I'm in the process of upgrading from Yocto Sumo to Yocto Dunfell. In this process there's quite a few packages getting added to the rootfs that wasn't there before and which I don't have use for. I would like to know why they are added? Which dependency triggers them to get added?
In previous versions of Yocto there was a pn-depends.dot file which provided this information. This has now been removed. All that is left is a task-depends.dot which I guess I should use, however it is harder to read as it lists dependencies between individual tasks and doesn't show why a certain package is added to the rootfs. The command bitbake -g <image-name> -u taskexp makes it slightly easier to read the file but it is still hard to understand as package names are not always the same as task names.
What is the preferred solution to get an answer to "why is included in my rootfs?"
Related
I am writing a bitbake recipe to deploy a third party pre-built tool, similar to this wiki page: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/TipsAndTricks/Packaging_Prebuilt_Libraries
However, I have a Release and Debug pre-build versions of the tool available as *.so files. How do I distinguish inside the recipe which one of both build types I shall deploy?
Thanks and regards,
Martin
You can have two different virtual recipes each with their own .so file. This then warrants a selection in a configuration file (with PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/my-recipe), so either in a machine or distro configuration file. This is probably preferred if you consider having release and debug distros.
A second option is to install the libraries in two different paths, in two different PACKAGES (use FILES_my-package for that) and make them RCONFLICTS_my-package each other to be sure they can't both be in the rootfs. After that, you could write a pkg_postinst_my-package() task specific to each package that actually move the library from the "different" path to the intended one. This will be run both at build time when creating the rootfs and at runtime on first boot, so you need to make sure to exclude one or the other (it's usually done by checking if ${D} exists, which does at build time but not runtime).
c.f.: http://docs.yoctoproject.org/dev-manual/dev-manual-common-tasks.html#post-installation-scripts
If you can manage to have both libraries installed in your rootfs and select the one you want with the LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, a simple recipe, with two packages with each library in a different location, will be sufficient.
I need ldd utility in my final image of yocto. When I needed usbutils before, I went ahead and added the line in ../build/conf/local.conf file
CORE_IMAGE_EXTRA_INSTALL += "usbutils"
After searching around I came to see that ldd is part of the libc-bin package, atleast on my Ubuntu machine. But after reading this, I see that it is in eglibs recipe and not part of the standard package. Adding libc-bin similar to usbutils threw a Nothing RPROVIDES libc-bin error which is understandable.
What are the steps I take to get ldd onto my image if I need to add eglibs recipe. If not, is there another way I can do this.
Please bear with me, still a newbie with yocto and bitbake.
How to add "ldd" to your image depends on the used C library.
In case of glibc:
At least for the current "zeus" version the glibc recipes provide a separate ldd package, see: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-core/glibc/glibc-package.inc?h=zeus#n27
In case of musl:
At least for the current "zeus" version the musl package itself provides ldd, see: https://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/tree/meta/recipes-core/musl/musl_git.bb?h=zeus#n91
Adding packages to your image can be done in various ways but I would recommend to use
IMAGE_INSTALL_append. For more info in this topic please consult the YoctoProject manual: https://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/mega-manual/mega-manual.html#usingpoky-extend-customimage.
I have a simple CMake find module I've written, for a library of mine used by other projects. It's pretty simplistic, with its full text available here. Mainly there's one find_path() and one find_library(), and then some variables are set.
Now, I want CMake, when trying to find my package, to fall back on:
git-cloning or downloading the package/library from its GitHub repository,
Unpacking the archive, if it was a download
Building the package, either be using the running CMake itself somehow (the package has its own CMakeLists.txt), or by running an arbitrary shell command in the directory into which the packages was downloaded/cloned
The specifics of what happens post-download are less important to me than actually having a download fall-back.
How can I / how should I make this happen?
Notes:
Of course if the download/git clone fails, than finding the package has failed.
No need to worry about specific versions at the repo, although you can if you want to.
I am working on an embedded project on Zedboard. I would like (at least for now) to use Bitbake only to produce proper rootfs. I use recipe core-image-minimal, as I need only limited amount of staff there. How can I "tell" it to not compile kernel, not make u-boot, etc. and focus on rootfs only?
Here is what I've done so far:
Created my build environment
Downloaded needed layers
Modified local.conf to add needed packages to rootfs
Then after typing
bitbake core-image-minimal
I get my rootfs, and all this unnecessary staff. How can I avoid it?
I recently had the same need to only build the rootfs with yocto, skipping other things such as kernel, uboot, image creation etc. There are many legitimate reasons to do so. Anyways, this is what you have to do:
bitbake core-image-minimal -c image_cpio
in krogoth, this will populate the rootfs directory in build/tmp/work/$MACHINE/core-image-minimal/1.0-r0/ and create a rootfs.cpio file in build/tmp/deploy/images/$MACHINE/
in morty, the rootfs.cpio archives seem to be in build/tmp/work/$MACHINE/core-image-minimal/1.0-r0/deploy-core-image-minimal-image-complete/
Interesting concept. However, from what I observed, Yocto must get the defconfig in kernel and u-boot to do configuration on the image itself. Therefore, removing the process will make rootfs not bootable.
These happened for me a lot of time since I used different kernels to compile for different machines. I thought that the ARM image will be the same and will work for all machine but I was wrong.
For Debian, the image compiled need to use kernel's corresponding configuration to compile the rootfs for it to work. And Yocto is the same.
bitbake -e |grep IMAGE_FSTYPE
will give you something like:
IMAGE_FSTYPES="tar.gz cpio cpio.gz.u-boot ...."
it's a list of all the image that will be generated, to remove the undesired ones, in the local.conf file use:
IMAGE_FSTYPES_remove = " cpio cpio.gz.u-boot"
the space before the first element it's not optional.
Regards
If you don't want to build a kernel set the preferred provider of virtual/kernel to 'linux-dummy'.
I am creating rpm for apc. While writing spec file, I realized that some commands may have path which can keep on changing which are required during the compilation time. For eg. these commands are required to be executed during the building time.
$ /usr/local/php/bin/phpize
$ ./configure --with-php-config=/usr/local/php/bin/php-config
But the complete path of phpize and php-config file may change. So how can i prevent this dependencies so that i should not hard-code these path in my spec file.
Because these commands are used at building time, the ideal solution to this problem is here:
Find packages on distribution which provide these commands or paths e.g php-config is provided by php-devel package on Fedora operating system. In fedora you can find it using yum whatprovides "*/php-config" or if they are already installed on system then using rpm -qf /path/to/command.
Once you know the packages add them as BuildRequire tag in spec file. Step 2 will make sure that paths are always present whenever you build the package from spec file even if you use hard coded paths (which isn't ofcourse best way to do it).
In place of /usr/ you can use %{_prefix}, it depends entirely on macros available on distribution you are building this rpm on. Check macro files for path macros. One link which has common macro definitions is here.