I am working on a Kubernetes integration of the database Apache IoTDB which supports a Cluster mode. Currently, to start a cluster each node needs to know the IP adresses of all other nodes in its "ensemble" upfront, before starting.
I think the default approach to this in Kubernetes would generally be to use a StatefulSet and a headless Service. And the startup loop I scratched would be something like this
start each pod with a container which contains a "pre-start" script
In the pre-start script wait until all other pods of the set are started and get all their ip adresses from the headless service)
update the configs / env variables with all cluster ip adresses
start the iotdb instance(s)
So the only question I have is for step 2: When do I know that all pods are started?
Is the update of the DNS / A records of the headless Service atomic in the sense that I see all pods or no pod?
OR do I have to query the API Server separately to see the number of replicas and then wait until I got all their records from the headless service?
Or is there a more kubernetes-like way to achieve that?
Thanks already!
When a DNS address of a headless service is resolved, it returns a list of Pods (ie. IPs) from an underlying endpoint object. The endpoint object always holds the list of Ready pods.
So, you will get the list of Ready pods of that moment on resolving headless service DNS.
Related
I am learning the headless service of kubernetes.
I understand the following without question (please correct me if I am wrong):
A headless service doesn't have a cluster IP,
It is used for communicating with stateful app
When client app container/pod communicates with a database pod via headless service the pod IP address is returned instead of the service's.
What I don't quite sure:
Many articles on internet explaining headless service is vague in my opinion. Because all I found only directly state something like :
If you don't need load balancing but want to directly connect to the
pod (e.g. database) you can use headless service
But what does it mean exactly?
So, following are my thoughts of headless service in k8s & two questions with an example
Let's say I have 3 replicas of PostgreSQL database instance behind a service, if it is a regular service I know by default request to database would be routed in a round-robin fasion to one of the three database pod. That's indeed a load balancing.
Question 1:
If using headless service instead, does the above quoted statement mean the headless service will stick with one of the three database pod, never change until the pod dies? I ask this because otherwise it would still be doing load balancing if not stick with one of the three pod. Could some one please clarify it?
Question 2:
I feel no matter it is regular service or headless service, client application just need to know the DNS name of the service to communicate with database in k8s cluster. Isn't it so? I mean what's the point of using the headless service then? To me the headless service only makes sense if client application code really needs to know the IP address of the pod it connects to. So, as long as client application doesn't need to know the IP address it can always communicate with database either with regular service or with headless service via the service DNS name in cluster, Am I right here?
A normal Service comes with a load balancer (even if it's a ClusterIP-type Service). That load balancer has an IP address. The in-cluster DNS name of the Service resolves to the load balancer's IP address, which then forwards to the selected Pods.
A headless Service doesn't have a load balancer. The DNS name of the Service resolves to the IP addresses of the Pods themselves.
This means that, with a headless Service, basically everything is up to the caller. If the caller does a DNS lookup, picks the first address it's given, and uses that address for the lifetime of the process, then it won't round-robin requests between backing Pods, and it will not notice if that Pod disappears. With a normal Service, so long as the caller gets the Service's (cluster-internal load balancer's) IP address, these concerns are handled automatically.
A headless Service isn't specifically tied to stateful workloads, except that StatefulSets require a headless Service as part of their configuration. An individual StatefulSet Pod will actually be given a unique hostname connected to that headless Service. You can have both normal and headless Services pointing at the same Pods, though, and it might make sense to use a normal Service for cases where you don't care which replica is (initially) contacted.
A headless service will return all Pod IPs that are associated through the selector. The order is not stable, so if a client is making repeated DNS queries and uses only the first returned IP, this will result in some kind of load balancing as well.
Regarding your second question: That is correct. In general, if a client does not need to know all instances - and handle the unstable IPs - a regular service provides more benefits.
We are bringing up a Cassandra cluster, using k8ssandra helm chart, it exposes several services, our client applications are using the datastax Java-Driver and running at the same k8s cluster as the Cassandra cluster (this is testing phase)
CqlSessionBuilder builder = CqlSession.builder();
What is the recommended way to connect the application (via the Driver) to Cassandra?
Adding all nodes?
for (String node :nodes) {
builder.addContactPoint(new InetSocketAddress(node, 9042));
}
Adding just the service address?
builder.addContactPoint(new InetSocketAddress(service-dns-name , 9042))
Adding the service address as unresolved? (would that even work?)
builder.addContactPoint(InetSocketAddress.createUnresolved(service-dns-name , 9042))
The k8ssandra Helm chart deploys a CassandraDatacenter object and cass-operator in addition to a number of other resources. cass-operator is responsible for managing the CassandraDatacenter. It creates the StatefulSet(s) and creates several headless services including:
datacenter service
seeds service
all pods service
The seeds service only resolves to pods that are seeds. Its name is of the form <cluster-name>-seed-service. Because of the ephemeral nature of pods cass-operator may designate different C* nodes as seed nodes. Do not use the seed service for connecting client applications.
The all pods service resolves to all Cassandra pods, regardless of whether they are readiness. Its name is of the form <cluster-name>-<dc-name>-all-pods-service. This service is intended to facilitate with monitoring. Do not use the all pods service for connecting client applications.
The datacenter service resolves to ready pods. Its name is of the form <cluster-name>-<dc-name>-service This is the service that you should use for connecting client applications. Do not directly use pod IPs as they will change over time.
Adding all nodes?
You definitely do not need to add all of the nodes as contact points. Even in vanilla Cassandra, only adding a few is fine as the driver will gossip and find the rest.
Adding just the service address?
Your second option of binding on the service address is all you should need to do. The nice thing about the service address, is that it will account for changing/removing of IPs in the cluster.
I am new to the Kubernetes, and I'm trying to understand that how can I apply it for my use-case scenario.
I managed to install a 3-node cluster on VMs within the same network. Searching about K8S's concepts and reading related articles, still I couldn't find answer for my below question. Please let me know if you have knowledge on this:
I've noticed that internal DNS service of K8S applies on the pods and this way services can find each other with hostnames instead of IPs.
Is this applicable for communication between pods of different nodes or this is only within the services inside a single node? (In other words, do we have a dns service on the node level in the K8S, or its only about pods?)
The reason for this question is the scenario that I have in mind:
I need to deploy a micro-service application (written in Java) with K8S. I made docker images from each service in my application and its working locally. Currently, these services are connected via pre-defined IP addresses.
Is there a way to run each of these services within a separate K8S node and use from its DNS service to connect the nodes without pre-defining IPs?
A service serves as an internal endpoint and (depending on the configuration) load balancer to one or several pods behind it. All communication typically is done between services, not between pods. Pods run on nodes, services don't really run anything, they are just routing traffic to the appropriate pods.
A service is a cluster-wide configuration that does not depend on a node, thus you can use a service name in the whole cluster, completely independent from where a pod is located.
So yes, your use case of running pods on different nodes and communicate between service names is a typical setup.
I'm trying to understand the concepts of ingress and ingress controllers in kubernetes. But I'm not so sure what the end product should look like. Here is what I don't fully understand:
Given I'm having a running Kubernetes cluster somewhere with a master node which runes the control plane and the etcd database. Besides that I'm having like 3 worker nodes - each of the worker nodes has a public IPv4 address with a corresponding DNS A record (worker{1,2,3}.domain.tld) and I've full control over my DNS server. I want that my users access my web application via www.domain.tld. So I point the the www CNAME to one of the worker nodes (I saw that my ingress controller i.e. got scheduled to worker1 one so I point it to worker1.domain.tld).
Now when I schedule a workload consisting of 2 frontend pods and 1 database pod with 1 service for the frontend and 1 service for the database. From what've understand right now, I need an ingress controller pointing to the frontend service to achieve some kind of load balancing. Two questions here:
Isn't running the ingress controller only on one worker node pointless to internally load balance two the two frontend pods via its service? Is it best practice to run an ingress controller on every worker node in the cluster?
For whatever reason the worker which runs the ingress controller dies and it gets rescheduled to another worker. So the ingress point will get be at another IPv4 address, right? From a user perspective which tries to access the frontend via www.domain.tld, this DNS entry has to be updated, right? How so? Do I need to run a specific kubernetes-aware DNS server somewhere? I don't understand the connection between the DNS server and the kubernetes cluster.
Bonus question: If I run more ingress controllers replicas (spread across multiple workers) do I do a DNS-round robin based approach here with multiple IPv4 addresses bound to one DNS entry? Or what's the best solution to achieve HA. I rather not want to use load balancing IP addresses where the worker share the same IP address.
Given I'm having a running Kubernetes cluster somewhere with a master
node which runes the control plane and the etcd database. Besides that
I'm having like 3 worker nodes - each of the worker nodes has a public
IPv4 address with a corresponding DNS A record
(worker{1,2,3}.domain.tld) and I've full control over my DNS server. I
want that my users access my web application via www.domain.tld. So I
point the the www CNAME to one of the worker nodes (I saw that my
ingress controller i.e. got scheduled to worker1 one so I point it to
worker1.domain.tld).
Now when I schedule a workload consisting of 2 frontend pods and 1
database pod with 1 service for the frontend and 1 service for the
database. From what've understand right now, I need an ingress
controller pointing to the frontend service to achieve some kind of
load balancing. Two questions here:
Isn't running the ingress controller only on one worker node pointless to internally load balance two the two frontend pods via its
service? Is it best practice to run an ingress controller on every
worker node in the cluster?
Yes, it's a good practice. Having multiple pods for the load balancer is important to ensure high availability. For example, if you run the ingress-nginx controller, you should probably deploy it to multiple nodes.
For whatever reason the worker which runs the ingress controller dies and it gets rescheduled to another worker. So the ingress point
will get be at another IPv4 address, right? From a user perspective
which tries to access the frontend via www.domain.tld, this DNS entry
has to be updated, right? How so? Do I need to run a specific
kubernetes-aware DNS server somewhere? I don't understand the
connection between the DNS server and the kubernetes cluster.
Yes, the IP will change. And yes, this needs to be updated in your DNS server.
There are a few ways to handle this:
assume clients will deal with outages. you can list all load balancer nodes in round-robin and assume clients will fallback. this works with some protocols, but mostly implies timeouts and problems and should generally not be used, especially since you still need to update the records by hand when k8s figures it will create/remove LB entries
configure an external DNS server automatically. this can be done with the external-dns project which can sync against most of the popular DNS servers, including standard RFC2136 dynamic updates but also cloud providers like Amazon, Google, Azure, etc.
Bonus question: If I run more ingress controllers replicas (spread
across multiple workers) do I do a DNS-round robin based approach here
with multiple IPv4 addresses bound to one DNS entry? Or what's the
best solution to achieve HA. I rather not want to use load balancing
IP addresses where the worker share the same IP address.
Yes, you should basically do DNS round-robin. I would assume external-dns would do the right thing here as well.
Another alternative is to do some sort of ECMP. This can be accomplished by having both load balancers "announce" the same IP space. That is an advanced configuration, however, which may not be necessary. There are interesting tradeoffs between BGP/ECMP and DNS updates, see this dropbox engineering post for a deeper discussion about those.
Finally, note that CoreDNS is looking at implementing public DNS records which could resolve this natively in Kubernetes, without external resources.
Isn't running the ingress controller only on one worker node pointless to internally load balance two the two frontend pods via its service? Is it best practice to run an ingress controller on every worker node in the cluster?
A quantity of replicas of the ingress will not affect the quality of load balancing. But for HA you can run more than 1 replica of the controller.
For whatever reason the worker which runs the ingress controller dies and it gets rescheduled to another worker. So the ingress point will get be at another IPv4 address, right? From a user perspective which tries to access the frontend via www.domain.tld, this DNS entry has to be updated, right? How so? Do I need to run a specific kubernetes-aware DNS server somewhere? I don't understand the connection between the DNS server and the kubernetes cluster.
Right, it will be on another IPv4. Yes, DNS should be updated for that. There are no standard tools for that included in Kubernetes. Yes, you need to run external DNS and somehow manage records on it manually (by some tools or scripts).
DNS server inside a Kubernetes cluster and your external DNS server are totally different things. DNS server inside the cluster provides resolving only inside the cluster for service discovery. Kubernetes does not know anything about access from external networks to the cluster, at least on bare-metal. In a cloud, it can manage some staff like load-balancers to automate external access management.
I run more ingress controllers replicas (spread across multiple workers) do I do a DNS-round robin based approach here with multiple IPv4 addresses bound to one DNS entry? Or what's the best solution to achieve HA.
DNS round-robin works in that case, but if one of the nodes is down, your clients will get a problem with connecting to that node, so you need to find some way to move/remove IP of that node.
The solutions for HA provided by #jjo is not the worst way to achieve what you want if you can prepare an environment for that. If not, you should choose something else, but the best practice is using a Load Balancer provided by an infrastructure. Will it be based on several dedicated servers, or load balancing IPs, or something else - it does not matter.
The behavior you describe is actually a LoadBalancer (a Service with type=LoadBalancer in Kubernetes), which is "naturally" provided when you're running Kubernetes on top of a cloud provider.
From your description, it looks like your cluster is on bare-metal (either true or virtual metal), a possible approach (that has worked for me) will be:
Deploy https://github.com/google/metallb
this is where your external IP will "live" (HA'd), via the speaker-xxx pods deployed as DaemonSet to each worker node
depending on your extn L2/L3 setup, you'll need to choose between L3 (BGP) or L2 (ARP) modes
fyi I've successfully used L2 mode + simple proxyarp at the border router
Deploy nginx-ingress controller, with its Service as type=LoadBalancer
this will make metallb to "land" (actually: L3 or L2 "advertise" ...) the assigned IP to the nodes
fyi I successfully tested it together with kube-router using --advertise-loadbalancer-ip as CNI, the effect will be that e.g. <LB_IP>:80 will be redirected to the ingress-nginx Service NodePort
Point your DNS to ingress-nginx LB IP, i.e. what's shown by:
kubectl get svc --namespace=ingress-nginx ingress-nginx -ojsonpath='{.status.loadBalancer.ingress[].ip}{"\n"}'
fyi you can also quickly test it using fake DNSing with http://A.B.C.D.xip.io/ (A.B.C.D being your public IP addr)
Here is a Kubernetes DNS add-ons Configure external DNS servers (AWS Route53, Google CloudDNS and others) for Kubernetes Ingresses and Services allowing to handle DNS record updates for ingress LoadBalancers. It allows to keep DNS record up to date according to Ingress controller config.
I am working on a POC, and i find out some strange behavior after setting up my kubernetes cluster
In fact, i am working on a topology of one master and two minions.
When i tried to make up 2 pods into each minion and expose a service for them, it turned out that when i try to request the service from the master, nothing is returned (any response from 2 pods) and when i try to request the service from a minion, only the pod deployed in that minion respond but the other no.
This can heavily depend on how your cluster is provisioned.
For starters, you need to validate how networking is set up and if it works as kubernetes expects. Said short, if you launch two pods (on separate nodes), they should get IPs from their dedicated per node ranges, and be able to route that between nodes. You can use some small(ish) base image (alpine/debian/ubuntu etc.), with something like sleep 1d , exec into them interactively with bash and simply ping one from the other. If it does not work, your network setup is broken.
Make sure you test between pods, not directly from node host OS. In some configurations node is unable to access service IPs due to routing concerns, but pod-to-pod works fine (seen this in some flannel configurations)
Also, your networking is probably provided by some overlay network solution like flannel, weave, calico etc. so check their respective logs for signs of problems.