I want to config Keycloak to work across multi-tenancy / realms, so how to config client to work across multi-realms?
If you have a client application that is multi-tenant aware and every tenant is mapped to a different realm, different clients within a single realm, or a combination of both, you may want to implement a KeycloakConfigResolver in your client application and keep sepearate configs per client.
Assuming you are using Java and OIDC, check out the adpater documentation for multi-tenent support.
Related
Has anybody connected Kafka and ACL to a Payara/Glassfish server that uses declared security annotations like #DeclaredRoles #RolesAllowed?
I’m interested in the translation/connection from the ACL’s roles to the roles defined in the security realm used in the Payara server.
/Jan
I want the #RolesAllowed to work with the credentials of the calling user
I have setup Keycloak as a SAML broker, and authentication is done by an external IdP provided by the authorities. Users logging in using this IdP are all accepted and all we need from Keycloak is an OAuth token to access our system.
I have tried both the default setup using H2 and running with an external MariaDB.
The external IdP provides us with a full name of the user and a personal ID. Both data are covered by GDPR and I really do not like the sound of storing that data in a database running in the DMZ. Opening up for Keycloak to access a database in the backend is also not a good solution, especially when I do not need users to be stored.
The benefit of running without a database is that I have a simpler DMZ setup as I really do not need to store anything about the users but on the backend.
Do I need a database, and if not how do I run Keycloak without it?
Do I need a database, and if not how do I run Keycloak without it?
Yes, however, out-of-the-box Keycloak runs without having to deploy any external DB. From the Keycloak official documentation section Relational Database Setup one can read:
Keycloak comes with its own embedded Java-based relational database
called H2. This is the default database that Keycloak will use to
persist data and really only exists so that you can run the
authentication server out of the box.
So out-of-the-box you cannot run Keycloak without a DB.
That being said from the same documentation on can read:
We highly recommend that you replace it with a more production ready external database. The H2 database is not very viable in high concurrency situations and should not be used in a cluster either.
So regarding this:
The benefit running without a database is that I have a simpler DMZ
setup as I really do not need to store anything about the users but
on the backend.
You would still be better offer deploying another DB, because Keycloak stores more than just the users information in DB (e.g., realm information, groups, roles and so on).
The external IdP provides us with a full name of the user and a
personal ID. Both data are covered by GDPR and I really do not like
the sound of storing that data in a database running in the DMZ.
Opening up for Keycloak to access a database in the backend is also
not a good solution, especially when I do not need users to be stored.
You can configured that IDP and Keycloak in a manner that the users are not imported to the Keycloak whenever those user authenticate.
Spring Boot - 2.0.0.M3
Spring cloud - Finchley.M1
I want to know if someone is using Spring Cloud config server with both vault and git support in a production setup using Database storage backend.
I have evaluated Spring cloud config using vault and contemplating whether to go for Oracle JCE to encrypt username/pwd or Vault and seek suggestions on the same. we are working on Springboot/microservices.
Following are my findings -
Vault will introduce an additional layer and thus will introduce additional usecases of security, auditing while communicating with Vault.
Spring cloud Config actuator endpoints are broken for the milestone release at this point for generation of encrypted values and /encrypt /decrypt may not work if we go for Oracle JCE support so we generate encrypted values through stable versions.
We do not wish to use consul server and are trying to use Cassandra as Storage backend.
I used Vault Authentication backend using AppRole and generated a Token (different from root token as it's unsafe to use the same) with read permissions. However, Spring Cloud config at the moment support only Token based authentication from client side. That means we first generate token from Vault and then pass it as commandline/env variable.
Some additional points of concern are expiry of token (though we can have non-expiry token not sure about pros/cons), restarts, safety issues, instantiating new microservices. There is no provision of dynamic tokens/authentication at cloud config side.
For milestone release i found that the client side encryption/decryption is not working as of now using recommended inclusion of RSA jar. Here is the ticket i opened.
https://github.com/spring-cloud/spring-cloud-config/issues/805#issuecomment-332491536
These are some of my observations, please share your thoughts if there is any case study/whitepaper that address spring cloud config vault usecases, setup and challenges for production micro-services environment.
Thanks
Thanks for reaching out to me. One think I would state is that the App Role backend utilizes two distinct tokens, and indeed spring-cloud-config-vault does indeed support this functionality, see: http://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-vault/single/spring-cloud-vault.html#_approle_authentication. I leverage vault in the same way I leverage config server, as per the documentation. I don't encrypt any values in my config, I just don't put them there. I put the secret values in vault and let it serve config. As long as keys don't collide, you don't have to mess with anything, otherwise you may need adjust the priority so vault wins, again see the documentation that I pointed to above. I wouldn't mess with encryption/decryption in spring-cloud-config personally. Because you have to check the keys into SCM or distribute them to your teams for local development, you lose the value of having these keys IMO.
Thanks Spring Cloud vault does support but not Spring cloud config with Vault. Only way seems to be passing X-Config-token from Microservice to Config Server. We are bit skeptical with this part of generating tokens manually or through script. Especially with containerization and when new MS instances will be spawn. Not sure about this approach especially in production setup.
We are considering to use the keycloak as our SSO framework.
According to the keycloak documentation for multi-tenancy support the application server should hold all the keycloak.json authentication files, the way to acquire those files is from the keycloak admin, is there a way to get them dynamically via API ? or at least to get the realm public key ? we would like to avoid to manually add this file for each realm to the application server (to avoid downtime, etc).
Another multi-tenancy related question - according to the documentation the same clients should be created for each realm, so if I have 100 realms and 10 clients, I should define the same 10 clients 100 times ? is there an alternative ?
One of our flows is backend micro-service that should be authenticated against an application (defined as keycloak client), we would like to avoid keeping user/psw on the server for security reasons, is there a way that an admin can acquire a token and place it manually on the server file system for that micro service ? is there a option to generate this token in the keycloak UI ?
Thanks in advance.
All Keycloak functionality is available via the admin REST API, so you can automate this. The realm's public key is available via http://localhost:8080/auth/realms/{realm}/
A realm for each tenant will give a tenant-specific login page. Therefore this is the way to go - 10 clients registered 100 times. See more in the chapter Client Registration of the Keycloak documentation. If you don't need specific themes, you can opt to put everything in one realm, but you will lose a lot of flexibility on that path.
If your backend micro service should appear like one (technical) user, you can issue an offline token that doesn't expire. This is the online documentation for offline tokens. Currently there is no admin functionality to retrieve an offline token for a user by an admin. You'll need to build this yourself. An admin can later revoke offline tokens using the given admin API.
I am trying to deploy Orion on my own infrastructure, while using an hosted solution for MongoDB. With the hosting plans that I want to use, it is not possible to have access to the admin database.
Is there any way I can achieve multitenancy without access to the admin database?
I would like to have at least three tenants, but I can live with the fact that they must be created outside of Orion.
Current Orion version (0.22.0) uses admin database to authenticate in the case of multitenant. However, a workaround is possible: to set up different contextBroker processes (each one listening in a different port), each one running in mono-tenant way (i.e. without -multiservice enabled) with a different -db, -db user and -dbpwd.