 2| 5|
| 1| 15| 3| 10|
| 1| 20| 4| 15|
| 1| 25| 5| 20|
| 1| 30| 6| 25|
| 2| 2| 1| 2|
| 2| 4| 2| 2|
| 2| 6| 3| 4|
| 2| 8| 4| 6|
| 2| 10| 5| 8|
| 2| 12| 6| 10|
| 3| 1| 1| 1|
| 3| 2| 2| 1|
| 3| 3| 3| 2|
| 3| 4| 4| 3|
| 3| 5| 5| 4|
| 3| 6| 6| 5|
+---+------+---+----------+
I'm new to Apache Spark and trying to learn visualization in Apache Spark/Databricks at the moment. If I have the following csv datasets;
Patient.csv
+---+---------+------+---+-----------------+-----------+------------+-------------+
| Id|Post_Code|Height|Age|Health_Cover_Type|Temperature|Disease_Type|Infected_Date|
+---+---------+------+---+-----------------+-----------+------------+-------------+
| 1| 2096| 131| 22| 5| 37| 4| 891717742|
| 2| 2090| 136| 18| 5| 36| 1| 881250949|
| 3| 2004| 120| 9| 2| 36| 2| 878887136|
| 4| 2185| 155| 41| 1| 36| 1| 896029926|
| 5| 2195| 145| 25| 5| 37| 1| 887100886|
| 6| 2079| 172| 52| 2| 37| 5| 871205766|
| 7| 2006| 176| 27| 1| 37| 3| 879487476|
| 8| 2605| 129| 15| 5| 36| 1| 876343336|
| 9| 2017| 145| 19| 5| 37| 4| 897281846|
| 10| 2112| 171| 47| 5| 38| 6| 882539696|
| 11| 2112| 102| 8| 5| 36| 5| 873648586|
| 12| 2086| 151| 11| 1| 35| 1| 894724066|
| 13| 2142| 148| 22| 2| 37| 1| 889446276|
| 14| 2009| 158| 57| 5| 38| 2| 887072826|
| 15| 2103| 167| 34| 1| 37| 3| 892094506|
| 16| 2095| 168| 37| 5| 36| 1| 893400966|
| 17| 2010| 156| 20| 3| 38| 5| 897313586|
| 18| 2117| 143| 17| 5| 36| 2| 875238076|
| 19| 2204| 155| 24| 4| 38| 6| 884159506|
| 20| 2103| 138| 15| 5| 37| 4| 886765356|
+---+---------+------+---+-----------------+-----------+------------+-------------+
And coverType.csv
+--------------+-----------------+
|cover_type_key| cover_type_label|
+--------------+-----------------+
| 1| Single|
| 2| Couple|
| 3| Family|
| 4| Concession|
| 5| Disable|
+--------------+-----------------+
Which I've managed to load as DataFrames (Patient and coverType);
val PatientDF=spark.read
.format("csv")
.option("header","true")
.option("inferSchema","true")
.option("nullValue","NA")
.option("timestampFormat","yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss")
.option("mode","failfast")
.option("path","/spark-data/Patient.csv")
.load()
val coverTypeDF=spark.read
.format("csv")
.option("header","true")
.option("inferSchema","true")
.option("nullValue","NA")
.option("timestampFormat","yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss")
.option("mode","failfast")
.option("path","/spark-data/covertype.csv")
.load()
How do I generate a bar chart visualization to show the distribution of different Disease_Type in my dataset.
How do I generate a bar chart visualization to show the average Post_Code of each cover type with string labels for cover type.
How do I extract the year (YYYY) from the Infected_Date (represented in date (unix seconds since 1/1/1970 UTC)) ordering the result in decending order of the year and average age.
To display charts natively with Databricks you need to use the display function on a dataframe. For number one, we can accomplish what you'd like by aggregating the dataframe on disease type.
display(PatientDF.groupBy(Disease_Type).count())
Then you can use the charting options to build a bar chart, you can do the same for your 2nd question, but instead of .count() use .avg("Post_Code")
For the third question you need to use the year function after casting the timestamp to a date and an orderBy.
from pyspark.sql.functions import *
display(PatientDF.select(year(to_timestamp("Infected_Date")).alias("year")).orderBy("year"))
I have a DataFrame with a column "Speed". Can I efficiently add a column with, for each row, the number of rows in the DataFrame such that their "Speed" is within +/2 from the row "Speed"?
results = spark.createDataFrame([[1],[2],[3],[4],[5],
[4],[5],[4],[5],[6],
[5],[6],[1],[3],[8],
[2],[5],[6],[10],[12]],
['Speed'])
results.show()
+-----+
|Speed|
+-----+
| 1|
| 2|
| 3|
| 4|
| 5|
| 4|
| 5|
| 4|
| 5|
| 6|
| 5|
| 6|
| 1|
| 3|
| 8|
| 2|
| 5|
| 6|
| 10|
| 12|
+-----+
You could use a window function :
# Order the window by speed, and look at range [0;+2]
w = Window.orderBy('Speed').rangeBetween(0,2)
# Define a column counting the number of rows containing value Speed+2
results = results.withColumn('count+2',F.count('Speed').over(w)).orderBy('Speed')
results.show()
+-----+-----+
|Speed|count|
+-----+-----+
| 1| 6|
| 1| 6|
| 2| 7|
| 2| 7|
| 3| 10|
| 3| 10|
| 4| 11|
| 4| 11|
| 4| 11|
| 5| 8|
| 5| 8|
| 5| 8|
| 5| 8|
| 5| 8|
| 6| 4|
| 6| 4|
| 6| 4|
| 8| 2|
| 10| 2|
| 12| 1|
+-----+-----+
Note : The window function counts the studied row itself. You could correct this by adding a -1 in the count column
results = results.withColumn('count+2',F.count('Speed').over(w)-1).orderBy('Speed')
I'm looking for a way to rank columns of a dataframe preserving ties. Specifically for this example, I have a pyspark dataframe as follows where I want to generate ranks for colA & colB (though I want to support being able to rank N number of columns)
+--------+----------+-----+----+
| Entity| id| colA|colB|
+-------------------+-----+----+
| a|8589934652| 21| 50|
| b| 112| 9| 23|
| c|8589934629| 9| 23|
| d|8589934702| 8| 21|
| e| 20| 2| 21|
| f|8589934657| 2| 5|
| g|8589934601| 1| 5|
| h|8589934653| 1| 4|
| i|8589934620| 0| 4|
| j|8589934643| 0| 3|
| k|8589934618| 0| 3|
| l|8589934602| 0| 2|
| m|8589934664| 0| 2|
| n| 25| 0| 1|
| o| 67| 0| 1|
| p|8589934642| 0| 1|
| q|8589934709| 0| 1|
| r|8589934660| 0| 1|
| s| 30| 0| 1|
| t| 55| 0| 1|
+--------+----------+-----+----+
What I'd like is a way to rank this dataframe where tied values receive the same rank such as:
+--------+----------+-----+----+---------+---------+
| Entity| id| colA|colB|colA_rank|colB_rank|
+-------------------+-----+----+---------+---------+
| a|8589934652| 21| 50| 1| 1|
| b| 112| 9| 23| 2| 2|
| c|8589934629| 9| 21| 2| 3|
| d|8589934702| 8| 21| 3| 3|
| e| 20| 2| 21| 4| 3|
| f|8589934657| 2| 5| 4| 4|
| g|8589934601| 1| 5| 5| 4|
| h|8589934653| 1| 4| 5| 5|
| i|8589934620| 0| 4| 6| 5|
| j|8589934643| 0| 3| 6| 6|
| k|8589934618| 0| 3| 6| 6|
| l|8589934602| 0| 2| 6| 7|
| m|8589934664| 0| 2| 6| 7|
| n| 25| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| o| 67| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| p|8589934642| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| q|8589934709| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| r|8589934660| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| s| 30| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| t| 55| 0| 1| 6| 8|
+--------+----------+-----+----+---------+---------+
My current implementation with the first dataframe looks like:
def getRanks(mydf, cols=None, ascending=False):
from pyspark import Row
# This takes a dataframe and a list of columns to rank
# If no list is provided, it ranks *all* columns
# returns a new dataframe
def addRank(ranked_rdd, col, ascending):
# This assumes an RDD of the form (Row(...), list[...])
# it orders the rdd by col, finds the order, then adds that to the
# list
myrdd = ranked_rdd.sortBy(lambda (row, ranks): row[col],
ascending=ascending).zipWithIndex()
return myrdd.map(lambda ((row, ranks), index): (row, ranks +
[index+1]))
myrdd = mydf.rdd
fields = myrdd.first().__fields__
ranked_rdd = myrdd.map(lambda x: (x, []))
if (cols is None):
cols = fields
for col in cols:
ranked_rdd = addRank(ranked_rdd, col, ascending)
rank_names = [x + "_rank" for x in cols]
# Hack to make sure columns come back in the right order
ranked_rdd = ranked_rdd.map(lambda (row, ranks): Row(*row.__fields__ +
rank_names)(*row + tuple(ranks)))
return ranked_rdd.toDF()
which produces:
+--------+----------+-----+----+---------+---------+
| Entity| id| colA|colB|colA_rank|colB_rank|
+-------------------+-----+----+---------+---------+
| a|8589934652| 21| 50| 1| 1|
| b| 112| 9| 23| 2| 2|
| c|8589934629| 9| 23| 3| 3|
| d|8589934702| 8| 21| 4| 4|
| e| 20| 2| 21| 5| 5|
| f|8589934657| 2| 5| 6| 6|
| g|8589934601| 1| 5| 7| 7|
| h|8589934653| 1| 4| 8| 8|
| i|8589934620| 0| 4| 9| 9|
| j|8589934643| 0| 3| 10| 10|
| k|8589934618| 0| 3| 11| 11|
| l|8589934602| 0| 2| 12| 12|
| m|8589934664| 0| 2| 13| 13|
| n| 25| 0| 1| 14| 14|
| o| 67| 0| 1| 15| 15|
| p|8589934642| 0| 1| 16| 16|
| q|8589934709| 0| 1| 17| 17|
| r|8589934660| 0| 1| 18| 18|
| s| 30| 0| 1| 19| 19|
| t| 55| 0| 1| 20| 20|
+--------+----------+-----+----+---------+---------+
As you can see, the function getRanks() takes a dataframe, specifies the columns to be ranked, sorts them, and uses zipWithIndex() to generate an ordering or rank. However, I can't figure out a way to preserve ties.
This stackoverflow post is the closest solution I've found:
rank-users-by-column But it appears to only handle 1 column (I think).
Thanks so much for the help in advance!
EDIT: column 'id' is generated from calling monotonically_increasing_id() and in my implementation is cast to a string.
You're looking for dense_rank
First let's create our dataframe:
df = spark.createDataFrame(sc.parallelize([["a",8589934652,21,50],["b",112,9,23],["c",8589934629,9,23],
["d",8589934702,8,21],["e",20,2,21],["f",8589934657,2,5],
["g",8589934601,1,5],["h",8589934653,1,4],["i",8589934620,0,4],
["j",8589934643,0,3],["k",8589934618,0,3],["l",8589934602,0,2],
["m",8589934664,0,2],["n",25,0,1],["o",67,0,1],["p",8589934642,0,1],
["q",8589934709,0,1],["r",8589934660,0,1],["s",30,0,1],["t",55,0,1]]
), ["Entity","id","colA","colB"])
We'll define two windowSpec:
from pyspark.sql import Window
import pyspark.sql.functions as psf
wA = Window.orderBy(psf.desc("colA"))
wB = Window.orderBy(psf.desc("colB"))
df = df.withColumn(
"colA_rank",
psf.dense_rank().over(wA)
).withColumn(
"colB_rank",
psf.dense_rank().over(wB)
)
+------+----------+----+----+---------+---------+
|Entity| id|colA|colB|colA_rank|colB_rank|
+------+----------+----+----+---------+---------+
| a|8589934652| 21| 50| 1| 1|
| b| 112| 9| 23| 2| 2|
| c|8589934629| 9| 23| 2| 2|
| d|8589934702| 8| 21| 3| 3|
| e| 20| 2| 21| 4| 3|
| f|8589934657| 2| 5| 4| 4|
| g|8589934601| 1| 5| 5| 4|
| h|8589934653| 1| 4| 5| 5|
| i|8589934620| 0| 4| 6| 5|
| j|8589934643| 0| 3| 6| 6|
| k|8589934618| 0| 3| 6| 6|
| l|8589934602| 0| 2| 6| 7|
| m|8589934664| 0| 2| 6| 7|
| n| 25| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| o| 67| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| p|8589934642| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| q|8589934709| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| r|8589934660| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| s| 30| 0| 1| 6| 8|
| t| 55| 0| 1| 6| 8|
+------+----------+----+----+---------+---------+
I'll also pose an alternative:
for cols in data.columns[2:]:
lookup = (data.select(cols)
.distinct()
.orderBy(cols, ascending=False)
.rdd
.zipWithIndex()
.map(lambda x: x[0] + (x[1], ))
.toDF([cols, cols+"_rank_lookup"]))
name = cols + "_ranks"
data = data.join(lookup, [cols]).withColumn(name,col(cols+"_rank_lookup")
+ 1).drop(cols + "_rank_lookup")
Not as elegant as dense_rank() and I'm uncertain as to performance implications.
I have a tall table which contains up to 10 values per group. How can I transform this table into a wide format i.e. add 2 columns where these resemble the value smaller or equal to a threshold?
I want to find the maximum per group, but it needs to be smaller than a specified value like:
min(max('value1), lit(5)).over(Window.partitionBy('grouping))
However min()will only work for a column and not for the Scala value which is returned from the inner function?
The problem can be described as:
Seq(Seq(1,2,3,4).max,5).min
Where Seq(1,2,3,4) is returned by the window.
How can I formulate this in spark sql?
edit
E.g.
+--------+-----+---------+
|grouping|value|something|
+--------+-----+---------+
| 1| 1| first|
| 1| 2| second|
| 1| 3| third|
| 1| 4| fourth|
| 1| 7| 7|
| 1| 10| 10|
| 21| 1| first|
| 21| 2| second|
| 21| 3| third|
+--------+-----+---------+
created by
case class MyThing(grouping: Int, value:Int, something:String)
val df = Seq(MyThing(1,1, "first"), MyThing(1,2, "second"), MyThing(1,3, "third"),MyThing(1,4, "fourth"),MyThing(1,7, "7"), MyThing(1,10, "10"),
MyThing(21,1, "first"), MyThing(21,2, "second"), MyThing(21,3, "third")).toDS
Where
df
.withColumn("somethingAtLeast5AndMaximum5", max('value).over(Window.partitionBy('grouping)))
.withColumn("somethingAtLeast6OupToThereshold2", max('value).over(Window.partitionBy('grouping)))
.show
returns
+--------+-----+---------+----------------------------+-------------------------+
|grouping|value|something|somethingAtLeast5AndMaximum5| somethingAtLeast6OupToThereshold2 |
+--------+-----+---------+----------------------------+-------------------------+
| 1| 1| first| 10| 10|
| 1| 2| second| 10| 10|
| 1| 3| third| 10| 10|
| 1| 4| fourth| 10| 10|
| 1| 7| 7| 10| 10|
| 1| 10| 10| 10| 10|
| 21| 1| first| 3| 3|
| 21| 2| second| 3| 3|
| 21| 3| third| 3| 3|
+--------+-----+---------+----------------------------+-------------------------+
Instead, I rather would want to formulate:
lit(Seq(max('value).asInstanceOf[java.lang.Integer], new java.lang.Integer(2)).min).over(Window.partitionBy('grouping))
But that does not work as max('value) is not a scalar value.
Expected output should look like
+--------+-----+---------+----------------------------+-------------------------+
|grouping|value|something|somethingAtLeast5AndMaximum5|somethingAtLeast6OupToThereshold2|
+--------+-----+---------+----------------------------+-------------------------+
| 1| 4| fourth| 4| 7|
| 21| 1| first| 3| NULL|
+--------+-----+---------+----------------------------+-------------------------+
edit2
When trying a pivot
df.groupBy("grouping").pivot("value").agg(first('something)).show
+--------+-----+------+-----+------+----+----+
|grouping| 1| 2| 3| 4| 7| 10|
+--------+-----+------+-----+------+----+----+
| 1|first|second|third|fourth| 7| 10|
| 21|first|second|third| null|null|null|
+--------+-----+------+-----+------+----+----+
The second part of the problem remains that some columns might not exist or be null.
When aggregating to arrays:
df.groupBy("grouping").agg(collect_list('value).alias("value"), collect_list('something).alias("something"))
+--------+-------------------+--------------------+
|grouping| value| something|
+--------+-------------------+--------------------+
| 1|[1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 10]|[first, second, t...|
| 21| [1, 2, 3]|[first, second, t...|
+--------+-------------------+--------------------+
The values are already next to each other, but the right values need to be selected. This is probably still more efficient than a join or window function.
Would be easier to do in two separate steps - calculate max over Window, and then use when...otherwise on result to produce min(x, 5):
df.withColumn("tmp", max('value1).over(Window.partitionBy('grouping)))
.withColumn("result", when('tmp > lit(5), 5).otherwise('tmp))
EDIT: some example data to clarify this:
val df = Seq((1, 1),(1, 2),(1, 3),(1, 4),(2, 7),(2, 8))
.toDF("grouping", "value1")
df.withColumn("result", max('value1).over(Window.partitionBy('grouping)))
.withColumn("result", when('result > lit(5), 5).otherwise('result))
.show()
// +--------+------+------+
// |grouping|value1|result|
// +--------+------+------+
// | 1| 1| 4| // 4, because Seq(Seq(1,2,3,4).max,5).min = 4
// | 1| 2| 4|
// | 1| 3| 4|
// | 1| 4| 4|
// | 2| 7| 5| // 5, because Seq(Seq(7,8).max,5).min = 5
// | 2| 8| 5|
// +--------+------+------+