HI there in Mapping data flows and azure data factory. I tried to create data flow in that we used aggregate transformation to group the records, now there is a column called [createddate] now we want to pick the max of created record and out put should show all the columns.
any advice please help me
The Aggregate transformation will only output the columns participating in the aggregation (group by and aggregate function columns). To include all of the columns in the Aggregate output, add a new column pattern to your aggregate (see pic below ... change column1, column2, ... to the names of the columns you are already using in your agg)
Related
I need to store/map one or more data flow parameters to my Sink (Azure SQL Table).
I can fetch other data from a REST Api and is able to map these to my Sink columns (see below). I also need to generate some UUID's as key fields and add these to the same table.
I would like my EmployeeId column to contain my Data Flow Input parameter, e.g. named param_test. In addition to this I need to insert UUID's to other columns which are not part of my REST input fields.
How to I acccomplish that?
You need to use a derived column transformation, and there edit the expression to include the parameters.
derived column transformation
expression builder
Adding to #Chen Hirsh, use the same derived column to get uuid values to the columns after REST API Source.
They will come into sink mapping:
Output:
Any way to do this? Basically trying to do a SQL UPDATE SET function if matching record for one or more key fields exists in another dataset.
Tried using Joins and Merge. Joins seems like more steps and the Merge appends records instead of updating the correlating rows.
Scenario: azure data flow processing bulk records from a csv dataset. for doing dependent jobs at destination sql required a comma separated ids from multiple rows of that csv. Can some one help how to do this.
Tried using derived column step with coalesce, concat functions, didn't get the result looking for.
Use the collect() aggregate function. This will act like a string agg. It was just released last week.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/data-factory/data-flow-expression-functions#collect
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/azure-data-factory/adf-adds-new-hierarchical-data-handling-and-new-flexibility-for/ba-p/1353956
Oversimplified Scenario:
A process which generates monthly data in a s3 file. The number of fields could be different in each monthly run. Based on this data in s3,we load the data to a table and we manually (as number of fields could change in each run with addition or deletion of few columns) run a SQL for few metrics.There are more calculations/transforms on this data,but to have starter Im presenting the simpler version of the usecase.
Approach:
Considering the schema-less nature, as the number of fields in the s3 file could differ in each run with addition/deletion of few fields,which requires manual changes every-time in the SQL, Im planning to explore Spark/Scala, so that we can directly read from s3 and dynamically generate SQL based on the fields.
Query:
How I can achieve this in scala/spark-SQL/dataframe? s3 file contains only the required fields from each run.Hence there is no issue reading the dynamic fields from s3 as it is taken care by dataframe.The issue is how can we generate SQL dataframe-API/spark-SQL code to handle.
I can read s3 file via dataframe and register the dataframe as createOrReplaceTempView to write SQL, but I dont think it helps manually changing the spark-SQL, during addition of a new field in s3 during next run. what is the best way to dynamically generate the sql/any better ways to handle the issue?
Usecase-1:
First-run
dataframe: customer,1st_month_count (here dataframe directly points to s3, which has only required attributes)
--sample code
SELECT customer,sum(month_1_count)
FROM dataframe
GROUP BY customer
--Dataframe API/SparkSQL
dataframe.groupBy("customer").sum("month_1_count").show()
Second-Run - One additional column was added
dataframe: customer,month_1_count,month_2_count) (here dataframe directly points to s3, which has only required attributes)
--Sample SQL
SELECT customer,sum(month_1_count),sum(month_2_count)
FROM dataframe
GROUP BY customer
--Dataframe API/SparkSQL
dataframe.groupBy("customer").sum("month_1_count","month_2_count").show()
Im new to Spark/Scala, would be helpful if you can provide the direction so that I can explore further.
It sounds like you want to perform the same operation over and over again on new columns as they appear in the dataframe schema? This works:
from pyspark.sql import functions
#search for column names you want to sum, I put in "month"
column_search = lambda col_names: 'month' in col_names
#get column names of temp dataframe w/ only the columns you want to sum
relevant_columns = original_df.select(*filter(column_search, original_df.columns)).columns
#create dictionary with relevant column names to be passed to the agg function
columns = {col_names: "sum" for col_names in relevant_columns}
#apply agg function with your groupBy, passing in columns dictionary
grouped_df = original_df.groupBy("customer").agg(columns)
#show result
grouped_df.show()
Some important concepts can help you to learn:
DataFrames have data attributes stored in a list: dataframe.columns
Functions can be applied to lists to create new lists as in "column_search"
Agg function accepts multiple expressions in a dictionary as explained here which is what I pass into "columns"
Spark is lazy so it doesn't change data state or perform operations until you perform an action like show(). This means writing out temporary dataframes to use one element of the dataframe like column as I do is not costly even though it may seem inefficient if you're used to SQL.
we are trying to bring the data from the RDD based on the rows in other RDD.
for example.we have 2 tables with master and transaction data.transaction data has large volumes of sales data, so we like to get sales data only for specific customer and region values,do calculations and save it has file.
table1-CustomerID, regionID
table 2-RegionID,CustomerID,sales,product ID.
Please suggest
You want to join the two RDD's to one with the .join function.
For more see..
http://apachesparkbook.blogspot.com.au/2015/12/join-leftouterjoin-rightouterjoin.html