How to format Status Check Responses in Azure Devops Pull Requests - azure-devops

I have a branch policy that enforces the use of pull requests into a specific branch.
The policy also requires that an external status check is passed, in this case a web hook is triggered by the creation or update of the pull request. The web hook calls a web api which updates the status of the pull request via the devops REST API to set the required state check to succeeded or failed and include a description.
The description posted to the devops REST API is then displayed in the pull request in the event of a filed status check. For example:
I have control of the content of the returned description from the web api endpoint, and I am looking for a way to control the formatting of the displayed message in the pull request. Specifically a way to break the text over multiple lines.
I have tried adding a <br/> (shown above) or \n or \r or even \r\n to the text, all with no success.
Is it possible to do this? is there any parsing of the returned text, maybe to allow the use of something like markdown?

Related

How to assign a pull request using the REST API?

I'm creating a GitHub pull request using the appropriate REST API. Specifying a single assignee or an assignees (using either the user login or GitHub's internal id) has no effect. The pull request will be created, but without an assignee set. There also seems to be no other endpoint to explicitly assign a pull request to a user. Now I'm wondering whether it's possible at all to set the assignee of a pull request using the REST API?
Every pull request is an issue, but not every issue is a pull request.
For this reason, "shared" actions for both features, like manipulating
assignees, labels and milestones, are provided within the Issues API.
From PR Doc
So, you can use Add assignees to an issue API to set an assignee(s) to a pull request After PR is created. You need to know its number, which is in the JSON body of Create Pull Request's response.
/repos/{owner}/{repo}/issues/{issue_number}/assignees
where issue_number is same as pr_number

User for automation instead of personal access token

I have a service hook configured to point to a server which receives a request from Azure Devops every time a pull request is made, which then in turn makes a call to the Azure Devops services REST API to create another pull request.
This second part is done using a PAT (Personal Access Token) for the time being generated from my account. This means that all the pull requests created automatically are made under my name, meaning I receive all the emails and notifications related to this automation.
Is there a way I can create a "fake" identity (without adding an actual user which may authenticate) with a different token which can be used for this automation (opening all pull requests under that identity)?
Is there a way I can create a "fake" identity (without adding an actual user which may authenticate) with a different token which can be used for this automation (opening all pull requests under that identity)?
Short answer is no.
Notification could be setting with three Levels : Origination,project,personal. It is not related with the PAT token.
Based on my experience, the Azure Devops also has no way to know which request is automation or manual way to create PR.
So if you don't want to receive the created PR notification, you could disable it on the personal level.
You also could customize the receive emails with project setting to receive the related information.For more information please refer to this Document.

How do I check if an issue is a pull request?

I'm building a Github App. I receive an issue_comment webhook. Is there any quick way for me to know whether the comment was made in a pull request of not?
From the Issues API docs...
Note: GitHub's REST API v3 considers every pull request an issue, but not every issue is a pull request. For this reason, "Issues" endpoints may return both issues and pull requests in the response. You can identify pull requests by the pull_request key.
You should be able to look at comment["issue"]["pull_request"].

Github Pull Request Checks

Is it possible to create a Github Check for pull requests? I know there are WebHooks, but is there a way to also hook into the UI?
Aim:
Pull Request made. Perform validation and update pull request if valid.
Pull Request merged. Create web call to URL. Update Github issue with confirmation.
What's the best way to do this? Is it only via Web Hooks, API calls and getting write oAuth credentials?
Note: you now (August 2018) officially have the notion of Checks
When checks are set up in a repository, pull requests have a Checks tab where you can view detailed build output from status checks and rerun failed checks.
I know there are WebHooks, but is there a way to also hook into the UI?
The recommended way of doing this is to use required status checks and the Status API, in combination with webhooks:
https://help.github.com/articles/about-required-status-checks/
https://developer.github.com/v3/repos/statuses/
Users set up required status checks on the repository so that merging a pull request is blocked if a specific status isn't success.
At the same time, webhooks trigger an external process when a pull request is updated, and that process creates statuses based on the output of that process. If the process completes successfully, then the process should create a success status which will be shown in the UI and unblock the merging of the pull request.
Is it only via Web Hooks, API calls and getting write oAuth credentials?
In order to create statuses, you will indeed need to authenticate with the credentials of a user that has push access to the repository (e.g. via a token from that user with the right scopes).

Update Code from Git/Bitbucket to live server

How can i update my live server with the changes i made through Git/Bitbucket?
Is there any free service ?
Is it possible to do it with some kind of API which can be integrated with cronjob?
You could use the BitBucket service hooks.
They are illustrated in "Using Bitbucket for Automated Deployments", and that article uses the POST service.
Bitbucket POSTs to the service URL you specify.
The service receives an POST whenever user pushes to the repository.
The content header of the POST has an application/x-www-form-urlencoded type.
This services behaves similarly to an HTTP publish/subscribe service.
The payload has payload= prepended to the actual payload. The payload is url encode content.
The body of POST request contains information about the repository where the change originated, a list of recent commits, and the user that made the push.
Regarding GitHub, see this process which describes how to use the Post-receive hook