Imagine I have an Emacs Lisp script which I execute using M-x eval-buffer. In this script, I want to call :vsp (vertical split) several times.
How can I do it programmatically?
C-h k takes me to the evil-ex command. However, I cannot find there anything like vsp or split.
Update 1:
I found evil-window-vsplit in evil-commands.el.
However, it doesn't work like :vsp. If I execute the script
(evil-window-split)
(evil-window-vsplit)
(evil-window-down 1)
the window looks like shown below.
If I execute the commands C-w s, :vsp, and C-w j manually, the result is this:
Update 2: It looks like (evil-window-down 1) causes the problem.
Here is why: If I run the script
(evil-window-split)
(evil-window-vsplit)
(evil-window-vsplit)
I get the correct result (window split horizontally in two parts, the upper parts split in three parts). The bottom part is not split because there are no commands to split it in the script.
Then, I add the command for navigating to the bottom part of the horizontal split ((evil-window-down 1), equivalent of C-w j):
(evil-window-split)
(evil-window-vsplit)
(evil-window-vsplit)
(evil-window-down 1)
This script produces the wrong result: Not only the upper half is split in three (like it should), but also the bottom one (it shouldn't be split).
Update 3: The above error does not occur, if I execute the script using M-x load-file.
Related
I would like to display text and then overwrite it (for simple progress bars, etc.). The usual trick of displaying a carriage return ("\r") works fine when running Racket in the terminal in Linux and Windows, but in DrRacket and GRacket the carriage return does not seem to move the cursor to the beginning of the line.
With this code as an example:
(for ([x 5])
(display "\r")
(display x)
(flush-output) ; The result is the same with or without this line
(sleep 0.1))
Running in the terminal results in a counter that overwrites itself; at the end only 4 is displayed in the terminal.
Running in DrRacket results in the numbers displaying and not being overwritten:
0
1
2
3
4
Is there a way to overwrite a line of text in the interactions window of DrRacket?
For an authoritative answer on this, you'll want to hear from Robby Findler on the racket users mailing list, (see https://lists.racket-lang.org/).
I'm about 85% certain that the interactions window doesn't do this: that is, allow you to overwrite already displayed text. If you wanted to do something like this, you'd probably want to create your own text window using the graphical toolbox. That way, you could alter the text in the window in any way you wanted.
I want to delete the first x characters for every line in a region.
Is there any key binding available to do this without using regex?
The best way to do this is to use the "rectangle" family of commands. For example, mark the beginning of the region. Go to the end of the region and place the point at column X. Run the command kill-rectangle using C-x r k.
Of course, this is not limited to deleting characters at the beginning of lines.
If the mark is on column 0, put the point on column x and use kill-rectange:
C-x r k runs the command kill-rectangle, which is an interactive
autoloaded Lisp function in `rect.el'.
It is bound to C-x r k.
(kill-rectangle START END &optional FILL)
Delete the region-rectangle and save it as the last killed one.
When called from a program the rectangle's corners are START and END.
You might prefer to use `delete-extract-rectangle' from a program.
One command that I really love for these types of jobs is multiple cursor's edit lines:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNa3axo40qM
It is overkill compared to kill-rectangle (the best solution to the original problem) but it is an amazing tool in the toolbox. Definitely worth taking a look at it.
Select the required rectangle using rectangle command
M-x rectangle-mark-mode
Then use command
M-x kill-region
I have a very large text file with nearly 20 columns. Unfortunately the program which produced the file did not properly handle columns which began with a -10 (it only properly spaced data which had a total of 5 characters, not 6). Essentially I ended up with something that looks like this:
-10.072-10.179-10.2190.002
I want it to look like:
-10.072 -10.179 -10.219 0.002
and was almost able to do so with:
M-x replace-regexp RET -10\.... RET \&TAB RET
When I use TAB however, it only replaces with a space rather than tab- ideally a tab-to-tab-stop. If I manually go to one of these situations in the file and type TAB it properly does a tab-to-tab-stop to align the data with the proper column. How do I retain the tab-to-stop function within the replace-regexp?
The search and replace certainly ought to be inserting a tab. The apparent size of a tab can vary, of course, which is the only reason I can think of for it appearing to be a space. You could use whitespace-mode to make the difference more obvious.
As for tab-to-tab-stop, that's a dynamic function rather than a special kind of tab character, so you can't do that with a search and replace1. I would suggest using a keyboard macro instead, to get the same dynamic behaviour as manual typing.
F3
M-C-s -10.... RET
M-x tab-to-tab-stop RET
F4
or perhaps just: F3M-C-s -10.... RETTABF4
Then you can run the macro until it fails with C-0F4
(If you only want to run it on a portion of the buffer, you can simply narrow to the relevant region first.)
1 Not strictly true, as Emacs lets you evaluate arbitrary elisp as part of a replacement pattern; but it's not just a case of calling the tab-to-tab-stop function, so the macro is really much simpler.
I have 2 columns, separated by comma. How can I swap those columns with Emacs?
I have the following:
column 1,column2
x1,x2
y1,y2
f1,f2
and I want it like this:
column2,column 1
x2,x1
y2,y1
f2,f1
Use M-x query-replace-regexp and then:
\(.+\),\(.+\)
as replace regexp and
\2,\1
for replacement.
In Emacs, you need to escape grouping parentheses with \. So, above regexp would be usually written as
(.+),(.+)
which means that you want everything before comma in first group and everything after comma in second group.
\2,\1
means: write second group, then comma, then first group.
While you can apply techniques given by other people, you can also use the org-mode tables.
Once you convert the data into org-mode table, it is very easy to swap the columns by simple keystrokes. You can have M-x org-mode, select the region then do M-x org-table-convert-region, and then M- on the right most column. I am not sure, how to export the data as CSV, but that should be very easy for you with replace-regexp. This can be helpful: http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/org/Tables.html#Tables
Similar to the answer given by #darioo, type the following into the top of your buffer:
(query-replace-regexp "\\(.*?\\),\\(.*\\)" "\\2,\\1")
Then, put your cursor at the end of this line and press ctrl-x, ctrl-e.
You will have an interactive search-and-replace for which you press the space bar to make the change, and press ctrl-g to quit. If you press ! (exclamation mark) then the search will cease being interactive and take place on all matching text.
If you want to reverse the changes then press M-x (usually ESC followed by x) and type undo and press enter.
Emacs has a rectangular selection mode, see for example: http://emacs-fu.blogspot.com/2008/12/working-with-rectangular-selections.html
Even better, if you enable cua-mode, entering Ctrl-Enter will put you in rectangle selection mode that is very easy to use.
http://trey-jackson.blogspot.com/2008/10/emacs-tip-26-cua-mode-specifically.html
Use a macro !
Go to the first line of the buffer
Start recording a macro (F3)
Move to the beginning of the line (^a)
Search for comma (^s ,)
Transpose (M-t)
Move cursor down one line
Stop recording macro (F4)
Select the rest of the lines and:
M-x apply-macro-to-region-lines
UPDATE: This doesn't work properly if you have multiple words in a column. Looking for a more general solution...
I decided that I was ready to try something new, after a few years of using gEdit for most of my coding needs, and try to learn using Emacs. I knew this would be difficult, as I have heard how complex Emacs can be, but I was lured by its power. The hardest thing has been getting used to writing ELisp in the .emacs file to change things about the editor. I can't currently do it myself, but I have found a few helpful snippets here and there to change some options.
One thing I have been having a lot of problems with is getting Emacs to remember the text I have selected after a command. For instance, I commonly highlight a section of code to mass indent it. However, if I do this in Emacs, it will move the selected text only once before unselecting all of the text. Does anyone know a way around this?
Anyway, I apologize for what seems to me to be an easy question, but after an hour of Google searching and looking around here on SO, I thought it was worth asking. I have a few more questions about Emacs, but I will save them and ask separately after I get this straightened out. Thanks!
UPDATE
A few people have asked about what mod I am using and what type of text I am entering. While I don't know much about Emacs modes, I am editing a pure text file at the moment. Something like this:
Hello, I am a simple text file
that is made up of three separate
lines.
If I highlight all three lines and hit TAB, I get this:
Hello, I am a simple text file
that is made up of three separate
lines.
This is great, however, if I use C-x C-x like some suggest below to reselect the text and hit TAB again, I get this:
Hello, I am a simple text file
that is made up of three separate
lines.
I hope this helps!
FWIW, here is the reason for the behaviour of your newly-added example. (I'm not 'solving' the issue here, but I'm posting it to demystify what you're seeing.)
This was determined with emacs -q which disables my customisations, so the following is default behaviour for emacs 23.2.
You are in text-mode. You should see (Text) or similar in the mode line at the bottom of the screen, and C-h m will tell you (under the list of minor modes) "Text mode: Major mode for editing text written for humans to read." Emacs decides (by way of the auto-mode-alist variable) that it should switch to text-mode if you visit a filename matching certain extensions (such as .txt).
In text-mode pressing TAB with a region highlighted causes indent-according-to-mode to be called on each line of the region in sequence. The slightly convoluted path to finding this out starts at C-h k TAB, which tells us that TAB is bound to indent-for-tab-command, which in this instance calls indent-region -- that function name is not stated explicitly in the help, but can be seen in the code -- which checks the buffer-local indent-region-function variable, which is nil, and: "A value of nil means really run indent-according-to-mode on each line."
indent-according-to-mode checks the indent-line-function variable, which has the buffer-local value indent-relative.
Use C-h f indent-relative RET to see the help for this function. (Read this).
Although you probably won't yet have had the experience to know how to check all that (or necessarily even want to!), and fully understand everything it tells you, this is an example of how the self-documenting aspect of Emacs enables a user to figure out what is going on (which then makes it feasible to change things). I essentially just used C-h k (describe-key), C-h f (describe-function), and C-h v (describe-variable) to follow the documentation. Looking at the source code for indent-for-tab-command was as simple as clicking the file name shown as part of its help page.
I suggest doing the following to help see what is happening when indent-relative runs on each line:
M-x set-variable x-stretch-cursor t
M-x set-variable ruler-mode-show-tab-stops t
M-x ruler-mode
Now for each line in turn, put the cursor at the very start of the line and press TAB. You'll end up with all three lines indented to the first tab-stop ('T' in the ruler).
Now repeat this -- again, ensure you are at the very start of each line, in front of the existing indentation.
The first character of the first line (which is currently a tab) is once again indented to the first tab-stop, as there is no preceding line for it to examine.
Next, the first character of the second line is indented to match the position of the first non-white-space character of the preceding line. Because the first character of the second line is also a tab, the actual text of the second line is pushed one tab further along.
The third line follows suit. Its first tab character is lined up with the first non-white-space character of the second line, with the same relative effect as before, giving you the final state in your example.
To emphasise, note what happens if you now put enter the line "a b c" above the existing lines, then move back to the start of the next line (what was previously the first line) and press TAB. The first tab character will now be indented in line with the 'b'. Provided that the indent-tabs-mode variable is true (meaning you have actual tab characters), then this will have no practical effect on the position of the words in the line, as 'indenting' a tab with spaces will not have an effect until the number of spaces exceeds the width of the tab (but that's another kettle of fish entirely!)
All this really means is that text-mode in Emacs doesn't behave the way you'd like it to in this situation. Other major modes can do completely different things when you press TAB, of course.
As is invariably the case with Emacs, things you don't like can be changed or circumvented with elisp. Some searching (especially at the Emacs Wiki) will frequently turn up useful solutions to problems you encounter.
Try typing C-x C-x after Emacs unselects it.
Then, instead of hitting tab (I never knew that tab does what you said! That's totally whacked.), do M-8 C-x C-i. Pity it's so many keys, but it ought to do what you want -- namely, shove everything over 8 columns. Obviously replace the M-8 with something else if you want some other number of columns.
What I usually do is simply type C-x C-x (exchange-point-and-mark) after a command that deactives the region.
How are you indenting, and in which mode?
The indentation rules in any programming mode should generally just get it right. (If they don't, that's probably more indicative that you want to configure the rules for that mode differently, but I suspect that's a different question which has been asked already).
If you're in text-mode or similar and just using TAB, then I can see the problem.
Note that if you're using indent-rigidly (C-x C-i, or C-x TAB which is the same thing) then you can repeatedly indent the same region simply by repeating the command, even if the highlighting has disappeared from view.
You can also use a prefix arg to indent-rigidly to make it indent many times. e.g. C-u C-u C-x C-i (easier to type than it looks) will indent 16 spaces (4 x 4, as the prefix arg defaults to 4, and it multiplies on each repeat). Similarly, M-8 C-x C-i indents 8 spaces. This is fine in some circumstances, and way too cumbersome in others.
Personally I suggest putting (cua-selection-mode 1) into your .emacs and using that for rigid indentation. Trey Jackson made a handy blog about it. With this, you can C-RET to start rectangle selection, down as many lines as you need, TAB repeatedly to indent the lines, and C-RET to exit the mode.
While the rectangle is active, RET cycles through the corners. For left-hand corners, typing inserts in front. For right-hand corners, typing inserts after. For the single-column rectangle, bottom counts as 'left' and top counts as 'right' for this purpose.
Trey's blog lists all the available features (or look in the source file: cua-base.el)
Be warned that indentation in Emacs is generally an unexpectedly complicated topic.
You can do this with something like the following:
(add-hook 'text-mode-hook (lambda ()
(set (make-local-variable 'indent-region-function)
(lambda (s e)
(indent-rigidly s e tab-width)))))
Then selecting a region and hitting TAB. will indent the region by a tab-width. You can then exchange point and mark with C-x C-x and hit TAB again to repeat.
I do, however, agree with the previous answers that suggest using indent-rigidly directly.