im using
integration toolkit for each external system ... externalService
definition, Servers registation datas, ENV refers the J2C creds to use, datamapping, bussines-errors handling etc.
(Bussines-Layer TK ex. TK_SAP)
for the common functionality such as logging, tokenizing,
pseudomizing, common http-error handling i want to use another one
toolkit (Generic implementation for Transport-layer ex. TK_COM).
So its looks like this dependicies chain:
ProcessApp -> TK_SAP -> TK_COM
There is the serviceFlow with inputs externalServiceName, operationName and a serviceFlow ask for oAuth-token and call to target system using externalServiceName, operationName.
The problem is - when i try to invoke the BPMRESTRequest from TK_COM, i get NullPointerException because "externalServiceName" cant be resolved.
var request = new BPMRESTRequest();
request.externalServiceName = "language-translator-v2";
request.operationName="checkout";
...
var response = tw.system.invokeREST(request);
is it possible to store service definition in another TK (upper) and refer it from Toolkit-invoker?
Or is there callbacks for BPMRESTRequest-Construct to say which ServiceDefinition must be used and avoid NPE.
Or another way to call Rest programmaticaly supporting Environments.
Im understand that switching the layers can help (serviceDefinition in lower TK-dependency), but it unlogisch is:
ProcessApp -> TK_COM -> TK_SAP
the answer is: JS-lib implementation.
Implementing common functionality as JS-Server-file in TK_COM makes that a call to it from TK_SAP will instatiate JS-execution context in the TK_SAP namespace so all defined in TK_SAP externalServices and variables will be accesible by executing of JS-code (actualy provided by lower-dependency Toolkit)
Related
I am currently deploying multiple application instances through the FabricClient. A simple implementation of this would be:
var appDesc = new ApplicationDescription(new Uri(appName), appType, appVersion);
await fabricClient.ApplicationManager.CreateApplicationAsync(appDesc);
Whenever this code is executed the new application is started with its default parameters. It is possible to add name value pairs to the ApplicationDescription through its constructor. I would prefer to use the ApplicationParameters.xml files however. Is there a way to specify the new application to use an ApplicationParameters.xml file for its parameters?
Try creating the application with the ApplicationDescription(Uri, String, String, NameValueCollection) overload.
The last parameter is the list of parameters passed to the application.
We are implementing the updater service using the install4j APIs (without using the Updater.exe). We could successfully use the APIs as below to get the possible update version
UpdateCheckRequest updateCheckRequest = new UpdateCheckRequest(updatesUrl).applicationDisplayMode(ApplicationDisplayMode.UNATTENDED)
.askForProxy(false).connectTimeout(10000).readTimeout(20000);
UpdateDescriptor updateDescriptor = UpdateChecker.getUpdateDescriptor(updateCheckRequest);
return updateDescriptor.getPossibleUpdateEntry();
However, we are missing the below JVM arguments, (to set proxy settings and enable logging) which are available in the updater screens.
-Dinstall4j.noProxyAutoDetect=true
-DproxySet=true
-DproxyHost= “”,
-DproxyPort=””
-DproxyAuth="true"
-DproxyAuthUser=””
-DproxyAuthPassword=””
-Dinstall4j.keepLog=true -Dinstall4j.alternativeLogfile=${installer:sys.installationDir}/logs/patch-agent-updater.log
Please let us know how to pass them to the custom updater ?
In this case the update checker runs in the same process, so you can set these properties via System.setProperty.
I am using a zf2 module called GoalioRememberMe and now I want to override its service by my customized service. Or if it is not possible, I want to override the Module.php with my config. Is it possible?
In the Application module. I wrote this line in module.config.php:
'GoalioRememberMe\Service\RememberMe' => 'Application\Service\RememberMe'
Thanks in advance!
This is exactly the reason it is recommended to name the service as the type of the object that is returned. The object GoalioRememberMe\Service\RememberMe is named goaliorememberme_rememberme_service in the service manager. You can check that here.
So the solution is simple, instead of this:
'GoalioRememberMe\Service\RememberMe' => 'Application\Service\RememberMe'
Write this
'goaliorememberme_rememberme_service' => 'Application\Service\RememberMe'
As Jurian said, the service name is goaliorememberme_rememberme_service and it has been set in the getServiceConfig() method. So I wrote this code in the Module.php file in the Application Module:
$serviceManager->
setAllowOverride(true)->
setInvokableClass('goaliorememberme_rememberme_service', 'Application\Service\CustomRememberMe')->
setAllowOverride(false);
And it replaced successfully with my customized service!
Thanks very much to Jurian for the big help!
Actually the service manager first runs a method "canonicalizeName()" which "normalizes" the names as follows:
All _ / \ and - are stripped out
The key is made lowercase
Thus both "GoalioRememberMe\Service\RememberMe" and "goaliorememberme_rememberme_service" become "goalioremembermeremembermeservice" (i.e. they're both the same), thus the error message.
The quickest way to override an existing service is to create a *local.php or *global.php file in the /config/autoload folder. (That folder is identified in config/application.config.php.) Any override files in this folder are process after modules are loaded. If you have duplicate service manager keys, the last one wins.
In my project, there are additional (non-wicket) applications, which need to know the URL representation of some domain objects (e.g. in order to write a link like http://mydomain.com/user/someUserName/ into a notification email).
Now I'd like to create a spring bean in my wicket module, exposing the URLs I need without having a running wicket context, in order to make the other application depend on the wicket module, e.g. offering a method public String getUrlForUser(User u) returning "/user/someUserName/".
I've been stalking around the web and through the wicket source for a complete workday now, and did not find a way to retrieve the URL for a given PageClass and PageParameters without a current RequestCycle.
Any ideas how I could achieve this? Actually, all the information I need is somehow stored by my WebApplication, in which I define mount points and page classes.
Update: Because the code below caused problems under certain circumstances (in our case, being executed subsequently by a quarz scheduled job), I dived a bit deeper and finally found a more light-weight solution.
Pros:
No need to construct and run an instance of the WebApplication
No need to mock a ServletContext
Works completely independent of web application container
Contra (or not, depends on how you look at it):
Need to extract the actual mounting from your WebApplication class and encapsulate it in another class, which can then be used by standalone processes. You can no longer use WebApplication's convenient mountPage() method then, but you can easily build your own convenience implementation, just have a look at the wicket sources.
(Personally, I have never been happy with all the mount configuration making up 95% of my WebApplication class, so it felt good to finally extract it somewhere else.)
I cannot post the actual code, but having a look at this piece of code will give you an idea how you should mount your pages and how to get hold of the URL afterwards:
CompoundRequestMapper rm = new CompoundRequestMapper();
// mounting the pages
rm.add(new MountedMapper("mypage",MyPage.class));
// ... mount other pages ...
// create URL from page class and parameters
Class<? extends IRequestablePage> pageClass = MyPage.class;
PageParameters pp = new PageParameters();
pp.add("param1","value1");
IRequestHandler handler = new BookmarkablePageRequestHandler(new PageProvider(MyPage.class, pp));
Url url = rm.mapHandler(handler);
Original solution below:
After deep-diving into the intestines of the wicket sources, I was able to glue together this piece of code
IRequestMapper rm = MyWebApplication.get().getRootRequestMapper();
IRequestHandler handler = new BookmarkablePageRequestHandler(new PageProvider(pageClass, parameters));
Url url = rm.mapHandler(handler);
It works without a current RequestCycle, but still needs to have MyWebApplication running.
However, from Wicket's internal test classes, I have put the following together to construct a dummy instance of MyWebApplication:
MyWebApplication dummy = new MyWebApplication();
dummy.setName("test-app");
dummy.setServletContext(new MockServletContext(dummy, ""));
ThreadContext.setApplication(dummy);
dummy.initApplication();
I have been sitting with a problem for quite a while now and I just can't seem to find what I'm missing.
I have written a custom trace listener component for Enterprise Library 5.0 for the Logging application block which works but the configured ILogFormatter just won't resolve and so I always end up with the basic string text when it gets handled by my component.
I saw in the enterprise library source code that they use the "Container.ResolvedIfNotNull()" method. It doesn't seem to work for me. I need it to write out a custom formatted string for my component to use. You know, not just the message but the timestamp, machinename, threadId, etc.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to fix this?
Thanks in advance.
Like I've mentioned on this site: http://entlib.codeplex.com/discussions/261749
When you create your CreationExpression in the TraceListener data class make sure you have a flat constructor definition. To put it in other words, don't return:
() => new MyTraceListener(new TraceListenerConfig(..., Container.ResolvedIfNotNull<ILogFormatter>(), ...));
just have it in the constructor of the MyTraceListener:
() => new MyTraceListener(..., Container.ResolvedIfNotNull<ILogFormatter>(), ...);