Is there a way I can find how many records got processed into downstream delta table for each micro-batch. I've streaming job, which runs hourly once using trigger.once() with the append mode. For audit purpose, I want to know how many records got processed for each micro batch. I've tried the below code to print the count of records processed(shown in the second line).
ss_count=0
def write_to_managed_table(micro_batch_df, batchId):
#print(f"inside foreachBatch for batch_id:{batchId}, rows in passed dataframe: {micro_batch_df.count()}")
ss_count = micro_batch_df.count()
saveloc = "TABLE_PATH"
df_final.writeStream.trigger(once=True).foreachBatch(write_to_managed_table).option('checkpointLocation', f"{saveloc}/_checkpoint").start(saveloc)
print(ss_count)
Streaming job will run without any issues but micro_batch_df.count() will not print any count.
Any pointers would be much appreciated.
Here is a working example of what you are looking for (structured_steaming_example.py):
from pyspark.sql import SparkSession
spark = SparkSession \
.builder \
.appName("StructuredStreamTesting") \
.getOrCreate()
# Create DataFrame representing the stream of input
df = spark.read.parquet("data/")
lines = spark.readStream.schema(df.schema).parquet("data/")
def batch_write(output_df, batch_id):
print("inside foreachBatch for batch_id:{0}, rows in passed dataframe: {1}".format(batch_id, output_df.count()))
save_loc = "/tmp/example"
query = (lines.writeStream.trigger(once=True)
.foreachBatch(batch_write)
.option('checkpointLocation', save_loc + "/_checkpoint")
.start(save_loc)
)
query.awaitTermination()
The sample parquet file is attached. Please put that in the data folder and execute the code using spark-submit
spark-submit --master local structured_steaming_example.py
Please put any sample parquet file under data folder for testing.
Related
I have several tasks of streaming tables in pyspark (running on Databricks).
For the most part, it looks something like this:
stream = (
spark
.readStream
.option("maxFilesPerTrigger", 20)
.table("my_table")
)
transformed_df = stream.transform(some_function)
_ = (
transformed_df
.writeStream
.trigger(availableNow=True)
.outputMode("append")
.option("checkpointLocation", "/path/to/_checkpoints/output_table/input_table/")
.foreachBatch(lambda df, epochId: batch_writer(df, epochId, "output_table"))
.start()
.awaitTermination()
)
This works as expected and I can see each batch commit and offset in the checkpoints path. The problem is that, on occasion, the stream writer will just carry on (no new data coming in) and I can see the commit and offset go into the thousands. If I stop the job, it does not do it again and then later again.
I am running Pyspark on Databricks (Apapche Spark 3.2.1, Scala 2.12).
Should I do a check like if len(transformed_df.take(1)) > 0: # write stream? I suspect this will almost always be true and the stream is only determined at write.
Trying to write auto partitioned Dataframe data on an attribute to external store in append mode overwrites the parquet files.
I have a huge amount of data that I cannot load in one go. So I am reading data a folder at a time in a loop. In every iteration, I partition the data based on a certain attribute and use saveAsTable to write the parquet files on Amazon S3. I am finding that my s3 folder is getting wiped out at every iteration. I want to add on the data from every iteration to my hive store in partitioned folders, so I can categorize the data and can read only the category I want to work on.
This is the command I am using to save the dataframe.
DF.write.partitionBy('Type').format('parquet').mode("append").saveAsTable(('AllComponents', path='s3a://xxx/<Path>')
for Pos1 in HexKey:
folderKey = "{}".format(Pos1)
spark = SparkSession.builder \
.getOrCreate()
if DataSetSchema is None:
log.warn("Reviewing schema")
AllComponentsDF = spark.read \
.format('com.databricks.spark.xml') \
.load('s3a://location' + folderKey + '0/00/*')
DataSetSchema = AllComponentsDF.schema
else:
log.warn("Reading folder {}".format(Pos1))
AllComponentsDF = spark.read \
.format('com.databricks.spark.xml') \
.load('s3a://location/' + folderKey + '0/00/*', schema=DataSetSchema)
AllComponentsDF.write.partitionBy('Type').format('parquet').mode("append").saveAsTable(('AllComponents', path='s3a://spark-cluster-boomi/AllComponents')
I am using Spark 2.1.0 and Kafka 0.9.0.
I am trying to push the output of a batch spark job to kafka. The job is supposed to run every hour but not as streaming.
While looking for an answer on the net I could only find kafka integration with Spark streaming and nothing about the integration with the batch job.
Does anyone know if such thing is feasible ?
Thanks
UPDATE :
As mentioned by user8371915, I tried to follow what was done in Writing the output of Batch Queries to Kafka.
I used a spark shell :
spark-shell --packages org.apache.spark:spark-sql-kafka-0-10_2.11:2.1.0
Here is the simple code that I tried :
val df = Seq(("Rey", "23"), ("John", "44")).toDF("key", "value")
val newdf = df.select(to_json(struct(df.columns.map(column):_*)).alias("value"))
newdf.write.format("kafka").option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092").option("topic", "alerts").save()
But I get the error :
java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaSourceProvider does not allow create table as select.
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
at org.apache.spark.sql.execution.datasources.DataSource.write(DataSource.scala:497)
at org.apache.spark.sql.DataFrameWriter.save(DataFrameWriter.scala:215)
... 50 elided
Have any idea what is this related to ?
Thanks
tl;dr You use outdated Spark version. Writes are enabled in 2.2 and later.
Out-of-the-box you can use Kafka SQL connector (the same as used with Structured Streaming). Include
spark-sql-kafka in your dependencies.
Convert data to DataFrame containing at least value column of type StringType or BinaryType.
Write data to Kafka:
df
.write
.format("kafka")
.option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", server)
.save()
Follow Structured Streaming docs for details (starting with Writing the output of Batch Queries to Kafka).
If you have a dataframe and you want to write it to a kafka topic, you need to convert columns first to a "value" column that contains data in a json format. In scala it is
import org.apache.spark.sql.functions._
val kafkaServer: String = "localhost:9092"
val topicSampleName: String = "kafkatopic"
df.select(to_json(struct("*")).as("value"))
.selectExpr("CAST(value AS STRING)")
.write
.format("kafka")
.option("kafka.bootstrap.servers", kafkaServer)
.option("topic", topicSampleName)
.save()
For this error
java.lang.RuntimeException: org.apache.spark.sql.kafka010.KafkaSourceProvider does not allow create table as select.
at scala.sys.package$.error(package.scala:27)
I think you need to parse the message to Key value pair. Your dataframe should have value column.
Let say if you have a dataframe with student_id, scores.
df.show()
>> student_id | scores
1 | 99.00
2 | 98.00
then you should modify your dataframe to
value
{"student_id":1,"score":99.00}
{"student_id":2,"score":98.00}
To convert you can use similar code like this
df.select(to_json(struct($"student_id",$"score")).alias("value"))
I am new to Spark streaming. I am trying structured Spark streaming with local csv files. I am getting the below exception while processing.
Exception in thread "main" org.apache.spark.sql.AnalysisException: Queries with streaming sources must be executed with writeStream.start();;
FileSource[file:///home/Teju/Desktop/SparkInputFiles/*.csv]
This is my code.
val df = spark
.readStream
.format("csv")
.option("header", "false") // Use first line of all files as header
.option("delimiter", ":") // Specifying the delimiter of the input file
.schema(inputdata_schema) // Specifying the schema for the input file
.load("file:///home/Teju/Desktop/SparkInputFiles/*.csv")
val filterop = spark.sql("select tagShortID,Timestamp,ListenerShortID,rootOrgID,subOrgID,first(rssi_weightage(RSSI)) as RSSI_Weight from my_table where RSSI > -127 group by tagShortID,Timestamp,ListenerShortID,rootOrgID,subOrgID order by Timestamp ASC")
val outStream = filterop.writeStream.outputMode("complete").format("console").start()
I created cron job so every 5 mins I will get one input csv file. I am trying to parse through Spark streaming.
(This is not a solution but more a comment, but given its length it ended up here. I'm going to make it an answer eventually right after I've collected enough information for investigation).
My guess is that you're doing something incorrect on df that you have not included in your question.
Since the error message is about FileSource with the path as below and it is a streaming dataset that must be df that's in play.
FileSource[file:///home/Teju/Desktop/SparkInputFiles/*.csv]
Given the other lines I guess that you register the streaming dataset as a temporary table (i.e. my_table) that you then use in spark.sql to execute SQL and writeStream to the console.
df.createOrReplaceTempView("my_table")
If that's correct, the code you've included in the question is incomplete and does not show the reason for the error.
Add .writeStream.start to your df, as the Exception is telling you.
Read the docs for more detail.
I've got a fairly simple job coverting log files to parquet. It's processing 1.1TB of data (chunked into 64MB - 128MB files - our block size is 128MB), which is approx 12 thousand files.
Job works as follows:
val events = spark.sparkContext
.textFile(s"$stream/$sourcetype")
.map(_.split(" \\|\\| ").toList)
.collect{case List(date, y, "Event") => MyEvent(date, y, "Event")}
.toDF()
df.write.mode(SaveMode.Append).partitionBy("date").parquet(s"$path")
It collects the events with a common schema, converts to a DataFrame, and then writes out as parquet.
The problem I'm having is that this can create a bit of an IO explosion on the HDFS cluster, as it's trying to create so many tiny files.
Ideally I want to create only a handful of parquet files within the partition 'date'.
What would be the best way to control this? Is it by using 'coalesce()'?
How will that effect the amount of files created in a given partition? Is it dependent on how many executors I have working in Spark? (currently set at 100).
you have to repartiton your DataFrame to match the partitioning of the DataFrameWriter
Try this:
df
.repartition($"date")
.write.mode(SaveMode.Append)
.partitionBy("date")
.parquet(s"$path")
In Python you can rewrite Raphael's Roth answer as:
(df
.repartition("date")
.write.mode("append")
.partitionBy("date")
.parquet("{path}".format(path=path)))
You might also consider adding more columns to .repartition to avoid problems with very large partitions:
(df
.repartition("date", another_column, yet_another_colum)
.write.mode("append")
.partitionBy("date)
.parquet("{path}".format(path=path)))
The simplest solution would be to replace your actual partitioning by :
df
.repartition(to_date($"date"))
.write.mode(SaveMode.Append)
.partitionBy("date")
.parquet(s"$path")
You can also use more precise partitioning for your DataFrame i.e the day and maybe the hour of an hour range. and then you can be less precise for writer.
That actually depends on the amount of data.
You can reduce entropy by partitioning DataFrame and the write with partition by clause.
I came across the same issue and I could using coalesce solved my problem.
df
.coalesce(3) // number of parts/files
.write.mode(SaveMode.Append)
.parquet(s"$path")
For more information on using coalesce or repartition you can refer to the following spark: coalesce or repartition
Duplicating my answer from here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/53620268/171916
This is working for me very well:
data.repartition(n, "key").write.partitionBy("key").parquet("/location")
It produces N files in each output partition (directory), and is (anecdotally) faster than using coalesce and (again, anecdotally, on my data set) faster than only repartitioning on the output.
If you're working with S3, I also recommend doing everything on local drives (Spark does a lot of file creation/rename/deletion during write outs) and once it's all settled use hadoop FileUtil (or just the aws cli) to copy everything over:
import java.net.URI
import org.apache.hadoop.fs.{FileSystem, FileUtil, Path}
// ...
def copy(
in : String,
out : String,
sparkSession: SparkSession
) = {
FileUtil.copy(
FileSystem.get(new URI(in), sparkSession.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration),
new Path(in),
FileSystem.get(new URI(out), sparkSession.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration),
new Path(out),
false,
sparkSession.sparkContext.hadoopConfiguration
)
}
how about trying running scripts like this as map job consolidating all the parquet files into one:
$ hadoop jar /usr/hdp/2.3.2.0-2950/hadoop-mapreduce/hadoop-streaming-2.7.1.2.3.2.0-2950.jar \
-Dmapred.reduce.tasks=1 \
-input "/hdfs/input/dir" \
-output "/hdfs/output/dir" \
-mapper cat \
-reducer cat