we currently run our IdP on Firebase auth. One of our partner (service provider) only supports SAML 2.0. They want us to send in a request with a payload to a URL with User's email address.
I do not have much experience SAML 2.0, what you guys think the best approach for this would be?
Sorry for a vague question.
Thanks,
Sam
Firstly, You will have to configure your SP and IDP by exchanging the metadata(via a URL or XML file or manually). From the question, it seems that you are looking for IDP initiated SSO. After a user successfully authenticates with the IDP, the IDP sends a response(XML payload) which contains the user identifier typically a username or email. The SP will read the payload and after verifying the data it will create the user session in your SP.
The SAML response looks something like this.
Related
I have two service providers set up with one IdP and users are required to be authenticated twice to access both services at the same time. From my point of view, this is not "SSO" and I am thinking that there might have been settings done incorrectly and I would like to see if the community here can provide me with directions and/or possible solutions.
Just a thought - the behaviour for the authentication on each service looks valid as I understand that IdP is required to send signed SAML assertions to the providers in order to access the services. However, because I only have one IdP, can I not be authenticated just once and be able to access all the services?
Any suggestion is appreciated. Thanks.
Typically in this scenario the user would authenticate once to the IdP when the first SP SSO's to it. There would be no authentication at the IdP when the second SP SSO's to it as there's already an authentication session at the IdP for the user.
However, there might be use cases where you want the user to be authenticated at the IdP even if they already have an authentication session. The SP can set the ForceAuthn flag in the SAML authn request sent to the IdP. This requests that the IdP authenticates the user regardless of whether or not they already have an authentication session.
ADFS also has a configuration option for relying parties (SPs) to always require authentication. Take a look at the AlwaysRequireAuthentication flag.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/module/adfs/set-adfsrelyingpartytrust?view=windowsserver2022-ps
I'm a Service Provider (SP) who wants to support multiple Identity Providers (IdP) via Web SSO profile.
I'm struggling to understand how should I negotiate SAML features (e.g. signing/not signing AuthnRequests) with Identity Provider admins.
Here's my current understanding:
I create a single sp-metadata.xml which I expose to all IdPs who want to integrate with me.
To integrate with me, IdP admins upload their idp-metadata.xml via my web interface. I validate it against my sp-metadata.xml. If their metadata features don't match with my metadata features, I show them a detailed error on upload so they can change their setup.
Questions:
Is this a valid and common approach?
How do I write SP metadata to support all or most IdPs out-of-the-box? For example, should I put "AuthnRequestsSigned = false" or "AuthnRequestsSigned = true"? It seems that Web SSO Profile does not give strict guidance on this.
About 2: You can not really validate the IdP meta data against your SP meta data. Most IdP's do not tell if they accept a digitally signed SAML AuthnRequest. They also typically do not tell which signature algorithm or keysizes they support.
Some IdP implementation do not even create SAML meta data schema compliant meta data files.
If you care about security, then you should digitally sign the SAML AuthnRequest and either ask the IdP to ignore the signature in case your SP sends it.
Also note that there some update to the spec for some time ... see the new processing rules.
Alternative: During upload ask (checkbox/radio button) if they can handle a digitally signed SAML AuthnRequest and which signature algorithm has to be used.
I.e. Microsoft ADFS and Azure AD bail out with an non-descriptive SAML error response if they can not handle the SAML AuthnRequest.
I'm knew to SAML and i'm trying to understand how a clients details are stored for SSO.
If select a link in a browser to a service provider and I haven't been set up on the IDp after I have my account created at the IDp and authenticated to the SP what is stored? is it my ipddress? if I tried to connect to the same SP from a different machine would I need to be registered on the IDp again.
Or is it done another way?
Thank You
An IdP creates a SAML assertion about an authenticated subject.
Based upon the NameID format being used an opaque handle could be transmitted ("transient NameID format") or an email address ("email NameID format") or even some other id can be transmitted from the IdP to the SP. Furhtermore attribute statements could be used to transmit additional information about the subject.
Authentication happens on the IdP, however it's not defined in the SAMLv2 spec how this has to take place.
If authentication happened a "session" is established at the IdP. Most IdP implemenatations use a cookie to track the "session". So when you return to the IdP again there is no need for re-authentication unless an SP mandates this. ("ForceAuth" in the SAML AuthnRequest).
This is only a quick overview, reading the SAMLv2 tech overview (https://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/Saml2TechOverview) certainly gives you more insights.
So I'm struggling a bit with the basics of the flow of SAML. Here's the scenario I find confusing.
I have a java web application. The user is logged in. I know they want to order cookies from a 3rd party because they've clicked on the "I want chocolate chip cookies" link. I also know that "Mrs. Pillsbury Cookies Co." is a "Service Provider" because she sent me her meta-data and I've registered her with my Gluu Server (IdP). I've also sent her my IdP meta-data so we've done the whole hand-shaking thing.
My question is...how do I now send the SAMLResponse to Mrs. Pillsbury? She's given me a SOAP endpoint that is waiting for a SAMLResponse. How do I tell my Java application to get some XML from my gluu server as a SAMLReponse that I can then pass to the Pillsbury SOAP endpoint? That's the part where I'm stuck...I don't know how to get a response to forward. I can see in the metadata that there are lots of SSO endpoints
<SingleSignOnService Binding="urn:mace:shibboleth:2.0:profiles:AuthnRequest" Location="https://idp.myjavaapp.com/idp/profile/SAML2/Unsolicited/SSO"/>
<SingleSignOnService Binding="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:HTTP-POST" Location="https://idp.myjavaapp.com/idp/profile/SAML2/POST/SSO"/>
<SingleSignOnService Binding="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:HTTP-POST-SimpleSign" Location="https://idp.myjavaapp.com/idp/profile/SAML2/POST-SimpleSign/SSO
Am I supposed to hit one of those SSO endpoints and it'll generate a response that I can then forward on to Pillsbury? Can one of you SAML experts out there get me straigtened out? Thanks in advance.
There are a few ways SAML Requests/Responses can be generated.
IdP initiated:
This is a SAML Response generated w/o a SAML request. This requires the user to login/be logged into the idP and the idP will generate a SAML Response based off the SP setup in the idp.
SP initiated:
This is usually an HTTP Redirect but can be a POST as well. This is a SAML Request Redirect/POST that gets sent to the idP based of some link or button on the SP's website.
As I understand it you have the following relationship:
Your App
\
3rd Party ordering
/
IdP Server
Your app needs to make a request to the 3rd party, but also need it to authenticate against the IdP. Yes?
Normally the process works such that the 3rd party requests the token itself. Your app shouldn't have the token intended for the 3rd party -- it should only have the token for its own app.
Usually you send whatever your app-specific request is to the 3rd party first. When they receive that bit of information they hold onto it and then make a SP-Initiated authentication request to your IdP. They will attach a bit of information as part of the auth request called relay state. This bit of information is used to reconstitute the session after the IdP responds.
Once the IdP receives the request it does whatever it needs to do to authenticate the user, and sends the token back to the 3rd party. As part of that response they also send the relay state. The 3rd party then verifies the token and sets the session as necessary, then reads the relay state and sets whatever internal state is necessary to continue the order.
You're on the right track. As the previous answers have explained, it can be done one of two ways: the SP site (Pillsbury) sends you an authentication request, or you can direct your IDP/Gluu server to send an SAML message to the SP without them prompting: "unsolicited".
In the case of the first "SP-Initiated", you just create a link to the SP site for the user's browser to follow. The user's browser hits the SP site, the SP site realizes that it needs to authenticate the user: so it creates a SAML Authentication Request to your IDP endpoint, directing the user's browser there. Then your IDP server will respond according to the metadata/relationship that you've set up with the SP site. Just as one of the other answers explained, this Authentication Request can include a RelayState parameter which will be sent back to the SP to tell them where to send the user after the SAML message had been consumed & validated. I haven't used Gluu but I believe the SP would use the second endpoint you showed in your question to do this.
In the case of the second "IDP-initiated", you need to direct the user's browser to one of the Gluu server endpoints to generate a SAML assertion, which will be POST'd back to the SP site without the SP site's prompting. This one is less used because every time the user is directed to the SP site from your site, they will be forced through the AuthN process among other reasons. I believe this is the first listed endpoint that you showed in your question.
Here's a really good explanation of IDP-initiated from Shibboleth, that should help clear this up for you: https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/IdPUnsolicitedSSO
Best of luck!
When initiating a SAML authentication request (from the Service Provider), is there any way to give the Identity Provider a hint as to which username to use? In my application I know which user it wants to authenticate (based on a unique link the user clicked in an e-mail), and I'd like that username to be prefilled in the IdP's username box.
Using SAML 2.0 with Active Directory Federation Services (AD FS) 2.1.
Yes, you can use the optional <saml:Subject> field in the AuthnRequest message sent from the SP to the Idp to request a specific subject from the Idp. See section 3.4.1 in the SAML2 spec.
I have no idea if ADFS respects that field though.