I am trying to map a certain value of a column based on its count on another table. If the count of [Location] i.e a column of IMPORT.DATA_SCRAP table in each row. For now for location static value i.e Utah and Kathmandu is supplied for test purpose only is equal to 1, then only i need to get the result in the select statement i.e only single value expression must be returned but here n rows of table with value is returned.
For. eg. In the below query,total rows of IMPORT.DATA_SCRAP gets returned, i only need the single first row value in my case.
I came to know whether cursor or CTE will acheive my result but i am unable to figure it out.
Here,
select
case
when
((SELECT COUNT(stateName) FROM Location.tblState where stateName = 'Utah')=1)
then (select stateName, CountryName from Location.tblState where stateName= 'Utah')
end as nameof
from IMPORT.DATA_SCRAP
The relation between country, state, city is as below:
select
case
when
((SELECT COUNT(cityName) FROM Location.tblCity where cityName = 'Kathmandu')=1)
then (select ct.countryName from Location.tblCity c
inner join Location.tblState s
on c.stateID = s.StateID
inner join Location.tblCountry ct
on ct.countryId = s.CountryId
where c.cityName = 'Kathmandu'
)
end as nameof
from IMPORT.DATA_SCRAP
How can i return only a single value expresion despite of multiple nmax rows of IMPORT.DATA_SCRAP row in the result.
If i comment out the -- from IMPORT.DATA_SCRAP in the above query i would get the desired single result expression in my case, but unable how can i acheive it in other ways or suggest me the appropriate way to do these types of situation.
Related
I am trying to update a column in one database with a query:
Here the query
and this is the output i think it is impossible to asign a query to a field but what is the solution for that plz.
enter image description here
= can be used when we are pretty sure that the subquery returns only 1 value.
When we are not sure whether subquery returns more than 1 value, we will have to use IN to accommodate all values or simply use TOP 1 to limit the equality matching to one value:
UPDATE mascir_fiche SET partner = (SELECT TOP 1 id FROM hr_employee WHERE parent_id IN (SELECT id FROM hr_employee));
With Limit:
UPDATE mascir_fiche SET artner = (SELECT id FROM hr_employee WHERE parent_id IN (SELECT id FROM hr_employee) limit 1);
I'm trying to decipher another programmer's code who is long-gone, and I came across a select statement in a stored procedure that looks like this (simplified) example:
SELECT #Table2.Col1, Table2.Col2, Table2.Col3, MysteryColumn = CASE WHEN y.Col3 IS NOT NULL THEN #Table2.MysteryColumn - y.Col3 ELSE #Table2.MysteryColumn END
INTO #Table1
FROM #Table2
LEFT OUTER JOIN (
SELECT Table3.Col1, Table3.Col2, Col3 = SUM(#Table3.Col3)
FROM Table3
INNER JOIN #Table4 ON Table4.Col1 = Table3.Col1 AND Table4.Col2 = Table3.Col2
GROUP BY Table3.Col1, Table3.Col2
) AS y ON #Table2.Col1 = y.Col1 AND #Table2.Col2 = y.Col2
WHERE #Table2.Col2 < #EnteredValue
My question, what does the fourth column of the primary selection do? does it produce a boolean value checking to see if the values are equal? or does it set the #Table2.MysteryColumn equal to some value and then inserts it into #Table1? Or does it just update the #Table2.MysteryColumn and not output a value into #Table1?
This same thing seems to happen inside of the sub-query on the third column, and I am equally at a loss as to what that does as well.
MysteryColumn = gives the expression a name also called a column alias. The fact that a column in the table#2 also has the same name is besides the point.
Since it uses INTO syntax it also gives the column its name in the resulting temporary table. See the SELECT CLAUSE and note | column_alias = expression and the INTO CLAUSE
I have a table of Verticals which have names, except one of them is called 'Other'. My task is to return a list of all Verticals, sorted in alpha order, except with 'Other' at the end. I have done it with two queries, like this:
String sqlMost = "SELECT * from core.verticals WHERE name != 'Other' order by name";
String sqlOther = "SELECT * from core.verticals WHERE name = 'Other'";
and then appended the second result in my code. Is there a way to do this in a single query, without modifying the table? I tried using UNION
(select * from core.verticals where name != 'Other' order by name)
UNION (select * from core.verticals where name = 'Other');
but the result was not ordered at all. I don't think the second query is going to hurt my execution time all that much, but I'm kind of curious if nothing else.
UNION ALL is the usual way to request a simple concatenation; without ALL an implicit DISTINCT is applied to the combined results, which often causes a sort. However, UNION ALL isn't required to preserve the order of the individual sub-results as a simple concatenation would; you'd need to ORDER the overall UNION ALL expression to lock down the order.
Another option would be to compute an integer order-override column like CASE WHEN name = 'Other' THEN 2 ELSE 1 END, and ORDER BY that column followed by name, avoiding the UNION entirely.
I have the next query which does not work:
UPDATE item
SET popularity= (CASE
WHEN (select SUM(io.quantity) from item i NATURAL JOIN itemorder io GROUP BY io.item_id) > 3 THEN TRUE
ELSE FALSE
END);
Here I want to compare each line of inner SELECT SUM value with 3 and update popularity. But SQL gives error:
ERROR: more than one row returned by a subquery used as an expression
I understand that inner SELECT returns many values, but can smb help me in how to compare each line. In other words make loop.
When using a subquery you need to get a single row back, so you're effectively doing a query for each record in the item table.
UPDATE item i
SET popularity = (SELECT SUM(io.quantity) FROM itemorder io
WHERE io.item_id = i.item_id) > 3;
An alternative (which is a postgresql extension) is to use a derived table in a FROM clause.
UPDATE item i2
SET popularity = x.orders > 3
FROM (select i.item_id, SUM(io.quantity) as orders
from item i NATURAL JOIN itemorder io GROUP BY io.item_id)
as x(item_id,orders)
WHERE i2.item_id = x.item_id
Here you're doing a single group clause as you had, and we're joining the table to be updated with the results of the group.
How I can know cursor size (numbers of results)?
c CURSOR IS SELECT foo FROM mytable WHERE name='ok';
In my understanding, a cursor is NOT the result. You can use a cursor to GET your results row by row, and at the end of this row by row operations, you know how many results you got.
To know how many records you will (possibly) get, you can use a
select count(*) from ... where ...
assuming you have an index on column name, you could also write:
select count(name) from foo where name = 'ok'
If you want to obtain the total number of results without issuing a separate count query, you can:
SELECT count(1) OVER (), ... FROM ... WHERE ...
The count will be unaffected by ORDER/LIMIT clauses.