We have recently migrated to a new hosting environment so have installed a fresh instance of Shibboleth. When we generate sp metadata files, the urls are non-secure (ie http) even though the url used to generate the metadata uses https.
When using the test connection from our own Azure AD system, we see the obvious error: "The reply URL specified in the request does not match the reply URLs configured for the application:"
I have limited knowledge of configuring the system beyond working on shibboleth2.xml and attribute-map.xml so would be very grateful if anyone can point me in the right direction to fix this.
I'm not sure if you managed to configure it but i'm currently working on this as well, and i think i can help.
So the ReplyURL you need to provide in the Azure Portal, is the reply URL that accepts the authentiaction reply message from the identity provider.
In the case of Shibboleth it is:
http[s]://yoursitename/Shibboleth.SSO/Auth/Saml
So if your webpage is for instance:
https://localhost/Foo
The replyURL should be:
https://localhost/Shibboleth.SSO/Auth/Saml
Notice that the page "Foo" is not in the replyURL.
After the authentication the browser should send the IDP reply to https://localhost/Shibboleth.SSO/Auth/Saml, after which Shibboleth should redirect you back to https://localhost/Foo
At least that's the default behaviour.
Related
I integrate Google's Auth API in my production website.
When I enter the login page, it throws an idpiframe_initialization_failed exceptions to the console.
I found out that I can fix it by enabling that API / Cookies in my chrome browser, but I want to find a comprehensive solution that will prevent those exceptions in my production environment.
So my two questions are:
What do you suggest me to do in order to achieve that?
In general, what is the meaning of those excpections?
Thanks :)
If you have a production url like http://godaddysite.com etc host your page there with a Webserver.
Opening a htnl page from your computer with javascript doesnot work as it is not hosted on webserver.
Please check your redirect url etc when you created Oauth client.
Go to the Credentials page.
Click Create credentials > OAuth client ID.
Select the Web application application type.
Name your OAuth 2.0 client and click Create
check origins
create new OAuth with correct origins.
I have SAML with ADFS configured in Artifactory and it is working just fine really. We are also "filtering" users by AD group membership and only allow users within a certain group to log in. All that is and has to be done by ADFS because Artifactory doesn't do that.
When a user is not authorized to log in with SAML he is redirected to an HTTP 400 Page though which obviously isn't a good solution. I can already see the tickets pouring in telling my that Artifactory doesn't work at all.
How can I avoid that or tell them actually what's the problem?
EDIT: using Artifactory version 5.3.1
After going through walkthroughs I had a test mvc app, test web api, and identityserver3 all working perfectly on my machine. I deployed IdentityServer3 to our servers in AWS behind a load balancer. I followed all the instructions in the Deployment wiki. I am able to hit the .wellknown configuration fine after deployment from a browser on my machine.
I changed the authority url for the mvc and api test apps to point to the aws deployment. Clients, Scopes, users, etc are all configured identically as they are hitting the same database as it was when running on local machine.
I can get an access token using RequestResourceOwnerPasswordAsync just fine so I think ids is installed fine.
However, both the API and the MVC app just trying to use implicit flow are now failing. FOr instance, when I try to hit a mvc controller action marked with [Authorize] I get an error stating "An invalid request URI was provided. The request URI must either be an absolute URI or BaseAddress must be set".
If I try to hit the webapi from the mvc app (both running locally on my machine) after a successful RequestResourceOwnerPasswordAsync call, I get the error "Response status code does not indicate success: 401 (Unauthorized)." after what seems like a timeout.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Figured out the problem. When specifying PublicOrigin, it has to be a full URL and not just the domain. I had left off https:// prefix.
The web api issue was related to connectivity to the identity server. There was some incorrect proxy settings for the app.
I have a REST api in my web application where I get cas ticket generated by another webapp.
That webapp intern use cas20proxyticketvalidator to validate the ticket. Therefore, I also use Cas20ProxyTicketValidator in my custom filter to validate the ticket.
But it always give me following error:
ticket = ST-148008-jWXKeEdHkxmuktvYqXF6-cas
org.jasig.cas.client.validation.TicketValidationException:
ticket 'ST-148008-jWXKeEdHkxmuktvYqXF6-cas' not recognized
at org.jasig.cas.client.validation.Cas20ServiceTicketValidator.parseResponseFromServer(Cas20ServiceTicketValidat
or.java:86)
at org.jasig.cas.client.validation.AbstractUrlBasedTicketValidator.validate(AbstractUrlBasedTicketValidator.java
:217)
Why my ticket is not recognized?
The way that cas validates tickets is:
Your client (or the other web app) requests a ticket from the relay
server for a particular service, for example case
http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mywebapp.com
The cas server generates a row that stores the user's ssoguid, the service and the ticket. It returns the ticket to the client (or
other web app)
The client (or other webapp) sends the ticket to your server
Your server then sends a request to the serviceValidate endpoint of the cas server with the ticket and the service,
http%3A%2F%2Fmywebapp.com
The cas server uses the ticket and service pair to find the row it generated. If it finds the row it: a) checks to see if the
service is real by sending a request to that url b) deletes the row
to invalidate the ticket after this validation check c) it returns
the user attached to the ticket to your server. Now the ticket can
not be validated again.
The problem you are experiencing could arise for several reasons:
The ticket has already been validated (I don't think that is the
case for you)
The service you send when generating the ticket is different to the service you send to the serviceValidate endpoint (they have to
be identical). (I would guess that this is the problem you are
experiencing, especially if another webapp generated the ticket. The
cas server would have http%3A%2F%2Fotherwebapp.com on file but would
be trying to find a row with http%3A%2F%2Fmywebapp.com, which
doesn't exist because you didn't create it)
The service sent can
not be contacted by the relay server (I'm not exactly sure of the
details about how this works or exactly when the check it done but
it is recommended that you use a service that can be contacted)
Check the serviceUrl generated, so change the log level for package org.jasig.
With SpringBoot, in the application.properties add
logging.level.org.jasig=DEBUG
In the console
org.jasig.cas.client.util.CommonUtils : serviceUrl generated: https://xxx
Verify and adapt your cas.client-host-url in the application.properties
## CAS[2.0]
cas.server-url-prefix=https://cashost.com/cas
cas.server-login-url=https://cashost.com/cas/login
cas.client-host-url=xxx
cas.validation-type=CAS
Be careful with cas.client-host-url, no slash at the end of url.
Don't forget mvn clean package after modifying .properties
I am trying to configure openam as Identity provider to test my SAML
based service provider application.
I have searched a lot and saw documentation of openam. There are lots
of thing supported by openam which probably I do not need at this
moment. I don't wish to read whole documentation which will take lot
of time reading things I do not want to test right now. I even saw
chatpet 9 "Managing SAML 2.0 SSO" at
http://docs.forgerock.org/en/openam/10.0.0/admin-guide/index/index.html
But it requires lot of things to be configured before this.
Is there any quick start guide to test it as saml based IdP?
EDIT
Not a quick, detailed is also fine. But I want OpenAm as Identity provider. SP is an application hosted on Jetty which we have developed. Also tell me what changed do I have to make on SP like what urls of application should respond with what.
There is no one-fits-all answer to your question really. Setting up SAMLv2 Federation largely depends on the actual SP implementation, some SPs can work with SAML metadata, some don't..
The simplest way to set up federation between two OpenAM instances for reference would be something like:
Create Hosted IdP wizard on node1
Create Hosted SP wizard on node2
On both nodes remove the persistent NameID-Format, so both will have transient at the top of the list
Register Remote SP wizard on node1, with URL: node2/openam/saml2/jsp/exportmetadata.jsp
Register Remote IdP wizard on node2, with URL: node1/openam/saml2/jsp/exportmetadata.jsp
On node2 in the Hosted SP setting set the transient user to "anonymous"
After all this you can test Federation by using:
/openam/spssoinit?metaAlias=/sp&idpEntityID=node1_entityid on node2
/openam/idpssoinit?metaAlias=/idp&spEntityID=node2_entityid on node1
I've used the default metaAlias values, but those should be visible on the console pages. Similarly by downloading the metadata you can see the actual entity IDs for the given entities.
Based on this, you should see now that with an OpenAM IdP you could at least test SAML support using the idpssoinit URL (if your SP supports unsolicited responses), but from the other way around it pretty much depends on your SP implementation how you need to actually trigger a SAML authentication.
This seems like a simple setup.