I am new to using windbg, and I am trying to set a breakpoint inside of the main function of a .net assembly that I am trying to debug, but am getting:
Unable to insert breakpoint 0 at 000001d1`4465384e, Win32 error 0n998 "Invalid access to memory location."
I have tried using bp and bu $exentry to set a break point for the entry to the program, but even that is giving me the same error. I've tried searching other old stackoverflow topics on this issue and through google, but still haven't found a solution.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Given a trivial .NET Console application compiled for .NET framework 4.7
using System;
namespace DebugNetMainMethod
{
class Program
{
static void Main()
{
Console.WriteLine("If you can read this, it's too late. You wanted to set a breakpoint earlier.");
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
}
you can use WinDbg Preview to debug it.
Run WinDbg Preview
Choose "Launch Executable" and select the EXE
WinDbg will stop at the initial breakpoint
ntdll!LdrpDoDebuggerBreak+0x2b:
7743ecc2 cc int 3
At this point, you get the problem you described:
0:000> bp $exentry
0:000> bl
0 e Disable Clear 007a27c6 0001 (0001) 0:**** DebugNetMainMethod!COM+_Entry_Point <PERF> (DebugNetMainMethod+0x27c6)
0:000> g
Unable to insert breakpoint 0 at 007a27c6, Win32 error 0n998
"Invalid access to memory location."
0:000> bc 0
0:000> bl
Note: In the future you want to provide exactly the information above, so everyone can reproduce your issue.
WinDbg is not made for .NET but for debugging "native code", i.e. code that was compiled for a specific processor like x86 or AMD64. WinDbg does not work well for Java, Python or .NET. However, for .NET, Microsoft provides an extension called SOS. You would typically load it like this:
0:000> .loadby sos clr
Unable to find module 'clr'
But at this early stage of debugging, not many DLLs have been loaded and the clr is still missing. So let's postpone this:
0:000> sxe ld clrjit
0:000> g
[...]
ModLoad: 72950000 729da000 C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\clrjit.dll
[...]
0:000> .loadby sos clr
No output means it worked.
0:000> !bpmd DebugNetMainMethod Program.Main
Found 1 methods in module 00914044...
MethodDesc = 00914d5c
Adding pending breakpoints...
0:000> g
[...]
(2658.2e08): CLR notification exception - code e0444143 (first chance)
JITTED DebugNetMainMethod!DebugNetMainMethod.Program.Main()
Setting breakpoint: bp 00BA085F [DebugNetMainMethod.Program.Main()]
Breakpoint 2 hit
0:000> !clrstack
OS Thread Id: 0x2e08 (0)
Child SP IP Call Site
0075eff4 00ba085f DebugNetMainMethod.Program.Main() [C:\...\Program.cs # 8]
0075f170 63dff036 [GCFrame: 0075f170]
0:000> !u eip
Normal JIT generated code
DebugNetMainMethod.Program.Main()
Begin 00ba0848, size 32
[...]
Related
I am reading the book Advanced Windows Debugging: Developing and Administering Reliable, Robust, and Secure Software by Daniel Pravat and Mario Hewardt. I have questions about Chapter 2.
I am using WinDBG 10.0.19041.1 X86 on Windows 10 Pro Version 2004 build 19041.572. I built 02sample.exe with Microsoft Visual Studio Community 2019 Version 16.7.6 with the GenerateDebugInformation property set to DebugFull. I am debugging the Debug|x86 configuration of 02sample.exe.
I am reading the section in chapter 2 named Setting a Breakpoint on Access and I am seeing differences between what is in the book and what I am experiencing.
The first difference in behavior is with the following command.
0:000> dt gGlobal
This command fails with the following error.
Symbol gGlobal not found.
The following command does work.
0:000> dt 02sample!gGlobal
*** WARNING: Unable to verify checksum for 02sample.exe
gGlobal
+0x000 m_ref : 0n0
The next difference in behavior is with the following command.
0:000> ba w4 gGlobal+0
Based on the following output, this appears to work.
0:000> bl
0 e Disable Clear 00969130 w 4 0001 (0001) 0:**** 02sample!gGlobal
However, the breakpoint is not being hit. I cannot figure out why.
Symbols Are probably Not Yet Loaded
try either .reload /f or .reload /f foo.exe
before attempting unqualified dt gGlobal
a qualified foo!gGlobal will always work because it loads the symbols
check with !sym noisy
0:000> !sym noisy
noisy mode - symbol prompts off
0:000> dt gGlobal
Symbol gGlobal not found.
0:000> dt gGlobal
Symbol gGlobal not found.
0:000> dt gGlobal
Symbol gGlobal not found.
0:000> dt awd!gGlobal
SYMSRV: BYINDEX: 0x2
snipxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
DBGHELP: awd - public symbols & lines
C:\Users\XXX\Desktop\awd\Chapter2\Debug\awd.pdb
+0x000 m_ref : 0n0
0:000>
how is the Book Telling You to set the ba breakpoint ?
You Cannot Set a ba breakpoint on a module when you are Stopped At System Breakpoint
Because the system will reset the thread context
you have to go the Entry Point and then Set the ba breakpoint as windbg suggests do you do that ?
:\>cdb -c "g #$exentry;ba w4 awd!gGlobal;g;u .;kb;q" awd.exe |awk "/Reading/,/quit/"
0:000> cdb: Reading initial command 'g #$exentry;ba w4 awd!gGlobal;g;u .;kb;q'
*** WARNING: Unable to verify checksum for awd.exe
Breakpoint 0 hit
awd!Global::Global+0x21:
00a23461 8b45fc mov eax,dword ptr [ebp-4]
00a23464 83c404 add esp,4
00a23467 3bec cmp ebp,esp
00a23469 e895ddffff call awd!ILT+510(__RTC_CheckEsp) (00a21203)
00a2346e 8be5 mov esp,ebp
00a23470 5d pop ebp
00a23471 c3 ret
00a23472 cc int 3
ChildEBP RetAddr Args to Child
0026f9d4 00a21687 0026f9ec 522c59df 00a21670 awd!Global::Global+0x21
0026f9dc 522c59df 00a21670 00a2b208 0026fa50 awd!`dynamic initializer for 'gGlobal''+0x17
0026f9ec 00a24a5e 00a2b000 00a2b30c 91b61bad ucrtbased!_initterm+0x3f
0026fa50 00a2498d 0026fa60 00a24d08 0026fa6c awd!__scrt_common_main_seh+0xbe
0026fa58 00a24d08 0026fa6c 7683ed6c 7ffde000 awd!__scrt_common_main+0xd
0026fa60 7683ed6c 7ffde000 0026faac 773337eb awd!wmainCRTStartup+0x8
0026fa6c 773337eb 7ffde000 761f96f6 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadInitThunk+0xe
0026faac 773337be 00a21145 7ffde000 00000000 ntdll!__RtlUserThreadStart+0x70
0026fac4 00000000 00a21145 7ffde000 00000000 ntdll!_RtlUserThreadStart+0x1b
quit:
if by chance you misunderstood entrypoint to wmain() and set a ba break on reaching wmain() it probably will never be hit because the code in question has already been executed
I have a 32-bit application (targeting .NET 3.5) hosted on a 64-bit machine. I want to analyze the memory dump of this 32-bit application. I captured the memory dump using 32-bit adplus and cdb. I am loading the memory dump into 32-bit windbg. When I load .net 2.0 sos.dll and .net 2.0 mscorwks.dll into windbg and execute !clrstack, I get the following error: "Failed to find runtime DLL (mscorwks.dll), 0x80004005
Extension commands need mscorwks.dll in order to have something to do." What am I doing wrong?
Info as requested in the comments
ADPlus command line:
adplus -hang -quiet -p 2440 -o C:\temp
WinDbg commands:
0:000> .load <fullpathto>\sos.dll
0:000> lmvm mscorwks
start end module name
0:000> .exr -1
ExceptionAddress: 00000000
ExceptionCode: 80000007 (Wake debugger)
ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 0
The dump indicates that no .NET 2 was loaded. Otherwise the output of lmvm mscorwks should show the details of the .NET runtime, like this:
0:003> lmvm mscorwks
start end module name
61bc0000 6216e000 mscorwks (deferred)
Image path: C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\mscorwks.dll
...
File version: 2.0.50727.5485
...
You mentioned that you loaded SOS by full path. If the dump was taken on your machine, you would typically load it using
0:003> .loadby sos mscorwks
In your case, this should already give you the hint that .NET was not loaded:
Unable to find module 'mscorwks'
If you're not so sure about the .NET version, try
.loadby sos clr; *** .NET 4
.loadby sos coreclr; *** Silverlight / Universal Apps
Maybe you had a typo in your AdPlus command line and specified the wrong process ID. If that PID accidentally exists, you got a wrong dump. Use | to check the process name
0:003> |
. 0 id: 1e78 attach name: E:\...\NET2x32.exe
BTW: The -quiet parameter of ADPlus is obsolete, you can omit it.
Today I wanted to write a crash dump and I got the error message
0:000> .dump /ma c:\classid_loads_net4.dmp
Creating c:\classid_loads_net4.dmp - mini user dump
GenInvokeEnumStackProviders(C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\mscordacwks.dll) failed, 0x8007007f
Dump successfully written
I googled for GenInvokeEnumStackProviders but there are no results at all.
What could the reason for this error message be and what impact could this have on the dump (which was successful according the last message)?
Using WinDbg 6.3.9600
Update 2014-09-18
Same error again today, reproducible at the moment. In Process Monitor I can see that WinDbg tries to access verifier.dll while writing the dump
C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Kits\8.1\Debuggers\x86\verifier.dll
However, the file does not exist in that place. From the list of loaded modules I see it is loaded from
0:008> lm fm verifier
start end module name
6ddf0000 6de50000 verifier C:\Windows\syswow64\verifier.dll
In addition (not sure it is related) I get errors dumping the .NET heap:
0:008> !dumpheap -stat
c0000005 Exception in C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\sos.dumpheap debugger extension.
PC: 6b55dbe8 VA: 00000000 R/W: 0 Parameter: 00000000
Still using WinDbg 6.3.9600
The problem persists, even after a reboot and after disabling application verifier.
I'm attempting to debug a manual dump file of a 64bit w3wp process with 64bit Windbg (Version 6.10). The dump was taken with taskmgr. I can't get anything from the !clrstack command. Here is what I'm getting:
!loadby sos clr
!runaway
User Mode Time
Thread Time
17:cf4 0 days 5:37:42.455
~17s
ntdll!ZwDelayExecution+0xa:
00000000`776208fa c3 ret
!clrstack
GetFrameContext failed: 1
What is GetFrameContext failed: 1?
Use !dumpstack command instead of !clrstack. It usually works.
Try getting the "native" call stack by doing "k" and see what that gets you. Sometimes, the stack isn't quite right and the !ClrStack extension is pretty sensitive.
I am trying to make a call to a method of a Windows COM interface from the Go language. I suspect I am doing something wrong in the way I invoke the call and would like to see how the registers change during the invocation.
But I have a hard time getting to it since I can't seem to set a breakpoint in WinDBG. The command "bu 64b6ea43" ends up not working with an error "Only part of a ReadProcessMemory or WriteProcessMemory request was completed". The full message is below.
Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.2.8400.0 X86
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
CommandLine: C:\Users\ccherng\Go\bin\error.exe
Symbol search path is: *** Invalid ***
****************************************************************************
* Symbol loading may be unreliable without a symbol search path. *
* Use .symfix to have the debugger choose a symbol path. *
* After setting your symbol path, use .reload to refresh symbol locations. *
****************************************************************************
Executable search path is:
ModLoad: 00400000 00971000 image00400000
Unable to insert breakpoint 1 at 64b6ea43, Win32 error 0n299
"Only part of a ReadProcessMemory or WriteProcessMemory request was completed."
bp1 at 64b6ea43 failed
WaitForEvent failed
eax=00415a7b ebx=7ffdd000 ecx=00000000 edx=00000000 esi=00000000 edi=00000000
eip=77b37098 esp=0006fff0 ebp=00000000 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na po nc
cs=001b ss=0023 ds=0023 es=0023 fs=003b gs=0000 efl=00000200
77b37098 89442404 mov dword ptr [esp+4],eax ss:0023:0006fff4=00000000
To me it was problem because of ASLR.
running editbin /DYNAMICBASE:NO NameOfDetectedExe.exe fixed it.
Switched to Ollydbg which works. Learned that WinDbg sucks badly.