SetAscending Business Central Sales Order List - visual-studio-code

I am attempting to use the SetAscending in Visual Studio Code for Business Central Sales Order List Page. It works to set the Sales Order "No." field to descending however it does not reset the scrollbar to the top of the page. I've tried adding it to multiple places and it sorts the page but no scrollbar update. What code could I be missing?
Places I've added it to:
Sales Order List Page Extension - OnAfterGetRecord and OnAfterGetCurrRecord
Sales Order List Page Events - OnOpenPageEvent, OnAfterGetRecordEvent, and OnAfterGetCurrRecordEvent
trigger OnAfterGetCurrRecord()
begin
rec.SetCurrentKey("Document Type", "No.");
rec.SetAscending("No.", false);
end

You must tell the page to navigate to the new first record.
In the OnOpenPage trigger you do the following:
Rec.SetCurrentKey("Document Type", "No.");
Rec.SetAscending("No.", false);
if Rec.FindSet() then; // use if-then to avoid error if there are no records within the filter

You have 3 methods to use as FIND
FindFirst = Find the first ocurrence of your filters
Findlast = Find the last ocurrence of your filters
FindSet = Find a set of ocurrence of your filter
You can use all of them with the repeat and until statements to loop through records.
The difference between FindFirst and FindSet for Repeat and Until is that FindSet find a Set of registers Whilst FindFirst find only one so FindSet it is more performant.
For your case
You need to modify the property sourceTableView. This is a page property. FindSet is used for variables not for DataSourceTable in page list.
Create a key in your table and then put this key in sourceTableView property of the page.

This is what worked for me. Since, this is a standard list page in Business Central I could not modify the SourceTableView. I had to use two triggers to first sort and the move the cursor to the top of the list.
trigger OnAfterGetRecord()
begin
rec.SetCurrentKey("Document Type", "No.");
rec.SetAscending("No.", false);
end;
trigger OnOpenPage()
begin
rec.FindLast();
end;

I was testing answers and reading about this subject on learn.microsoft.com, but the only trick that works is the following:
trigger OnOpenPage()
begin
Rec.SetCurrentKey(SystemCreatedAt);
Rec.Ascending := false;
end;
Note: I'm sorting by a datetime object. But the clues are: OnOpenPage trigger, SetCurrentKey and Ascending property instead of SetAscending. This is the unique solution that leaves the scroll bar on the top, at least for me.

Related

Microsoft Access 2010 lag in continuous form header subforms

I am a research student working on an access database where I have created a continuous form that is to be used in a sort of scrolling electronic health record format. The header includes information about the patient and the continuous form aspect is a series of patient visits. In the header, I have a few subforms, which populate based on linking on the patient_ID number which is posted in the header (generated by vba macro such that previously reviewed patients aren't revisited). These subforms seem to significantly lag such that they the results from the previous patient stick around going into the next one. The subforms contain user-selected pertinent data. Each form has its own table. They are linked primarily based on patient_ID.
I have tried:
macro on the header detail: on click, refresh. - seems to work, but not very elegant/intuitive
macro on the main form - same as above but on load, click, got focus, lost focus, open, activate -- none of them seem to do anything.
forced requery via vba (see below) on opening/etc of the form. Neither way has worked. Tried to run these on opening the header form.
Public Function RequeryMain()
Dim frmMain As Form
Set frm = Forms("FRM_continuous_reports_patient")
frm.Requery
End Function
Public Function RequeryHeader()
Dim frmHeader As SubForm
Set frmHeader = Forms("FRM_continuous_reports_patient").FRM_continuous_header_working
frmHeader.Requery
End Function
In the end, it is frustrating for users to have to click to clear the form for new entries. It works otherwise.
The end goal is for the form to open and have all the subforms load based on the newest patient_ID. This would likely have to involve a staggered load: (1) VBA script selects the next patient based on certain characteristics and passes the patient_ID to the main form; (2) load main continuous form based on patient_ID submitted to it; (3) load the header subforms and any pertinent data within (although should be blank for the first time these are seen); (4) on completion, back to (1).
From what I understand, this is already how it is working, however the subforms are loading too quickly? How can I fix this?
Hopefully someone can help explain how to remedy this/correct any misunderstandings I have about the mechanics of forms.
I know this will sound odd, but subforms actually load before parent form. Lag in subform display is not something I have encountered. Code should not be needed and likely will not correct. Must be something about the form/subform design, maybe their RecordSource. Would have to examine db to determine.
It is not necessary to create form objects in VBA just to requery. Is code behind the main form? Me.Requery will be enough for the main form. I always give subform container a name different from the object it holds, like ctrPatient. Then just Me.ctrPatient.Requery.
Why not put subforms in Detail section?
To answer your questions, and provide a condensed version of the logic referenced at: https://accessexperts.com/blog/2014/01/07/delay-loading-subforms-in-access/
is to:
In design view, set your subform SourceObject to "" (and save your form)
When you are ready to show the subform, just execute: Me..SourceObject = ""
When you are ready to navigate to the NEXT patient, clear the subform link: Me..SourceObject = ""
Now that should solve the issue of out of sync data between the main and sub.
You don't need to use the CASE statements, but they operate as if you had a bunch of "If" / "ElseIf" all nestled together -- except the CASE makes it easier to follow. It basically gets a value from a variable (i.e. Select Case MyVariable); then checks to see if it equals what you want (Case 1, Case 2, etc.), and if so, does whatever you code.

Do you want to made changes in oracle forms

I trying to update the existing fields through the forms and click on the SAVE(from the Main Menu), that time i want to show Alerts/Messages 'Do you want to made changes? Yes or No?" Can you please help me, how to use this ? What triggers to use , i set the properties of the Updated Items , Values are getting effected into the Table, But i want a messages please help
I checked all code like :System.Message_Level := '20';
My Database tables data are effected,I don't want any button,i want triggers to save the records
You need to have Key-Commit form level trigger. In that trigger you write logic to show alert. The built in is Show_Alert(), if I remember this correctly. You need to create alerts under Alert(s) node in Forms builder. The alert can have one or up to 3 buttons. Check Show_Alert() in Forms help - Forms Builder -> Help. You can copy paste code from there. It is very easy to figure out. I do not remember exact syntax...
Declare
al_button number;
Begin
IF :System.Form_Status = 'CHANGED' THEN
al_button := Show_alert('SAVE');
IF al_button = alert_button1 THEN
Commit_Form;
END IF;
END IF;
End;
I have written in the KEY-COMMIT Trigger at the Form Level...

ACCESS: Ticking checkbox on form if a value beginning with "(REF)" is selected from combobox

I am trying to tick a check box on a form when I select one of many combobox values that begins with (REF) - this is code that stands for Referral closure.
this is what I've done..it's not working
Private Sub ReasonForInappriopriateReferral_AfterUpdate()
If Me.RsnForInappropriateRef.Value Like "(REF)*" Then
Me.Check66 = True
End If
End Sub
Please help, I was previously trying to conditional format a label to a different colour if the closure reason was a Referral closure, but couldn't do that either and think it could be down to the IF Like command.
I added two controls exactly as you indicated. I populated my combo by setting the Row Source Type to a Value List, and the Row Source to "Blah Blah";"(REF) - Jackson";"Two Times";"(REF) - Tyson"
I put this in the Click event of a button:
If Me.RsnForInappropriateRef.Value Like "(REF)*" Then
Me.Check66 = True
Else
Me.Check66 = False
End If
it behaved exactly as expected. I then moved it to the AfterUpdate event of the combobox, and again it worked flawlessly. The only thing I can see is that in your example, the combobox does not have the same name as your sub (ReasonForInappriopriateReferral vs RsnForInappropriateRef). Are you sure your names are right?

How do you edit records from a VBA form that you want to interactively select?

I have a set of ComboBox's in an MS Access 2003 DB that are all bound to fields in a single table. However, the data that they allow you to select doesn't come from that table and instead comes from various other tables. This works fine for the record creation story but now I want to be able to edit the record retroactively. The problem is that I can't figure out how to refill the form elements without writing a bunch of custom code.
My initial inclination is to provide a combo box that limits your choices to record IDs and then do a custom query and use that to set the selected values in all of different form elements. However, I feel like I should be able to do something as simple as DoCmd.GoToRecord , , , ID and the form should repopulate just fine. I'm not opposed to doing the busy work but I'm sure I'm just missing something in my relatively puny knowledge of VBA and Access.
Just to add to the mix, I would offer two approaches, one recommended, the other not.
Approach 1: If you've bound your form to the whole data table (this is the non-recommended approach), you can use the combo box wizard to navigate to the requested record, but I wouldn't recommend it in recent versions of Access:
a. it doesn't allow you to properly name the combo box before it creates code.
b. the code is just WRONG.
Here's the code I just produced in my test database:
Dim rs As Object
Set rs = Me.Recordset.Clone
rs.FindFirst "[InventoryID] = " & Str(Nz(Me![Combo2], 0))
If Not rs.EOF Then Me.Bookmark = rs.Bookmark
This is wrong in so many ways it's just remarkable. This is what the code should be:
With Me.RecordsetClone
.FindFirst "[ID]=" & Me!cmbMyComboBox
If Not .NoMatch Then
If Me.Dirty Then Me.Dirty = False
Me.Bookmark = .Bookmark
Else
MsgBox "Not Found!"
End If
End With
There is no need to clone the form's recordset when the RecordsetClone already exists.
There is no reason to use an object variable when you can just directly use the pre-existing object.
There needs to be a check for a dirty record before departing the record because if you don't force the save, errors in the save process can lead to lost data.
But the better approach is this:
Approach 2: Use the combo box to change the form's underlying recordsource.
The AfterUpdate event of your combo box would look something like this:
If Not IsNull(Me!cmbMyComboBox) Then
Me.Recordsource = Me.Recordsource & " WHERE [ID]=" & Me!cmbMyComboBox
End If
Now, this only works the first time, as on the second resetting of the Recordsource, you end up with two WHERE clauses, which is not good. There are two approaches:
a. assuming that the form opens without a WHERE clause, store the opening recordsource value in a module-level variable in the form's OnLoad event:
Private Sub Form_Load()
strRecordsource = Left(Me.Recordsource,Len(Me.Recordsource)-1)
End Sub
And at the module level, define strRecordsource accordingly:
Dim strRecordsource As String
Then in the combo box's AfterUpdate event, you have this instead:
Me.Recordsource = strRecordsource & " WHERE [ID]=" & Me!cmbMyComboBox
Now, if your form opens with a WHERE clause already defined, it gets more complicated, but I'll not go into that and leave it as an exercise to the reader what the best approach might be.
I presume that you've already set up the row sources for each combo box. So long as you haven't limited the combo box to that list; it should display what you have stored in that column.
However, if your Combo Box changes its list for each row you can do something like this in the record's OnCurrent event or the field's GotFocus event:
Me.combo_box_name.Requery
After re-reading your question, I think I see what you are trying to achieve. You're on the right track with GotoRecord, although I would probably use OpenForm in this case, because it has a WhereCondition property that allows you to use SQL to specify exactly what record to open. It sounds like you want to implement a "jump to record" type functionality in your form, where the user selects a record ID from a list and the form changes to display the selected record.
One possibility is to switch to the new record each time the user selects an item in the ComboBox. You can handle this in the ComboBox's Click event.
I'll use a simple example: suppose you have a Students table, and a StudentForm for viewing/editing records in the Students table. The StudentForm has a ComboBox cboStudentID that is bound to the Students.ID column via it's RowSource property. When you select a student ID in the ComboBox, the StudentsForm will switch to display the corresponding student record.
In the Click event handler for the ComboBox, you can code this "jump to record" functionality with something like the following:
Private Sub cboStudentID_Click()
Dim recordID As Long
'The ItemData property will return the value of the bound'
'column at the specified index.'
recordID = cboStudentID.ItemData(cboStudentID.ListIndex)
'Jump to the record. This assumes we want to use the same form.'
'You can change the form name if you want to open a different form when'
'the user selects an ID from the ComboBox.'
DoCmd.OpenForm "StudentForm", WhereCondition:="Student.ID=" & recordID
End Sub
As David W. Fenton points out in the comments, you can shorten the following line:
recordID = cboStudentID.ItemData(cboStudentID.ListIndex)
to this:
recordID = Me!cboStudentID
or just:
recordID = cboStudentID
since the default value of the ComboBox in this case will be the value of the bound column at the current ListIndex. In this case, you could just remove recordID altogether and code the Click event as follows:
Private Sub cboStudentID_Click()
DoCmd.OpenForm "StudentForm", WhereCondition:="Student.ID=" & cboStudentID
End Sub

Access 2013 - Embedded query filtered by combo box on form

I'm new to Access and this is the problem I'm suffering: I have four tables - Task, Person, Role, and TaskPerson (mapping table). I have a form that at the top has a unbound combo box displaying a list of people from Person. In the body of the form I have a query pulling from the Task and TaskPerson tables that is embedded as a datasheet. The fields from TaskPerson perform a lookup on Person and Role to display the actual values. Each task can have multiple people assigned to it and each person can have multiple roles. I am looking to pick a name from the combo box with the datasheet updating to only show the tasks associated with that person (i.e. matching the name from the combo box to the name in the person field (which is a lookup) on the form and only showing those tasks).
I have tried adjusting the Record Source for the query so the person field criteria would pull from the combo box using
'Forms![Task Form]![Combo11]'
but that hasn't worked. I have also tried a version of this answer:
Private Sub Form_SelectionChange()
' If the combo box is cleared, clear the form filter.
If Nz(Form) = "" Then
Me.Form.Filter = ""
Me.FilterOn = False
' If a combo box item is selected, filter for an exact match.
' Use the ListIndex property to check if the value is an item in the list.
ElseIf Me.Combo11.ListIndex <> -1 Then
Me.Form.Filter = "[Combo11] = '" & _
Replace(Me.Combo11.Text, "'", "''") & "'"
Me.FilterOn = True
End If
End Sub
While the code is not balking, it also isn't grabbing the selected name from the combo box, so it doesn't update. A likely factor is when I type Me.Combo11.Text, it doesn't actually display Combo11 as an option. I tried typing it in, in hopes of working, but I know that is a bit foolish.
Any detailed answers would be appreciated. I'm still learning my way around and I get lost a bit easily.
Steve.
The first method is the easier one.
In the query you have
WHERE TaskPerson = Forms![Task Form]![Combo11]
Note that there are no ' around the combo reference. With 'Forms![Task Form]![Combo11]' the whole thing is interpreted as string, so it doesn't work.
Then in Combo11_AfterUpdate you simply have
Me.Requery
Disadvantage of this method: you always have to select a person, or the form will be empty.
The second method:
Your query lists all record, the combobox applies a filter. Or removes it, if the user clears the combobox.
I suggest going back to the answer you used, and only replace
Combo_Reported_LOB_Selection by Combo11
and
[ReportedLOB] by [TaskPerson]
And the code doesn't go into Form_SelectionChange(), but into Combo11_AfterUpdate()