User from a group like Build Administrator can access the project from Azure Devops. I need to control the user in that group to upload the file directly to the master branch. The user can manually upload files to all branches except Master. Because my master branch is based on Pull request. How can I implement this? Does it need any permission?
There are a few critical branches in your repo that the team relies on always being in good shape, such as your master branch. Require pull requests to make any changes on these branches. Developers pushing changes directly to the protected branches will have their pushes rejected. Thus, following this doc: Improve code quality with branch policies to protect your master branch.
In addition, be reference to this doc: Allow bypassing branch policies without giving up push protection, please note that these 2 permissions(Bypass policies when completing pull requests and Bypass policies when pushing) shouldn’t be granted to your mentioned Build Administrator group for master branch. See: Set branch permissions for details.
As soon as you enable any policy on your default branch changes must be made via pull request.
From the branch policy dialogue
Branch Policies: Note: If any required policy is enabled, this branch cannot be deleted and changes must be made via pull request.
So to disable direct commits follow these steps:
Navigate to project settings (cogwheel)
Repositories > select your repo
Navigate to Policies
In the Branch Policies section select your default branch
Enable any policies that make sense to your use case. Require a minimum number of reviewers might be a good starting point.
Just to understand,
You want to allow your user to store their files on the master branch ? Which tool are they using to upload ? Visual Studio or just drag & drop ?
Anyway you can have some settings on the azure devops by going on
Azure Devops ---> Your Repository --> Branches --> Select the branch you want to modify and click on the 3 dots (...) --> Select Branch Policies
Related
I'm trying to prevent developers from directly editing and committing to the master branch in ADF.
There is a risk that users can accidently make changes in ADF by not creating a feature branch but instead working directly on master (I've done it myself!)
Is there a way to enforce this in ADF? I do have a branch policy on master that only allows merging via a pull request but don't think this stops developers from working directly on master:
Another way to achieve this is to require a reviewer.
Select "Branch policies":
Turn on the option "Require a minimum number of reviewers":
Set the number of reviewers to 1.
This example shows "Allow requestors to approve their own changes". This setting is optional. If you set it, the user is still prevented from committing to main/master, but can complete their own PRs.
You can deny the contribute permission for the user group in git repo. Check the following official documentation:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/devops/repos/git/branch-permissions?view=azure-devops
Is it possible to enable branch protection rules at the organisation level in Github so that all repositories that are part of that organisation inherit these rules for the applied branches. Right now it's really a hassle to enable those same set of rules on a per repo basis for same set of branches. Please help on how we can achieve this
Right now it's really a hassle to enable those same set of rules on a per repo basis for same set of branches.
There is no organization level default option to set a branch protection for all repositories in an org.
If this is something you don't want to repetitively do by hand, you can take a look at the GitHub API for Branch Protection. That way you can run a short script whenever you setup a new repo or have a job run periodically that sets and confirms the branch protection for all repos in the org at once.
Is there a way to restrict users from pushing new branches?
Our management wants the Repo admin to control what branches get created, they don't want devs pushing branches to a repo from their desktops in order to create them.
Is there a way to lock branch creation/pushes? I know you can lock an EXISTING branch, but how about a net new branch a dev pushes to ADS?
Is there a way to lock branch creation/pushes?
To limit users to create new branches, you can set the permission of the users/group.
You can navigate to Project Settings -> Repositories-> Select Repository -> Security and set the permission: Create branch as Deny.
For example:
Then the users will have no access to create/push branch via UI or Git commnad.
We store our git in TFS - Azure Devops.
We want to protect the main branch from push and deletion. push must be done with PR.
So we added a branch policy "Require a minimum number of reviewers".
The problem: users can still push to the branch.
So we updated the policy for "Bypass policies when pushing" and "Force push (rewrite history, delete branches and tags)" to "Deny".
But now the users cannot delete other branches..
Any idea how can we protect only the Main branch from deletion and push ?
Based on your description, it seemed that you had denied Force push (rewrite history, delete branches and tags) security settings on the repository level, so that all other branches were unable to be deleted as well.
Please check the security permission Force push (rewrite history, delete branches and tags) in All repositories and one affected repository for the users/groups. You may try and set the permission of Force push (rewrite history, delete branches and tags) in your repository Security tab back to Allow/Not Set for the users/groups and only adopt branch security restriction on the branch level.
Kindly refer to the security settings on the main branch like below. Thus, other branches will not be affected by the settings of the main branch and they could be still deleted or pushed.
You don't need the force push policy. Setting the require minimum number of reviewers in conjunction with denying the Bypass policies when pushing should give you what you want.
As long as you have these in place, your users cannot bypass the PR rule and if they try to do it with a force push will still receive an error
I found how to block/protect branch from pushes, force pushes but how to protect branch from pull requests? When somebody creates pull requests branch merges with branch which locked (f.e. master branch) without any problems or acknowledges. How to protect branch from pull request Of course if it possible?
Branch lock (protect branch from pushes);
Branch security (deny force pushes)
I want to make impossible to complete pull request to locked branch. Of course if it possible.
I tested locking a branch, the result of the test is that it can successfully prevent other users from completing the pull request and merge to the target branch.
When I lock the master branch, and then create pr from the dev branch to the master branch, when I click complete, I will be prompted to stop me from completing the pr.
In addition, locking the branch can also prevent me from committing to the locked branch.
So I think locking branch can meet your need.For details ,please refer to this official document.
Plainly block branch from any PR isn't possible as a singular feature. But you can use branch policies to achieve something alike.
ADO docs says you can set policies:
Add specific person as required approver (it can be you)
Require minimum number of reviewers (you can add 999 person)
Check for linked work items
Require approval from external services (via API)
Plain locking branch forever and whatever happens is not the best approach (you want to have opportunity to do that sometimes). Hope that helps.
Hm strange. Because in our case lock not preventing from PR.
Probably it depends on who made PR. His privileges in Project but I'm not sure...
master branch lock
successfull PR