I have a few tools that I would like to use during a build. For Azure DevOps I tried putting them in a Universal Package. This works great for Windows but on Linux and Mac the file attributes are not preserved, specifically the execution bit. Is there some way to preserve the attributes with a Universal Package, or is there another tactic I need to take to use tools during a build?
I need something that is not done by a pipeline task because it needs to happen on developer's boxes as well. Pulling just about any sort of repository or package is viable.
How to preserver file attributes with universal packages in Azure DevOps?
I am afraid there is no such way to preserver file attributes with universal packages in Azure DevOps.
It is precisely because of the non-preserving properties of universal packages that it may be used to store different types of packages other than the widely used ones like NuGet, npm, Maven, or Python packages.
To use the tool package for Linux and Mac, you could consider to use HackPorts and Kali Linux.
Related
I am looking to replace CoApp because CoApp is no longer supported. I have explored few alternatives but they seems to be more aimed at installing and uninstalling software than creating and consuming packages in a build environment.
So need any suggestions on alternative of CoApp.
We have an on-premises Azure DevOps 2019 server, with build pipelines for numerous .Net 4.x solutions that our small team maintains using VS2019.
The team is about to upgrade to VS2022, and at some point I would like to migrate some solutions to .Net 6. Can DevOps 2019 build .Net 6 solutions, and if so what changes are needed to support this (such as presumably installing VS2022 on the server)?
Will those solutions' build pipelines require any changes or should they continue to work as-is? They don't contain anything too clever, with steps such as: NuGet restore, build solution, run unit tests, NuGet pack & push. (The build pipelines are managed via the web GUI, not YAML, if that makes a difference).
Some solutions will remain .Net 4.x, so the server will still need to support (build) these.
You should just need two things:
First you have to install the corresponding SDK for building the apps (see sdk download - Build apps - SDK) on your build-agents.
(Optional) Add or modify your set SDK Task in your pipelines (see use dotnet core task).
One more hint, you don't need to install a whole VS on the server. The Build-Tools are enough (VS2022 Buildtools preview).
I am using Chocolatey to make installers for a bunch of different tools, but the versions I need for some of these tools are considered outdated and are not available as packages on the Chocolatey package repository. What should I do?
If you are part of an organization, I (and Chocolatey.org) recommend setting up your own Chocolatey feed and building your own packages for internal use. This way, you control the package versions and their sources. Another benefit is that you can host the source internally or embed any installation files in the installer without worrying about distribution rights (as long as the feed is only available internally).
Unfortunately, you can't squeeze blood from a stone. Many packages in the public Chocolatey feed are "unofficial" from the software's point of view (as in, not maintained by the vendor) and as such it's tough to rely on the public feed. If you can't get the package maintainer to update the package, and you don't want to maintain your own feed, then as long as you can commit to keeping the package up to date for the community then consider creating your own community package to maintain.
I can fine a whole bunch of information on how to install packages using Package Management (nee PowerShellGet (nee OneGet)), but I can find nearly zero information on creating those packages.
I did find this which describes how to use the Publish-Module cmdlet to publish a PowerShell module, but I cannot find any information on how to create any other sorts of packages.
Specifically, I would like to create two types: from an .MSI, and from an .EXE. The .EXE I only need installed somewhere on the system, and I need the ability to update the PATH environment variable to allow it to be run by users. For the .MSI, I would ideally like it to be installed (using msiexec), but if that's not possible, I can use other means.
The only remotely-related information I can find is from Chocolatey, which is a system that predates Package Management but that Package Management works with (maybe? sorta? not really clear?). Chocolatey can create packages, but is that really the only way to create packages for Package Management?
Where can I find information on how to accomplish these packaging tasks?
To quote Microsoft:
PackageManagement is essentially a Package Management Aggregator. It creates a unified and consistent PowerShell interface for users and provides a plug-in model at the back end that different installer technologies or package managers can plug-in as providers, using PackageManagement APIs. Each provider further manages one or multiple package sources (repositories) where software packages are stored.
This means there isn't a single way of creating packages, it will depend which Package Management Provider and/or Package Source you are using.
NuGet is widely documented, and so is Chocolatey (which has a plugin available for package management)
If you're looking to install your own private software, as opposed to commercially available software (where you're best off just using one of the existing repositories), you will need to create your own feed/repo. Again this will depend which options you're using. For example, the NuGet documentation on this is readily available.
I'm sketching an application deployment process for a bunch of relatively complex desktop applications. We have both native and Java apps, so the deployment must be able to check for existence of the JRE and install it if needed. Some of the apps depend on special hardware, so the deployment must also be able to launch the necessary driver installers. Some of the apps are multiplatform, and preferably the same mechanism should be able to create Windows, Linux and Mac OS X installers. That is:
The installer must be able to install, in addition to the application itself:
Java Runtime Environment.
Drivers (hardware) - that is, launch other installers.
The installer builder must be operable from the command line so that it can be integrated with an automatic build mechanism that generates installer packages for each platform as nightly builds.
In addition, I need to create "update from the web" mechanisms for the applications. It could be included in the installer, or it could also be a separate custom mechanism built into the application.
Now, this is getting a bit complex, and I suspect that there might be no single installer that could do this all. Therefore I'm thinking between two fundamentally different approaches:
Platform-specific mechanisms: NSIS would create .exe or .msi for Windows, XXX would create .deb for Ubuntu, and YYY would create .dmg for OS X.
Cross-platform installer that would handle all the requirements above: ZZZ?
Any recommendations? Some options that I've looked include:
NSIS - Excellent, but Windows only.
IzPack - Good, but requires JVM to run.
Is there an universal tool for this, or should I just pick an appropriate tool separately for each platform? In the latter case, what would be "NSIS equivalents" for Ubuntu and Mac OS X?
I have some recommendations as follows.
Use WIX (Windows Installer XML) for creating MSI installers for Windows
Use Package Maker (part of XCode tools) on MAC OS X, preferably the command line version
Write wrapper scripts (in Python or so) to drive the over-all installer creation process.
to aggregate all the components you need to install (may be from ur version control system)
generate necessary files for Wix and Package Maker as much as possible
to run the packaging tool and generate the package
Make sure that the overall installer creation process is a simple one command operation overall (with options to create different versions of your package based on criteria like release branch etc.)
Overall, developing this workflow requires some initial effort and quite a lot of thinking. But the end result is quite worth the effort.
I haven't done this on the Linux side, but I guess would use RPM/DEB on that front in this workflow.
BitRock InstallBuilder meets all the requirements, including being multiplatform and providing an autoupdate mechanism
You should take a look at InstallJammer. It will definitely handle the cross-platform elements that you want and can even add entries to the DEB and RPM databases on the target system during installation. OS X support is still experimental, but it mostly works.