I'm using STM32f103 and in my program, I need to save some bytes in the internal flash memory. But as far as I know, I have to erase a whole page to write in it, which will take time.
This delay causes my display to blink.
Can anybody help me to save my data without consuming so much time?
Here is a list that may help:
1- MCU: STM32f103
2- IDE: Keil vision
3- using HAL driver provided by STM32CubeMx
4- sample data for saving in Flash: {0x53, 0xa0, 0x01, 0x54}
In the link below, you can find the code that I'm using.
FLASH_PAGE for Keil
The code you provide doesn't seem to be implemented well. It basically does 2 things each time you initiate a write operation:
Erase the page (this is the part that takes time)
Start form the given pointer, write until it hits a zero.
This is a very ineffective way of using the flash.
Probably the simplest and the most well-known way is to use the method described in ST's AN2594, although it has some limitations.
Still, at some point a page erase will be necessary regardless the method you use and there is no way to avoid some delay, unless your uC supports dual flash banks (STM32F103 don't have this feature). You need to plan the timing of flash writes and display refresh accordingly. If you need periodic writes to the flash, there is probably some high level error in your design.
To solve this problem, I used another library that STM itself presented. I had to include "eeprom.h" into your project and then add "eeprom.c" to it. You can easily find these files on the Internet.
Related
I've been researching about memory segmentation, and it's been giving me lots of ideas for potential ways in which user code could benefit from swapping out segment registers. Specifically, I am interested in the x86-64 architecture because that's what I have.
Is there any way in which a user-mode program can create a new segment, for internal use?
To what extent can a program configure its own address space?
I imagine the GDT is way outside of a process' reach, but can a process modify the LDT?
Sorry if I sound naive, this is new stuff for me.
I also imagine that, if there even is a way to do this, it will almost certainly pass through OS specific functions. How would one do this in, say, Win32? I have found GetThreadSelectorEntry (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-getthreadselectorentry), but I haven't been able to find the equivalent SetThreadSelectorEntry.
I am trying to make some custom firmware for a MIDI controller (AKAI LPD8).
There is an STM32F102R8T6 chip in the unit.
I am trying to reach it with a programmer to wipe it, but it seems to not be responsive.
Some information and thing I have tried:
The firmware that came with the unit works, so the chip is not broken
Removed the components connected to the programming pins (PA9-PA10 and PA13-PA14)
I am able to pull BOOT0 high and have it not run the main program, but I am however not able to get a life sign using either an ST-Link2(clone) connected to PA13/14, nor a USB to serial adapter connected to PA9/PA10, so I am not sure what mode it is in
The connection has been checked, and RX-TX etc is the correct way around (but also for the sake of trying it all, I reversed the connections as well...).
Tried both the STM32CubeProgrammer and stm32flash, but none connects.
I am actually not sure if AKAI have locked the chip in such a way that you cannot even do a full chip erase and use the chip for something new? The NRST pin is strangely not doing anything to the running of the firmware either when I try to pull it low.
Is there a way to reprogram these chips when they come off of a commercial product, or are they permanently locked?
Any solution/tips?
Many of the STM32 parts have "proprietary code read-out protection" (google PCROP) which but you might be lucky and they haven't enabled it in the option bytes. Read the documentation for that and the bootloader documentation and get a good idea of what you expect it to do if it is enabled and if it isn't.
If you have a scope, try watching the SWD/JTAG pins to see if there is any response from the device. (If you aren't even sure if it is in reset then scope the crystal if there is one).
If you haven't got a scope, you might be able to to verify what it is doing by seeing if it sets the pins and pull-resistors to how they would be expected to be in the bootloader mode, eg: UART TX should be high if it is enabled, even it it isn't transmitting anything. Put a strong pull-down (~1k) on there and see if it still reads high.
After hours of trying different ways of making it work (also tried the alternate mapping of the UART port), and probed the TX pin as suggested by Tom V to no avail, I have given up working on that specific chip and ordered an upgrade from the STM32F4 family instead to replace it with. A lot more power and useful peripherals.
A bit of a non-answer to the specific question. Frustrating to not have found out what was wrong (chip or approach) but being mindful of the sunk cost fallacy, I think it was best to just replace the chip with a fresh one and start development from there.
I have a 600W digital step up converter with broken STM8S103K3T6C and another that is currently working OK. Is there a way to copy (dump) firmware from the working one and upload it to the new chip. Since I have only one working, I have to be extra careful not to damage the working controller. I do have some basic experience with STM32, but I am grateful for any help I could get. I have a copy of ST-Link v2 programmer. Apparently (if there is a way), it has to be done via SWIM (which I don't nothing about, started reading few days ago). Not sure what is the proper way to start. Converter itself has UART pins at the right side of the board.
Thanks in advance.
if the chip is not locked, yes it's possible using SWIM interface. use STVP tool to extract firmware from the old one or to program it to the new one. it is bundled in a package called "ST toolset" for STM8 and downloadable from ST website. the SWIM needs 1 pin (plus reset if target uses that pin). despite that the STM8s hvae 3~5V supply, it's better to use 3.3V supply for it for the sake of the other circuitry. you can extract it even when the device is on, so there's no need to connect a supply pin from programmer to it.
After searching for a veeery long time (more then 3 months) in all the main places where to get info and reading the datasheet of the chip I would like to ask the STM32 specialists inhere if there is a example for using the ADC maybe with DMA from the arduino IDE. I did see some incomplete parts inhere and for other compiler/IDE environments. But maybe i did not strike the good luck of finding the right info (that even i can understand) yet for what i need.
Your help is much appreciated.
I want to sample audio data, one channel 30KHz plus, 12 bits and each time 16 samples are taken an interrupt to handle the data that is in an array.
I have seen the pigOscope code (it uses analogread) and the info about analogread where there is stated this command is not meant for higher sampling speeds So that got me sort of into conflict with myself .... Who can break me out of my endless brainloop .....?;
Greetings ... Eric.
I have seen the pigOscope code (it uses analogread)
I wrote the Pig-o-scope code, with a lot of input from others at stm32duinocom and if you take the time to read the code, which I will grant you is somewhat simplistic, you will discover that analogRead is only used to trigger. The code uses DMA to do the high speed transfer.
I completely agree with the comment that you dont't need the Arduino IDE, you could "borrow" the DMA code and tailor it to your needs. However if you want a quick and dirty coding and prototyping environment, then there is nothing wrong with using the Arduino IDE. Take a trip to the stm32duino.com site, and you will see that I along with a lot of the other developers use the Arduino IDE, and Eclipse, and Atollic, and roll our own batch files, use vi, etc etc.
It all depends on what you are trying to do, and in many cases using the Arduino IDE gets you to working result a lot faster than learning an entire new IDE, just for one task.
But then again, I'm firmly on the side of vi in the vi/emacs wars, so what the heck do I know. Just don't use nano. ;¬)
I need help, I'm desperate
During two weeks I have been working in my project, this uses serial port communication (a PIC serial board). I got to set the connection up, but I can not get data from the COM port. I've read some forums and the cause of the problem seems to be the incomplete implementation of System.IO.Ports class.
When I try to get data of the COM port, the event SerialDataReceivedEventHandler (represents the method that will handle the DataReceived event of a SerialPort object.) is not called or activated. I tried to resolve it but I don't find a definitive solution. I thought to prove a external DLL, but a friend told me that the problem will go on, in fact I did it and got the same problem: SerialDataReceivedEventHandler does not work. Also, someone recommended me using a secondary thread, although I don´t understand how to do it at all.
I wrote a program in visual C# and everything works fine. I'm intrigued.
I need to find a solution, some idea or good documentation. If there's someone knows something about it, help me please.
I need to understand the cause of this to continue.
Unity is based on Mono, and Mono doesn't implement completely the Serial class, in particular there are no notifications implemented (such as SerialDataReceivedEvent).
That's why it works in Visual Studio, and not in Unity.
Here are the differences between the Mono and complete .NET implementation of the Serial class :
Extract from http://www.mono-project.com/archived/howtosystemioports/#limitations
"Limitations
At the time of this writing, there are a a few limitations that one must take note:
1) There is no event notification for received serial data. If you want to receive data, one must set a timeout and watch for received data by polling ReadByte() when you think there might be data.
2) One must Read data in byte[] format only – there is no char[] support. You must do your own reading of bytes and translate that into your encoding.
3) DiscardNull, ParityReplace, ReceivedBytesThreshold are not implemented."
I think it happens because the Unity is based on Mono instead of .Net, and a pretty old version of it. You couldn't use Linq on iOS devices for a long time because of AOT bugs, and the localisation implementation is buggy (or at least it was in the previous versions of Unity I tried to work with). I wasn't even able to find the source of System.IO.Ports in the source of Unity's Mono fork, so it's surprising it compiles at all.